Чечня и дорога к власти или возрождение империи по Путину

 

Алик  Бахши

 

Чечня и дорога к власти или возрождение империи по Путину

 

 

“Горят аулы, нет у них защиты,

  Врагом сыны отечества разбиты,

  И зарево, как вечный метеор

  Играя в облаках, пугает взор.

  Как хищный зверь, в смиренную обитель

  Врывается штыками победитель;

  Он убивает старцев и детей,

  Невинных дев и юных матерей”

...............

   “Прошло два года, всё кипит война;

   Бесплодного Кавказа племена

   Питаются разбоем и обманом;

   И в знойный день и под ночным туманом

   Отважность их для русского страшна.”

 

         “Измаил – бей”  М.Ю. Лермонтов

 

    С тех пор, как великий поэт написал эти строки, минуло 170 лет, но время нисколько не умалило их актуальность на фоне происходящих в наши дни кровавых событий на Кавказе. Военные действия в Чечне и Дагестане можно рассматривать как очередной эпизод Кавказкой войны. Войны, которую Россия вела в 19 веке и которая вновь разгорелась в конце 20 века. Война на Кавказе началась не сегодня и не вчера, она началась 200 лет назад, когда русские решили захватить этот райский уголок земли. Заметьте, не горцы (читай бандиты, террористы) спустились с гор на русскую равнину, а русские пришли к ним и отнюдь не с хлебом и солью, а с превосходящим по качеству и количеству оружием, неся смерть и разрушение непокорным нехристям. И то, что русский классик не преувеличивал рифмы ради свидетельствует не менее красноречивое послание царского генерала А.П. Ермолова Александру – в 1819 году во время военных действий на Кавказе: “Я сделал марш в горы, пользуясь общим ужасом и бегством, истребил несколько селений, весь на полях хлеб и ни одного не встретил на пути человека; до такой степени рассеялся неприятель”. Там же: “Приказано было истреблять селения, и, между прочим, разорен прекраснейший городок до 800 домов, Улу-Айя называемый. Отсюда с такой поспешностью бежали жители, что оставили несколько грудных ребят. Разорения нужно было как памятник наказания гордого и некому доселе не покорыстовавшегося народа; нужно в назидание прочим народам, на коих одни примеры ужаса удобны наложить обуздание.” (Записки А.П. Ермолова, во время управления Грузией).

   

    Из всех колониальных народов Российской империи на долю кавказцев пришлись наибольшие лишения за их любовь к свободе. Русские власти уже тогда отлично поняли, что стремление к независимости можно уничтожить только вместе с народом, поэтому было предпринято беспрецедентное в истории планомерное физическое истребление горцев, которое  можно сравнить с Катастрофой европейского еврейства. Обрекая горцев на голод, все плодородные земли Кубани и Терека были изъяты и розданы под казачьи станицы. Отсюда и появились кубанские и терские казаки, которые сегодня требуют возрождения казачьего войска. Огромные массы горцев насильственно вывозили с родных мест на поселение в глубь России, вернее не на поселение, а на гибель. Что может быть красноречивее следующего факта: В 1859 году 159 человек были направлены на поселение в Новоузенский уезд Самарской губернии. Через год в живых осталось только 81 человек. ( Центральный государственный военно-исторический архив. Москва). Кроме насильственной депортации от горцев избавлялись и обманным путем, а именно, под предлогом паломничества в Мекку. По плану царского министра Милютина, желающих совершить паломничество переправляли в Турцию бесплатно, на нанятых государством пароходах. Таким путем было вывезено с Кавказа 500 тысяч человек. Всем им не суждено было увидеть Родины, потому что  с возвращением у них возникали заготовленные бюрократические трудности. У многих за время паломничества паспорта оказывались просроченными, и им ничего не оставалось, как принять турецкое подданство. Тех же, которых миновали бюрократические препоны, направляли этапом, минуя Кавказ, в Уральские степи на поселение, мотивируя тем, что в случае возвращения в родные места, их ждут неизбежные стычки с казаками. Дело в том, что за время отсутствия горцев земля и имущество их конфисковывались в пользу переселенных на Кавказ донских казаков. Уже в советское время  дело физического уничтожения горцев продолжил “отец всех народов”, по приказу которого горцев, словно скотину, битком набитыми эшелонами вывозили в Сибирь и Казахстан. Нетрудно догадаться какая участь их там ожидала. Причем, эта депортация народов Кавказа Сталиным бала осуществлена дважды; до и во время Второй мировой войны.

  

    Какой бы красивой идеологией не прикрывала свою захватническую сущность  Империя Зла, наступил и её конец. Завязнув на восемь лет в другой горной стране, которой кремлёвские идеологи хотели принести процветание, вспахивая её землю разрывами бомб и снарядов, Россия потерпела жестокое поражение. Афганец-бандит, -душман, -дух, одним словом - террорист, с самодельным автоматом и ослом вместо бронетранспортера отстоял свою свободу, не дал превратить свою родину в очередной хлопковый придаток российской империи и похоронил давнюю мечту Кремля выйти к Индийскому океану. Ведь оставалось два танковых перехода через Пакистан и русский солдат полоскал бы портянки в водах Индийского океана с чувством выполненного интернационального долга.                     

 

  Громадная страна, имеющая самую большую в мире армию, вооруженную сверхзвуковыми самолётами, мощными танками, артиллерией всех калибров, лучшими в мире автоматами Калашникова, самонаводящимися ракетами и прочими электронными штучками не смогла справиться с афганским народом. Афганистан оказался тем последним лишним куском, который вызвал у страдающего внутренними болезнями дракона несварение. Оказывается, слова Александра Невского “Кто к нам с мечём придет от меча и погибнет” справедливы не только на русской земле.

   Неудачная военная авантюра в Афганистане имела далеко идущие политические последствия. Необъявленная позорная война обнажила всю ложь и лицемерие, которыми почивали кремлёвские коммунисты своих граждан. Невозможно было запаять правду вместе с погибшими, неизвестно за что, в цинковые гробы, поступавшие всё в больших количествах в ответ на тотальную войну, развязанную Советским Союзом против афганского народа. Первые же демократические преобразования, которые М. Горбачёв вынужден был ввести, чтобы придать цивилизованное лицо советскому строю, так перетрясли лоскутную империю, что она начала распадаться на куски. Москва еще правда пыталась залить кровью эту поступь к свободе, - события в Тбилиси, Риге, Вильнюсе и Баку, но как метко сказал архитектор перестройки Михаил Горбачев, сам того не понимая, во что она выльется, “процесс пошел “.     

  

   

   Развал Российской колониальной империи не закончился с обретением независимости бывшими союзными республиками, что видно на примере Чечни. Но, если свобода для союзных республик обошлась малой кровью, то Чечне она стоила 100 тысяч жизней. По уже известной традиции, обозвав чеченцев бандитами, а народное ополчение банд-формированиями, Россия в который раз развязывает войну на Кавказе, мотивируя, что это исконно российская территория и чтобы не создавать прецедента для других покорённых ею народов. Правда говоря, не поддаётся разумному объяснению чем, например, отличаются Чечня или Дагестан от Азербайджана или Молдавии, получивших статус независимых государств. Может ли кто-то ответить на вопрос: почему Грузия имела статус союзной республики, а Ингушетия, Тува или Чечня являются автономными республиками. Как определялось это различие? Грузия сама вроде бы попросилась в состав России, во всяком случае, так утверждает легенда с подачи Москвы. Украина даже подписала знаменитый договор Богдана Хмельницкого “Навеки вместе”. Белоруссия, вообще никогда не знавшая государственности, неожиданно получает независимость буквально в подарок и до сих пор не знает, что с ней делать. Народы же Кавказа сотни лет боровшиеся против присутствия русских на своей земле не удостоились такой привилегии на свободу. За два года войны была полностью разрушена нефтедобывающая и нефтеперерабатывающая промышленность. Руины Грозного напоминают Сталинград времен Второй мировой войны, а стёртые с лица земли Бамут и Самашки отличаются от  трагедии Хиросимы и Нагасаки  разве что масштабом опустошения и отсутствием радиации. Но также как в Афганистане, несмотря на то, что русские войска полностью владели оперативным пространством, они потерпели поражение. Маленький полуторамиллионный народ, бросивший вызов империи, вынудил Москву начать переговоры о мире, которые завершились Хасавьюртовсим соглашением. Хотя Россия официально и не признала самостоятельность Чечни, фактически чеченский народ ценой неимоверных лишений обрёл независимость.

   

    Однако, после чехарды премьер-министров во главе российского правительства становится бывший чекист В.Путин, который от либерально-интеллигентных предшественников отличается  типичной для работников КГБ протокольно-серой внешностью и, как вскорости выяснилось, грубой, характерной для убийц-рецидивистов, речью. Каковы же причины прихода к власти подобной личности,- своего рода российского варианта Августо Пиночета? Но в отличие от чилийского генерала, захватившего власть самолично, В. Путин всё же ставленник российских олигархов, которые перед страхом победы коммунистов на предстоящих выборах привели его к власти взамен прогрессивно деградирующему больному президенту Б. Ельцину.

    Ельцин, считавший себя гарантом Конституции, которая для России - пустой звук, на самом деле являлся гарантом финансового благополучия олигархов. Именно при Ельцине симбиоз власти и денег достигает наивысшего апогея. Новая власть, пришедшая на смену коммунистам, предоставила возможность легкого обогащения, поэтому коррупция моментально пронизывает все эшелоны власти. Деньги и власть приобретают в сложившихся условиях России неограниченные возможности. За деньги олигархами покупаются депутатские кресла в государственной думе и посты в правительстве. Б. Березовский самый богатый человек в России, имеющий израильское гражданство, становится секретарем Совета Безопасности. Правда, впоследствии, уже будучи секретарем, Березовский отказывается от израильского гражданства, но этот факт лишь  подчеркивает уникальность ситуации. Можете представить себе, чтобы в Израиле аналогичный пост занимал человек, русский по национальности, да еще и с российским гражданством. В Путине как в традиционно исполнительном чиновнике КГБ олигархи видели безвольную марионетку, которая позволит им дальнейшее обогащение за счет продажи сырьевых ресурсов страны без создания производственных предприятий. Такая тенденция в экономике могла поставить Россию в положение стран, являющихся сырьевыми придатками Запада и Японии. Россия из страны бывшей диктатуры пролетариата могла превратиться в страну диктатуры олигархов. Новые нувороши не связывали свое будущее с Россией. Прежде всего, они не видели в ней Родины. Все они заранее подготовили тылы  в Израиле и в других странах, вывозя туда по мере возможности свои капиталы. Россия для них являлась только средством обогащения. Однако в Путине они вовремя не разглядели второй стороны его натуры. Как истинный чекист, он сумел скрыть свои будущие честолюбивые намерения, замешанные на сильном патриотизме. Тогда олигархи не предвидели, какую опасность для их финансовой империи представляет собой Путин.

  

     Не сомневаясь, что в России довольно много противников отпускать Чечню, даже среди интеллигенции, Путин, дабы заручиться поддержкой народа на предстоящих президентских выборах, делает ставку на новую войну с Чечней. С этой целью сразу же после прихода националиста Путина в правительство затевается война в Дагестане. Вспомнили вдруг о непокорных ваххабитах, которые вот уже два года не подчинялись ставленникам Москвы в Махачкале. Ваххабиты снабжались оружием из Чечни и поддерживались тамошними добровольцами, заметьте не официальным Грозным. Но для русских этого было достаточно, чтобы начать войну в Чечне. Проскальзывают обвинения в сторону Грузии и Азербайджана, через территорию которых возможно поступает военная помощь Чечне. Так что, при необходимости, ни Грузия, ни Азербайджан не застрахованы от посягательства кремлёвских политиков. Вспоминается аналогичная ситуация: афганские партизаны имели лагеря в Пакистане, но русские не осмеливались бомбить территорию нейтрального государства. Или другой пример. Добровольцы из России воевали в Боснии на стороне своих единоверцев, однако боснийцы не объявляли за это войны России.

    Кроме того, очень кстати взрываются жилые дома в самой Москве. Против Чечни по всей стране раздувается настоящая истерия. Сразу, буквально в первые же часы после террористических актов, ловят десятки причастных к ним чеченцев, находят сотни килограммов гексагена. Правда, в Рязани у ФСБ случился прокол; жильцы дома, который якобы хотели взорвать террористы, обнаружили, что вместо гексагена в мешках находился обычный сахар. Чтобы сгладить свой промах, ФСБ объясняет, что это была проверка на бдительность. Российские следственные органы, не раскрывшие ни одного из целой серии громких заказных убийств,  как то, убийство Холодова, Меня, Листьева, Старовойтовой, проявляют вдруг такую расторопность. Всё это выглядит, по меньшей мере, довольно странно. Чеченский президент А. Масхадов, отрицая причастность Грозного к взрывам, неспроста упоминал имя Березовского, подчёркивая опасность этого человека, как  для Чечни, так и для России. Почему-то Масхадову больше верится, тем более, что известны давние связи Березовского  с чеченским криминалом.

  

    Оккупировав Чечню, Путин конечно же чеченскую проблему не решил, как раз наоборот Россия вновь обрела кровоточащую рану, приносящую страдания обоим народам, но зато, Путин выглядел триумфатором, этаким собирателем “земли русской”, что и позволило ему въехать в качестве такового в Кремлевские ворота. С этого момента и можно начать отсчет времени для олигархов, свободы слова и вообще демократии западного образца, ибо все это вредно для Российской империи, которую Путин хочет сохранить, а то и возродить в прежних границах. За четыре года своего президентства Путину удалось многое: устроив гонения на олигархов, Путин лишил их возможности влиять на политику Кремля, более того, у олигархов отобрали то, чем они владели в России и что наиболее важно СМИ оказались в руках президента. Путин постепенно фактически ликвидировал свободу слова в СМИ. Телевидение стало таким же лживым, зарегулированным и неинтересным, каким оно было при коммунистах и это наглядно показало освещение событий, связанных с “Норд-Остом”. Свобода слова, развалившая тоталитарный коммунистический режим, оказывается, мешает специалисту по “замачиванию в сортире”, а также, как неожиданно выяснилось, “обрезанию”, успешно бороться с международным терроризмом и экстремизмом. Используя телевидение, Путин превращает выборы в Думу в фарс и теперь, обеспечив себе абсолютное большинство в парламенте, он может изменить Конституцию. Примечательно, что  это самое абсолютное думское большинство составляет пропрезидентская партия “Единство”, не имеющая какой-либо программы и что не менее примечательно, сам президент не является ее членом. Здесь важно отметить, что вместо потерпевших полное фиаско демократов, за душой которых кроме амбиций ничего нет, в нынешней Думе заседают депутаты от откровенно националистических партий. В сложившейся политической ситуации вполне верится в заверения президента Путина, что предстоящие выборы будут для него последними, потому, что они могут оказаться последними вообще. Все это очень напоминает обстановку, при которой Гитлер пришел к власти в Германии.

 

    Мировая демократия должна понять, что Россия была тюрьмой народов и остаётся ею по сей день, а приход к власти таких людей, как Путин, свидетельствует о тенденции к возрождению былого величия Советского Союза.   Реставрация тоталитарного строя в России, вновь поставит мир на грань ядерной угрозы. Cнисходительность Запада на то что происходит в Чечне развязывает руки русским нацистам и заключает величайшую опасность для Мира. Лермонтовские строки могут стать актуальными не только для народов Кавказа:

                   

         “Не ждут ли русского отряда,

           До крови лакомых гостей?”

                      

                                       “Хаджи-Абрек” М.Ю. Лермонтов

 

  Русский поэт 19 века был гораздо большим демократом, чем нынешний президент России. 

 

14.10.1999

 

3/1=3

 Алик Бахши

3/1=3

Под давлением Запада, угрожающего, в случае отказа Путина от 30-ти дневного прекращения огня, новыми санкциями и поставками Украине вооружения в необходимом количестве, в том числе ракет с большей дальностью поражения, Путин срочно в 2 часа ночи собрал штатных пропагандистов, чтобы поспешно, пока угроза не приведена в действие, сообщить Миру свою готовность начать 15 мая прямые переговоры с Киевом в Турции. Зеленский в свою очередь без промедления выразил готовность вылететь в Стамбул и встретиться тет-а-тет с Путином, дав знать Хозяину Кремля, чтобы тот не искал отговорок. Торопливость Путина поставила его перед ситуацией, которую он явно не предвидел. Во всяком случае личная встреча с Зеленским, в его планы точно не входила. Путин рассчитывал послать на переговоры группу дипломатов, в задачу которых, надо думать, входила бесконечная проволочка на всё время пока идёт война, война, которая для Путина является гарантией его пребывания в качестве президента. Пока идёт война, которая питает имперское мировоззрение русского народа, Путину нечего опасаться за власть. Поэтому война для фашиста Путина подобна соломинке для утопающего (1).

Вероятность, появления Путина на переговорах в Стамбуле нулевая. Дело в том, что при встрече с Зеленским сразу выяснится не только нежелание Путина на 30-ти дневное перемирие, но и на прекращение войны. Не приедет же Путин лишь для того, чтобы сказать хочу воевать. Более того, встреча, можно сказать, произойдёт косвенно в присутствии Трампа, который изъявил желание засветиться в этот момент в Турции, чтобы вызвать у мировой общественности свою причастность к столь знаменательному событию, что вполне в его духе самовосхваления. Нельзя не учесть и Эрдогана, формального организатора встречи, позиция которого известна, как сторонника суверенитета Украины, имеющего большие виды на Крым с его коренным тюркоязычным населением. В связи с этим, Путин, если приедет на встречу с Зеленским, в одиночку предстанет в Турции перед тремя идеологическими противниками. Однако, такой расклад маловероятен. В лучшем случае, как я сказал, в Турцию прибудет группа ничего не решающих переговорщиков, с которыми вести переговоры бесполезно.

Как бы там не было, с большой вероятностью состоится встреча трёх президентов Зеленского, Трампа и Эрдогана, итоговый результат которой в отношении России будет сопоставим с результатом тегеранской встречи Рузвельта, Черчилля и Сталина в отношении фашистской Германии. Таким образом, прекращение войны между Украиной и напавшей на неё Россией может быть достигнуто только в одном случае, а именно, при победе над фашистской Россией, с последующем падением режима фюрера Путина. (2)

1. Путин в панике. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/128808.html
2. Великорусский шовинизм, и Путин его фюрер. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21133.html

13.05.2025

Armenia and the failed Crusade

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

Armenia and the failed Crusade

 

 

 

       Having lost the last two wars to Azerbaijan, the Armenians, finally convinced that the Russians no longer intended to fight for them, turned to the West in the hope of finding new patrons to realize the dream of creating a chimerical Greater Armenia from sea to sea. To this end, the Armenians began to once again exploit the Christian idea of ungrateful barbarian Muslims who had seized the promised land and, it must be said, found fertile soil in France (1), which in the past was the most active participant in the Crusades against the Saracens. Only this time, instead of the promised land, Azerbaijan was offered, which is about to begin the genocide of the Christian Armenian people.

      It seems that the French liked the idea of a new Crusade, but in order not to be alone in this godly undertaking, they decided to attract fellow travelers through the UN and urgently convened the Security Council to condemn Azerbaijan with the adoption of subsequent sanctions, and possibly forceful methods. However, unexpectedly, one might say, right during a meeting of the Security Council, the Armenians let France down by officially abandoning territorial claims to Azerbaijan, thereby making France a laughing stock. Members of the Security Council, who already had enough problems with the war in Ukraine, breathed a sigh of relief and peacefully dispersed, mentally scolding the French representative.

    

     As a result, Armenia, which uses political chicanery (2) and has traditionally betrayed its allies in history, flogged itself, burying the “Great Armenia” project (3, 4).

 

 

1. Corrupt girl of imperialism. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/97866.html

2. Armenia’s trickery in the Karabakh conflict. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/58068.html

3. Was there a “Great Armenia”? https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/71952.html

4. “Great Armenia” or the Great Lie. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/91885.html

  

       09.22.2023

The Great Religious Controversy Returns

 

Alik Bakhshi

The Great Religious Controversy Returns

 

 

      

        Today, it can undoubtedly be said that the liberation of Azerbaijan’s territory from the Armenian occupiers was openly disapproved by Western Europe, and this despite 4 UN Security Council resolutions calling for the withdrawal of all Armenian occupation forces from the occupied regions of Azerbaijan. For 30 years, European politicians, along with the aggressor, ignored UN resolutions; they were not bothered by the expulsion under threat of death of 186 thousand ethnic Azerbaijanis from Armenia and 500 thousand from Karabakh and seven surrounding regions. There was no political or economic pressure from the West to force Armenia to seize 20% of Azerbaijani territory. But the Europeans reacted completely differently when Azerbaijan complied with UN resolutions, liberating its lands from the Armenian occupiers. Suddenly, Azerbaijan was called an aggressor country by Western politicians, and without any intelligible arguments. They suddenly became concerned about the Armenian refugees of Karabakh, although no forced deportation was noticed on the part of Azerbaijan, the Armenians voluntarily left Karabakh, despite the guarantees given by Azerbaijan for their safety, endowing them with the same rights that citizens of Azerbaijan have. So what is the reason for such an ambiguous attitude towards Azerbaijan and Azerbaijanis on the part of Western democracies calling for economic sanctions and even sending Western peacekeepers to Karabakh to protect the non-existent Armenian population from supposedly bloodthirsty Azerbaijani Islamists?

       A similar situation happened in Ukraine, when the Russians, having occupied Crimea and Eastern Ukraine and then held a referendum, seized these territories from Ukraine, on the grounds that a significant number of Russians lived there. And in this case, the West identified Russia as the aggressor and sided with Ukraine, which is absolutely correct from all points of view. Sanctions were introduced against Russia, and both political and military support were provided to Ukraine. But Armenia did exactly the same as Russia! Why such an unfair assessment regarding Azerbaijan? The double standard of the West is clearly evident here without any reservations.

      In my opinion, there is an explanation for this, because there is a reason for everything and it lies, strange as it may seem in our enlightened age, in religion. Armenia is the only Christian country in the Middle East and is perceived by the West as the leading stronghold of Christianity. Here it is appropriate to turn to distant history, namely the era of numerous Crusades of Western European countries, whose troops, during 1096 - 1272, rolled into the Middle Eastern region in waves, bringing death and destruction to the Muslim population. They were opposed mainly by the Turks, who put up stubborn resistance and forced the Europeans to leave the region. It must be said that the military confrontation between Christianity and Islam, represented by the Ottoman Empire, continued until the 15th century. Few people know that the fortress wall around Jerusalem, which the crusaders tried to capture, was built on the orders of Suleiman the Magnificent. This wall still encircles the old historical part of Jerusalem. It is appropriate to remember here that the initiator of the Crusades was France, which even today shows the most active support for defeated Armenia, provoking it to a new war with Azerbaijan. France's demarche against Azerbaijan was stopped by the UN Security Council (1), but France stubbornly continues to try to turn the EU against Azerbaijan and exert political and economic pressure on Azerbaijan.

    Thus, in the Karabakh conflict, France openly sided with Yerevan, not taking into account all four UN resolutions, which clearly indicate the withdrawal of Armenian occupation forces from Azerbaijan. (2) Today, because of France, Armenia, not deciding on the issue of choosing a patron, is similar to Buridan's donkey, which is characteristic of the historical past of the Armenians. To betray Russia, which created an Armenian state on the lands of Azerbaijan, a state that has never existed in those parts in history, is entirely in the spirit of the Armenians. (3)

     It should be noted that the West is very narrow-minded, accusing countries that have recently gained independence from the Russian Empire of insufficient Western-style democracy. In this regard, it is necessary to take into account the fact that these countries, having fallen into colonial dependence on Russia for a long time, whose people do not like democracy (4), were cut off from world social progress. Democracy cannot suddenly be acquired by the people, much less introduced at the bayonets of the Marines, as was the case in Iraq. The people themselves must evaluate the advantages of democracy without outside interference, and this is a striking example of Turkey, whose people unconditionally accepted the democratic reforms introduced by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. The same France moved towards democracy through guillotines and bloody revolutions, passing through five republics. By the way, Azerbaijan, having gained independence, became the first in history in 1918 in the East, a democratic republic in which religion was separated from the state, and women received all rights equal to men, which was a very progressive step for a Muslim country in those days. True, soon, after the arrival of the Red Army, democracy in the young Azerbaijan Democratic Republic was ended for a long time, the Azerbaijani people again found themselves under the harsh heel of Moscow.

      Western guardians of democracy do not want to take into account the difficult conditions in which the Azerbaijani people found themselves, namely the fact that democratic reforms had to be carried out from the very first day of independence, namely, being in a state of war with Armenia, which did not hide its aggressive intentions to seize significant territories , or even completely capture the whole of Azerbaijan, if we take into account the plans of the Armenian nationalists to create a chimerical Greater Armenia, in which, judging by the map drawn by the Armenian would-be historians, there is no place for either the Azerbaijani people or the country called Azerbaijan.(4)

      Today, some European politicians are opening Pandora's  box, and again at the initiative of France, making plans for a new Crusade, but not under the pretext of saving Christ, but under the absurd pretext of saving Armenia from non-existent Azerbaijani Islamists and creating a vast Christian state in the Middle East.

       Undoubtedly, it is absurd, but on the other hand, how else can we explain the behavior of the West towards Azerbaijan, which finally expelled the Armenian occupiers from its land.

  

1. Armenia and the failed Crusade.  https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/04/armenia-and-failed-crusade.html  

2. Corrupt girl of imperialism. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/97866.html 

3. Armenia – history and legend. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/101164.html

4. Was there a “Great Armenia” https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/71952.html

                              

02/05/2024

Israel in the circle of political absurdity

 

Alik Bakhshi

Israel in the circle of political absurdity

 

         

 

       So, after 77 years, when, in accordance with UN General Assembly Resolution No. 181 of November 29, 1947, it was decided to create two states of Israel and Palestine in the British mandated territory of Palestine, Palestine finally received the status of a full member of the UN on May 10, 2024. To be honest, this resolution surprised me. The fact is that thanks to resolution No. 181, Israel automatically received membership in the UN, and of course this should have happened to Palestine as well. What was the point of re-involving the UN to re-admit Palestine to the UN? Absurd, nothing less!

 

       However, one absurdity gives rise to another, no less incredible absurdity. Israel, being a fierce opponent of Palestine's membership in the UN, draws the attention of the international community to the fact that UN resolutions are only advisory in nature and are not obligatory for their implementation. This explanation from Israel again caused bewilderment, because Israel received a mandate for a state and membership in the UN thanks to the resolution. This attitude towards UN resolutions completely nullifies the significance of this international organization.

 

        I must say the following circumstance is even more absurd. This refers to those 9 countries that are opponents of Palestine’s membership in the UN, motivating their negative attitude towards Palestine and the formation of the state of Palestine by the fact that first this issue should be resolved between Israel, which has the status of a state, and Palestine with an unequal status of autonomy. But, as you know, they have been solving this issue for 75 years to no avail through war, which, like any war, is accompanied by mass deaths of the civilian population. From the first day of the formation of the state, martial law was introduced in Israel, which has not been lifted to this day. True, during the time of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin there was an opportunity to agree on a peaceful solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, but everything ended with his murder, and, to be honest, this outrageous murder by an Israeli terrorist was perceived positively by the majority of Israeli citizens. (1) And Today, the Biden administration is sending the decision on the creation of the state of Palestine to Israel, which, unlike the Palestinians, I repeat, has the status of a state. You may say it's nonsense, but this is what is happening. Did they take into account the opinion of the Palestinians when they decided in 1947 to allocate part of the territory of Palestine to the state of Israel, which occupied the entire territory of former Palestine!

 

       America's mischief-making together with Israel created the absurdity of the situation regarding the creation of the state of Palestine, which had already been resolved back in 1947. (2) According to American President Biden, it is possible to end the confrontation between Jews and Palestinians by creating the state of Palestine, however, on the other hand, America is blocking this possibility by vetoing it in the Security Council. Once again, absurdity and a demonstration of the policy of double standards. (3) Such an immoral position of Biden does not paint America, which stands for justice and democracy.

       Israel's future is at peace with the Arabs, and there is no other option.(4)

 

1. On the question of who killed Rabin. Israel. Our country. 04.12.96.

2. The UN's fatal mistake. 05.12.2023.  https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2024/07/the-fatal-mistake-of-un.html  

3. An open letter to Mr. President Joseph Biden. 04/23/2024. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/109710.html

4. Peace and democracy are the future of Israel. Israel. Our country. 09.18.96.

     

         05/11/2024

Israel is a nest of international terrorism

 

Alik Bakhshi

Israel is a nest of international terrorism

 

"He who weaves slander does not know

That slander will later kill him"

M. Saadi

 

Who could have imagined that pirates would return from the depths of time to the Mediterranean, the cradle of civilization? Nor did the people sleeping sweetly before dawn in the cabins of the Turkish cruise liner "Mavi Marmara" think so when armed Israeli commandos clambered aboard and literally descended from the sky onto the upper deck. The hijacking of the peaceful liner took place in international waters, which is classified as nothing less than piracy, and the fact that the act took place under the cover of darkness underscores its malicious intent. The unarmed men's attempt to prevent this lawlessness prompted a merciless opening of lethal force. As a result, nine people were killed and dozens wounded. A significant fact, highlighting the criminal actions of the commandos, is Israel's attempt to suppress information coming from the "Free Gaza" flotilla that was attacked.

 

Blaming the gunned-down Turks for their own fault, having resisted illegal violence, is tantamount to excusing an armed bandit who killed a homeowner simply because the latter attacked the bandit as he was breaking into the house.

 

Seeing the extremely unsightly international situation Israel found itself in, Jewish journalists raised a veritable hue and cry, accusing everyone and everything: Turkey of a planned provocation and Islamization, America and Europe of the same Islamization, and human rights activists and peacekeepers of lying. In the heat of hysteria, the notorious Palestinian hater E. Bonner (http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/7804.html ), rejecting the slogan "two states for two peoples" and attempting to justify Israel's illegal actions, calls for abandoning political correctness. And it's clear why. Because political correctness is in no way compatible with Bonner's outburst of blatant cynicism. The self-proclaimed human rights activist believes that only a "swollen belly and limbs like sticks" reflect the degree of starvation, and if this symptom isn't observed in Palestinian children, then there's no humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. In that case, one would have to assume that the tummy fused to the spine, visible in photographs of children from Auschwitz, is proof that the Nazis provided excellent nutrition to concentration camp prisoners. This isn't a question of political correctness, but rather of Ms. Bonner's complete lack of morality. Even living with a man of conscience and great morality proved ineffective in this case.

Bonner's cynicism echoes, I would say, the brazen cynicism of Israeli Foreign Minister Lieberman, known for his particular "peacefulness" toward Arabs. The minister shared with the world the revelation that the people of Gaza eat in expensive restaurants! This circumstance, in his opinion, exposes the absurdity of talk of a humanitarian catastrophe. It becomes clear why chocolate is included among the long list of prohibited foods for Gaza. It's purely out of concern for the health of the people, to protect Palestinians from diabetes. I wondered if Lieberman's dream for solving the Palestinian issue (http://proza.ru/2008/03/22/576 ) had really come true. He envisioned a carpet bombing campaign, then feeding the surviving Palestinians generously, and then peace and prosperity would follow.

Explaining the bloody massacre of the peaceful "Free Gaza" flotilla in neutral waters, Lieberman sees nothing extraordinary in it, because, as he says, there are far more significant human murders in the world, and a dozen dead Turks aren't worth the attention it would require to stir up a political scandal. A very interesting thought! So was it worth it for Israel to start a Second Lebanon War over two kidnapped Israeli soldiers?

 

I'd like to address the big lie woven into the statements of journalists hanging out at Echo of Moscow (Latynina, Radzikhovsky), who always foam at the mouth to justify any aggression on the part of Israel. I deliberately recalled the Soviet newspaper phrase "foaming at the mouth," which was considered by party propagandists to be the most apt phrase for concluding the final verdict on "Western slander," but which, in this case, is precisely true. Their lie is hidden here:

"And now regarding the so-called blockade of the Gaza Strip. Well, regarding the fact that the supposed 'blockade' is simply political isolation after the Hamas terrorist organization came to power there, a policy with which the Palestinian Authority itself, to put it mildly, disagrees. And what does 'blockade' even mean? All food, energy, and other essential goods are constantly being imported from Israel." The restrictions imposed on Gaza were a response to the kidnapping of soldier Gilad Shalit from Israeli territory by Hamas terrorists."

 

In justifying the military action to seize the Free Gaza flotilla, Bonner writes: "Israel, like any state, not only can but must—it is the primary responsibility of any government—defend the country from the entry of any entity that poses a threat to its citizens." But the previous quote implies that Gaza is not Israeli territory. So where is the truth? The flotilla, as we know, was heading for Gaza, not Israel. Conclusion: Bonner is not knowledgeable enough about the subject to take her amateurish approach seriously. It seems to me that Ms. Bonner doesn't even know where Israel's border is.

First, what happened before the blockade. Before the blockade, it was like this: Jewish settlers, who made up 5% of the Gaza Strip's population, owned 40% of the arable land, not counting the area where significant Israeli army forces were stationed to protect the settlers, who were also armed with machine guns. The Arab population of Gaza, squeezed into a small patch of land close to the sea (Gaza has one of the highest population densities in the world) and deprived of livelihoods, desperately resisted the occupation, and as a result, in 2005, Israel was forced to withdraw its army and dismantle the Jewish settlements. However, Israel retained control, continuing the complete isolation of Gaza from the outside world. Essentially, Gaza, surrounded by a concrete wall, became a vast open-air prison for the Arabs, and the only way out was seen as continuing the struggle for freedom. The intolerable conditions led to the radicalization of society and the rise of Hamas to power in 2006. In an attempt to suppress the resistance, Israel prevented fuel and food from passing through checkpoints and occasionally cut off electricity and water supplies. Israeli naval boats prevented all fishing. In 2007, a famine struck Gaza. Palestinians, like moles, burrowed into the ground, digging underground tunnels through which food and fuel were primarily supplied from Egyptian territory. Thus, the lies of the Echo of Moscow journalists are obvious. It wasn't the emergence of Hamas on the political scene that caused the blockade, but rather Israel's attempt to force the Palestinian people to their knees by resorting to the blockade that fuelled Hamas's popularity, making Mahmoud Abbas a political corpse in comparison.

 

Imagine, for example, France blockading the Netherlands, isolating it from the outside world by erecting a concrete wall. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand the consequences of such an undertaking. The Gaza blockade is an integral part of the apartheid policy towards the Palestinian people. At the same time, the blockade is a desperate attempt to break the will of the Palestinian people, to divide the Palestinian resistance movement into two isolated enclaves, and thereby cause internal political discord.

Now about the Islamization of Turkey, which Latynina and Radzikhovsky see as the cause of the deterioration of relations with Israel. So, Islam is a religion, but in Turkey, religion is constitutionally separated from the state, which cannot be said of Israel. Turkey is a secular country, while in Israel, rabbis are members of parliament and government. Moreover, some Israeli laws are halachic, and it should be noted that Judaism, unlike other religious ideologies, contains an element of misanthropy, as it considers the Jewish people to be chosen by God, qualitatively different from the goyim, that is, from the rest of humanity. Incidentally, of all the members of the Israeli parliament convicted of theft, it was the rabbi-politicians who succeeded most in this "God-pleasing" endeavour.

The separation of church and state is an essential indicator of the degree of democratization of society. But, moreover, and most importantly, Turkey has a constitution and has implemented the fundamental principle of democracy—the separation of legislative and executive powers. This is not the case in Israel, and therefore, not Israel, but Turkey is currently the only democratic country in the region; not Israel, but Turkey is the outpost of democracy in the Middle East. And speaking of Islamization, is there a country in the world without a synagogue? How is Judaism better than Islam? Generally speaking, blaming someone for something you're up to your ears in the same mess is, at the very least, unwise. Religion has brought many ills to humanity. The polytheism of Ancient Greece and the Roman Empire contained more democracy than monotheism, which has been the cause of religious hostility and religious wars. Recall the era of the Crusades, the endless slaughter of Catholics and Protestants, the destruction of ancient monuments—an entire layer of cultural heritage was maliciously destroyed by Christianity. The dark chapter of history—the Inquisition—also owes its origins to the religion of monotheism. All of this is a consequence of monotheism, which everyone coerced into favouring their own side. A necessary condition for democracy is the removal of the dogma of faith from power, and, I repeat, in this regard, Israel lags far behind Turkey and differs little from the Islamic Republic of Iran (see "The Sephardic Revolution or the Jewish Republic of Israel" http://proza.ru/2008/03/22/561 ).

Regarding Israel's accusations against Turkey, allegedly organizing the "Free Gaza" flotilla for provocative purposes in order to gain some kind of political advantage, they are easily dismissed by the fact that the dry cargo ship "Rachel Corrie" is Irish. Could it be that Ireland, too, provoked Israel? It would be interesting to learn from Minister Lieberman what insidious goals Ireland was pursuing. Lieberman has no answer to this.

Latynina offers a humorous explanation for European participation in the "provocation": "Israel should rely only on itself; it shouldn't rely on those European scoundrels and scum who collaborate with terrorists because the terrorists ask for their help." According to Latynina, the scoundrel she considers to be human rights activist Rachel Corrie, after whom the ship seized by Israel is named, gave her life to provoke Israel into crushing itself with a military bulldozer, standing in its way as it carried out an order to destroy the home of a Palestinian family. The poet M. Saadi involuntarily comes to mind:

"If you speak ill of people,

Even if you're right, you're evil inside."

 

But in our case, it's impossible to argue that Latynina is right. Latynina cannot understand the motivation for such an act due to its complete lack of morality, and there's no other explanation. However, I would say that other Echo of Moscow journalists, M. Fishman and V. Shenderovich, also possess this "advantage" in their lack of morality (see "Word, Fornication, or Complete Albats" http://proza.ru/2010/05/21/139 ).

But this gibberish of Latynina's, simply childish babble, is difficult for a normal person to understand: "Europe has ceased to be Europe; freedom in Europe is slowly turning into its opposite. Specifically, into a bureaucracy that openly collaborates with terrorist regimes because these regimes ask for money and portray themselves as unhappy people, and it's always a pleasure to help the unfortunate."

If Europe, according to Latynina, is not free, and America, with its Obama, has completely gone bad, then from now on we will consider Israel the truly free country!

One must assume this is yet another example of Yulia Latynina's confusion, as in her phrase "a peaceful Palestinian convoy carrying humanitarian aid to Gaza".

 (http://www.echo.msk.ru/programs/code/685110-echo/ ), which clearly shows the journalist is unaware that a flotilla (caravan) of peaceful ships cannot be considered a convoy. Israeli warships served as a convoy for these ships when, under gunfire, they escorted the peacekeeper flotilla to the port of Ashdod.

 

What was the cause of this bloody incident? What prompted Israel to commit such a blatant international crime? The answer lies in the impunity ensured by the most powerful country in the world – America – at least until now.

 

The Arab-Israeli conflict is a generator of international terrorism, which, on the Israeli side, has escalated into state terrorism. By persisting in its occupation of Palestine, Israel is sinking deeper into the quagmire of its practice of international terrorism, and its refusal to comply with numerous Security Council decisions condemning Israel is leading to the disastrous path of self-isolation.

Israel deliberately refuses to acknowledge its ongoing war with the Palestinians and reduces it to a series of terrorist attacks, responding to them according to the law of vendetta. The persecution and liquidation of Palestinian resistance leaders is taking place worldwide, regardless of borders and countries. Given that the moral component of the conflict is on the side of the Palestinians, Israel cannot resort to international investigation and prosecution, as a host of unflattering questions concerning Israel itself would inevitably arise, and therefore resorts to the services of cloak-and-dagger knights. This explains the uncivilized and immoral actions of the Mossad, such as the assassination in Dubai. The immorality also lies in the fact that Israeli intelligence services frame citizens of other countries using forged passports, which creates an international scandal that only worsens Israel's image, portraying the Jewish state as a breeding ground for international terrorism. The pirate seizure of the peaceful "Free Gaza" flotilla is compelling evidence of this.

June 16, 2010

Israel and the Moscow-Tehran Axis

 

This article, in which I foresaw Israel's strategic cooperation with Turkey and Azerbaijan, was published in the Israeli newspaper “Our Country” on 11/19/1997.

 

                                                            Alik Bakhshi

 

Israel and the Moscow-Tehran Axis

 

                                                                      

 

                                                                         

  Turkey and Israel are an ideal pair of strategic partners.

    

    For the past two centuries, Russia has been Iran's most dangerous neighbor. Iran was the last obstacle to the advance of the Russian Empire to the Indian Ocean. And the weak impoverished country would certainly become its next victim, if not for the intercession of England. Moscow made its last attempt to carry out its aggressive plans at the end of World War II, when Soviet troops occupied part of Iranian territory, the so-called South Azerbaijan. Only the political talent and foresight of Winston Churchill, who foresaw the era of the Cold War, forced Stalin to withdraw the army from Iran.

        Subsequently, under American patronage, the SEATO bloc was created, which included Turkey, Iran and Pakistan. This trio formed a military-political shield against the possible expansion of the Soviet Union to the South. Given that Turkey is a member of NATO and has a bilateral mutual assistance pact with the United States, SEATO was as unassailable as NATO.

      Iran at that time received a lot of American weapons and economic assistance. The Shah of Iran, Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, who graduated from an institute in Switzerland, was a supporter of the development of his country on the model of Western civilization, like Turkey, which made a rather bold step for the religiously orthodox East, separating religion from the state. But, if Atatürk had support in the person of the Young Turks in his progressive reforms, then Pahlavi did not have such support. And yet, thanks to petrodollars, the country was developing rapidly in technical and economic terms and was on the verge of an economic boom.

 

      Following American goods, the seeds of Western culture entered the country. American films literally flooded cinemas and television. Young people like a sponge absorbed everything new and unusual. The "corruption of the souls" of the faithful aroused the wrath of the religious elite, who saw in the cultural transformation of society a threat to their influence on the masses. All attempts to convince the shah to turn off the chosen path, which runs counter to religious dogma, were unsuccessful. Moreover, the shah did not stand on ceremony with his ideological opponents, and the future father of the Islamic revolution even had to leave Iran and turn into a kind of martyr for the faith.

 

      Everyone knows the tragic finale of the transformations of Iranian society, undertaken by none other than the Shahinshah (Shah of all Shahs) of Iran, Mohammed Reza Pahlavi. A proud loner, ahead of his time, ended his last days in exile. Cruel terror scattered the sprouts of a new life. The Revolutionary Guards took great pleasure in public executions of women who dared to appear with an open face, or who were convicted of treason. Cinemas were burning along with the spectators locked in them. The black veil of religious fanaticism has again descended on Iran, protecting it from the rest of the world, and in an instant plunging the country into an era of medieval obscurantism.

     The civilized world was shocked by what happened in Iran, and only Moscow remained silent. The communists have always respected all totalitarian regimes that are close to them in spirit, be it fascist in Germany, dictatorial in Libya or Iraq, and now another version of it - religious totalitarianism in the face of the Islamic state of Iran.

 

    Knowing perfectly well that democracy is the main evil for their power, the religious oligarchy declared Western civilization the enemy of Islam and all Muslims. (This is fundamentally not true, if only because it was the military action of the West that saved the Bosnian Muslims from the genocide committed by the Serbs.) Naturally, America and its ally Israel became the main opponent of the revolution, and not for the reason that Israel is at war with the Arabs, Iran and he himself fought with Iraq for 8 years, but because Iran, like any totalitarian regime, needs an enemy to mobilize the spirit and eliminate the slightest free-thinking within the regime.

    Iran is trying to assume the role of leader in the Muslim world, and for this it is necessary to back up propaganda with some more active actions. You can't reach America, but Israel is nearby.

 

     The collapse of the Soviet Union, an empire that occupied a sixth of the land, changed a lot on the political map of the world, reshuffling the interests and military-strategic plans of many states. In the sphere of geopolitics, Russia is failing, especially in Europe. NATO is expanding to the East, getting closer and closer to Russia, and if the former Soviet Baltic republics and Ukraine become NATO members, then Russian naval forces in the Baltic and Black Sea will be effectively blocked.

 

   The situation is no better in the southern direction, where Moscow quite reasonably foresees a threat to its Turkic-speaking underbelly from the Caucasus and Central Asia. Here, the contours of the bloc of Turkic countries emerging under the auspices of Turkey from Asia Minor to Altai, which cuts like a wedge into the very center of the Asian continent, are becoming more and more clearly visible here. The possibility of reviving Turkic cooperation on such a vast territory changes the geostrategic situation. This legacy of Timur has a great military-strategic potential not only because of the space, but also because of the presence of huge oil and gas reserves, not inferior to those of the Persian basin. Russia undoubtedly fears such a change in the geopolitical situation and takes preventive measures to prevent the emergence of a union of Turkic countries.

 

    The weak point of the Turkic community is the absence of a continuous territorial corridor between Turkey and Azerbaijan, which is also the reason for the difficulty in implementing the project of laying an oil pipeline from Baku to Turkey. In strategic terms, the situation is aggravated by the occupation of 20% of Azerbaijani territory by Armenia. But in case of reunification of Azerbaijan with its southern part, located in Iran, the bloc will become monolithic. Naturally, for Iran, the prospect of losing a significant part of the territory, where about 30 million Azerbaijanis live (there are 9 million Azerbaijanis in Northern Azerbaijan), seems like a nightmare. This is where the geopolitical interests of Russia and Iran intersect, and the existing Moscow-Yerevan-Tehran axis just serves as a noose in this most vulnerable spot. In addition, the unfinished Karabakh war plays the role of a smoldering fuse in order to start military operations in this region with the hands of Armenia at a favorable moment for Moscow.

 

     In military cooperation with Iran, Russia sees a worthy response to the West for NATO expansion, and assistance in the construction of a nuclear reactor, which, with an excess of natural energy resources, Iran undoubtedly needs to create an atomic bomb, is a good irritating factor for America and Israel. And politicians who consider Russia already completely defeated are greatly mistaken. The Evil Empire is still capable of burning the Earth with nuclear breath in death convulsions or giving birth to its own kind in the face of Iran.

 

      The Moscow-Tehran axis should also protect Russia's economic interests. Russia cannot accept the fact that Azerbaijan is single-handedly extracting oil and gas from its shores and from time to time raises the issue of some unclear status of the Caspian Sea. Moreover, it should be taken into account that oil from Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan may be added to Baku oil. Thus, Baku will become a transit hub for transporting oil from the Caspian basin through Turkey to the countries of the Mediterranean Sea. It is very important for Russia that Caspian oil be transported to the Black Sea through its territory, and by political leverage, using the Karabakh conflict, Russia will in every possible way prevent the laying of an oil pipeline from Baku to Turkey. On the other hand, the throughput of the existing oil pipeline through Chechnya is insufficient to carry out the pumping of the amount of oil that is planned to be produced in the Caspian. Moreover, it should be taken into account that oil from Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan will be added to Baku oil. Along with technical difficulties, Russia also has political problems due to the instability of the general situation in the North Caucasus.

Taking all this into account, the Turkish option for building a new oil pipeline remains the most promising. In this case, oil will become more accessible to all Mediterranean countries, including Israel, and then there will be no need to bring oil from distant Mexico.

 

    Thus, Caspian oil is the cause of future political and possibly military clashes.

 

    After a series of political defeats in the Middle East, Russia does not give up hope of resuming its activity in this region, which is not desirable for both Israel and Turkey.

    Having common political opponents and not having friends in the immediate environment, Israel and Turkey need mutual support and the union of these countries is the best response to Moscow's demarche to return to the political arena of the Middle East with the help of Iran.

 

    Turkey and Israel are an ideal pair of strategic partners. The combination of a country that has the largest army among NATO members and in the Middle East region, and a country that possesses nuclear weapons and is not associated with any military bloc and, as a result, is able to make decisions independently, represents a serious force that cannot be not to take into account strategists in Moscow and Tehran, not to mention closer neighbors.

         Hence the recent visit of Minister of Foreign Affairs Yevgeny Primakov to Israel, one of the purposes of which, I think, was to probe how deep Israeli-Turkish military contacts are.

 

    In the current situation, the conclusion of an alliance between Israel and Turkey would undoubtedly cool the ardor of the Tehran fanatics and make it clear that any intentions to upset the balance of power that has developed in the Middle East will not go unpunished.

 

     11/19/79.