The Constitution as the President's Guarantor

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

The Constitution as the President's Guarantor

 

 

 

 

As is well known, the constitution is the fundamental law of the state. A democratic constitution provides for the principle of separation of powers: legislative, executive, and judicial. A constitution is adopted by referendum once and for all; otherwise, it loses its significance as the highest legal force. Thus, the US Constitution was adopted in 1787 and remained essentially unchanged, taking into account 10 important amendments introduced in the first four years. The remaining 17 amendments, including minor ones such as Prohibition and the amendment repealing it, essentially did not change the political structure of the state.

 

The last constitution in Russia was adopted in 1993 and has been amended repeatedly at the instigation of President Putin, the guarantor of the constitution, as he proudly called himself. Following each of Putin's promises to treat the constitution as sacred, amendments were introduced to the organization of the executive branch. While the amendments to the American Constitution promoted democracy, in Russia, all the amendments are nothing more than sheer chicanery, negating the very meaning of the constitution as such.

 

As a result of these changes, a metamorphosis has occurred: no longer is the president the guarantor of the constitution, but the constitution has become the guarantor of the president, that is, Putin. While in mathematics, rearranging the terms doesn't change the sum, in our case, rearranging who is whose guarantor fundamentally alters the final meaning. In reality, we are witnessing the emergence of an absolute monarchy, where parliament is a lapdog on a leash. And it's best not to even discuss the judiciary and appointed governors.

 

In fact, such a constitutional change was to be expected, given Putin's definition of democracy in Russia as a sovereign democracy, which should be understood as nothing less than democracy for the sovereign (1). This definition of democracy is fully illustrated by the general political situation in Russia, which would be rash to call a democratic country. There is no democratic country in the world where a president can remain unchallenged for more than 20 years! This is nonsense, but not for Russia, with its servile people, who therefore do not understand and reject democracy (2, 3).

 

1. A sovereign for a sovereign democracy.

   https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/sovereign-for-sovereign-democracy.html

2. Democracy is contraindicated for an empire

   https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/08/empire-democracy-is-contraindicated.html

3. The people's destiny, or to each cricket his own hearth.

 https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/the-peoples-fate-or-to-each-cricket-         his_01010016616.html

 

27.01. 2020

The people's fate or to each cricket his own hearth

 

Alik Bahshi

The people's fate or to each cricket his own hearth

         Everyone is different and distinct from each other, not only visually, but also features an individual thinking and behavior. Each man has his own destiny, and attempts to change it is hopeless, because change itself, not as a person. A similar observation can be transferred to people. Inherent to every nation on the common features is not very difficult to recognize the typical representatives of different nations. Just as we can give a description of an individual, and can be characterized by a whole people. Every nation has the genotype, that is, hereditary characteristics, which are likely the people can identify and which determine its historical destiny. Thanks genes we have such a variety of people and as a result states. From this we can conclude that it is the people as a group of people united not only by a common historical past, but also a common future, that is destiny. Thus determine the fate of hereditary characteristics from which no getting around it, which once again points to the validity of the famous wise saying "can not escape the fate", and most importantly in our case, this is true for all the people in general, not just for the individual.

      The question is, why Peter touts Germans in Russia? Because he realized that only the Germans (not French and Italians) can teach Russian law, and the management work that only they can rely on it to his intended reorganization of the state reformatory. In the former Soviet Union can be found German villages, which contrast with the beauty, neatness and order. Even when you are not in their homeland, people do not leave their habits and lifestyles. If they say that, in cases Englishman can usually rely on the word, it goes without conclusion is that, when dealing with someone else, you should not rely solely on words. Gypsies love liberty, but hard work is a burden to them. Russian differ in their .... However, it is better not to detail these differences, because both positive and negative traits can be found in every nation. We note only that, however, such as the Arabs did not want to, they cannot be like the Scandinavians and is not that important external difference as a difference in mentality.

You can spend a mental experiment. If the German, Russian and Hebrew, along with their families to land on a desert island and visit them, that way, in ten years, in what condition we find them? It seems most likely the following simplified picture. The German - solid house with a garden and a strong economy. Russian lives in a mud hut, and rotten to the Germans, and a Jew is mediating between them, say, to buy vodka at the German and Russian markets. Or let's say, what if all the Swiss move to Mexico and Mexicans in Switzerland. How do you think, what would be in this case, well-groomed, and how rich Switzerland transformed Mexico. Probably not hard to imagine what would happen to Germany and Russia, if we make the cross-migration of peoples. No climatic or geographical conditions do not change the character of the people. Why did the Japanese live richer Vietnamese or Russian? Because they are the Japanese and the other explanation is needed. Give Roma land, give them the opportunity to live and handle it, alas, the next day you're gypsies in the land will not find. A similar case is unnatural for Roma, they have a different way of being, however, is not for them alone. Impoverished after the war, do not have any natural resources, Japan and Germany, but by the willingness and ability of their people to work much more than that, what country is Russia. Finland, a former colony of Russia, not a rich mineral resource, with severe climatic conditions far ahead of Russia in terms of life and an explanation of this one, there lived Finns. There is no other explanation. Quite the opposite result, we will have, if hypothetically settle in this territory Russian. I do not for a moment doubt that if the Russian succeeded in 1940 again returned to Finland in the empire, then the standard of living adequate for today's Russia there. So, the Finns knew why they needed freedom and valued this essential condition for a people who knew how to work and wanted to control their own destiny. An empire could not break this will to freedom.

.

There are no racist or nationalist ideas, I do not pursue, just stating the fact that every nation has its own character and therefore his fate. It would be sheer folly to assert the superiority of one nation over another on the basis that they are at different stages of social development. Yes Englishman richer gypsy, he has his own house, his own country, the Falkland Islands, in the end, there was nothing like a gypsy, but he did not have to, because he belongs to the whole world. Summarizing, we can say that's what people probably unknowingly, and according to their own way, people's mentality is an addiction, and it has. You can realize many of the social phenomena associated with a particular people, and according to its historical destiny.

Unless the person who has musical talent and love music trying to make a talented mathematician, it is unlikely to come out of this venture is something worthwhile. Beginning with Peter the Great Russian people literally pull the ears in Europe, but the distance is not at all close. The latest venture, connected with the introduction of Western-style democracy, has been rejected by Russia, just as all previous ones were alien to the Russian spirit of innovation. Since the days of Rurik Russian used to be ruled and desirable by people because they themselves are useless organizers.
Russia has reached the highest dawn of Catherine the Great, which is two words, then in Russian could not connect. In Russia оblomovism  this phenomenon, not a special case. Who made up the backbone of the Bolsheviks, led by Lenin? Whether there was a lot of Russian? Do not want to be like Russian nationalists, accused of all misfortunes of the Jews. But on the other hand, where you were Russian businessmen, when for example, given the freedom of economic activities after the collapse of the communist ideology. Why were people oligarchs, well, non-Russian nationality? And again, there's no guilt Russian. The fact that the Russian see other value for money than the Jews or Germans. The value of money for the Russian people, is to have fun. From classical Russian literature: Russian aristocrat could dissipate money, drink, and not as I do not spend for useful work. For a Jew money are valuable in themselves, and are a means to enlarge the scheme: money - (mediation, foreign exchange) is money - in other words, the money put into circulation, to make money. The desire to have money in preference to any other property, whether land, factory, farm, make the Jews mobile. They like the Roma, who appreciate the absolute freedom and gold, are not tied to one place and can migrate to any vending their country. A good example is the mass migration of Jews associated with the collapse of Communism and the collapse of the USSR, and preference was given to America and the rich countries of Western Europe, mainly Germany, despite the Holocaust, and not problematic for Israel. But not always for the money can buy everything. For example, there was a famine, no one will sell you bread. And then, the money can be taken away, the one who made the money gun. No wonder the prophet Moses warned his tribe from the worship of the Golden Calf. Unfortunately, either then or later, that charge is left without proper obedience. The people who can not feed himself, will always depend, - gold not grow corn. And in order to grow grain, we need not only his own land, but also their sweat. Germans see the money means for production, that is, they do not appreciate the money as such, but a product that can be made on the money (according to the scheme: product - money - product). Therefore, banks have been the Rothschilds, and the means of production from the croup. The Russian is no such cycle (money - fun - ...). Of course, this is a very rough and simplified scheme to caricature.

In post-communist Russia bankers, traders Tipster emerged mainly from the Jews not to leave the country, but the major manufacturers have not appeared. Though again shills in the country of the Germans. Group of oligarchs that emerged under Yeltsin, the authorities take this free enterprise and using the lack of initiative of the Russian population, achieves a significant impact, both in financial and political spheres. Yeltsin, who regarded himself as the guarantor of the Constitution, which in Russia has always been a dead letter, in fact, is the guarantor of the financial well-being of the oligarchs. It was under Yeltsin symbiosis of power and money reaches its highest peak. The new government, which replaced the communists, provided an opportunity for easy dressing, so instantly corruption permeates all echelons. Money and power gain in the circumstances, Russia unlimited possibilities. For the money, the oligarchs bought parliamentary seats in the State Duma and government posts. Berezovsky is the richest man in Russia with Israeli citizenship, became secretary of the Security Council. Though later, already, as secretary, Berezovsky rejects Israeli citizenship, but this fact only underlines the uniqueness of the situation. Can you imagine a similar post in Israel occupied people, an ethnic Russian, and even with Russian citizenship. In Putin as in traditional executive officer KGB oligarchs saw limp puppet, which will allow them to further enrichment by the sale of the country's natural resources without creating manufacturing enterprises. This trend in the economy could put Russia in a position of countries that are resource fringes of the West and Japan. Russia from the former dictatorship "of the proletariat" could turn into a country of the dictatorship of the oligarchs. (By the way, America is wary of Russian oligarchs close some of them to enter.) This outcome was favorable pathologic complete political uninitiated Russian people. New rich did not associate their future with Russia. First of all, they saw it as a country. They are all pre-produced rear in Israel and in other countries, taking out there as much as possible their capital. Russia is for them only a means of enrichment. However, Putin's time they did not see the other side of his nature. As a true security officer, he managed to hide his ambitious future intentions, mixed with strong patriotism. Then the oligarchs did not foresee the danger to their financial empire is Putin. On the other hand violence against the oligarchs prevented spontaneous pogroms, which inevitably would occur, with further economic stratification of society, when one of the causes of such a bundle is readily apparent national factor.

It is worth noting that the fight against oligarchs Putin and his anti-democratic politics, was a lightning rod of an approaching storm in the form of the growth of a large number of various nationalist and clearly pro-fascist parties and organizations in Russia.

The victory of democracy turned around for the Russian people to complete impoverishment and ultimate collapse of the Russian Empire. Can I like the Russian people to pay for their freedom? Do all the freedom, the people who carries a gene Abramovich? Only a dictatorship for society, who does not want to engage in any political or economic problems. So the rise of Putin is not accidental, but fatal for the Russian people.

The collapse of the communist ideology has put the Russian people in a dilemma of choosing between freedom and dictatorship, and the people decided not to tempt fate and chose tradition, according to the mentality, the last. The unpopularity of democratic ideas in the Russian environment is reflected in the composition of the national leaders of the Democrats. Moreover, unjustifiably high political ambitions of everyone, Yavlinsky, Nemtsov and Hakamada, ripped, in the end, the balloon of their verbiage.

Russian people prefer the Little Father in the face of Putin, the man did not take place in any party, which is a simple, international, without any ambiguity, vowed to strangle the vermin (ie Chechnya), fighters (ie Chechens), wet in the toilet, and all the other Western guardians of democracy to get circumcised. Do you think it was possible after such a clear and concise policy speech to select a presidential some busybody Democrat willing to distribute empire infidels. Magnificent triumph in the presence of priests and high officials of the state on the occasion of Putin as president more like a coronation to the throne than the taking of the oath.

 

Putin came not so much a revival of the empire, and how many, continued her agony that is dangerous to the world, even more so when one sixth part again, apparently installed a totalitarian regime.

In the incident, of course, wine young democrats Russian who had to take into account the mentality of the Russian people during the market reforms in the economy and not to go to a situation appears oligarchs. Young democrats  naively believed that enough to deprive the communist government, the people gladly take advantage of being given the opportunity for free political and economic activity, by which Russia is sure to reach the standard of living of the world's leading powers. But in reality, trying to taste democracy, the Russian people, in fact, rejected it as not acceptable for domestic use

21.04.04
_____________

I want to say a few words about the "Other Russia", a new party - a new attempt talkers Democrats, led by American paratroopers emerged from Garry Kasparov, Russian fool and seize power. He decided to checkmate the Russian people outside the chess board. True to the role of first violin there like Kasyanov claimed, but "The Other Russia" is not the Russian party. Even if we assume that they will be able to buy the Russian voters, they are still not good for Russia will not do (you can not change people's character and his destiny), and only an even stronger robbery happen, because they, unlike Putin, all currency will place on foreign banks, and the Russian people do not get it. Russian people for himself nothing of democracy will not win, because, I repeat, democracy requires the active participation of people in politics and the economy, that is, what is not traditional in the Russian people. It is this fact, and it is tempting for people like Kasparov (Weinstein), why not use the political passivity of the people and enter into power in pursuit of personal interests. Thought, why Kasparov-Vanshtein not try to Armenia or Israel, but there it is reaching out to Russia, where it is possible to use passive people. The closer the elections in Russia, the more active of the natives of the "Other Russia" for self-promotion. Truly greed for power and money overthrew former players - the new leader of talkers Democrats.

 

 

 

 

" Turkish Party" to "Grand Chessboard", middlegame

 

Alik Bakhshi

" Turkish Party" to "Grand Chessboard",

middlegame

 

   Thus, the "Turkish Party" played out Tayyip Erdogan (http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/10334.html), crept to the middlegame. As befits in the middlegame, designated the main strategic objectives. However, there is nothing new - traditionally, if you take into account the historical fact that, of all wars, the given Russia the largest number of accounts for Turkey, then again the main Russian political plans tied to the Turkish area. It is important to note that the Russian empire against Turkey has always supported the aggressor. Nothing has changed during the stay of the Soviet Union. So during the Second World War, namely in November 1940, when conducted difficult negotiations with Hitler to join the Soviet Union in the Pact axis (Germany, Italy, Japan), Stalin gave consent, but on the condition that Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey will enter in the sphere of interests of the Kremlin. However, later, Stalin somewhat retreated in their demands and asked to give to the slaughter Soviet Union only Bulgaria and Turkey, but it was too late, Hitler had already begun to develop "Barbarossa" plan (see "Fatal mistakes of Stalin, who saved the world» (http:. / /samlib.ru/editors/b/bahshi_a/alikbahshi-34.shtml).

    The German invasion of the USSR temporarily pushed territorial claims to Turkey, but Stalin was persistent and repeatedly raised the "Turkish question" at the Tehran Conference in 1943 and in 1944 during negotiations with Churchill in Moscow. After the war, in June 1945 the Turkish ambassador in Moscow issued an ultimatum was asked to sign a friendship treaty, which provided for the construction of Soviet naval bases in the Straits of Bosporus and Dardanelles, and the transfer of large parts of the eastern part of Turkey. http://cont.ws/post/107632

 

 

   Stalin considered control over the Black Sea straits primary geopolitical challenge, so the summer of 1945 at the insistence of the Soviet delegation, "Turkish question" was included in the agenda of the Potsdam Conference. Then, Truman and Churchill unanimously rejected the blatant, in fact, Moscow's territorial claims. But Stalin did not reckon with their opinion and continued the policy of pressure on Turkey. He could not come to terms with the fact that all along the Soviet border from the Baltic to the Black Sea, Turkey was the only country not fallen into Moscow's sphere of influence. Stalin thought that this was the opportune moment to take advantage of the friendly allied relations with the United States and Great Britain, as well as the increased power of the post-war Soviet Union, to finally carry out long-held dream to capture the Russian Black Sea straits. This caused a sobering Western politicians, there is the famous "Long Telegram" of the American Ambassador in Moscow John. Kennan of 22 February 1946, in which he warns Washington about the expansionist ambitions of Moscow and advises refers to the Soviet Union, not as an ally but as an enemy. The final rejection of the blind policy of Roosevelt, Stalin fully trust and skeptical about the constant warnings of Churchill accomplished after the famous prophetic Churchill's Fulton speech March 5, 1946. Churchill said directly that Soviet Russia "wants to disrupt the fruits of victory, and completely using its power to publicize its doctrine." There he said: "Turkey and Persia are deeply concerned and are concerned about the claims made on them, and the pressures to which they are subjected by the government of Moscow." http://www.coldwar.ru/churchill/fulton.php

     

    Immensely postwar Moscow's demands in the territorial acquisitions, besides those already acquired during the war (Tyva, Prussia, a significant part of eastern Poland, southern Sakhalin, the Kuril Islands), - another fatal mistake of Stalin.

    

    The threat of the loss of sovereignty and territorial integrity was the cause of Turkey's accession to NATO, which protect the country against the encroachments of the Soviet Union and its successor no less aggressive today Putin's Russia, which invaded Syria under the pretext of fighting Islamic terrorism and with the caveat "We in Syria do not do the decision of any special tasks in addition to the declared (fight against terrorism), where we protect our national interests "- Munich speech Medvedev (http://www.rbc.ru/politics/13/02/2016/56bf31bd9a79475a1fcea255).

     

     As for the protection of national interests Medvedev is absolutely right. The fact that in the Russian Empire, many colonial peoples are Muslims, and it is possible that they do not follow the Chechen scenario. In this case, Moscow under the pretext of the fight against Islamic terrorists will ruthlessly suppress the aspiration of peoples to freedom, as has happened in Chechnya. Raising the fight against international Islamic terrorism to the rank of top priority, interested parties themselves use terrorism for all-out war of terror decisions purely political purposes. In fact, international terrorism slot is located behind the walls of the Kremlin (1). That inmate security officer Putin, the Kremlin's treacherous terrorist plans are developed, such as a series of undermining buildings in Moscow and Volgodonsk, in order to pass off as terrorist acts by Chechen fighters to the second Chechen war, leaning all the power of a huge empire of the paucity of the Chechen people. Return rebellious people, or rather, what remains of it, in the bosom of the empire and the triumph to come to the presidential election was the primary task of Putin. It Kremlin revanchist responsible for the attack on Georgia and Ukraine, annexing part of the territory of these countries. By freezing the war with Ukraine, Putin gets involved in Middle Eastern affairs, where in addition to the fight against Islamic terrorists, he is going to protect the interests of Russia and more, as it follows from the Munich speech Medvedev.

 

     What are the specific interests of Russia, Putin has found in Syria? If the war with Georgia and Ukraine can be explained by the desire of Putin to restore the empire in the borders of the Soviet Union, the collapse of which he regrets, that of military invasion Russia to Syria, in my opinion, hiding some other, deeper political reasons, rather than just the intention to help the dictator Assad in his struggle with the opposition and the Islamists of LIH. It was not in vain Medvedev uttered the phrase about the presence of Russian interests in the vinaigrette Syrian problems. I think that the Syrian crisis has turned up, as well as possible, by the way, to fish in troubled waters.

 

     I must say the political situation in Syria is very complicated indeed. In the civil war in Syria will be typed almost a dozen warring parties differing political and ethnic lines. Of these, the principal, clearly identify possible supporters of Assad (Arab Alawites), secular opposition (Arabs, Turkmens), Kurds, Islamists (LIH) and Turkmen (same Turks).

    

    The beginning of the crisis put come down, finally, and to Syria's "Arab Spring". Dictator Assad appeared the opposition, demanding democratic reforms. The dictator acted in a dictatorial, - instead of dialogue rather harshly crack down on political opponents, which is nothing to do but to take up arms. The country began a civil war, against which, due to the weakening of the central government, there was a tendency of separatism among the Kurds, compactly living in the north-east and therefore in Turks living in the north-western part of Syria. Ethnic bomb was planted by the British and the French after World War I when redrawing the boundaries of the defunct Ottoman Empire, not really ignoring the ethnic composition of the population living there. The main principle that guided the winners was "Delhi and conquer." Unprecedented active Western interference in the Middle East region, begun by amateur W. Bush policy and continuing to this day, people made life unbearable in the region. Hence, the problem of refugees, a million streams rushed to their founders, responsible in the past for the bloody era of the Crusades, two world wars and now a new intervention in the Middle East region. Is it so difficult to understand that democracy can not bring on the bayonets of the marines, it's like entering the house of the Jew, and to present as a gift to roast a pig. The people should not tamper ripe for the adoption of democracy, as happened in Turkey. A striking example is not ready for democracy demonstrated by the Russian people, who tasted the taste of democracy, he rejected it by returning to the totalitarian regime of government. Elections, parliament (the Duma), - all this is a profanation of pure water, and it was all under the communist regime, which was issued for the form of true democracy. Today, Putin has called a regime of sovereign democracy, that is necessary to understand democracy for the sovereign, for which the Russian people are not denotes the soul in it. He returned to the people so beloved empire, without which the Russian people at all was nearly lost.

    Putin clearly overestimated the economic possibilities of Russia starts a war with Ukraine, and certainly did not expect that sanctions and falling oil prices will affect so detrimental to the state of the economy. Putin has destroyed the free market in Russia and seemed to be just right to sell off state-owned enterprises, but the question is, who will buy them? To then, if Russia will creep out their newly nationalized. Fools do not. Its oligarchs would not give dollars for rubles and, of course, the state will not buy. Maybe he thought he could blackmail the gas to Europe, as once the Ukraine, but it is the export of gas to date the only reliable source of revenue and likely Europe has a great opportunity to blackmail Russia, abandoning the Russian gas. Realizing at last, in what abyss rolls Russia, Putin did not even know who to offer gas and is worn with a gas pipe from one country to another, but to no avail. Hope for China is illusory, there is the economy is experiencing a recession, especially since China already buys gas from Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. Cover with a copper basin and gas project "South Stream", because of the conflict with Turkey. Here we come to the traditionally important for Russia to the Turkish issue, and what is needed to Putin Syria.

 

   Perhaps there is no more important strategic point on the Earth than the territory of Turkey, located at the junction of Europe and Asia. For the possession of this important geopolitically territory fought many empires including, as I mentioned, and the Russian Empire. And after a lull Moscow again fixed her eyes on Turkey. However, if earlier dominated by expansionist Russia, but now in the foreground purely economic problem, threatening the collapse of the new empire. The fact that Turkey is becoming a hub of hydrocarbons from the Caspian basin and the Persian Gulf. There is a lot of gas transport projects to Europe via Turkey, bypassing Russia. Construction of one of them, the Trans-Anatolian gas pipeline (TANAP) to be completed in 2018, that put an end to the monopoly of Russian gas delivery to the EU. To this pipeline will connect Iran in the future.

 

 

Here lies the Russian involvement in the Syrian crisis. Syrian-Turkish border has a length of 822 km. In the area adjacent to the border Syrian territory inhabited by the Turks and the Kurds. The Kurds in the Middle East is very spread out and in terms of the creation of their state claim to a vast area that includes part of the Syrian territories, Turkey and Iraq. It should be noted that on the same territory claimed by both the Nazis from Armenian Dashnaktsutyun party, which in the years of the First World War, with the support of Russia, waged a military mutiny, having started the ethnic cleansing under the Great Armenia, cutting both Turkish and Kurdish population. In connection with this interesting fact: an uprising in Turkey in 1927, the Kurds declared the Kurdish Republic of Ararat. http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki/1612511 Kurds Stalin hoped to use in case of war with Turkey. Today, Russia's goal, taking advantage of the civil war in Syria to destabilize the entire region, adjacent to Turkey. In this regard, the rate on the Kurds, who are constantly seeping through the Turkish border to commit terrorist acts, quite reasonable, because it threatened the security becomes a trans-Anatolian gas pipeline and the future gas pipeline from the Gulf. Putin has repeatedly tried to cut the pipeline "Baku - Tbilisi - Erzurum" by attacking Georgia in 2008.

 

   The Kremlin's true there is another option to avoid a competitor for transporting gas to Europe, is to attack Azerbaijan, which not only produces oil and gas, but will in the future transit hub for gas from Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. No wonder the Russian Caspian Flotilla has significantly strengthened with new frigates, which was not even in the days of the Cold War. This is a clear demonstration of the military threat to the Caspian countries, former colonies of Russia. Again, how can we not recall Putin regrets the collapse of the Soviet Union, and they unleashed the war in Ukraine. There is no guarantee that in Baku and Turkmenbashi appear "green men". This is why Putin has cultivated since the days of the Chechen war, the legend of international Islamic terrorism, which is at the origin of the Kremlin. And the Petersburg Chekists bully Putin is no stranger to blow up a couple of houses in Tashkent or Almaty, presenting it the work of Islamists from Islamic State, and Russian soldiers at the time showed up to protect the residents from non-existent terrorists. And then, you know, "a voluntary expression of the will", "desire to join the people", and of other such traditional nesusvetitsa.

   For good reason intimidate Putin 'expansion in Russia and the CIS militants in Syria is open plan. " (Http://ria.ru/syria/20160220/1377942415.html) Well, not nonsense! However, Putin is a liar known (2).

But his words about the appropriate actions of the Russian army: "Our armed forces must always be ready to respond quickly and adequately to potential threats, stop any provocation and aggressive actions." (Https://russian.rt.com/article/149820)

   Particularly note that we are talking about the response to the potential threat. So Putin is optionally always find in every Muslim country on the periphery of Russia.

   By placing the air force of Syria, Putin immediately decided to test Turkey's reaction to the provocative actions if Erdogan dare to express, to put it mildly, lack of respect for a mighty empire, had just seized the Crimea, and chop off the fifth part of Ukraine. Ankara twice to no avail expressed a note of protest about the violation of Turkish airspace, Putin decided that Turkey, fear of confrontation, already keeps a low profile. However, the third time the Russian SU-24 bomber was shot down. Russian received a lesson, after which the pilots no longer make mistakes as it tried to present was Moscow. Apparently Putin this turn of events was a complete surprise that he foolishly blurted out anti-Turkish sanctions and importantly has come under question, so important for the Russian "South Stream". Honestly, I have a suspicion that Turkey did not want to implement this project and haggling about the price of gas, while pulling the end of the pipe laying on the TANAP project, that is what he wants the EU - Russian gas monopoly destruction. With the introduction of TANAP need for the "South Stream" will disappear altogether.

 

   It looks like the economic collapse of Russia is inevitable. Putin, like a beast, rushing in he himself constructed the cell in such a situation of agonizing Russia can expect any trouble, right up to nuclear war. As if there was not, but Erdogan will have to be prepared for a war with Russia, which will fight the hands of Armenia and the Kurds. Armenia with the dream of creating a "Greater Armenia" from sea to sea just waiting for a visual signal of the Kremlin, to renew the war with Azerbaijan. Do not exclude the probability of inclusion in the mess and Iran as a strategic ally of Russia (3). To counter the aggression of the Armenian armed to the teeth, Turkey will introduce troops in Azerbaijan, as it was in 1918, when the Armenians raising mutiny, seized Baku and a number of towns and villages of Azerbaijan. Undoubtedly, hostilities will begin along the Armenian-Turkish border. Thus, the Caucasus could become a blazing fire that would exclude the possibility of transporting hydrocarbon from the Caspian region to Europe bypassing Russia. Erdogan is necessary to inform the world community about the serious threats to peace on the part of Russia and NATO to develop a plan of action in the event of such an outcome of events. On the other hand all the Turkic countries should show solidarity and present a united front in defense of Turkey and Azerbaijan, because they will be the next victim of Putin's Russia.

  

1. International terrorism and its interested parties. http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/1904.html ,

    https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/04/international-terrorism-and-its.html 

2. Empire of Lies and its chief liar. http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/22317.html ,

    https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/08/the-empire-of-lies-and-its-chief-liar.html  

3. Armenia and Moscow-Tehran axis. http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/1347.html ,

    https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/armenia-and-moscow-tehran-axis.html 

 

   02.27.16.

Armenia and Moscow - Tehran axis

 This article was written when 20% of Azerbaijan was under Armenian occupation.

Alik Bakhshi

 

Armenia and Moscow - Tehran axis

  

        After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia has emerged a potentially dangerous adversary - a nascent over a huge area, from Angara (River in Turkey) to the Angara (a river in Siberia) Turkic community, a kind of inheritance Timur, representing a threat to Turkic-speaking underbelly of Russia. For the same reason, Iran is concerned for the integrity of its territory, considering that it includes the South Azerbaijan. Besides geopolitical changes will have a big fuss around the Caspian Sea, with its huge oil reserves.

       Common strategic and economic objectives, and were the cause of the Moscow-Tehran axis. The same reasons have prompted Moscow to transfer nuclear technology to Iran, despite protests from Washington? Russia transfer to Iran of nuclear technology is not a bargain, and the fee for political cooperation. Explanations of Iran that a nuclear reactor is necessary as an alternative energy source, available huge natural energy resources, which are the oil and gas, devoid of logic and expediency.

       

       The link to this axis is Armenia, which has territorial claims against its neighbors. In addition, Armenia is Russia remained the only reliable springboard military presence in the Caucasus.

       By occurred at the time the political changes in the leadership of Armenia, namely the voluntary and unexpected to the casual observer the resignation of President Ter-Petrosian under pressure from supporters of a military solution to the Karabakh problem, one can assume with great certainty that it went to war.

       

   Lingering ceasefire between Armenia and Azerbaijan with a politically loose any agreements Armenian military successes more annoyed militant opposition leaders, former president already. The isolation of Armenia, due to the political situation in the Caucasus, a deep economic crisis without any prospect of improvement in the face of an expected economic boom in Azerbaijan, thanks to the oil produced in the Caspian Sea, leaves no hope for the future of Ter-Petrosyan as President - a supporter of peaceful dialogue Baku. In addition, arrived from Russia through Iran additional weapons, including medium-range missiles "Scud", which can draw Baku and its oil terminals in the ruins, created a moment of undisputed military supremacy of Armenia to Azerbaijan. And while Azerbaijan does not yet have the currency for the purchase of adequate weapons, hawks in Yerevan would not mind to take advantage of the situation and now Yerevan is waiting for a sign from the Kremlin to launch military action. Moscow has not exhausted all possible options for diplomatic pressure to force Baku not only to transport the Caspian oil to the whole exclusively through Russia, but also to give up the right to develop the oil alone shelf from its shores. Moscow is increasingly exaggerates the issue of some unclear status of the Caspian Sea.

    

     Azerbaijan difficile is easily explained by economic and political considerations.

    The current pipeline currently passing on the North Caucasus, does not have sufficient bandwidth for all the oil produced in Azerbaijan planned. We must also take into account the oil of Kazakhstan, to which Baku will become a transit point. Thus, the need to build new, more powerful pipes clear. And if we build a new pipeline, it is much more profitable to lay him to the shores of the Black Sea through Georgia, which is considerably shorter, moreover, disappear concerns about political instability in Chechnya and Dagestan, through which the existing pipeline. Further laying the pipeline from Georgia to Turkey, Caspian oil will make available throughout the Mediterranean.

    

     Russia is reasonable to anticipate significant foreign exchange losses in the implementation of the project. Therefore, Moscow desperately taking all possible levers to destabilize the political situation in Georgia.

    General for Azerbaijan and the Turkic states of Central Asia economic issues related to oil and gas will contribute to the political consolidation of the Turkic peoples of the former Soviet Union, the consolidation of which dreams of most leading country of the Turkic world - Turkey. And then the revival of the past legacy of Tamerlane just around the corner.

  

     Against such a turn of events and aims previously set up the axis Moscow - Yerevan - Tehran, in which the main acting role for Armenia. Russia again, as at the turn of the 19th - 20th centuries, is playing the Armenian card to achieve their selfish goals.

     

     Here we come to the most dramatic moment, put the top of hatred in the history of relations between Armenians and Turks peacefully coexisted for a long historical period in the Ottoman Empire. The Turks did not pursue any of the Armenians due to nationality, or because of their Christianity. A large percentage of the Armenians was among the prosperous part of merchants and artisans.

      

      The reason for hostility lies in a completely different field, and to understand it, it is necessary to comprehend the events in Turkey and in Transcaucasia, during the late Ottoman Empire. It was during this period forms the Armenian party "Gnchak" [ "bell"] and "Dashnaktsutiun" [ "Union"], which put the task of creating in the eastern Anatolian Armenian state. According to their plan of "Great Armenia" should include the territory "from sea to sea" [meaning the Black, Caspian and Mediterranean Seas].

Supporters of this idea is not bothered that no one in the field of Turkish Armenians did not constitute a majority, and this is a necessary condition for the creation of at least autonomy, not to mention the state. To correct this undesirable demographic factor Dashnaks planned by murder and cruel violence to sow fear and panic among the Muslim population, to force him to leave their homes, freeing thus for the future territory of "Great Armenia".

   

      This circumstance, as well as possible, by the way, coincided with the intention of Russia in its expansion to the south from the Caucasus. On the eve of the First World War a large number of Russian in Dashnaks supplied weapons for the rebellion in the rear of the Ottoman Empire.

    

     Armenians were fighting not with regular Turkish troops, and mainly attacked civilians, unarmed Muslims and achieved considerable success. Hundreds of thousands of Turks and Kurds became refugees before the approach of the Russian troops. [It should be noted that the Kurds claim to the same land as the Armenians]. Armed insurgencies Armenians facilitated the Russian advance into the heart of Turkish territory. To protect the rear, the Turkish government was forced to order the eviction of Armenians from places intended direction of advance of the Russian army. Now columns, forcibly evicted Armenians stretched south towards Syria terrain on which the Muslims who had fled earlier from the cruel massacres committed by Armenian militants. And something happened that could not happen. Driven by revenge, the Turks and the Kurds attacked the defenseless Armenians. Evil has created evil. This terrible tragedy of 1915, which cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of Armenians could not be, if the Armenian fighters did not carry out a strategy of squeezing the peaceful population, sowing the seeds of evil that still sprout like weeds, threatening to strangle the world field in the South Caucasus.

   

      It would be an unforgivable mistake to equate the tragedy that befell the Armenian people, genocide. The catastrophe of European Jewry was planned in accordance with Nazi ideology and carried out in secret by special forces. A trial was held, identify the specific perpetrators of the genocide of the Jews and brought them to the verdict. What happened in Turkey - is a spontaneous reaction to the response of ordinary people in the pre-conceived ideology of "Dashnaktsutiun" beating Muslims.

      Evil is rooted in the ideology itself, "Dashnaktsutiun" party. Most of the wars conducted for the territory. Russia absorbed the earth together with the peoples inhabiting them, the Dashnaks had space for "Great Armenia" completely free from any nation other than the Armenian. The criminal propaganda absurd ideas drove Armenians in the middle of a war between the two empires in the line of fire to by the extermination of the local population to build a chimerical state.

     

    After the peace agreement Russian troops, leaving the front, delivered weapons to the Armenians, who not only continued to hold a part of Turkish territory, but did not hesitate to unleash a war with neighboring Azerbaijan and Georgia by presenting their territorial claims.

  

      Armenians since ancient times, monopolizing trade, settled over a large area, creating a compact point foci of residence. At the time of the conquest of Georgia by Russia in Tbilisi, 60% of the population were Armenians. Even during the Soviet era, Armenians settled in the North Caucasus and the Black Sea, focusing mainly in the resort towns and, of course, known to the Armenian diaspora in Moscow. In Azerbaijan, a large number of Armenians living not only in Karabakh, [c Azerbaijani-Karabakh (Gara bang) - "see snow"] a district of Baku predominantly Armenian population, not numerically inferior Karabakh Armenians, called Armenikent. Therefore, it is possible that after the Baku-Karabakh should become part of Great Armenia. Few people know that the Dashnaks in 1918, raising an armed uprising and seized power in Baku, massacred, and Azerbaijanis, saving lives, fled from the city. To prevent the complete destruction of Baku Armenian rebels, Turkey sent troops to Baku. This history is silent.

   

      To understand the place in those days, events in the Caucasus, and the current situation it is necessary to know the history, and not the one that was written in the Kremlin offices and served the totalitarian communist power. The real story was hidden from the people of the Soviet empire, if not supplanted by a lie. Since the conquest of the Khanate Russian Erivanskogo (one of the Azerbaijani khanate), its ethnic composition began to change with time acceleration. Erivan fortress town was founded Rivangulu Khan, hence the name of Erivan. The population there is 90% were Turkic (Azerbaijani), the remaining 10% equally accounted for Kurds and Armenians. To strengthen in the conquered new lands, Moscow decides to change the ethnic composition of the population in the border area with Turkey. To this end, since 1828 in the former Erivanskoe and Nakhichevan khanates begins mass migration of Armenians from Turkey and Persia. By 1897, according to the conducted census in the Yerevan district of the Azerbaijani population is 51.4%, and the Armenian has already reached 38.5%. With the advent of the Armenian nationalist party "Dashnaktsutyun" threat to the Turkic (Azerbaijani) population during the First World War and especially increases catastrophic nature takes over the entire territory of Azerbaijan after the overthrow of the monarchy in Russia. Only through the timely assistance provided by Turkey failed to prevent the ethnic cleansing against Azerbaijanis.

 

    However, when the Soviet government after the establishment of the Armenian Republic and the persecution of the Nazis, the Dashnaks, Moscow's policy to oust Azerbaijanis has not changed. In the center of Yerevan is liquidated history of the city - demolished the fortress wall and completely destroyed the Shah's palace. Stalin, and he did not give up on their aggressive war plans for mastering the Black Sea straits, preparing for war with Turkey and considering Azerbaijanis "fifth column", it is decided on the deportation of the Azerbaijani population from Armenia. Is published for the decision N 4083 of 23 December 1947 "On resettlement of collective farmers and other Azerbaijani population from the Armenian SSR to the Kura-Araz lowland of Azerbaijan SSR". In the same judgment is given permission to the Armenian SSR Council of Ministers of foreign arrivals to settle Armenians in the Azeri population vacated buildings and homes. In those postwar years, thanks to the propaganda in Armenia resettled 80 thousand Armenians from abroad. Notably, during the Soviet era, Armenia becomes unlike other Soviet republics increasingly mono-ethnic. It should be noted that the nationalist tendencies as a consequence of the ideology of the party "Dashnaktsutyun" Armenian has not disappeared. So Armenian terrorists made a series of terrorist acts January 8, 1977 in Moscow (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzZWB5GZU-k).

   

 

   Under Gorbachev, taking advantage of the weakening of central authority, resurrected militias Armenian militants began to cast out, the Azerbaijanis living in Armenia. For the first time after the war with the Nazis in the Soviet Union there were refugees again. They were Azerbaijani from Kafan. Information about the iniquity was not resolved things happening in Armenia. Then there was no publicity. The authorities did not dare to let the refugees from Armenia in Baku, stopping them in Sumgait. The irresponsible behavior of the authorities made the position of the homeless, the unemployed people a real nightmare. On this and hoped to Armenia. Sumgayit events is a well-planned provocation to blame for vandalism Azerbaijanis and begin an unprecedented scale with the help of nowhere who had taken arms, the expulsion of Azerbaijanis from Armenia and Karabakh, and all this in the Soviet era. It is hard to imagine that suddenly appeared in the Soviet Union weapons from ordinary citizens in the short term, and even in such large numbers! And it should be good to understand the chronology of events - Kapan was first, then Sumgait and then to Karabakh war. These are the facts and this is true.

 

   Today, in the face of Russia, artificially created Russian state, Armenia has only ally in the Caucasus and is trying to use it to restore its former influence, but this is possible only in case of war.

   

     Being in power in Yerevan War Party does not leave in this situation is no chance for a peaceful resolution of the Karabakh crisis. In the event of the outbreak of war, Armenia, using considerable superiority in weaponry, can win, it is possible that the Armenian troops will be in Baku, but hardly a military victory, decides that any politically. In terms of economic neither Armenia nor Russia will not receive any dividends. In the oil fields no money will not give the restoration and maintenance. It is safe to assume that Turkey will be involved in the war. At the same time it is unlikely that Moscow will decide to open hostilities with Turkey, as NATO with the issue of retaliation against an aggressor who attacked the country - block member and can then deploy a large-scale battle for the Caspian Sea and the world is on the verge of World War III . Most likely, Armenia alone will have to fight with the Turkic unit with material and diplomatic support Moscow. It is not difficult to foresee which side will take America, already had time to invest in the Caspian oil. Washington should understand that the strengthening of the axis Moscow - Tehran, is a potential threat and Middle Eastern oil region, to which America has spent a lot of money and effort.

 

 

   02.07.2004

 

"Turkish game" on "Grand Chessboard"

 

Alik Bahshi

"Turkish game" on "Grand Chessboard"

    In contrast to the well-known in the theory of chess "Vienna game" "The Turkish game" is relatively new and not yet thoroughly Research all its options, but it has played Recep Erdogan to "Grand Chessboard" by Zbigniew Bjezinski. Sure, you could call it, and "Debut Erdogan," but the fact is that it would have played out any other player, because due to the vital necessity, and not a personal initiative of Prime Minister Erdogan, who, to his credit it must be said as it is brilliant, and how well the party will continue to be seen.

   

   Turkey today is a successful and harmonious developing country, shows a marked increase as the traditional Turkish agricultural and industrial production, which, and this is important, at a faster pace than agricultural. Naturally is interested in peace and stability, but the Middle East is far from a prerequisite for prosperity and care to provide a favorable political climate in the region duty of political leadership.

     

    Against the background of recent events the Middle East, Turkey, due to pragmatic policy Erdogan, came very prepared for the threshold of the inevitable future changes in the region. The definition of "pragmatic" gives a certain amount of cold practicality and cynicism, but if we remember the words of Andrei Sakharov humanist that "ultimately a moral choice is the most pragmatic," namely morality and is the main component in the policy of the Turkish Prime Minister. According to my understanding, Erdogan can be attributed to the leaders who are choosing the right strategic goal thinking ahead advance their political moves to an end, and, most importantly, their consequences. As for morality, which is usually not compatible with the policy, then try to run the analysis show that it is difficult to accuse Erdogan of immorality of his policy.

 

     Geopolitical picture around Turkey extraordinarily complex. In human history, probably no more than the desired point on the Earth for the possession of which fought during all civilizations and eras. Being at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, Turkey has been the subject of claims of many states and, especially, Russia. The history of relations between Russia and Turkey, is a story of constant wars in which Russia was the aggressor.

    Immediately after World War II to the share of the Turkish people, the threat of dismemberment of the country on the sector and the loss of independence, came a fierce struggle with the Franco-Greek-Italian coalition and the Armenian nationalists, which under the leadership of Ataturk was a convincing victory. Since then, relations with Greece and Armenia remain hostile. These include, and Bulgaria, which held the government program "Bulgarization Turks", in which the Bulgarian Turks proposed to change the name of the Slavic or leave the country.

 

    Next Iran, a country which is quite a long historical period, there was no war, and yet the relationship cannot be considered friendly, especially given axis Moscow-Yerevan-Tehran political economical aims to prevent, first, the supply of energy from the Caspian Basin through Turkey to Europe, bypassing Russia, and secondly, to create a continuous geographic corridor between Turkey and Azerbaijan, which can alarm in Iran, which includes the South Azerbaijan. By the way, the main reason for Russia's aggression against Georgia in 2008, it cut the Baku-Ceyhan oil pipeline that passes through the Georgian territory, and to put an end to the "Nabucco" project, which would deprive the Russian monopoly on the sale of gas to Europe. Russian Foreign Ministry has officially filed a note of protest against laying a trans-Caspian gas pipeline under the Caspian Sea, which provides for "Nabucco", citing the danger of seismic activity area. Of course Russia will use its best efforts to implement the death its economy project. In general, according expansion inflame passions around the Caspian Sea, to be major political fuss that has the potential to develop into a world-scale military conflict. Kremlin is only to give the go-ahead to Yerevan to set fire to a smoldering Karabakh conflict and war will break out again, and the fact that this time will not be without the participation of Turkey, no doubt.

   

        Now as to the direction of the southern Arabian. Here, too, Turkey unenviable situation. As a strategic partner of Israel, Turkey unwittingly supported Israel in its confrontation with the Arabs and would not consider erroneously Arab majority in the Middle East. Today, the Arab-Israeli conflict is a major destabilizing factor in the region. It should be noted, a military alliance with Israel, Turkey, except regional problems, did not give any benefits. No doubt Erdogan knows that reckless policy of Tel Aviv is Israel to fatal isolation and the probability of being a pariah of the international community, making the company its ally, Turkey is unlikely to suit.

      As a result, Turkey's standing in front of a closed door in the EU, in an environment hostile country strategic vision is far from rosy. It is this fact and forced Ankara to take political steps, where still possible to change the situation.
For this purpose, since the Second Lebanon War, Turkey undertakes mediation attempts to mitigate the level of confrontation over its unruly ally with the Arabs, but Israel, stubbornly ignoring international opinion, continuing the policy of occupation and building of settlements on Palestinian territory. Ankara cannot see the trend of deterioration of the situation around Israel. Israel not only plays in the information field, but there is not successful and hostilities. All under increasing pressure from the Arab Israel was forced to leave Lebanon, occupying army to withdraw from the Gaza Strip, destroying Jewish settlements. The defeat in the second Lebanon recognize Israeli politicians and army command, for the war aims were not achieved. Military failures occur not because the Israeli army poorly equipped, but because it is at war with the civilian population. In order to win the war in the first place needs an opponent, his army. Throwing bombs among the defenseless population can hardly achieve anything but hate, anger and radicalization of the political forces of the Palestinian resistance as an example of the party "Hamas". The world has been struck by violent operation "Cast Lead", the use of illicit phosphorus bombs even in such a densely populated area like Gaza. The international community has condemned Israel. Swept the country anti-Israel demonstration was not spared, and Turkey, and Erdogan accused Israel of numerous victims among the civilian population of Gaza, only expressed the opinion of the Turkish community in the Israeli army. At this point, we can say, and began the rift between the two allies. This was followed by the demonstrative humiliation of Turkish Ambassador Ahmed Chellikkola the Israeli Foreign Ministry, where, after an official protest was expressed in about the show on Turkish TV movie "Walk of wolves," which is the episode with the ugly actions of "Mossad".

  

     Turkey is a democratic country and a sign of this statement is irrefutable fact the active participation of the Turkish people in politics and not only in the election of the government, but also in various public, including international humanitarian organizations to which the Turkish government has nothing to do, such as to perturb the Israeli power movie "Walk the wolves" and to deliver humanitarian aid to Gaza. Israel charges the Turkish government organizations flotilla «Free Gaza» totally groundless, because you can just as well accuse the Government of Ireland, France, America, the citizens who participated in the flotilla. Israel's refusal to completely just demand Turkey to apologize and pay compensation for the killing of nine Turkish citizens during the night attack and even in international waters Israeli commandos on the Turkish ship "Mavi Marmara" finally made it impossible to return to the previous level of strategic partnership. Moreover, Israel hastily concluded in defiance of Turkey military cooperation with Greece and Cyprus, which naturally was seen by Ankara as nothing but a hostile move.

    Thus, at the official level of international relations, it is Israel actually initiated the break the alliance with Turkey. Moreover, Israel has defined himself against its former ally, despite more than loyalty to the Turkish Jews throughout history. Even the participation of Jews in the heaviest for Turkey Gallipoli battle of World War I on the side of the British and French had no effect on the Jews living in Turkey. True participation consisted in glorious quartermaster "Mule Corps' number 650 and 750 mules led by Trumpeldor, and maybe that's because the Turks themselves, and did not take offense, but the fact you have one.
    It is hard to imagine that Erdogan predicted the "Arab spring", but it just so happens by force of circumstances, which occurred on the eve of the Turkish-Israeli rift strategic alliance, led Turkey to lead regional state, the economic power of the country, thanks to Erdogan, was supplemented sensible policy.

  

    Turkey, unlike Israel, as a truly democratic state supported the democratic progress in the Arab world. Erdogan immediately boldly spoke out against the dictatorial regimes in the Arab nation, which certainly will be counted a positive assessment of his political career. By the way, a different ratio of the two former allies to the ongoing democratic progress in the Arab world demonstrates who are really committed to the principles of democracy. Israel claims to be the only democratic country in the Middle East entirely without foundation, and as a country that has no constitution, the country, where there is no separation of legislative and executive powers, the country in which religion is not separated from the state, the country's policy of apartheid against in the occupied territory, the country in which there is no market economy can be called democratic.
Israeli fears are understandable before awakening of the Arab nation, for the departure from the political scene of dictators, for which the main priority was to maintain his personal power, disappear obstacle to the unification of the nation and solve national problems. Having lost an ally in Turkey, Israel alone is in the region before the Arab majority, and if the American taxpayer understand foolishness instigated by George Bush wars in Afghanistan and Iraq over the alien American interests, Israel, while maintaining its aggressive policy, the path to oblivion booked (1).

 

      Rupture of relations with Turkey, Israel will try to explain the policy of Islamization, which allegedly holds Erdogan, without citing a single fact of Islamization. What's wrong in that raze understood by the term Islamization! To label, Israeli politicians do not bother what is on their own understanding of the "Islamization". Maybe in Turkey in secular schools teach Islam, like Judaism in Israel, which is a compulsory subject. Maybe that Turkey welcomed the fall of the dictatorial regimes in some Arab countries? And America with France and Britain, which help people in revolt to overthrow the usurpers, can be accused of Islamization. On the other hand the religious laws in Israel Halacha rose to the rank of state, just as the laws of Sharia in Iran. Incidentally Judaism contains racism does not exist in Islam (2).

      Erdogan today is a model for the Arab countries, which, if democratization may well be on the path of creating associations or political-economic union by type of EU, and implement such a way it is much easier than creating a Turkic union for reasons of anti-Russia, Iran, Armenia and China (3).

1. Israel, - way to nonexistence, http://www.proza.ru/2008/03/23/506

2. Israeli Democracy or "Jewish view of the world». 

  https://samlib.ru/editors/b/bahshi_a/alikbahshi-2.shtml, 

  https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/israeli-democracy-or-jewish-view-of.html        

3. Turkey, Turkic-line or is it a terrible word - Pan-Turkism. 

     http://zhurnal.lib.ru/b/bahshi_a/bahshi-6.shtml

09/10/11