"Turkish game" on "Grand Chessboard"

 

Alik Bahshi

"Turkish game" on "Grand Chessboard"

    In contrast to the well-known in the theory of chess "Vienna game" "The Turkish game" is relatively new and not yet thoroughly Research all its options, but it has played Recep Erdogan to "Grand Chessboard" by Zbigniew Bjezinski. Sure, you could call it, and "Debut Erdogan," but the fact is that it would have played out any other player, because due to the vital necessity, and not a personal initiative of Prime Minister Erdogan, who, to his credit it must be said as it is brilliant, and how well the party will continue to be seen.

   

   Turkey today is a successful and harmonious developing country, shows a marked increase as the traditional Turkish agricultural and industrial production, which, and this is important, at a faster pace than agricultural. Naturally is interested in peace and stability, but the Middle East is far from a prerequisite for prosperity and care to provide a favorable political climate in the region duty of political leadership.

     

    Against the background of recent events the Middle East, Turkey, due to pragmatic policy Erdogan, came very prepared for the threshold of the inevitable future changes in the region. The definition of "pragmatic" gives a certain amount of cold practicality and cynicism, but if we remember the words of Andrei Sakharov humanist that "ultimately a moral choice is the most pragmatic," namely morality and is the main component in the policy of the Turkish Prime Minister. According to my understanding, Erdogan can be attributed to the leaders who are choosing the right strategic goal thinking ahead advance their political moves to an end, and, most importantly, their consequences. As for morality, which is usually not compatible with the policy, then try to run the analysis show that it is difficult to accuse Erdogan of immorality of his policy.

 

     Geopolitical picture around Turkey extraordinarily complex. In human history, probably no more than the desired point on the Earth for the possession of which fought during all civilizations and eras. Being at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, Turkey has been the subject of claims of many states and, especially, Russia. The history of relations between Russia and Turkey, is a story of constant wars in which Russia was the aggressor.

    Immediately after World War II to the share of the Turkish people, the threat of dismemberment of the country on the sector and the loss of independence, came a fierce struggle with the Franco-Greek-Italian coalition and the Armenian nationalists, which under the leadership of Ataturk was a convincing victory. Since then, relations with Greece and Armenia remain hostile. These include, and Bulgaria, which held the government program "Bulgarization Turks", in which the Bulgarian Turks proposed to change the name of the Slavic or leave the country.

 

    Next Iran, a country which is quite a long historical period, there was no war, and yet the relationship cannot be considered friendly, especially given axis Moscow-Yerevan-Tehran political economical aims to prevent, first, the supply of energy from the Caspian Basin through Turkey to Europe, bypassing Russia, and secondly, to create a continuous geographic corridor between Turkey and Azerbaijan, which can alarm in Iran, which includes the South Azerbaijan. By the way, the main reason for Russia's aggression against Georgia in 2008, it cut the Baku-Ceyhan oil pipeline that passes through the Georgian territory, and to put an end to the "Nabucco" project, which would deprive the Russian monopoly on the sale of gas to Europe. Russian Foreign Ministry has officially filed a note of protest against laying a trans-Caspian gas pipeline under the Caspian Sea, which provides for "Nabucco", citing the danger of seismic activity area. Of course Russia will use its best efforts to implement the death its economy project. In general, according expansion inflame passions around the Caspian Sea, to be major political fuss that has the potential to develop into a world-scale military conflict. Kremlin is only to give the go-ahead to Yerevan to set fire to a smoldering Karabakh conflict and war will break out again, and the fact that this time will not be without the participation of Turkey, no doubt.

   

        Now as to the direction of the southern Arabian. Here, too, Turkey unenviable situation. As a strategic partner of Israel, Turkey unwittingly supported Israel in its confrontation with the Arabs and would not consider erroneously Arab majority in the Middle East. Today, the Arab-Israeli conflict is a major destabilizing factor in the region. It should be noted, a military alliance with Israel, Turkey, except regional problems, did not give any benefits. No doubt Erdogan knows that reckless policy of Tel Aviv is Israel to fatal isolation and the probability of being a pariah of the international community, making the company its ally, Turkey is unlikely to suit.

      As a result, Turkey's standing in front of a closed door in the EU, in an environment hostile country strategic vision is far from rosy. It is this fact and forced Ankara to take political steps, where still possible to change the situation.
For this purpose, since the Second Lebanon War, Turkey undertakes mediation attempts to mitigate the level of confrontation over its unruly ally with the Arabs, but Israel, stubbornly ignoring international opinion, continuing the policy of occupation and building of settlements on Palestinian territory. Ankara cannot see the trend of deterioration of the situation around Israel. Israel not only plays in the information field, but there is not successful and hostilities. All under increasing pressure from the Arab Israel was forced to leave Lebanon, occupying army to withdraw from the Gaza Strip, destroying Jewish settlements. The defeat in the second Lebanon recognize Israeli politicians and army command, for the war aims were not achieved. Military failures occur not because the Israeli army poorly equipped, but because it is at war with the civilian population. In order to win the war in the first place needs an opponent, his army. Throwing bombs among the defenseless population can hardly achieve anything but hate, anger and radicalization of the political forces of the Palestinian resistance as an example of the party "Hamas". The world has been struck by violent operation "Cast Lead", the use of illicit phosphorus bombs even in such a densely populated area like Gaza. The international community has condemned Israel. Swept the country anti-Israel demonstration was not spared, and Turkey, and Erdogan accused Israel of numerous victims among the civilian population of Gaza, only expressed the opinion of the Turkish community in the Israeli army. At this point, we can say, and began the rift between the two allies. This was followed by the demonstrative humiliation of Turkish Ambassador Ahmed Chellikkola the Israeli Foreign Ministry, where, after an official protest was expressed in about the show on Turkish TV movie "Walk of wolves," which is the episode with the ugly actions of "Mossad".

  

     Turkey is a democratic country and a sign of this statement is irrefutable fact the active participation of the Turkish people in politics and not only in the election of the government, but also in various public, including international humanitarian organizations to which the Turkish government has nothing to do, such as to perturb the Israeli power movie "Walk the wolves" and to deliver humanitarian aid to Gaza. Israel charges the Turkish government organizations flotilla «Free Gaza» totally groundless, because you can just as well accuse the Government of Ireland, France, America, the citizens who participated in the flotilla. Israel's refusal to completely just demand Turkey to apologize and pay compensation for the killing of nine Turkish citizens during the night attack and even in international waters Israeli commandos on the Turkish ship "Mavi Marmara" finally made it impossible to return to the previous level of strategic partnership. Moreover, Israel hastily concluded in defiance of Turkey military cooperation with Greece and Cyprus, which naturally was seen by Ankara as nothing but a hostile move.

    Thus, at the official level of international relations, it is Israel actually initiated the break the alliance with Turkey. Moreover, Israel has defined himself against its former ally, despite more than loyalty to the Turkish Jews throughout history. Even the participation of Jews in the heaviest for Turkey Gallipoli battle of World War I on the side of the British and French had no effect on the Jews living in Turkey. True participation consisted in glorious quartermaster "Mule Corps' number 650 and 750 mules led by Trumpeldor, and maybe that's because the Turks themselves, and did not take offense, but the fact you have one.
    It is hard to imagine that Erdogan predicted the "Arab spring", but it just so happens by force of circumstances, which occurred on the eve of the Turkish-Israeli rift strategic alliance, led Turkey to lead regional state, the economic power of the country, thanks to Erdogan, was supplemented sensible policy.

  

    Turkey, unlike Israel, as a truly democratic state supported the democratic progress in the Arab world. Erdogan immediately boldly spoke out against the dictatorial regimes in the Arab nation, which certainly will be counted a positive assessment of his political career. By the way, a different ratio of the two former allies to the ongoing democratic progress in the Arab world demonstrates who are really committed to the principles of democracy. Israel claims to be the only democratic country in the Middle East entirely without foundation, and as a country that has no constitution, the country, where there is no separation of legislative and executive powers, the country in which religion is not separated from the state, the country's policy of apartheid against in the occupied territory, the country in which there is no market economy can be called democratic.
Israeli fears are understandable before awakening of the Arab nation, for the departure from the political scene of dictators, for which the main priority was to maintain his personal power, disappear obstacle to the unification of the nation and solve national problems. Having lost an ally in Turkey, Israel alone is in the region before the Arab majority, and if the American taxpayer understand foolishness instigated by George Bush wars in Afghanistan and Iraq over the alien American interests, Israel, while maintaining its aggressive policy, the path to oblivion booked (1).

 

      Rupture of relations with Turkey, Israel will try to explain the policy of Islamization, which allegedly holds Erdogan, without citing a single fact of Islamization. What's wrong in that raze understood by the term Islamization! To label, Israeli politicians do not bother what is on their own understanding of the "Islamization". Maybe in Turkey in secular schools teach Islam, like Judaism in Israel, which is a compulsory subject. Maybe that Turkey welcomed the fall of the dictatorial regimes in some Arab countries? And America with France and Britain, which help people in revolt to overthrow the usurpers, can be accused of Islamization. On the other hand the religious laws in Israel Halacha rose to the rank of state, just as the laws of Sharia in Iran. Incidentally Judaism contains racism does not exist in Islam (2).

      Erdogan today is a model for the Arab countries, which, if democratization may well be on the path of creating associations or political-economic union by type of EU, and implement such a way it is much easier than creating a Turkic union for reasons of anti-Russia, Iran, Armenia and China (3).

1. Israel, - way to nonexistence, http://www.proza.ru/2008/03/23/506

2. Israeli Democracy or "Jewish view of the world». 

  https://samlib.ru/editors/b/bahshi_a/alikbahshi-2.shtml, 

  https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/israeli-democracy-or-jewish-view-of.html        

3. Turkey, Turkic-line or is it a terrible word - Pan-Turkism. 

     http://zhurnal.lib.ru/b/bahshi_a/bahshi-6.shtml

09/10/11

Israeli Democracy or "Jewish view of the world"

 

                                                                                Alik Bahshi

                Israeli Democracy or "Jewish view of the world"

 

"No matter what the goyim say, it is important that the Jews do."
Zionist David Ben-Gurion

"The only reason for the existence of the goyim, a ministry to the Jews"
Israeli Rabbi Ovadia Yosef

      These two quotes from representatives of different ideologies, yet ...

"The Jewish view of the world" - an expression which sometimes there involuntarily puzzling, not only to emphasize national identity, but also the fact that no other nation on its own special view of the world has not yet been claimed. However, that's why the Jewish people is the people of the book - the Torah, the Talmud, which are the source of much of the Jewish world view and are submitted for Jews and management, and philosophy, and history. Thus, "the Jewish view of the world" is tied to Judaism and seemingly nothing unusual in this, taking into account that many moral values ​​are equally understood by all the world's religions, if not for some things that are not that are puzzling and striking cynicism and very far from the humanist views on the rest of humanity that distinguishes Judaism from other faiths. But again, if you remember what privations monotheistic religion has brought to humanity, when for the sake of faith in one God destroyed the ancient temples, where the name of God burning people at the stake of the Inquisition, when this God could not share with each other Protestants and Catholics (http://www .youtube.com / watch? v = q88iQE6_t-c), with the Shiites Sunnis, then Christianity and Islam for many sins listed, and not without reason since democracy was introduced in a period of polytheism, and then clear the motive of the state branch of the Faith in a modern civilized society , but ...

      However, Israel is an exception in this regard, and with the first day of the Jewish state representatives are invariably present in the government. It follows only one conclusion: Zionism and Judaism live well and not only get along, but, as explained below, successfully complement each other. Is it feasible synergies in a democratic state? Like the sovereign democracy in Russia, that is democracy for the sovereign in Israel seem represented another kind, namely, democracy, religious stuffing, which puts Israel in the same category of unique, which is the second representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran, with the only difference that Iran is filling this obscurantism is Islam. Judging by the growth of the religious population in Israel and, most importantly, non-resistance of the people actively participate in politics rabbis in the absence of antagonism between the ideology of Zionism and Judaism, but rather the contrary, and with the full agreement of power, elected by the people, with the laws of Halacha, by analogy with the Shariah in Iran, the transformation of Israel in Judea, Republic of Israel is a matter of time (http://proza.ru/2008/03/22/5611). And not surprisingly, if Israel would today be called the Jewish Republic of Israel, the state and society are no significant changes will occur.

      Unit of society - the family, are relegated to the officials of religion who vigilantly comply racial purity. Jew in Israel is not allowed to start a family with a representative of another nation. Religious officials in the Office of the rabbinical carefully through a global network of agents will test pedigree for Goy blood before wedlock. Nazism was pure! Nazism, Nazi Germany which resulted eventually in the Holocaust. Against this background, the constant appeal to the Holocaust to cover the reality associated with Israel, appears highly immoral and cynical.

Goyim, and proper attitude of the Jews to them, it is an important Talmudic Judaism. In religion, I am not strong and did not see the point of a detailed analysis of the theological doctrine of the soul and Goy exclusively by Jews, but because in this matter fully rely on these meters Judaism as Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, who is the spiritual leader of an ultra-religious Shas party and member of the Israeli parliament Yossi Paritski, inferences which

"The difference between a Jew and a goy is so great that it is not in any way be compared to the difference between man and animals» (http://www.hofesh.org.il/haredim_papers/01/1201.html).

excellent agreement with the revelations of Ovadia Yosef, the reason for the existence of the goyim. Permissiveness of Judaism in relation to the Gentiles has no boundaries. Such statements in the conventional system of values ​​- is nonsense, for Judaism is - is the norm.

     Judaism excludes the concept of tolerance, because the only way to explain the blazing fire of the hundreds of books "of the New Testament," seized from the local population on the order of the vice-mayor of Or Yehuda, Uzi Aharon member, it is not difficult to guess, all of the same party Shas. It should be noted that the charity were done under the auspices of the police, so that outside observers have arisen about the legality of measures against Jewish dissent, the ongoing struggle with the crucifixion of the most popular to date people - an apostate Jew, Jesus Christ (http://sem40.ru / lenta/news-dir/173809.html) to the present. It must be remembered that Judaism is studied not only in religious yeshiva in Israel, Judaism is a compulsory subject in secular schools and rabbis are seen for students, authoritative teacher-mentors. Whatever ruckus up in the media world, if you imagine the fire of the holy to the Jews the Torah and Talmud, arranged anywhere in Europe or, God forbid, in Turkey, a recent incident occurred after the flotilla «Free Gaza» intentionally accused pilling to Islam. I do not think that in Turkey in general this can happen. There's separation of religion and state, which does not feed religious bums as it is in Israel. True lends considerable financial support to them through America influential Jewish organizations, directing financial flows to Israel, which are created in the Diaspora, that is goyim. Thus, in a sense, to realize the ideology of Judaism, namely the Gentiles exist to work for Jews. If hypothetically, that all the Jews of the Galut move to Israel, then there are big doubts about their self-sufficiency for the well existence, is unlikely to be reached without the goyim the level of welfare, which they sold in the U.S. or Europe. Who is going to milk the cows on Saturdays! If say, the Anglo-Saxons could well do without any other people, in the case of the Jews, all in question, so the Jews at a subconscious level in no hurry to return to the land of their ancestors. After all, most of the Jews who left the Soviet Union were in the affluent countries in Europe and overseas, even Germany they preferred, then Promised Land, despite the horror that fell to their lot in the time of Nazi Germany. The question is why a powerful religious movement "Chabad" centered in New York, which has branches in India, even in Israel itself was scarcely noticed. Yes, because his job is to regulate the existence of the Jews in the Diaspora of the goyim, and if necessary transfer funds to Israel. In Israel, Chabad do nothing.

     Of course, all this religious nonsense can be attributed to obscurantism, if not grim reality of what Ovadia Yosef and other rabbis are real people today, and the main thing is that these rabbis have been politically active. Even starker picture emerges if we take into account the existence of an extensive global network of Judaism movement type "Chabad" and various Jewish Congress, are closely related and political influence, that's why virtually every American president is committed to meet with representatives of Judaism. And most surprisingly, never any Israeli government nor Parliament, nor even grate officials rabbinate, not renounced inappropriate for a democratic state to voice their comrades in power and religion.

Jewish Congress, if we are talking about them, not even tried to pull up the policy of Israeli rabbis, closing their eyes to their racist attempts, but the alert for manifestation anti-Semitism, bearing case indicate authorities in a country where they are, as they should do in a given case. So Moscow prosecutor's office had to deal with the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" and the decision was made that the distribution of this product is not a violation of the law on the press secretary of the Chief Rabbi of Russia Berel Lazar A. Glotser said: "We are very concerned about the conclusions of the prosecutor's office of Moscow. Sure, they do not do credit to anyone, neither the prosecutor's office, nor the expert group that has made an assessment of this highly dangerous book. "Quick to express their opinions and RJC President Yuri Kanner said that the ban on the sale of this book is particularly important in multinational Russia. How it should, in the transfer of "Ekho Moskvy" Jewish RTVi television journalist L. Radzikhovsky announced that it would be good to ban the book "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion." How harmoniously and efficiently carried out the attack against the work. Particular emphasis is placed on the fact that there are no protocols . Well, false reports, but is that the point, do not try it to understand some things that are taking place. And as extremism in them are much smaller than in the words of Israeli rabbis from politics.

     Yes, but in mono-Israel rabbis getting away with it, although their statements entirely extremism, and in its extreme form. It is understandable, neither L. Radzikhovsky or A. Glotser not know Hebrew. And it correct to compare a literary work, and even the last century with today's performance rabbis mentors, every word of their flock takes the form of law, and calls for his execution (see "On the question of who killed Rabin» http://zhurnal.lib .ru/b/bahshi_a/salt-3.shtml). So the head of the Israeli yeshiva Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro, engaged in scientific research and the work of the Tanakh in Judaism known special love for the rest of mankind Rabbi Kook, concludes on the exclusive right of the Jews to murder non-Jews and their children, explaining that the murder of the children of non-Jewish leaders can have on pressure them. Finding study these things worthy of attention of the Israeli public, he published the book "The Laws of the king", so to say 230-page "Guide to the murder," which is accompanied by a positive review of Yitzhak Ginsburg, Dov Lior, Yaakov Yosef and other prominent rabbis in Israel (http://www .newsland.ru/News/Detail/id/576243/cat/42 /).

    Yet it is not the fact that there are rabbis who boldly and openly tell us about the nature of Judaism, and the fact is that religion in Israel is not separated from the state and Judaism, therefore, is the state ideology, and if, for example, in Russia traditionally suffer unsuccessfully seeking Russian national idea, the Jewish state, such a question is originally from the date of its creation.

    In this light, one can understand the motivation of a sinister act former student of American religious school Boruch Goldstein, discharged into the thick of the eight hundred worshipers in Hebron mosque three machine-gun cartridge. Trampled when trying to replace the clip, the survivors, the terrorist was buried with full honors as a hero, "who gave his life for the Torah, the Jews and Israel." It is written on a gravestone. Is it possible to correlate with the state of Israel in fighting terror, or, as with a light hand is called interested parties, international Islamic terrorism? Do not absurd! (See "International terrorism and its interested parties» http://proza.ru/2008/03/22/568).

     While writing this article, as if to prove the point of absurdity, Anders Breivik - a great admirer of Israel, the state, standing, in his view, in the way of the expansion of Islam and Islamic terrorism, undermines in Oslo, before the government building, manufactured by him, an explosive device, and then coolly shooting participants of the youth camp of leftist activists. It is important to note that just two days before the Norwegian government is one of the first in Europe to recognize an independent Palestinian state. Here you have the motivation to Nazi Breivik, an enthusiastic admirer of the State where there is a synergy of social ideology of Zionism and Judaism religious ideology.

     Zionism without the support of Judaism was very difficult to carry out the settlement policy. The goal of Zionism to leave for Israel from all occupied territories, which is achieved by the military and legal cover under construction settlements and clerics provide manpower and financial support, mainly from overseas. Most of the settlers are American Jews and their descendants, immigrated from eastern Europe, but keep the nostalgia parochial habits. In America, it is impossible to dissociate itself from the world of barbed wire and Shabbat prohibition, and in this sense the settlements in the territories - the perfect place.

    Synergies of Judaism and Zionism portrayed Israel as the only democracy in the Middle East, but democracy is highly selective, it does not fall under Palestinian drag miserable existence without rights in the occupied or, as in Israel formally accepted call-controlled territories. Solely on that Palestinian Arabs have a right, it is to work for pennies on the construction sites and plantations, where Jews traditionally do not work.

Speaking of democracy, the Jews have always been committed to liberalism, active promoters and participants of democratic reforms and revolutions, but in recent years in their statements to the media calling the trend, especially those of Western Europe, beware of too much democracy, even blamed for signs of excessive tolerance and humanity to Muslim nations, threatening the West war of civilizations and the invasion of Islam as extremist ideology, deliberately forgetting that extremism in Judaism far more than any other religious denomination, not realizing that by doing so cultivate religious fanaticism, and what happened in Norway should alert the public, because it is a great first sign of trouble. As though it was a disaster again, with a much larger scale, and the only way to avoid the path of Israel's non-existence is to separate religion from the state, leaving the ideology of Zionism, as already served their purpose, because the state of Israel exists, to give freedom to the Palestinian people, to enter at last long promised a constitution, to abandon the policy of state protectionism in the economy and pave the way for the free market, or there'll be, pardon the commercialism, the case of this case with the "cottage."

Cottage - lactic product in Israel, whose price is unjustifiably high.

07/30/2011

 

Turkey - Turk direction or is it a terrible word - Pan-Turkism

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

 

Turkey - Turk direction

or is it a terrible word - Pan-Turkism

 

Perhaps the First World War had the greatest impact on two states: the Ottoman Empire ceased to exist, and the Russian Empire lost all its colonies in Europe, including Ukraine, albeit briefly. In both empires, monarchical rule fell. The peoples of both empires faced years of difficult trials until 1923.

 

Thus, the end of the First World War turned into a war of independence for the Turkish people; the nation was forced to make desperate efforts to defend its own territory from the plans of the Franco-Italian-Greek coalition and Armenian nationalists to dismember the country into sectors. It should be noted that, despite the dire military situation, Turkey found the strength to help the Azerbaijani Turks suppress the Armenian rebellion that had massacred the unarmed local population in Baku and other cities of Azerbaijan. As often happens in history, at a tragic moment for a country, the nation would emerge with an outstanding figure, a leader who rallied the people around him and led them to victory. For the Turks, such a leader was Mustafa Kamal. As a sign of their deep gratitude, the people gave him the name Atatürk. His greatness in world history is so significant that he was recognized as "Man of the 20th Century." Mustafa Kamal proved himself a talented military leader in the bloodiest battle of World War I, when 610,000 Anglo-French troops landed at Gallipoli with the goal of capturing Istanbul—a city at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, whose strategic location is invaluable, a city that, unlike the capitals of other countries, had never been captured by anyone since the Turks captured Constantinople. They were confronted by 450,000 Turks, who displayed desperate heroism and courage, forming a human wall on a narrow strip of the peninsula. Mustafa Kemal, who led the defense, famously declared, "I do not command you to win, I command you to die," and 74,635 Turkish soldiers obeyed, winning the battle. Perhaps there is no more mournful place on earth; more than half a million soldiers died here. The British Empire lost 490,000 killed, wounded, and missing at Gallipoli, and France 80,000. The Turks honor all those who perished by establishing a memorial park at the site of the brutal battle, commemorating their military courage and bravery, and, I would say, as a warning to future generations about the great human foll.

                

                                Bullets colliding during the Battle of Gallipoli

 

Ataturk's greatness was also demonstrated by the fact that he saw no difference in the nationality of the soldiers buried here. At the unveiling of a monument to British soldiers, he said: "After they gave their lives on this land, they probably are, and our sons.” 

 

Thanks to his high standing among the people and their boundless faith in him as the nation's savior, Mustafa Kemal succeeded in laying the social foundations of the Turkey we know today. The Turkish people embraced all the progressive reforms conceived by Atatürk. The country transitioned to a democratic form of government and took a rather bold step for the Muslim East: legislatively separating religion from the state and equalizing civil rights for men and women. Since then, Turkey has been the only truly democratic country in the Middle East, surpassing Israel, whose claims to this status are unfounded because, firstly, in Israel, religion is not separated from the state, and the laws of Halacha are part of Israeli law. Secondly, Israel is an apartheid state, which is in no way consistent with the principles of democracy.

 

After a bloody civil war, a totalitarian regime of Bolshevik commissars was established in Russia, characterized by the aggressive nature characteristic of totalitarianism, with the cudgel of World Socialist Revolution raised over the world. The very first attempt, as part of the overall strategic plan to restore the empire's pre-war borders by force, to return Poland to Russia's fold ended in the complete defeat of Tukhachevsky's Red Army near Warsaw. Until World War II, Russia licked its wounds, intensively preparing for revenge.

 

I anticipate legitimate confusion about what Russia has to do with Turkey. The fact is that the history of these two countries is a history of centuries-long military confrontation; Russia has fought so much war with no other country as it has with Turkey. Russia's goal was to capture Istanbul, to seize this important geostrategic hub, opening the way for further imperial expansion. There's a well-known Turkish proverb: "If water can sometimes stand still, Russia will never stop." At times, England and France intervened in the confrontation (Crimean War 1853-1856) to stop Russia.

 

By the late 1930s, Germany, like Russia, was preparing for revenge, and had accumulated sufficient military potential to begin active hostilities. In an attempt to reverse the results of World War I, Russia and Germany entered into a sinister non-aggression pact, dividing Europe between them in advance. The Russians, remembering the lesson taught them by the Poles, hesitated to attack Poland first, leaving the initiative to the Germans. They also did so for political reasons, lest they prematurely anger England and France, who, by declaring war on Germany, were unaware that, under the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, Russia, in addition to part of Poland, received Germany's tacit consent to the annexation of Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. England and France, outraged by Moscow's aggressive actions, were unable to take any action, as they were preoccupied with the war with Germany, which acted as a kind of shield for Russia's reprisals against its former colonies, which had decided to rebel. True, there was an affront with Finland. The Finns defended their homeland; the entire nation (3,650,000 in all), including women, rose to defend it from the Russian invaders. The Red Army, despite its colossal superiority in every respect, failed to fulfill its assigned task, leaving 2,300 tanks, 1,000 aircraft, and 1 million Red Army soldiers buried in the deep snow of the Karelian Isthmus. And today, thanks to the heroism of the Finnish people in those distant 1940s, we know Finland as the most prosperous country.

Turkey was also supposed to be among the countries subjected to Russian aggression. Moscow, in a similar, carbon-copy of its message to the Finns, tried to impose a mutual assistance treaty on Turkey, including the requirement to establish a naval base on the Bosphorus. Turkey, like Finland, rejected such an impudent proposal, which provoked sharp displeasure in Moscow (http://www.oldgazette.ru/lib/propagit/21/01.html) and would inevitably have been attacked. However, Moscow's plans were not destined to come to fruition; unexpectedly for Stalin, Hitler unleashed the full might of Germany on the Soviet Union. The predators locked in mortal combat, and Russia no longer had time for war with Turkey. The Russians' cherished dream of seizing the Bosphorus remained just that. If Germany and Russia had remained true to the non-aggression pact, it is quite possible the world map would be different today.

Due to the American political naivety, as pointed out by Winston Churchill, after the war the Soviet Union secured all its former colonies except Finland and Poland (parts of Finnish and Polish lands were annexed by Moscow), and even acquired Prussia, South Sakhalin, and the Kuril Islands, while America entered into the Cold War.

After World War II, Turkey hastily concluded a mutual assistance treaty with America in the event of a third-country attack and became a member of NATO, thus protecting itself from any possible future aggressive Russian encroachments. Later, the CENTO bloc was created, comprising Turkey, Iran, and Pakistan, which was as impenetrable to Russia as NATO was due to Turkey's membership. The bloc collapsed after religious obscurantists came to power in Iran. Turkey currently maintains the largest army among the bloc's European members and protects NATO's southeastern flank.

 

Long years of the grueling Cold War led to the collapse of communist ideology. As a result of the partial collapse of the Russian Empire, the global geopolitical situation changed, with new states emerging in Europe, the Caucasus, and Central Asia. One important aspect of this geopolitics is the fact that five of these newly independent countries are Turkic.

Here I would like to clarify some confusion in the Russian language regarding the inaccurate use of the words "Turkish" and "Turkic." These words sound identical phonetically in the Turkic (Turkish) language. Saying that Azerbaijani is spoken in Azerbaijan, and Turkmen in Turkmenistan, for example, is like saying that Australians speak Australian in Australia, and American in America. When the Russians arrived in the Caucasus, they called the local population in Azerbaijan "Caucasian Tatars" precisely because both Azerbaijan and Tatarstan speak a Turkic (Turkish) language. Of course, due to the vast territory of the Turkic peoples and their political disunity, the language has several dialects, which is inevitable. However, there is an example of a language with several dialects even within a relatively small territory, for example, in England.

The Soviet Empire made every effort to divide the Turkic peoples by creating artificial divisions. For example, in Central Asia, the Russians created several states out of Turkestan, which never existed. It should be noted that part of Turkestan (East Turkestan) is located in China, with its center in Kashgar, which was equal in cultural and administrative significance to Bukhara. Recently, with the growth of Turkic national consciousness, the Chinese have faced a serious ethnic problem. As a result of the Russian conquests in the Caucasus, Azerbaijan—most of which is in Iran—was also divided, with the Russians seizing the territory of the Derbent Khanate from Azerbaijan, as well as Dagestan (meaning "Mountain Country" in Turkic), incorporating it into the Russian Federation.

The Russians inflicted serious cultural damage on the Turkic peoples by changing their alphabet to the Cyrillic alphabet, which instantly rendered them illiterate and deprived of their cultural heritage. Imagine if Russia banned the Cyrillic alphabet and introduced Chinese characters. This is precisely what happened to the Turks who fell under the Russian Empire's control. School curricula didn't include the study of Eastern literature; only Pushkin and other Russian poets and writers were required reading. The sublime poetry of Nizami, Omar Khayyam, Saadi, and Emre was buried beneath the frozen railway embankment of the "Soviet masterpiece" of literature, "How the Steel Was Tempered," depriving several generations of Soviet Turks of their poetry through cold, callous indifference. Indeed, university textbooks were only in Russian. Now, freed from the Russian Empire, the new Turkic countries must not only reclaim their cultural heritage but also integrate into the global economy to ensure a prosperous existence.

 

Of all the Turkic countries, Turkey occupies the most advanced position, and across the vast expanse from the Angara in Turkey to the Angara in Siberia (the two rivers of the same name), history has placed Turkey in a leading role in unifying the Turks. Whether you call this idea of ​​unification pan-Turkism or the creation of a union similar to the EU or the British Commonwealth of Nations, this is precisely the direction in which Turkey's political and economic activity lies, as the most promising, preferable to waiting for years in front of the EU's closed door. Of course, Europe has the right to decide for itself whether Turkey should join the EU, but there is no doubt that a Turkish corridor would provide the EU with easier access to the markets and hydrocarbon resources of the Caspian region and Central Asia, bypassing an overly interested Russia.

 

Until recently, Turkey had only one strategic partner in the Middle East: Israel. However, Israel's policies, which are increasingly unpopular with the international community, have placed Turkey in a difficult situation. This explains the various initiatives aimed at somehow facilitating a resolution to the Arab-Israeli conflict, in particular Turkey's offer to mediate in Israel's negotiations with Syria. Turkey condemned Operation Cast Lead, recognizing that Israel's aggressive policies also negatively impact Turkey's position as a leading power in the region.

 

Against the backdrop of the growing struggle of humanitarian organizations for Palestinian rights, and especially after the piratical attack by Israeli commandos on the Free Gaza flotilla and the murder of nine Turkish citizens, continuing military and strategic cooperation with such a recalcitrant ally as Israel has become meaningless for Turkey. Remaining politically inactive in today's dynamic times means condemning itself, along with Israel, to political isolation. While Israel enjoys powerful political and economic support from America thanks to its Jewish diaspora, Turkey lacks such support. Moreover, the Armenian lobby is gaining increasing strength in Congress. Following in the footsteps of the Jewish lobby and taking advantage of America's well-known political naivety and America's might as a superpower, it will make every effort to implement the extreme nationalist ideology of the Dashnaktsutyun party, which envisions the creation of a "Greater Armenia." "Armenia from sea to sea" is the slogan of Armenian Nazis. The Nazis, because this ideology first requires ethnically cleansing the territory for a "Greater Armenia," otherwise such a venture is unfeasible. This idea has already been partially realized: the Turks have been completely expelled from the captured Karabakh and from Armenia itself. All that remains is to ethnically cleanse Azerbaijan, part of Georgia, part of Iran, and eastern Turkey all the way to the Mediterranean. Further, part of Lebanon, the North Caucasus, including Sochi, is possibly also planned for the territory of "Greater Armenia"—that is, anywhere where Armenians have established compact settlements. Incidentally, the first attempt to create an ethnically pure territory was made in Turkey during World War I, when Armenians, having received weapons from the Russians, began to slaughter the Turkic population in anticipation of a planned Russian offensive. And now, the Armenians are trying to portray the spontaneous Turkic resistance, which resulted in the deaths of many Armenians, as a deliberately planned genocide by the authorities. Unlike the genocide of Jews organized by the Nazis in Germany, this never even occurred in Turkey. The propaganda of the absurd Dashnak ideology drove Armenians into the line of fire at the height of the war between two empires, in order to build a fictitious state there by exterminating the local population. This resulted in a true tragedy for both the Turks and the Armenians themselves. However, the Dashnaks, having failed, did not abandon their criminal enterprise and are now, with the help of the Armenian diaspora in America, attempting to impose yet another alien goal on the American people. It appears that a trend is emerging in America, imposed on it by national diasporas, to solve the problems of their countries of origin with the help of American taxpayers and American soldiers. Thus, hypothetically, a situation similar to the Palestinian one could very well happen to Turkey.

It should be noted that the break between Turkey and Israel conveniently preceded the awakening of the Arab nation, which is precisely the term used to describe the uprisings underway in Arab countries against dictatorial and monarchical regimes. Their disappearance paves the way for Arab unification, which will significantly complicate Israel's position, which has failed to achieve peace with the Arabs in 60 years. It could be said that Israel's policies have unwittingly helped Turkey secure its position in the Arab world. Turkey is a leading regional power and is not indifferent to future Arab attitudes toward it, especially given the unrest, I would say, of the Arab nation—a significant nation, especially one with a rich historical past in both science and culture.

 

The current geopolitical situation leaves Turkey with no other acceptable option than to focus its efforts on integrating with the Turkic countries liberated from Russia. The idea of ​​pan-Turkism is not new, but it was after the collapse of the USSR that it gained traction. However, the consolidation of the Turks has serious opponents:

- first and foremost, Russia, where an indigenous Turkic population lives across a vast territory from the Volga basin (Tatarstan) to the Arctic Ocean (Yakutia-Sokha). Pan-Turkism was presented by Russians as a harmful bourgeois-nationalist ideology, and the very word "pan-Turkism" in the USSR was associated with something incomprehensibly terrifying.

- China, East Turkestan (capital Kashgar), where the Uyghur Turks long fought the Chinese for independence, and only with the help of the Soviet Union in 1937 was the popular uprising suppressed. It should be noted that it was only in 1943 that the Chinese finally formally established themselves in Kashgar.

- Iran, Southern Azerbaijan, where more Azerbaijanis live than in Northern Azerbaijan.

- Armenia, which occupied Karabakh with Moscow's support and is Russia's only military ally in the Caucasus.                                                                

 

Opponents of Turkic consolidation are also united by purely economic motives, namely the vast oil and gas reserves of the Caspian Basin and Central Asia, the exploitation of which would compete with Russia and Iran. Moscow and Tehran are encroaching on the Turkic rights to extract oil from the seabed, periodically raising the issue of the Caspian Sea's status. Russia's latest military aggression in Georgia was aimed at shutting down the Baku-Ceyhan oil pipeline, and Moscow perceives the Nabucco project as specifically designed to undermine Russia's economy. Frankly speaking, the full implementation of pan-Turkism ideology would spell the end of the Russian Empire, and this would entail not only territorial losses but also economic ones, as it would deprive Russia of its only source of income. Russians have become so accustomed to living without creating anything, plundering the mineral wealth of others, that, left without Siberia and the Urals, that is, within the borders of Russia proper (Muscovy), they will inevitably have to learn to work and produce something themselves, of course, under the guidance of the Vikings; otherwise, nothing worthwhile will come of it.

 

However, the main obstacle to the consolidation of the Turks, as always, lies within them: constant rivalry and internecine strife, combined with a clan-based power structure. The Turks have never fought with anyone else more than among themselves, if we recall the wars of Timur with Tokhtamysh, Bayazet, and numerous minor khans, as well as the mutually destructive war between the Ak Goyunlu and the Gara Goyunlu in Azerbaijan. Currently, due to the presence of authoritarian regimes (clan-based) in all former Russian Turkic countries without exception, whose dictators cling to power, sometimes sacrificing the country's independence, as happened in Uzbekistan (2), full unification is out of the question. But a commonwealth, similar to the "British Commonwealth of Nations" in the first stage of consolidation, is entirely possible. With the inevitable advent of democracy, the commonwealth will develop into a union similar to the EU. The union is closer because in this case it will consist of states of a single nation. The repetition of the Swiss unification model is noteworthy. In short, it is precisely in this direction that Turkey, as the leading Turkic country, must take the initiative.

 

Of course, opponents of pan-Turkism will once again literally scream about the invasion of Islam and the revival of the Caliphate, which can be considered deliberate slander. But, firstly, in all Turkic countries, religion is separated from the state; secondly, the Caliphate is an Arab entity and has no connection to the Turks except that the Turks themselves fought against the Arab Caliphate, if we recall the national liberation uprising led by Babak, while the Seljuk Turks and Timur finally consigned the Baghdad Caliphate to history. And most importantly, for those interested in Islam as a religion has no connection whatsoever with today's terrorism. Modern international terrorism is a phenomenon of our time and does not originate in the mists of time. There is no connection between the development of Islam as a religious ideology and terrorism as a phenomenon. Yes, terrorism is associated with some countries whose people profess Islam, but its roots lie elsewhere. Furthermore, the deliberate or misguided search for the roots of terrorism in religion poses a grave danger to the global community and opens a Pandora's box from which religious fanaticism will spread throughout the world, which could actually lead to a clash of civilizations. (3)

 

 1. Appeal to the “Commission under the President of the Russian Federation to counter attempts to falsify history to the detriment of the interests of Russia”

      https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/06/appeal-to-commission-under-president-of.html

2. A terrible price to the roof of pink revolution.  http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/#post-alikbahshi-3149

3.  International terrorism and interested parties. 

     https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2024/07/international-terrorism-and-interested.html    

       

       

 12.03.2011

 

 

 

 

 

Karabakh eshak, or some mistakes of Nature

 

Alik Bahshi

 

Karabakh eshak, or some

mistakes of Nature

 

 

 

      Molla Nasreddin had a donkey that could read, though silently, like most people. In Azerbaijan, to emphasize someone's special intellectual abilities, the expression "Karabakh eshak" is used. I would like to immediately make a reservation that the word "eshak" in translation from Azerbaijani is a donkey. Be that as it may, this species of odd-toed ungulates, which also includes horses, has been in close contact with humans since ancient times, which apparently explains the unique ability of Molla Nasreddin's inseparable companion. Much time has passed since then, and today some representatives of the odd-toed ungulate order have learned not only to read, but also to think, and to put it into words. Therefore, it is not surprising that a donkey, in our case a horse, which makes no difference for this species, possessing such a gift, ended up in an important post in the Russian government as the Minister of Foreign Affairs, and this is, one might say, the second-highest post in the state. So the efforts of Molla Nasreddin, who taught the donkey to read, were not in vain. By the way, this fact once again confirms the accuracy of such a science as genetics. It is not for nothing that the hereditary traits of an odd-toed ungulate are clearly visible in the photo of the minister.

 

 

     The other day, this minister once again showed what heights a horse can reach in thinking ability. I am saying this because the Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs found Hitler's hereditary origins, discovering Jewish roots in him, which caused a stir in Israel. The international scandal that has flared up now threatens to sever political relations between the Kremlin and the Jewish state, which until now has remained neutral on the issue of anti-Russian sanctions of the West. It seems that the horse, having learned to talk, did not learn that not all thoughts, especially dubious ones, should be spoken out loud, in a position such as the Minister of Foreign Affairs.

 

    According to rumours, Putin apologized for his minister. However, there is no official confirmation of this. And to believe the words of Putin, a known liar, is the last thing. Now, if Lavrov himself, who insulted the Jews, had officially apologized, that would be a different matter.

    

 05.05.2022

 

     

Чечня и дорога к власти или возрождение империи по Путину

 

 

Алик  Бахши

 

Чечня и дорога к власти или возрождение 

империи по Путину

  

  

  

 

“Горят аулы, нет у них защиты,

  Врагом сыны отечества разбиты,

  И зарево, как вечный метеор

  Играя в облаках, пугает взор.

  Как хищный зверь, в смиренную обитель

  Врывается штыками победитель;

  Он убивает старцев и детей,

  Невинных дев и юных матерей”

...............

   “Прошло два года, всё кипит война;

   Бесплодного Кавказа племена

   Питаются разбоем и обманом;

   И в знойный день и под ночным туманом

   Отважность их для русского страшна.”

 

         “Измаил – бей”  М.Ю. Лермонтов

 

    С тех пор, как великий поэт написал эти строки, минуло 170 лет, но время нисколько не умалило их актуальность на фоне происходящих в наши дни кровавых событий на Кавказе. Военные действия в Чечне и Дагестане можно рассматривать как очередной эпизод Кавказкой войны. Войны, которую Россия вела в 19 веке и которая вновь разгорелась в конце 20 века. Война на Кавказе началась не сегодня и не вчера, она началась 200 лет назад, когда русские решили захватить этот райский уголок земли. Заметьте, не горцы (читай бандиты, террористы) спустились с гор на русскую равнину, а русские пришли к ним и отнюдь не с хлебом и солью, а с превосходящим по качеству и количеству оружием, неся смерть и разрушение непокорным нехристям. И то, что русский классик не преувеличивал рифмы ради свидетельствует не менее красноречивое послание царского генерала А.П. Ермолова Александру – в 1819 году во время военных действий на Кавказе: “Я сделал марш в горы, пользуясь общим ужасом и бегством, истребил несколько селений, весь на полях хлеб и ни одного не встретил на пути человека; до такой степени рассеялся неприятель”. Там же: “Приказано было истреблять селения, и, между прочим, разорен прекраснейший городок до 800 домов, Улу-Айя называемый. Отсюда с такой поспешностью бежали жители, что оставили несколько грудных ребят. Разорения нужно было как памятник наказания гордого и некому доселе не покорствовавшегося народа; нужно в назидание прочим народам, на коих одни примеры ужаса удобны наложить обуздание.” (Записки А.П. Ермолова, во время управления Грузией).

   

    Из всех колониальных народов Российской империи на долю кавказцев пришлись наибольшие лишения за их любовь к свободе. Русские власти уже тогда отлично поняли, что стремление к независимости можно уничтожить только вместе с народом, поэтому было предпринято беспрецедентное в истории планомерное физическое истребление горцев, которое  можно сравнить с Катастрофой европейского еврейства. Обрекая горцев на голод, все плодородные земли Кубани и Терека были изъяты и розданы под казачьи станицы. Отсюда и появились кубанские и терские казаки, которые сегодня требуют возрождения казачьего войска. Огромные массы горцев насильственно вывозили с родных мест на поселение в глубь России, вернее не на поселение, а на гибель. Что может быть красноречивее следующего факта: В 1859 году 159 человек были направлены на поселение в Новоузенский уезд Самарской губернии. Через год в живых осталось только 81 человек. ( Центральный государственный военно-исторический архив. Москва). Кроме насильственной депортации от горцев избавлялись и обманным путем, а именно, под предлогом паломничества в Мекку. По плану царского министра Милютина, желающих совершить паломничество переправляли в Турцию бесплатно, на нанятых государством пароходах. Таким путем было вывезено с Кавказа 500 тысяч человек. Всем им не суждено было увидеть Родины, потому что  с возвращением у них возникали заготовленные бюрократические трудности. У многих за время паломничества паспорта оказывались просроченными, и им ничего не оставалось, как принять турецкое подданство. Тех же, которых миновали бюрократические препоны, направляли этапом, минуя Кавказ, в Уральские степи на поселение, мотивируя тем, что в случае возвращения в родные места, их ждут неизбежные стычки с казаками. Дело в том, что за время отсутствия горцев земля и имущество их конфисковывались в пользу переселенных на Кавказ донских казаков. Уже в советское время  дело физического уничтожения горцев продолжил “отец всех народов”, по приказу которого горцев, словно скотину, битком набитыми эшелонами вывозили в Сибирь и Казахстан. Нетрудно догадаться какая участь их там ожидала. Причем, эта депортация народов Кавказа Сталиным бала осуществлена дважды; до и во время Второй мировой войны.

  

    Какой бы красивой идеологией не прикрывала свою захватническую сущность  Империя Зла, наступил и её конец. Завязнув на восемь лет в другой горной стране, которой кремлёвские идеологи хотели принести процветание, вспахивая её землю разрывами бомб и снарядов, Россия потерпела жестокое поражение. Афганец-бандит, -душман, -дух, одним словом - террорист, с самодельным автоматом и ослом вместо бронетранспортера отстоял свою свободу, не дал превратить свою родину в очередной хлопковый придаток российской империи и похоронил давнюю мечту Кремля выйти к Индийскому океану. Ведь оставалось два танковых перехода через Пакистан и русский солдат полоскал бы портянки в водах Индийского океана с чувством выполненного интернационального долга.                     

 

  Громадная страна, имеющая самую большую в мире армию, вооруженную сверхзвуковыми самолётами, мощными танками, артиллерией всех калибров, лучшими в мире автоматами Калашникова, самонаводящимися ракетами и прочими электронными штучками не смогла справиться с афганским народом. Афганистан оказался тем последним лишним куском, который вызвал у страдающего внутренними болезнями дракона несварение. Оказывается, слова Александра Невского “Кто к нам с мечём придет от меча и погибнет” справедливы не только на русской земле.

   Неудачная военная авантюра в Афганистане имела далеко идущие политические последствия. Необъявленная позорная война обнажила всю ложь и лицемерие, которыми почивали кремлёвские коммунисты своих граждан. Невозможно было запаять правду вместе с погибшими, неизвестно за что, в цинковые гробы, поступавшие всё в больших количествах в ответ на тотальную войну, развязанную Советским Союзом против афганского народа. Первые же демократические преобразования, которые М.Горбачов вынужден был ввести, чтобы придать цивилизованное лицо советскому строю, так перетрясли лоскутную империю, что она начала распадаться на куски. Москва еще правда пыталась залить кровью эту поступь к свободе, - события в Тбилиси, Риге, Вильнюсе и Баку, но как метко сказал архитектор перестройки Михаил Горбачев, сам того не понимая, во что она выльется, “процесс пошел “.     

  

   

   Развал Российской колониальной империи не закончился с обретением независимости бывшими союзными республиками, что видно на примере Чечни. Но, если свобода для союзных республик обошлась малой кровью, то Чечне она стоила 100 тысяч жизней. По уже известной традиции, обозвав чеченцев бандитами, а народное ополчение банд-формированиями, Россия в который раз развязывает войну на Кавказе, мотивируя, что это исконно российская территория и чтобы не создавать прецедента для других покорённых ею народов. Правда говоря, не поддаётся разумному объяснению чем, например, отличаются Чечня или Дагестан от Азербайджана или Молдавии, получивших статус независимых государств. Может ли кто-то ответить на вопрос: почему Грузия имела статус союзной республики, а Ингушетия, Тува или Чечня являются автономными республиками. Как определялось это различие? Грузия сама вроде бы попросилась в состав России, во всяком случае, так утверждает легенда с подачи Москвы. Украина даже подписала знаменитый договор Богдана Хмельницкого “Навеки вместе”. Белоруссия, вообще никогда не знавшая государственности, неожиданно получает независимость буквально в подарок и до сих пор не знает, что с ней делать. Народы же Кавказа сотни лет боровшиеся против присутствия русских на своей земле не удостоились такой привилегии на свободу. За два года войны была полностью разрушена нефтедобывающая и нефтеперерабатывающая промышленность. Руины Грозного напоминают Сталинград времен Второй мировой войны, а стёртые с лица земли Бамут и Самашки отличаются от  трагедии Хиросимы и Нагасаки  разве что масштабом опустошения и отсутствием радиации. Но также как в Афганистане, несмотря на то, что русские войска полностью владели оперативным пространством, они потерпели поражение. Маленький полуторамиллионный народ, бросивший вызов империи, вынудил Москву начать переговоры о мире, которые завершились Хасавьюртовсим соглашением. Хотя Россия официально и не признала самостоятельность Чечни, фактически чеченский народ ценой неимоверных лишений обрёл независимость.

   

    Однако, после чехарды премьер-министров во главе российского правительства становится бывший чекист В.Путин, который от либерально-интеллигентных предшественников отличается  типичной для работников КГБ протокольно-серой внешностью и, как вскорости выяснилось, грубой, характерной для убийц-рецидивистов, речью. Каковы же причины прихода к власти подобной личности,- своего рода российского варианта Августо Пиночета? Но в отличие от чилийского генерала, захватившего власть самолично, В.Путин всё же ставленник российских олигархов, которые перед страхом победы коммунистов на предстоящих выборах привели его к власти взамен прогрессивно деградирующему больному президенту Б.Ельцину.

    Ельцин, считавший себя гарантом Конституции, которая для России - пустой звук, на самом деле являлся гарантом финансового благополучия олигархов. Именно при Ельцине симбиоз власти и денег достигает наивысшего апогея. Новая власть, пришедшая на смену коммунистам, предоставила возможность легкого обогащения, поэтому коррупция моментально пронизывает все эшелоны власти. Деньги и власть приобретают в сложившихся условиях России неограниченные возможности. За деньги олигархами покупаются депутатские кресла в государственной думе и посты в правительстве. Б.Березовский самый богатый человек в России, имеющий израильское гражданство, становится секретарем Совета Безопасности. Правда, впоследствии, уже будучи секретарем, Березовский отказывается от израильского гражданства, но этот факт лишь  подчеркивает уникальность ситуации. Можете представить себе, чтобы в Израиле аналогичный пост занимал человек, русский по национальности, да еще и с российским гражданством. В Путине как в традиционно исполнительном чиновнике КГБ олигархи видели безвольную марионетку, которая позволит им дальнейшее обогащение за счет продажи сырьевых ресурсов страны без создания производственных предприятий. Такая тенденция в экономике могла поставить Россию в положение стран, являющихся сырьевыми придатками Запада и Японии. Россия из страны бывшей диктатуры пролетариата могла превратиться в страну диктатуры олигархов. Новые нувороши не связывали свое будущее с Россией. Прежде всего, они не видели в ней Родины. Все они заранее подготовили тылы  в Израиле и в других странах, вывозя туда по мере возможности свои капиталы. Россия для них являлась только средством обогащения. Однако в Путине они вовремя не разглядели второй стороны его натуры. Как истинный чекист, он сумел скрыть свои будущие честолюбивые намерения, замешанные на сильном патриотизме. Тогда олигархи не предвидели, какую опасность для их финансовой империи представляет собой Путин.

  

     Не сомневаясь, что в России довольно много противников отпускать Чечню, даже среди интеллигенции, Путин, дабы заручиться поддержкой народа на предстоящих президентских выборах, делает ставку на новую войну с Чечней. С этой целью сразу же после прихода националиста Путина в правительство затевается война в Дагестане. Вспомнили вдруг о непокорных ваххабитах, которые вот уже два года не подчинялись ставленникам Москвы в Махачкале. Ваххабиты снабжались оружием из Чечни и поддерживались тамошними добровольцами, заметьте не официальным Грозным. Но для русских этого было достаточно, чтобы начать войну в Чечне. Проскальзывают обвинения в сторону Грузии и Азербайджана, через территорию которых возможно поступает военная помощь Чечне. Так что, при необходимости, ни Грузия, ни Азербайджан не застрахованы от посягательства кремлёвских политиков. Вспоминается аналогичная ситуация: афганские партизаны имели лагеря в Пакистане, но русские не осмеливались бомбить территорию нейтрального государства. Или другой пример. Добровольцы из России воевали в Боснии на стороне своих единоверцев, однако боснийцы не объявляли за это войны России.

    Кроме того, очень кстати взрываются жилые дома в самой Москве. Против Чечни по всей стране раздувается настоящая истерия. Сразу, буквально в первые же часы после террористических актов, ловят десятки причастных к ним чеченцев, находят сотни килограммов гексагена. Правда, в Рязани у ФСБ случился прокол; жильцы дома, который якобы хотели взорвать террористы, обнаружили, что вместо гексагена в мешках находился обычный сахар. Чтобы сгладить свой промах, ФСБ объясняет, что это была проверка на бдительность. Российские следственные органы, не раскрывшие ни одного из целой серии громких заказных убийств,  как то, убийство Холодова, Меня, Листьева, Старовойтовой, проявляют вдруг такую расторопность. Всё это выглядит, по меньшей мере, довольно странно. Чеченский президент А.Масхадов, отрицая причастность Грозного к взрывам, неспроста упоминал имя Березовского, подчёркивая опасность этого человека, как  для Чечни, так и для России. Почему-то Масхадову больше верится, тем более, что известны давние связи Березовского  с чеченским криминалом.

  

    Оккупировав Чечню, Путин конечно же чеченскую проблему не решил, как раз наоборот Россия вновь обрела кровоточащую рану, приносящую страдания обоим народам, но зато, Путин выглядел триумфатором, этаким собирателем “земли русской”, что и позволило ему въехать в качестве такового в Кремлевские ворота. С этого момента и можно начать отсчет времени для олигархов, свободы слова и вообще демократии западного образца, ибо все это вредно для Российской империи, которую Путин хочет сохранить, а то и возродить в прежних границах. За четыре года своего президентства Путину удалось многое: устроив гонения на олигархов, Путин лишил их возможности влиять на политику Кремля, более того, у олигархов отобрали то, чем они владели в России и что наиболее важно СМИ оказались в руках президента. Путин постепенно фактически ликвидировал свободу слова в СМИ. Телевидение стало таким же лживым, зарегулированным и неинтересным, каким оно было при коммунистах и это наглядно показало освещение событий, связанных с “Норд-Остом”. Свобода слова, развалившая тоталитарный коммунистический режим, оказывается, мешает специалисту по “замачиванию в сортире”, а также, как неожиданно выяснилось, “обрезанию”, успешно бороться с международным терроризмом и экстремизмом. Используя телевидение, Путин превращает выборы в Думу в фарс и теперь, обеспечив себе абсолютное большинство в парламенте, он может изменить Конституцию. Примечательно, что  это самое абсолютное думское большинство составляет пропрезидентская партия “Единство”, не имеющая какой-либо программы и что не менее примечательно, сам президент не является ее членом. Здесь важно отметить, что вместо потерпевших полное фиаско демократов, за душой которых кроме амбиций ничего нет, в нынешней Думе заседают депутаты от откровенно националистических партий. В сложившейся политической ситуации вполне верится в заверения президента Путина, что предстоящие выборы будут для него последними, потому, что они могут оказаться последними вообще. Все это очень напоминает обстановку, при которой Гитлер пришел к власти в Германии.

 

    Мировая демократия должна понять, что Россия была тюрьмой народов и остаётся ею по сей день, а приход к власти таких людей, как Путин, свидетельствует о тенденции к возрождению былого величия Советского Союза.   Реставрация тоталитарного строя в России, вновь поставит мир на грань ядерной угрозы. Cнисходительность Запада на то что происходит в Чечне развязывает руки русским нацистам и заключает величайшую опасность для Мира. Лермонтовские строки могут стать актуальными не только для народов Кавказа:

                   

                    “Не ждут ли русского отряда,

                      До крови лакомых гостей?”

                      

                           “Хаджи-Абрек” М.Ю.Лермонтов

 

  Русский поэт 19 века был гораздо большим демократом, чем нынешний президент России. 

 

14.10.1999