воскресенье, 30 августа 2026 г.

Empire Democracy is contraindicated

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

Empire Democracy is contraindicated

 

images (5)

 

    Empire and Democracy are incompatible things. Moreover, empire democracy is contraindicated and a vivid example is Russia. The venture connected with the willful introduction of Democracy in Russia failed miserably due to compelling objective reasons, however, like all previous ones. Although the reasons are objective, they are inherently subjective, for they relate to such a subject as the people. Every nation has its own genetic background, which, in general, distinguishes one nation from another. Thus, the reasons directly considered by us lie in the genetic field, which explains their steady constancy in time.

    The first reason: the reluctance and inability of the Russian people to engage in political and economic activities. This fatal circumstance comes from the depths of the centuries, when the Berendees, being incapable of self-government, invited for this purpose the Ruriks of the Rus tribe, to whom Russia itself owes its name. The inability of Russians to rational labor is known as the definition taken from Russian classical literature - Oblomovism. There can be no democracy in a state without at least some kind of active participation of the people in politics and, most importantly, no democratic state is viable without the initiative economic activities of its people.

    

   The total collapse of the communist ideology caused the disintegration of the Soviet Union and put a new Kremlev power in front of the economic problem, the solution of which she saw in the democratic model of state structure tested in the West. Russian young Democrats hoped that they should sell the people, literally for nothing, through the voucher system, state property, as the country's economy will automatically switch to capitalist rails and bring the country out of chaos. In fact, the country has all the necessary conditions for prosperity: fertile land, acceptable climatic conditions, a whole set of mineral resources, and labor, but I would like to recall the phrase of Prime Minister Chernomyrdin, famous for its eloquence, It turned out as always. ”

    

   This “as always” is the very same genetic constant that is characteristic of every nation, the carrier of this constant. The passivity of the Russian people led to the fact that most of the state property fell into the hands of a small handful of people, let's say not Russian nationalities. For the same reason, they were in politics. The traditional for Russia, the dominance of the bureaucratic apparatus, as an integral part of the dictatorial regime of power, but left out of state control during the Yeltsin's democracy, combined with fraudsters and fraudsters, gave rise to oligarchy. This symbiosis of power and criminal capital has reached incredible heights in Russia. Very symbolic for this time is the fact that the richest oligarch Berezovsky, who has Israeli citizenship, becomes the secretary of the Russian Security Council!

    

   The oligarchs were entrusted with the holy of holies of the Russian power, the Kremlin, and even brought the power of the Kremlin master to power. Looking for an urgent replacement for the sick and progressively degrading Yeltsin as a person, who was not so much the guarantor of the constitution, how he loved to dignify himself, and how much the guarantor of their financial well-being, the oligarchs brought to power V. Putin, with whom, however, there was a fatal slip, cost them a disaster afterwards. The fact is that in the inconspicuous look, obedient and executive in the past employee of the KGB, Putin, they overlooked a very programmatic and powerful man with ambitious plans, implicated in strong patriotism.

    

   Once the will of the oligarchs was responsible for Russia, Putin was faced with a dilemma: whether to play the unenviable role of the puppet intended for him by the oligarchs, or to engage in an empire that was slipping to death. Choosing the second option, and knowing the imperial outlook of the Russian people well, Putin very sensibly began with the war in Chechnya, accompanying the army’s actions with simple and understandable words “strangle a reptile”, that is, Chechnya and “drench them in the toilet”, that is, Chechens than immediately gained the love and support of the Russian people. After that, he carefully directed actions to curtail democracy, which today exactly corresponds to the status of democracy under the Communists.

 

    In Russia, democracy is known only in its very word - a sort of thing in itself that is accessible to people elected to power, and the more the person has a greater degree of power, hence Putin's definition of democracy in Russia as sovereign, that is, democracy for sovereign .

In order to save the Russian empire from economic catastrophe, Putin first of all dispersed the oligarchs, established a vertical of power in Russia with its numerous bureaucracy, turned the election into a farce, the parliament as a legislative body, in fact, became an obedient appendage of the Kremlin, unquestioningly serving the president’s wishes. In a word, Putin returned totalitarianism to the Russian people, with all the ensuing consequences, that is, everything that is observed today.

 

 

  Russian people are genetically incapable of embracing democracy (1). No wonder all known democrats in Russia are not of Russian nationality (2). And the new attempt to achieve power over the Russian people - the congress, once again baked for the upcoming elections of the party "Other Russia", will end in failure. Surprisingly exact name. As soon as there is the slightest opportunity to get to power in Russia, you and Trotsky with Lenin, Zinoviev with Kamenev, Stalin with Beri and Kaganovich and the current pleiad of word folk, and again not Russian nationality, so to speak, Kasparov. Yes, talkers feel where and when they can hang noodles on their ears! They would be better asked if Russians need another Russia. Right in the name of a mock with a mockery. You can’t think better! In short, as Bulgakov sir Woland would say, "We are in awe!"

 

1. Folk fate or each cricket its hearth. http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/4732.html

2. Word, fornication or complete albats. http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/8082.html

 

06/15/2006.

The Empire of Lies on the Road to End

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

The Empire of Lies on the Road to End

 

 

 

Lies are the Embodiment of Evil

                                                Victor Marie Hugo

 

The Russian Empire is once again suffering defeat, this time under Putin. It should be noted that since Napoleon, who won every battle against the Russians and captured Moscow, Russia has never won a single war it unleashed. The greatest damage to Russia came from its defeat in World War I and the shameful Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. Nicholas II, declaring war on Austria and Turkey, did not foresee how tragic his expansionist plan would be for the empire and for him personally. True, Russia defeated Germany in World War II, but that victory was a victory for the anti-Hitler coalition, and it is unknown how that war would have ended for Russia without assistance from the United States and Great Britain. The Russians suffered two more defeats – the so-called Winter War with Finland and the war in Afghanistan. The humiliating defeat in the Cold War with the Western democracies ended with a very tragic result – the collapse of the USSR.

 

Although Putin studied history, he apparently failed to draw the necessary conclusions. With the mentality of a St. Petersburg kid and the terrorist skills acquired in the KGB, he believed that Ukraine would fall at the feet of Russia in two or three days, which, as he claimed, he had raised from its knees. Yes, Putin raised Russia from its knees, but not to improve the country's prosperity, but to wage war – a war to seize territories that had previously been part of the Soviet Empire. Presumably, the next victims of Putin's intentions are Georgia, Kazakhstan, and so on down the list.(1)

 

However, Putin's blitzkrieg failed; the Ukrainians routed the Russian invaders on the outskirts of Kyiv. The Ukrainian people, by demonstrating courage, showed the Russians that they do not wish to again find themselves in the prison of nations that is Russia. Moreover, judging by the historical opus published by Putin, there is no place there for either the Ukrainian people or a country called Ukraine. This implies that the fascist Putin's goal of exterminating the Ukrainian people is no different from Hitler's goal of exterminating the Jewish people. This is called nothing less than genocide. Raschism is the Russian version of German fascism.(2) It is interesting to note that the notorious liar Putin positions himself as an anti-fascist. One cannot help but recall the prophetic dictum of Winston Churchill:

"The fascists of the future will call themselves anti-fascists."

 

Winston Churchill's brilliant prediction has become reality in Putin's Russia. One must assume that the democratic West will rid humanity of Russian fascism, just as it saved it from German fascism.

 

As for Russia's war with Ukraine, it will lose it, like all the previous ones. Russia suffered a shameful defeat in Afghanistan, despite its incomparable superiority in weapons and resources. If an Afghan peasant armed with a homemade assault rifle defeated professional Russian killers equipped with planes, missiles, tanks, and other paraphernalia of the most modern weaponry, then the Russians have no chance of victory in Ukraine, which is being aided by the West with ever-increasing supplies of weapons. Putin's special operation, which has escalated into a full-scale war, will undoubtedly end in defeat, with far-reaching consequences.

 

Firstly, we must hope that this time the West will not make the same mistake in providing assistance as it did after the collapse of the Soviet Empire. Secondly, the second collapse of the Russian Empire, which the French traveler Marquis de Custine called a prison of nations, will prove catastrophic. The fact is that, unlike previous empires such as the British or French, which had overseas colonies, the Russian Empire is monolithic. All its colonial peoples live within a common state border. Therefore, its disintegration will inevitably affect the metropolis itself, historically known as Muscovy. (3,4) The fate that Putin was preparing for Ukraine in his special denazification operation could result in the denazification of Russia itself and the Russian people. Putin, who loves to refer to proverbs, forgot one: don't dig a hole for someone else, you'll fall into it yourself.

 

1. Ukraine, Kazakhstan, get ready..., and so on down the list.

      https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/36270.html

2. Who are these Rashists? https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/83536.html

3. A complete idiot, or the last war of the Russian Empire.

      https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/96209.html

4. Russian Revolt, or the End of an Empire. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/97558.html

 

January 11, 2025

A liar in his element

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

A liar in his element

 

 

Putin, having assembled a massive army around Ukraine, swore it was for military exercises and nothing more, insisting that attacking Ukraine was not part of the Kremlin's plans. He sent an ultimatum to the West regarding NATO. Instead, he attacked Ukraine, which is in no way connected to NATO. He should have attacked Estonia or Slovakia, both NATO members. But what does Ukraine have to do with it? The Russian liar(1) claimed that only a madman could think of reviving an empire within the borders of the USSR, but the Russian army's invasion of Ukraine, which began in 2014 and the annexation of its territory, testifies to the contrary. One cannot help but recall Putin's words about the other former Soviet republics:

"The question arises: if this or that republic joined the Soviet Union but received a huge amount of Russian land, traditional Russian historical territories, and then suddenly decided to leave the Union—at least then it would have left with what it came with. And wouldn't have dragged along gifts from the Russian people."

 

True, Putin forgot to mention the circumstances of how the peoples of these republics ended up in the Russian Empire, and their entry into the Soviet Union could in no way be called voluntary. Regarding the "gifts," Putin chose not to elaborate.

But regarding Kazakhstan (2), which will likely be the next target of Russian aggression, Putin said (2): "He (Nazarbayev) created a state on territory where there had never been a state. The Kazakhs had no statehood."

 

It turns out that Putin is the madman who dreams of a Russian Empire within the borders of the Soviet Union, and perhaps even an empire that included the territories of Poland and Finland.

 

1. The Empire of Lies and its Chief Liar. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/22317.html

2. Ukraine, Kazakhstan, get ready..., and so on. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/36270.html

 

February 25, 2022

To the last will of Taras Shevchenko

 Alik Bakhshi


To the last will of Taras Shevchenko


When I die, bury me

In dear Ukraine,

Amidst the vast steppe

Dig a grave,


So that I may lie on a burial mound,

Above the mighty river,

So that I may hear the raging

Old Dnieper beneath the steep bank.


And when from the fields of Ukraine

The blood of hateful enemies

Shall it carry...then I

Will rise from the grave—


I will rise and reach

God's threshold,

I will pray...But for now

I do not know God.


Bury me and rise,

Break the chains,

Sprinkle my will with the evil blood of the enemy

Taras Shevchenko


Today, the people of Ukraine are close to fulfilling the famous last will of the Ukrainian poet Taras Shevchenko.(1) Putin's plans to capture Kyiv in two or three days have failed. Encountering the courageous resistance of the Ukrainian people, the Russian army, abandoning burned-out tanks and the corpses of rapist and marauding soldiers on the outskirts of Kyiv, turned to shameful flight, allowing the spring waters of the mighty Dnieper to wash away from the fields of Ukraine the "blood of hateful enemies" who had come to take the land from a people who, according to the definition of the fascist Nazi Putin, do not even exist. Unable to defeat the Ukrainian army in battle, the Russian invaders began to exterminate the civilian population not only in the occupied territory but also in the deep rear, shelling major cities with missiles, hoping to sow panic and divide society. However, this action by the Russian army had the exact opposite effect. The Ukrainian people rallied against the aggressor in a fight for their future, realizing it was under threat.


By and large, Ukraine is also fighting for the future of Europe. It's just a shame that not all of its politicians understand how dangerous Putin's Russia is for them. They try to court Putin and, despite his brazen behavior in international politics, have not given up hope of success in negotiations with a liar and murderer. France has been particularly notable in this regard. This prostitute of Europe had previously found common ground with Hitler (the Vichy government). Its constant hesitation is well known. For example, in 1966, France decided to partially withdraw from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and only rejoined it as a full member in 2009. While Great Britain immediately sided with Ukraine, supplying it with lethal weapons, President Macron is in no hurry to assist in the fight against the new Hitler in the person of Putin (2). One cannot help but recall Macron's 2019 remarks about reconsidering his stance on Russia, which, in his view, is no longer an enemy of NATO, and this was after Russia had seized Crimea and Donbas from Ukraine. Fortunately, Macron's remarks about "NATO's brain death" were met with condemnation from the other members of the alliance. Only the Baltic states and Poland, whose peoples were previously subjected to violence by Russians, understand the real danger Putin and his Russia pose to the world. (3)


Putin started the war with Ukraine for two main reasons. The first was to restore the empire to its former borders. The second was to prevent the Ukrainian people from overtaking the Russian people in achieving prosperity, something a priori unattainable for Russians and which could fuel discontent with Putin's rule in Russia.


The Ukrainian people have been given the difficult and responsible mission of stopping the aggressor from realizing its plans of conquest. If successful, Russia as an empire will cease to exist, and dozens of nations will gain long-awaited freedom.


1. Taras Shevchenko and Putin are representatives of the same people. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/69850.html


2. Hitler's ghost haunts Europe. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/38049.html


3. Russia is the source of global evil. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/66937.html


April 11, 2022

Are Russians ready to die for Ukraine?

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

Are Russians ready to die for Ukraine?

 

Хайль Путин: кроме жить прошлым, россияне ничего не умеют

 

Despite its colossal superiority in both numbers and technical equipment, Russia is losing the war with Ukraine. The reason for this failure lies primarily in the soldiers' motivation. A similar situation occurred in the Afghan War, which Russia lost shamefully. Ukrainians are fighting, first and foremost, for their land, to live as they wish, to speak their native language, and to be free from the dictates of Russia, which for some reason has decided to dictate their fate without having any right to do so. And for this, Ukrainians are ready to give their lives. One can't help but recall the famous phrase of Mustafa Kemal (Atatürk), who commanded the bloodiest battle of World War I at Gallipoli: "I do not command you to win, I command you to die." And 74,635 Turkish soldiers obeyed the order, winning the battle.

 

What is this Russian soldier fighting for, on Ukrainian soil, and is he ready to give his life for victory? According to the plan of the bloody dictator Putin, he was sent to a foreign country to denazify and demilitarize Ukraine. So on what basis did Putin decide that power in Ukraine is in the hands of Nazis, who, in accordance with Nazi ideology, are militarizing it for the purpose of attacking Russia? According to Putin, Ukrainian fascists seized power in Ukraine as a result of the 2013 uprising, when Oleksandr Turchynov, a Nazi by definition, was elected acting president after the fleeing President Yanukovych. But then, strange events uncharacteristic of a fascist regime occurred. Six months later, as a result of popular elections, Petro Poroshenko became president of Ukraine. He, too, was clearly a Nazi, considering that it was under his rule that the law on the Ukrainian language was passed, granting it the status of state language, which provoked Putin's fury and indignation. However, the Russian language has exactly the same status in Russia, since, according to the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the Law "On the State Language of the Russian Federation" (2005), Russian is the official language throughout the country, especially in a multi-ethnic country like Russia. Then, according to Putin's logic, Nazis are in power in Russia too.

 

However, let's continue with the Ukrainian oddities: after Poroshenko's presidential term ended, in accordance with the Ukrainian Constitution, Volodymyr Zelenskyy became president again through popular elections, which Putin considers an even greater fascist than Poroshenko. And this is Russia's dictator-for-life speaking about Zelenskyy, a Jew! Moreover, how could three elections be held in the fascist country of Ukraine, and three dictators at that, is sheer nonsense. Hitler, if he could, would have turned over in his grave three times. What kind of popular elections can we even talk about under a fascist regime, especially with a succession of dictators?! And Putin's regime is a case in point. In short, the world-famous liar Putin has outdone himself by calling Ukraine a Nazi country that needs to be denazified. And if we consider Putin's historical ingenuity, which claims that Ukrainians and Russians are one and the same people, then his plan for denazification—the destruction of the Ukrainian nation—is understandable. In other words, it's called genocide.

 

As for demilitarization, Putin lied as usual. It's well known that before Russia's attack on Ukraine, Ukraine handed over all its nuclear weapons to Russia and sold the rest of its military equipment to anyone. One would have to be crazy to believe Ukraine is being militarized. As a result of this reckless attitude toward armaments, and especially the belief in Moscow's assurances of non-aggression (the Budapest Memorandum), Ukraine became desperately in need of them after Russia's invasion. It's good that the West, after much hesitation, finally realized that Ukraine was essentially confronting a resurgent Nazism in Russia—the archenemy of Democracy (1, 2, 3)—and decided to arm Ukraine's courageous soldiers. The high motivation of the Ukrainian soldier, combined with Western weapons, transformed the situation on the front. Having withstood the initial onslaught of the fascist invaders and routed them near Kyiv and then Kharkiv, the Ukrainians shifted from defense to expelling the enemy from their homeland. Putin is no longer talking about the denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine; the goal of the war he has waged has changed for him personally, for defeat threatens the Führer of the Russian version not only with the loss of power and thefts, but also with a tribunal, followed by the inevitable collapse of his beloved Empire of Evil and Lies. (4)

 

Returning to the question of Russian motivations in the war with Ukraine, it is well illustrated by the horde of conscription-age Russians fleeing Russia and the raids on them carried out by Putin's security forces. Why should they die in a foreign country? For the palaces and yachts of Putin and his thieving henchmen, who have hired lying propagandists to deceive the people.

 

1. Who are these Rashists? https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/83536.html

2. Great Russian chauvinism, and Putin its Führer

     https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21133.html

3. Hitler's Specter Haunts Europe. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/38049.html

4. The Evil Empire – The Empire of Lies. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/87696.html

 

October 26, 2022

суббота, 29 августа 2026 г.

Готовы ли русские умереть за Украину?

 

Алик Бахши

Готовы ли русские умереть за Украину?

 

Хайль Путин: кроме жить прошлым, россияне ничего не умеют

   

   Несмотря на колоссальное превосходство как в количественном так и техническом оснащении армии, Россия проигрывает в войне с Украиной. Причину неудач прежде всего надо искать в мотивации солдат. Аналогичная ситуация была и в Афганской войне, которую Россия с позором проиграла. Украинцы воюет прежде всего за свою землю, за то, чтобы жить на ней так, как им хочется, говорить на родном языке и быть свободным от диктата России, которая почему-то решила распоряжаться их судьбой, не имея на то никаких прав. И за это украинцы готовы отдать жизнь. Невольно вспоминается знаменитая фраза Мустафы Кемаля (Ататюрк), руководившего в самом кровавом сражении Первой мировой войны при Галлиполи, - «Я не приказываю вам победить, я приказываю вам умереть», и 74 635 турецких солдат выполнили приказ, одержав в этой битве победу.

 

   За что же воюет русский солдат, на украинской земле, и готов ли он отдать жизнь за победу? По плану кровавого диктатора Путина он заслан в чужую страну для денацификации и демилитаризации Украины. Так на каком же основании Путин решил, что в Украине власть в руках нацистов, которые в соответствие с нацистской идеологией проводят милитаризацию с целью нападения на Россию. По утверждению Путина в результате мятежа 2013 года, власть в Украине захватили украинские фашисты, когда временно исполняющим президентскую власть после убежавшего президента Януковича был избран, как надо понимать нацист, Александр Турчинов. Но вот далее происходят странные не свойственные для фашистского режима события. Через пол года в результате всенародных выборов президентом Украины становится Пётр Порошенко, который тоже был не иначе как нацистом, если именно при нем был принят закон об украинском языке, который получил статус государственного, что вызвало у Путина ярость и негодование. Однако, точно такой же статус в России и русского языка, ведь в соответствии с Конституцией Российской Федерации и законом «О государственном языке Российской Федерации» (2005), на всей территории страны государственным является русский язык, причем это в многонациональной стране, каковой является Россия. Тогда в соответствие с логикой Путина и в России у власти нацисты.

    Однако, продолжим об украинских странностях: после окончания президентского срока Порошенко, в соответствие с Конституцией Украины в результате опять таки всенародных выборов президентом страны становится Владимир Зеленский, который по мнения Путина ещё больший фашист, чем Порошенко. И это пожизненный диктатор России говорит о еврее Зеленском! Более того, как могло случиться, чтобы в фашистской стране Украине могли трижды происходить выборы, да ещё трёх диктаторов, это уже запредельный нонсенс. Гитлер, если бы мог, трижды перевернулся в гробу. О каких всенародных выборах может идти речь в условиях фашистского режима, да ещё со сменой диктаторов?! И пример тому режим Путина. Короче, известный мировой лжец Путин превзошел сам себя, назвав Украину нацистской страной, которую необходимо денацифицировать. А, если принять во внимание, исторические изыски Путина в том, что украинцы и русские это один народ, то понятен его план по денацификации, то, есть уничтожения украинской нации, другими словами это называется геноцидом.

 

    Что же касается демилитаризации, то тут Путин как обычно соврал. Известно, до нападения России на Украину, Украина передала всё имеющееся у неё атомное оружие России, а остальную военную технику продавала кому ни попадя. Надо быть безумцем, чтобы поверить в  милитаризацию Украины. Как результат такого безрассудного отношения к вооружению, а более, вере в заверения Москвы о гарантии ненападения (Будапештский меморандум), Украина  стала остро нуждаться в нём после вторжения России. Хорошо, что Запад после долгих колебаний в конце концов понял, что Украина по сути противостоит возродившемуся в России нацизму, - злейшему врагу Демократии (1,2,3)  и решился дать вооружение мужественным солдатам Украины. Высокая мотивация украинского солдата в сочетании с западным оружием изменили обстановку на фронте. Выдержав первый натиск фашистких захватчиков и, разгромив их под Киевом, а затем Харьковом, украинцы перешли от обороны к изгнанию врага с родной земли. Путин уже молчит о денацификации и демилитаризации Украины, цель, затеянной им войны лично для него изменилась, ибо поражение грозит фюреру русской версии не только потерей власти и наворованного, но и трибуналом, с последующим неминуемым распадом любимой им Империи Зла и Лжи. (4)

 

     Возвращаясь к вопросу мотивации русских в войне с Украиной, то он хорошо иллюстрируется ордой россиян призывного возраста, покидающих пределы России и облавами на них, устраиваемые путинскими силовиками.  За что они должны умирать в чужой стране? За дворцы и яхты Путина и его воров-приспешников, нанявших лживых пропагандистов для одурманивания народа.

 

1.  Кто они рашисты?  https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/83536.html

2.  Великорусский шовинизм, и Путин его фюрер.

      https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21133.html  

3.  Призрак Гитлера бродит по Европе.  https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/38049.html


4.  Империя Зла – Империя Лжи. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/87696.html

 

 

   26.10.2022

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

An Unanswered Question

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

An Unanswered Question

 

Description: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/rVO1BNc5558/maxresdefault.jpg

 

Due to my diligent efforts to find an instance where President Putin had told the truth, I posed the question on my Proza.ru blog, LiveJournal, and on Russian-language forums, "I would be grateful if anyone could provide even one example of Putin telling the truth." (1) To my surprise, there was no affirmative answer. The reaction of the Proza.ru moderator to this innocent question was particularly telling. The thread immediately disappeared, replaced by the message "Work not displayed." (2) After some time, apparently realizing that he was thereby revealing the lack of truth in Putin's words, the moderator reinstated my question. However, no one who read the question found an example where Putin had told the truth. After that, the moderator was finally forced to close the thread to avoid being labeled an extremist under the new legislation and facing prison.

Thus, the lack of an answer leads to an unambiguous conclusion: Putin is a liar, which once again confirmed my long-standing definition of Putin as a liar. (3)

 

1. Who can answer a simple question? https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/66404.html

2. Who can answer a simple question? https://proza.ru/2021/05/22/140

3. The Empire of Lies and its Chief Liar. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/22317.html

 

May 28, 2021

War Instead of Elections

 

Alik Bakhshi

  With this article, I predicted a year and a half ago that Russia would inevitably attack Ukraine in 2022.

 

War Instead of Elections

                                              https://img.pravda.com/images/doc/3/b/3b2a510-pu-i-lu.jpg 

Беларусь и Россия готовят совместные военные учения в марте - портал  новостей LB.ua

 

In anticipation of the upcoming elections, Putin organized massive military exercises along the entire perimeter of the Ukrainian border, including the Belarusian-Ukrainian one. Fully aware of the potential defeat of his party in the elections and taking into account his declining popularity among the people, the security officer could easily interrupt the elections by starting a war with Ukraine. It seems the two dictators have decided that war is the surest way to maintain their power. Putin certainly doesn't want a repeat of the Belarusian election failure in Russia, and in such a case, there's nothing better than war.

 

Furthermore, war would finally complete the plan, begun in 2014, to return Ukraine to the Russian Empire and resolve the Transnistria issue. Even if he fails to seize all of Ukraine, Putin will try to open a corridor to Moldova by capturing Odessa, cutting Ukraine off from the Black Sea entirely.

 

Due to legislative and democratic procedures, the West will not be able to immediately agree on a joint response to this brazen invasion. The advantages of totalitarian rule over democracy will be evident. However, in the long term, Russia's defeat is inevitable; the only pity is that many people will fall victim to Putin's gamble.

 

September 15, 2021

The nation-forming people and their Führer, or Ukraine and so on down the list

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

The nation-forming people and their Führer,

or Ukraine and so on down the list

 

 

Explanation: "nation-forming people" is a fortunate linguistic find for a federal state, so that there is no doubt who is the most important among the numerous peoples of the Russian Empire.

 

Finally, the Russian people have found a Führer who fully corresponds to their mentality and who is capable of restoring confidence in the future to the Russian Empire and its nation-forming people.

 

 

I considered writing "leader" instead of "Führer"; the words are foreign anyway, but "Führer" is somehow stronger in spirit, which is important for this historical moment. The fact is that after the defeat in the Afghan War and the subsequent collapse of the USSR, the Russian people became somewhat lost as a result of the democratic reforms undertaken by the government (1). A pathological inability to organize and govern, a lack of initiative in political and economic activity, under the open plunder of the country by oligarchs, naturally non-Russian, led the Russian people to impoverishment and, as a consequence, the final collapse of the Russian Empire (2). Considering that the Russian people can only exist within an empire, the collapse of the empire would have threatened the very existence of the Russian people. This would likely have happened if not for the great stroke of luck when the oligarchs Berezovsky and Gusinsky made a grave mistake in finding in Putin a replacement for the utterly degenerate Yeltsin. I would like to point out that because of their mistake, the oligarchs had to flee, and Berezovsky never forgave himself for such a blunder and, in grief, hanged himself in a toilet. As the saying goes, even an old woman can make a mistake.

 

Putin's slogan, "Back to the Empire," reflects great power status as the spiritual essence of the nation-forming people and its eternal, literally painful, desire to be a "protector" of other peoples, who, one after another, have voluntarily expressed a desire to be the younger brothers of the nation-forming people. Perhaps this explains the fact that Russians are constantly searching for goodness and justice, precisely what they chronically lack. In this regard, President Putin aptly captures the well-known saying, "Every nation has the government it deserves." And the Russian people deserve sovereign democracy under the sovereign Putin—that's how President Putin defined his status in the Russian Empire. I think he was being a bit modest here; in an empire, the proper status is that of an emperor. Incidentally, it's no coincidence that coins bearing the profile of Emperor Putin have appeared. During the reign of the Tsar-father, and then under Soviet rule, the constituent peoples of the state settled in Ukraine, Crimea, the Urals, Siberia, the Caucasus, Central Asia, Transnistria, the Baltics, Karelia, and so on down the list, if I've missed anything. Moreover, it sometimes happened that before this, to avoid any misunderstandings, certain peoples—such as the Poles, Lithuanians, Latvians, Estonians, Crimean Tatars, Circassians (who almost disappeared), Chechens, and so on—were resettled in more "favorable" climates. The only exception, either through forgetfulness or thanks to the long-serving Kremlin ruler Mikoyan, were the Armenians. But I dare say the reason for this is mentality. Armenians prefer to leave Armenia, which is catastrophically depopulating, and settle in resort areas along the Black Sea coast and the North Caucasus, in the hospitable lands of Kuban and Ukraine. After the collapse of the USSR, Armenians appeared in large numbers in California. Thus, there was no need for the nation-forming people to settle in Armenia in order to expel Armenians. A kind of Armenian cunning. It must be said that the Armenians are associated with an act that is astonishing for a totalitarian state like the former Soviet Union, a kind of nonsense: ethnic cleansing—the expulsion of the Azerbaijani population from Armenia and the creation of homeless refugees, followed by the provocation in Sumgait and the seizure, with the military support of the nation-forming people, of 20% of the territory of neighboring Azerbaijan. Armenia, unlike other fraternal republics in the USSR, became the only mono-ethnic republic, and one that even annexed part of the territory of a neighboring republic. Armenia today is Russia's only strategic ally of all the breakaway republics (3).

 

As I said, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the nation-forming people became somewhat lost, but, thanks to the fatal mistake of the oligarchs, they were found again and, under the leadership of the Fuhrer, they once again began to determine, as is proper for the nation-forming people according to their status.

 

So it was decided: Tajiks would be the janitors, probably because Russian house servants are usually drunk after dinner. Incidentally, even in Tsarist times, janitors were usually Tatars for the same reason, while taxi drivers were usually Caucasians—they don't drink before leaving for work. Uzbeks were entrusted with construction and vegetable gardening. Restaurant workers were to be specially imported Serbs—they weren't pushy. Bankers were to be Jews and Armenians by default.

All would have been fine, if not for the fact that the Russian people, apparently due to their mentality, began to dominate not only their own country but also neighboring Ukraine, where they have lived since the time of Hetman Khmelnytsky, who voluntarily reunited Ukraine with Russia. Since then, the percentage of the Russian population living in Ukraine has steadily increased, fueled by the settlement of Russians in the southeastern part of Ukraine, which had been particularly depopulated as a result of the Holodomor orchestrated by Moscow. In Crimea, for example, the entire indigenous population was evicted and replaced by a state-forming people. And so today, under the leadership of Führer Putin, the gatherer of Russian lands (wherever the state-forming people reside), Ukraine is faced with a dilemma: either voluntarily renounce Crimea and the southeastern territories, or face war, as a result of which the Ukrainian people as a whole risk becoming a "fraternal" people once again. The same fate, apparently, awaits other countries where Russians live, and Russians live in many countries.

 

Alone among others, Russians are, for the most part, quite pleasant people, especially the intelligentsia. True, in numbers equal to three, some imbalance can be observed, but in a certain number, a kind of critical mass, one can expect, as the events in Ukraine demonstrate, something akin to a chain reaction, whereby the Russian people instantly transition to the status of a state-forming people, threatening the world with a nuclear chain reaction.

 

It would be useful to identify a pattern in which such a threat is possible in a given country, depending on the percentage of the state-forming people living there. A kind of mathematical constant, upon reaching which the local population could lose its state:

 

k = R/P

where R is the minimum number of Russians settling there for self-determination, and P is the size of the local population. Knowing this constant, one can always calculate in which country one would expect Russians to form their own state, depending on the resident Russian population.

 

So: R = kP

It must be assumed that each people has its own value for this constant.

 

I propose naming k, following the example of "Planck's constant," "Putin's constant," in honor of the man who first successfully demonstrated the validity of this formula. Admittedly, Hitler came very close to discovering it before him, if we recall the annexation of the Sudetenland, but his experiment was unsuccessful. I can only assume that although Putin and Hitler are both Führers of their respective nations, there is a very significant difference between them: Putin and the Russian people are inseparable. Unlike Hitler, Putin did not have to create a party; his party is the entire Russian people, boundlessly grateful to him for the return of the empire, without which the nation-forming nation has no future.

 

The German people rejected Hitler and the propaganda and punitive methods of fascist ideology imposed on them, while the Russian people, with their inherent Great Russian chauvinism, are hardly ready to reject Führer Putin, who so remarkably successfully reflects the hopes and aspirations of his people.

 

Once again I am convinced that at the most difficult historical moment, a strong personality emerges within the nation, capable of averting disaster. Thus, after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the subsequent threat of the Turkish people losing their own country, Mustafa Kamal (Atatürk) emerged—a leader whom the people completely trusted and followed into the future. Today, we know Turkey as a democratic and economically developing country, whose policies show no sign of returning to the past. To say that this is solely the work of Atatürk would be inaccurate; it also belongs to the Turkish people, who were forced to make self-sacrifice to defend their homeland in a brutal struggle against numerous enemies, and who also found the strength to renounce much that connected them to the past.

 

Putin is certainly a sought-after figure for the Russian people, but, unfortunately, he is leading them back to empire, which poses a potential threat to the countries where the nation-forming people live.

 

1. "The People's Destiny, or Every Cricket in Its Own Place" http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/4732.html

2. "When the Donkey Dies" http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/3702.html

3. "Armenia and the Moscow-Tehran Axis" http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/1347.html

 

April 25, 2014

Putin, a coward and a villain

 

Alik Bakhshi

Putin, a coward and a villain

 

 

Putin is like a maniac in his revenge against all enemies of his empire. This time, an assassin sent by him shot and killed Zelimkhan Khangoshvili, a Georgian citizen, in central Berlin. He was fighting on the side of the Republic of Ichkeria against the Russian army. The German government suspects that, as with the Skripal case in the UK (1), this was a contract killing. The killer fired two shots to the back and one to the head, then attempted to escape but was caught. He turned out to be a 49-year-old Russian citizen. The victim's brother, Zurab, said that FSB officers had attacked Zelimkhan twice before in Georgia, but that time he escaped with only a wound. The Georgian authorities did not take the investigation seriously, forcing Zelimkhan to flee to Germany. However, the maniac Putin nevertheless carried out his vengeful plan, following through on his promise to "kill" the Chechens who dared to liberate their homeland from colonial dependence. (2)

 

Behind the walls of the Kremlin lurks a true criminal, using terrorist methods to eliminate those he dislikes. For him, neither international borders, nor established international order, nor signed treaties or obligations exist—he is Satan in human form. It's no wonder the Yakut shaman Gabyshev launched a campaign against Moscow to exorcise the demon from the Kremlin. Putin was so terrified by the prospect of the shaman appearing on Red Square that he hastily dispatched a detachment of 40 armed oprichniki to Buryatia to apprehend the daredevil. What sane leader would fear a peaceful, unarmed, lone beggar who dreams of depriving him of power through prayer? It seems Putin truly is Satan, if he fears a man of God.

However, another possibility is possible: Putin, in deciding the fate of the shaman Gabyshev, wants to immortalize himself by repeating the famous act of Pontius Pilate, who executed the man who said that among human vices, one of the most important is cowardice. Only a coward could act as Putin did.

 

1. Empire of Lies, or How the Skripals Broke Putin's Principles. https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/08/the-empire-of-lies-or-how-skripals.html

2. Chechnya and the Road to Power, or the Revival of an Empire According to Putin.  https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/04/chechnya-and-road-to-power-or-revival.html

 

September 25, 2019