Alik Bahshi
Trans-Caspian
gas pipeline, or Third World War
The idea of a Great Germany led to the Second World War.
The idea of creating a "Great
Armenia" …
Baku and Baku Oil is one of the main strategic
directions of the Wehrmacht in World War II, in the event of the success of all
military equipment of the Soviet Union immediately appealed to a useless scrap
iron, and Germany gained much-needed source of fuel. It
so happened that after 60 years in Baku in the eyes gradually tightened knot
geopolitical issues far beyond regional, and able to quickly develop into a
larger regional war, which has the potential to become the Third World.
At the heart of the emerging conflict is
old expansionist policy in the Caucasus, Moscow, and easily predictable
circumstances connected with the inevitable economic challenges that await in
the case of Russia, the Caspian states mining project and delivery of
hydrocarbons of the Caspian basin to Western Europe, bypassing Russia.
Naturally Moscow will make every effort, until the military to maintain its
monopoly in this vital area of the economy for it. It is true the first
attempt in the 2008 war with Georgia had failed. Unable to occupy Georgia,
although the armored columns were already on the outskirts of Tbilisi. The fact
is that having captured Georgia, Moscow takes control of operating oil pipeline
Baku-Ceyhan oil pipeline and eliminates any possibility of hydrocarbon export
Caspian countries bypassing Russia. In addition, eliminating an important
strategic gap - the continuity of the axis Moscow-Yerevan-Tehran. It is
possible that the military provocation of Russia in Georgia provoked
strong Armenian lobby, because the isolated location of Armenia hinders
not only military cooperation between the countries of the axis, but worsens
the already tragic in terms of the state of the economy of Armenia.
The last episode of the eternal conflict between
Russia and Turkey resulted in the late 19th century to the creation of a fixed
boundary, namely, the territory of Yerevan khanate of Azerbaijan, the buffer
zone by pushing the local Turkish population and its mass settlement of
Armenians in Turkey and Iran.
To a lesser extent
settling Armenians were in the Karabakh khanate. I must say, with the same
success Russian might inhabit the area the Kurds, who, like the Armenians lived
in the vast area of the region, and there obviously has played a major role
religious affiliation. Robust colonization of the Caucasus, especially in light
of the years of war with Shamil, Russia saw in the settlement of this territory
by Christians, so there Kuban and Terek Cossacks in the North Caucasus and the
Armenians in Azerbaijan.
Armenians, as traders and artisans, rather
dispersed lived in the territory of Turkey, Iran and the Caucasus, creating a
compact focal population in large cities. So at the time of the conquest of
Georgia's Armenians constituted 60% of the population of Tbilisi. An
interesting fact in Iravani, the future capital of an artificial Armenia,
Armenians and Kurds lived by 5%. In fact, the right to claim the same territory
of the Kurds under the "Great Kurdistan" is no less than that of the
Armenians under the "Great Armenia". Perhaps that is why, when,
during the First World War, the Armenians, with the support of Russian, raised
a bloody revolt in Turkey, along with the destruction of the Turks and the
Kurds were.
The Armenians were not directly linked to the land and
may be the reason in the lack of this people of the state until the Russian.
Maybe I'm wrong, but still let me make some comments on the relationship of the
people, his mentality and the state. People feed the land on which they live,
engaging in farming, but there are people, such as the Roma, which the land as
such is of no value, the gypsies another way of being. Armenians are great
craftsmen, traders, financiers, and it must be confessed, the organizers of
mafia structures traditionally scattered throughout the towns and the bulk of
the land is not directly related. Proof of this catastrophic state of
agriculture in Armenia, or rather its absence, and this despite the fact that
the capture of a large Azerbaijani territory is suitable for agriculture. Freed
from colonial rule, people have free access to their land, and the first thing
that has developed is agriculture, such as neighboring Armenia, Azerbaijan is
not only self-sufficient, but also exports of agriculture products in Russia,
and only Armenia is an exception in this respect. After the ethnic cleansing of
Armenia does deprived farmers of Azerbaijani and somehow make ends meet due to
the powerful Armenian diaspora. As a consequence, once populated by Armenians
Russian Erivan khanate, emptying, the population leaves an artificially created
country for a prosperous life, spreading to other nations in line with their
mentality. Well, not as they are their own boots! In confirmation of what has
been said is a known fact - all Azerbaijani refugees from Armenia were in
Azerbaijan, and all Armenian refugees had anywhere up to California, but not in
Armenia. Therein lies, I repeat, in my opinion, the reason that the Armenian
people had their state. And, if hypothetically, that the Armenian Nazis manage
to create a "Great Armenia from sea to sea", then it will be no one
to live.
The practice of weaning of Azerbaijani lands by
Armenia artificially created and continued under the Soviet regime, so in 1920,
Moscow gave Zangezour Armenian region of Azerbaijan. Then Karabakh was given
the status of an autonomous region with the renaming of a small village
Hankendi (translated Khan's village) in the neighborhood of Shusha - the
capital of Karabakh khanate in Stepanakert after Stepan Shaumyan, one of the 26
Baku commissars participant terrible massacre in 1918, hosted by Dashnak in Baku
, making it the capital of autonomy. Typically, the land acquisition was
followed by the eviction of the Turkic population, followed by the destruction
of landmarks, such as in the center of Yerevan, no trace remains of the city
wall and the Khan's palace to the mosque. If the Erivan khanate, where 90% of
Azerbaijani Turks and 10% of the population were equally Armenians and the
Kurds, today Armenia is perhaps the most mono-ethnic state in the world. Well,
that is the latest example of ethnic cleansing - the seizure of the territory
of Azerbaijan in the Karabakh war was accompanied by physical destruction of
the local population. Throughout the occupied territories of Azerbaijan by
Armenia, not a single Azerbaijani. Here we should mention a very important
fact, namely the active participation on the side of Armenian military units of
the Soviet Army (366 motorized infantry regiment in the attack on Khojaly) and
is in addition to the transmission Armenian militants including heavy weapons -
artillery, tanks and armored personnel carriers. The tragedy of Khojaly and
Aghdam (totally ruined city), this is the most that neither is genocide, as it
were the final chord of the enlightened 20th century - the bloodiest in the
history of civilization.
Since it has been agreed on a cease-fire
took 19 years, but the political resolution of the Karabakh conflict has not
been found and is primarily the fault of Russia, which, in fact, supports an
aggressive policy of Armenia, so that there is a military base, keeping thus
its military presence in the region. At any point you want to eliminate
Azerbaijan as the main key competitor sales of hydrocarbons Kremlin could give
the go-ahead Armenian Nazis, eager to continue the seizure of the territory
under the "Great Armenia".
Of the world's rabble gathered around
Putin's Russia, Tehran bigots and Armenian Nazis occupy special place of honor,
as strategic allies. Modern Iran is probably the only one on today's full and
self-sufficient, unlike Armenia, an ally of Russia. General political and
economic problems in the region pull together to Moscow and Tehran, and their
alliance directed against the Turkic countries of the Caspian Basin and
especially against Azerbaijan as a key participant in all projects on
transportation of hydrocarbons to the West. If Moscow sees Azerbaijan as a
potentially dangerous competitor, threatening to undermine the monopoly of the
Russian market of hydrocarbons, which can result in economic disaster for her,
that Iran has more to fear from its northern neighbor.
Having gained independence after nearly 200 years of
colonial residence in the Russian Empire Northern Azerbaijan was able to
dispose of their wealth. Having chosen the democratic path and rejecting
attempts were made to introduce Iran's northern neighbor in the bosom of
religion, through the organization of religious schools in Baku and invitations
to free education of young people in the Iranian madrasahs (I must pay tribute,
this initiative has not generated much enthusiasm nor the Azerbaijani people,
nor the authorities) , Azerbaijan today shows the high rate of development and
not just economic. Positive changes have affected virtually all areas,
including all kinds of international events. Could Azerbaijan, while in the
USSR, to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest and take prizes. Freedom
has given the opportunity to open Visits Azerbaijan. Modern Baku - shining gem
on the coast of the Caspian Sea - a metropolis, the appearance of which is
literally permeated with the spirit of the East and the West, a fine example of
multiculturalism, which deliberately see the danger of interested parties from
Tel Aviv, Baku - the city in which there is no hint of antagonism
civilizations, so carefully cultivated by the ayatollahs in Tehran. By the way,
if we are talking about Israel and Iran, Azerbaijan is a country may be, by
means of which will be to clarify their relationship Israel and Iran.
Independent and successful secular Northern
Azerbaijan from 9 million people, like a bone in the throat of Tehran
obscurantist, since it is a good example of what can give the people freedom
and democracy. This is especially concerned with Iran 35 million Turks of South
Azerbaijan, and their natural tendency to unite in a single state. If we add to
this the claims of Iran's oil and gas riches of the Caspian Sea, the clear
appearance of a strategic axis of the Moscow-Yerevan-Tehran. Evil Empire, has
lost all its allies and vassals or rather, did not find anything better than to
nourish, myself like a monster that is about to start waving like the Soviet
Union raised over World nuclear club. But above all, Iran is a threat to
neighboring Muslim countries, and all this rhetoric about Tehran's unfortunate
Palestinians only skillfully used propaganda to gain credibility in the Muslim
world in the hope that after the Iranian Islamic revolution, followed by other
Muslim countries.
We should point out the fact
incriminating Islamic clerics in the ideological hypocrisy, namely the fact
that, for political purposes, they, along with Christian Armenia and Russia, in
fact, are against fellow Shiites of Azerbaijan. This, frankly hostile attitude
of the religious regime to the people with whom Iran has for centuries been
historically linked illustrates the falsity of hypocrites from Tehran. Under
cover of the Koran for intoxication, above all, a devout Iranian people, they
are actually guided by purely practical advantage, pushing a seemingly
important - Islam, by the wayside.
In a strategic axis of the
Moscow-Yerevan-Tehran active role for Armenia. Moscow advantageous to keep the
smoldering Karabakh conflict, so that at any point you give the go-ahead to
those who taste the smell of blood Armenian Dashnaks, eager to continue the
aggression against the people of Azerbaijan. The main purpose of this Armenian
Nazis wiped out Northern Azerbaijan, destroying the people of Azerbaijan. It is
the physical removal of Azerbaijanis and not the other way, as it has done in
the Azerbaijani territory occupied by it as a result of the Karabakh war, it is
possible to create a "Greater Armenia". Like the run-flat with chain
mad dog Armenian soldiers rush to the flat part of Azerbaijan, to draw in the
ruins of Baku and Ganja and put the world with a fait accompli.
However, the implementation of these plans, the
enemy is Turkey, which has prevented dashnaks times, in 1918, sent an army to
rescue the people of Azerbaijan on the total extermination undertaken by the
Dashnak unprecedented scale massacres. In Nagorno-Karabakh war, Turkey could
help Azerbaijan, because the war was fought in the Soviet Union, and any action
on the part of Turkey would be regarded as outside interference. This time, in
the event of an attack of Armenia against Azerbaijan, the situation is
fundamentally different. Realizing that Turkey will not remain on the
sidelines, the Armenian propaganda was again recently intensively exploited lie
about the genocide in hopes to deceive the public, to provide Turkey a pariah
of the international community and to organize various kinds of international
sanctions, including the military, if Turkey will support Azerbaijan in case of
renewal Karabakh conflict.
Here we come to the answer to the question
why Armenia is so necessary for Turkey to recognize the Armenian genocide, and
even 100 years later, and what lies behind those tenacity with which the
Armenian propaganda to spread lies about the genocide. All becomes clear when
you consider the purpose of the Armenian Nazis - "Greater Armenia"
from sea to sea, which provides for the seizure of northern Azerbaijan. Judging
by the undisguised plans Armenian Nazis wiped off the political map of the state
of Azerbaijan, they want to neutralize Turkey, tied her hands recognition of
the genocide, and would deal with Azerbaijan without the intervention of
Turkey. And then, having access to the riches of the Caspian Sea, Armenia, with
the support of the all-powerful Armenian lobby has to present a claim to
Turkey.
The only thing with a high degree of
tension can be accused authorities of the Ottoman Empire is in the disarmament
and deportation of Armenians from the front line, where the Armenians committed
treacherous massacre of unarmed people, it is insidious, because the Armenians
rebelled not against the regular army, and suddenly began to ruthlessly cut
civilians. On the other hand, that the authorities could have done to protect
the rear in anticipation of the upcoming Russian army. To the credit of the Turkish
government, any repressive action not taken by the army of deportation. Not to
recall the deportation of Japanese San Francisco and their isolation on the
island after the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. By the way, unlike
the Armenians in Turkey, the U.S. subjected to deportation and even the
Japanese did not give a reason for any statements in support of Japan. In the
Turkish authorities did not have at hand the island to move out there hostile
Armenians. The tragedy occurred because the deported Armenians were among Turks
and Kurds who fled early from the Armenian massacres. Spontaneous violence of
the common people of the Armenian rebels who threw the corpses of tortured
Muslims wells in the villages to the survivors and thoughts did not think about
the return, can hardly be taken as a genocide, as Armenians would like the
Nazis of "Faction". Real culprit Dashnak Armenians in Turkey are with
their chimerical idea of "Great Armenia", by analogy with the
German Nazis, who dream of a "Greater Germany" - the main culprits of
the disaster, especially the German people, and the organizers of the genocide
of Jews and Gypsies.
In order to deflect the blame, Dashnak advantage
of the confusion during the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the subsequent
decisive war for the Turkish people for their existence, they began
manufacturing the fake documents to accuse the authorities in the organization
of the extermination of the Armenians. In fact, in all the mess that
accompanied the collapse of the empire, was found not a single government
circulars, orders, or one small note to begin the
prosecution of those found to be engaged in the planning of the genocide. Very
illustrative case of the 144 main perpetrators of genocide, the Armenian
arrested on a tip-off by the British in 1919 and held in prison in Malta. Which
began in 1920, the court was forced to drop all charges for lack of a single
document proving their guilt, and this at a time when the whole imperial
archive was in the hands of the English and all the persons involved were still
alive, by the way, the main accusatory document Andonian book "Talat Pasha
Telegrams" was recognized as crude forgery.
If you go back to the same question
about the genocide of the Jews, it is well known Nuremberg Trials declared the
Nazi Party and the SS pristupnymi organizations of all perpetrators were
sentenced to death. In this case was closed, no one was going to judge the
German people as opposed to the Armenians, who are clamoring to the Turkish
people itself condemned himself to the Armenian genocide, despite consisting of
the case to the court of Malta.
Having suffered a complete failure
legitimately accuse Turkey of genocide, the Armenians not only did not stop
making fakes, but also undertook a global propaganda in the hope to deceive the
public and put to the wall is no longer individuals but the whole Turkish
nation. It should be noted that the propaganda was accompanied by global terror
against the citizens of modern Turkey, without regard to the genocide. The
question is, why, in the end, Armenia does not file a complaint with the Hague
tribunal or the International Court of Justice? The answer is simple. The fact
is that at trial the prosecution of Armenians could easily turn into the
accused. By the way, if for a moment forget who started the war in the Pacific,
the Americas and can be convicted of genocide of the Japanese, after U.S.
atomic bombs were dropped not on purely military targets, and on the densely
populated cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which killed about five hundred
thousand the Japanese. The death toll of the Armenians in Turkey is about three
hundred thousand (a figure that has grown with time and a half million
Armenians obviously too high). But the Japanese, unlike the Armenians did not
have enough reason to contrive the subject of genocide. There is ample
documentation, including the statute of the party, "ARF" to blame the
Dashnak of ethnic cleansing in Turkey in 1915 and Azerbaijan in 1918. Is not
that genocide, when in 1918 did far from the "Great Armenia" Kokand
(Turkestan) the Armenian diaspora-led Dashnak three days of bloody mutiny
completely cut out the local population, making no exceptions neither women nor
children.
Nazi entity in conjunction with the
Dashnak Armenian diaspora guile after a long silence resurfaced in Karabakh.
Here it should be noted that all these ethnic atrocities did not occur without
the assistance of Moscow. And now Moscow at any desired moment for it can
unleash bloodthirsty Armenian Dashnak whose achievements of Azerbaijan in
comparison with the plight of the Armenian cause bestial rage. Russia is well
stocked only ally in the Caucasus with modern weapons, including anti-aircraft
missiles S-300 and Iskander-M missiles, capable of resulting in an accurate and
powerful shot in the rear. Important military-strategic importance, providing
excellence in Armenia in case of resumption of Karabakh war, has the presence
on its territory of the Russian military base. Talk about the isolation of
Armenia is not quite right. First, Armenia is bordered by a friendly Iran,
secondly, in case of war, in isolation Azerbaijan is surrounded on three sides
by enemies. Talk about a common border with Georgia is not necessary, because
the location of Georgia in this case is quite the same. On the part of Caspian
Sea, Azerbaijan is easily blocked by the vastly superior military and naval
forces of Russia and Iran. Small wonder that in recent years, these countries
are increasing their military presence in the Caspian Sea, introducing frigates
and missile boats, presumably to protect the ecological environment of the
Caspian Sea, which they see a threat in the laying of the Trans-Caspian gas
pipeline between Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan. In this particular concern in
Moscow about the ecology of the Caspian Sea was observed for decades ruthless
exploitation of oil fields, resulting in the Bay of Baku was turned into fuel
oil sump. It looks like the hypocrites and the Kremlin is now a little worried
about the state of the Baltic Sea environment, which is laid on the bottom of
the "Nord Stream", but for the environment of the Caspian Sea, they
are even ready to fight, and away from their shores.
Thus, political and economic issues, as
well as the aggressive ambitions of the three countries in the region are
solved loss of independence, if not disappearing from the political map of the
state of Azerbaijan. The only question is when this will happen, that is, when
Armenia with the permission of Russia will unleash war. It is necessary to take
into account the fact that Yerevan can independently provoke a war, so as not
to miss the military superiority. It is clear that Turkey can not afford to stay
on the sidelines and will inevitably clash with Russia. One might wonder how
NATO can respond quickly. If we imagine that the West will hand over to Turkey
and Azerbaijan, the next in line will be the countries - the former Soviet
Central Asian colonies and of course Georgia. In short there is nothing left
Moscow as soon as the request of the peoples of these countries together free
expression of the will wishing to reunite with Russia. And the West will get a
second cold war.
Such a scenario is possible under
certain impotence of the West. American presidents are increasingly good
economic managers and economists, such for example as Franklin Roosevelt, who
in the policy relied more on Uncle Joe (Stalin) than Winston Churchill,
which led to big problems after the Second World War. It looks like the West is
required for sobering new "Fulton speech." How much can you step on
the same rake! This brings to mind the wisdom of the east "drink milk
snake, is like poison to save it." "A friend of Putin" in layman
from Bush's policies still show the world grin renewed empire of evil. In
confirmation of what has been said is very indicative protection "friend
Putin" the Syrian dictator who "wets" his people, like Putin,
"drenched in the outhouse" Chechens. But then the West silently
watched the massacre Putin on Chechen people. There is a fundamental difference
in this example?
The world was very lucky in the
Second World War that began her aggressors Germany and Russia (1) clashed with
each other in mortal combat, otherwise the political map would be completely
different today. But is it worth playing dice, hoping to get lucky and just
observe how nurture Evil Empire Kremlin false democracy, holding a chain, ready to aggression, the Nazis of "Great
Armenia" and the roofs of Tehran obscurantist, stretching out their hands
to the nuclear club.
1. Appeal to the “Commission under the President of the Russian Federation to counter attempts to falsify history to the detriment of the interests of Russia” https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/06/appeal-to-commission-under-president-of.html
9.06.13.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий