A Demonstrative Ride by Putin's Oprichniks

 Alik Bakhshi

A Demonstrative Ride by Putin's Oprichniks

    The end of the school year in Russia was marked by a rather significant event: the defiant behavior of school graduates, who celebrated their graduation with a demonstrative drive in dozens of Geländewagens through the streets of the capital. This action left the public somewhat confused and even shocked. It would seem that such a thing shouldn't surprise the public these days—after all, the gilded youth—the children of oligarchs, bribe-taking officials, and bribe-giving businessmen, if not for one thing. The young men riding in the black Geländewagens turned out to be graduates of the FSB school! The reaction of people connected to the FSB, including the well-known TV host Vladimir Solovyov, is interesting; they were all upset not so much by the moral and ethical aspects of the incident, but rather by the unprofessional behavior of future agents and spies. After all, in their opinion, they all exposed themselves by posting a video online that they themselves filmed, thereby capturing their faces. However, in my opinion, the situation is different.

    One can't help but wonder: could something like this have happened during the Soviet Union? The answer is clear: no. It happened under the Kremlin's master—the St. Petersburg hooligan, the notorious liar and deceiver, the permanent President Putin. The fact is, they weren't trained as intelligence officers. They represent an entirely new caste of people—Putin's oprichniki, called upon, like Ivan the Terrible's oprichniki, to carry out punitive actions within the state. These new oprichniks are as ignorant of morality as their master, Putin, who blew up buildings with sleeping residents in order to blame the Chechens for the crime and, amid a victorious war, be elected president. I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out that for some of the participants in the Geländewagen rally, their thesis was about being football fans in France during Euro 2016.

    Putin forgot to take one thing into account: Ivan the Terrible's oprichniks fled shamefully when the Crimean Khan Dovlet Giray appeared at the walls of Moscow, betraying the Tsar of All Rus'. Then Ivan the Terrible lost his menacing demeanor, looking at the Khan's whip, which the Khan hung in the Kremlin as a warning.

July 12, 2016.

   The oprichniks were Ivan the Terrible's personal guard and punitive detachment, created to strengthen the Tsar's power and suppress political opponents.

Why Putin will not leave

Alik Bakhshi

 

Why Putin will not leave

 

Power is a drug.

Who tried it once - poisoned it forever.

                                     Winston Churchill

   

   Today, ahead of the upcoming presidential elections, many are wondering whether Putin will leave, or will participate in the elections? The naive question of whether he will win elections is naturally not worth it. The active participation in the election process of state structures under Putin's control, down to power, as was demonstrated in the case of Navalny, excludes a different outcome. It's another matter if Putin decides not to run for president, but this will not happen due to the following circumstances.

   The main problem for Putin in the event of his resignation as president is his personal safety. Castling, which he carried out in tandem with Medvedev in the past, this time is impossible because of the extremely low popularity of the latter. There is no other reliable candidate for Putin. By the way, if Putin voluntarily leaves, then Medvedev automatically finds himself in an identical situation with him. The change of power against the backdrop of inexorably slipping into the abyss of the economy will inevitably lead to the search for the perpetrators, which is similar for Putin. Even if an associate who is loyal to Putin today comes to power, he will have to break down the vertical of power built by Putin, because it is completely corrupt, but because it was the conductor of the vicious economic policy of the center.

 

    Undoubtedly, Putin is responsible for the state of the economy, because it negated the economic and political reforms that began under Yeltsin. But could Putin have acted differently? The fact is that democracy in Russia was transformed into an ugly form, where the power was in the hands of the oligarchs - scammers who, taking advantage of the lack of initiative of the Russian people, both in business and in politics, seized all the command posts of the administration. Then the partial disintegration of the Soviet empire prevented the inevitable general riot and chaos. The scattered peoples, no matter how they could, took up survival. A fairly reduced empire, it would seem, escaped the catastrophe and the democratic reforms that were initiated promised a promising future, but ...

  However, the new nouveaux riches, devoid of patriotism, did not see the Motherland in Russia and plundered the country, leaving no chance for the future as an empire. Putin, gaining power from the oligarchs who rashly brought him to power, hoping to make a puppet out of him, got rid of them first, and then restored the authoritarian regime traditional for Russia, as the only one capable of stopping the further collapse of the empire. Having defined the social system as a sovereign democracy, that is, democracy for a sovereign, Putin essentially abandoned democracy to the great joy of the people who do not understand and accept its values. The absence of a free economic market, the state's participation in production activities, as a consequence of the growth of the bureaucratic administration and the inevitable corruption in such conditions, returned the country in the 1990s, when the USSR ceased to exist.

    The main reason for the failed democracy in Russia lies in the inability of the Russian people to organize themselves, both in labor and political activities, as well as servility to an official of any rank. Democracy and the Russian people, this is nonsense (1). In this case, it does not matter whether Putin understood this or not, the reality shows that his authoritarian regime of management brought the empire back to the historical point of inevitable disintegration. The secret desire of Putin's revanchist to restore the empire within the borders of the USSR resulted in the emergence of sanctions, which further exacerbated the economic situation. Putin, who has built a vertical of power for himself, when any action, it's ridiculous to see, up to the repair of someone's apartment, can not do without his participation, naturally automatically puts him the main culprit of the coming economic catastrophe. The vicious circle, in which the patchwork empire turned out (the definition of K. Marx), presupposes a single outcome - disintegration. The Russian empire is at a stage when it can not function normally either under authoritarianism or under conditions of democracy.

   Putin is trying to stop the course of history, but history is not a children's tale, and it is unlikely that a pike caught by him can help him in this regard. Anyone who tries to stop the course of history becomes its victim and Putin is no exception. Putin's Russia is like the miracle of a surviving prehistoric monster from the era of the Lizards, which has no place in the modern world.

 

    Another landmark fact pointing to the fact that Putin was not going to leave the Kremlin is the national guard created by him, in analogy with the oprichniks of Ivan the Terrible (2), who is in direct subordination to him, with the sole task of safeguarding power. Putin has not enough police and army. The police are a well-known case - corrupt, and the army is too large an organization to be close and always at hand. Of course, at the head of the oprichniki Khinshtein, who, of course, without hesitation, will give the order to shoot at the people. On the example of the well-known executioners Lazar Kaganovich and Mendel Khataevich, the Kremlin authorities always knew who to choose as punishers of the people (3). The other, similar to him, namely, a well-known liar and a whore, completely devoid of conscience, Putin-caressed Kremlin nightingale Vladimir Rudolfovich (4) had already shown his attitude to the people, calling those who dared to be dissatisfied with the Putin regime, 2% of shit. How can I not remember that the oprichniks were the first to leave the Tsar as Khan Girey approached Moscow. I am sure that this support of Putin, as soon as he smells fried, breaks into Israel, fleeing from the popular anger.

    

1. People's destiny, or each cricket has its own pole. 

    https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/04/the-peoples-fate-or-to-each-cricket-his.html 

2. Demonstrative departure of Putin's oprichniki. 

    https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/a-demonstrative-ride-by-putins.html 

3. Katyn, before and after. https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/katyn-before-and-after.html 

4. Amazing! https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/amazing.html 

    

  11.08.17.

 

Amazing!

 Alik Bakhshi

Amazing!

   It's well known that President Putin, as a true Russian patriot, is prepared to make any sacrifice to enhance Russia's prestige not only in sports, as demonstrated at the Sochi Olympics, but also in culture. For example, Putin spared no expense in purchasing rare Antonio Stradivari cellos for the country (one alone cost $12 million), for which the people adore him and are willing to endure any hardship for the sake of the promised bright future. Considerable resources are also invested in the media, where anyone willing to bribe the president into appearing on the idiot box is given the opportunity. Preference is apparently given to Russian-speaking representatives of the truthful word abroad, among those Jews who once left Russia, who are ready to join those who never left the country in beating their chests, vowing their sincere love for Putin, the great Russian people, and their great country.

      

 

               

This opportunity is readily provided by the Kremlin's nightingale, V. Solovyov, on a television program in which they, along with the Armenian supporters, vie with each other in singing the praises of Putin and his peace-loving, constructive policy toward fraternal Ukraine, where, according to them, Ukrainian fascists, with American assistance, staged a coup d'état. Putin demonstrated his nobility by urgently organizing the escape of his protégé, the legitimately elected Ukrainian President Yanukovych, who was forced to abandon his beloved collection of gold toilets to an enraged crowd, egged on by Western agents.

   It's worth noting the remarkable talent of host Solovyov, who at times has to restrain the ardor of some particularly zealous participants in the televised debates, in particular the ethnic lawyer Zhirinovsky and the Armenians Bagdasarov and Kurginyan, who persistently call for Russians to march on Kyiv. However, when the intensity of hatred subsides somewhat, Vladimir Rudolfovich Solovyov reminds listeners of Putin's words about Russia's legitimate national interests, which the West and especially the peoples of the entire post-Soviet space must take into account.

   Somewhat unexpectedly aggressive against the general backdrop are the speeches of Yakov Kedmi, an Israeli and former Mossad officer who has already become a regular on Solovyov's show. He is simply delighted with every step Putin takes toward the West.

  This same Kedmi predicts that 2017 will mark the end of the European Community, and Ukraine as well. After Putin's meeting with Trump scheduled for April, America will abandon Ukraine, and the fascist government in Kyiv will inevitably collapse, with all the ensuing consequences. Thus, according to the non-Russian participants of Solovyov's television show, the great Russian people can expect a joyful event in 2017: the disappearance of the state of Ukraine. It's amazing how easily, with the help of the media, two fraternal peoples were able to develop a fierce mutual hatred in such a short period of time.

   It's mind-boggling, but exactly 100 years ago, a small group of revolutionaries, without a single representative of the Russian people, managed to plunge Russia into civil war, with brother turning against brother. Yes, propaganda is a formidable weapon, especially in an age where television exerts an all-powerful influence on people's consciousness.

   But an even more astonishing event on Russian television seemed to me to be a program hosted by a certain Natanson,

                                         

in which Jews discussed issues related to the Russian Orthodox Church. Are we really expecting interesting events there too?

 19.02.2017

Revival of the Great Silk Road

 

Alik Bakhshi

Revival of the Great Silk Road

 

   The "Great Silk Road", connecting the countries of the Mediterranean, with China is known from 121 BC. With the opening of the sea route from Europe to China and the development of shipping, which had a greater advantage over camel caravans, the value of the land route fell.

 

     

    With the transformation of China into a world factory of various goods, and as a result of the colossal growth of freight turnover, the idea of ​​the revival of the Great Silk Road has again acquired relevance. China launched the initiative "One belt - one way", which means creating the shortest way of the railway that connects the Middle Kingdom with Europe. And this way was created. The route includes a ferry crossing in the Caspian Sea and the Marmaray Tunnel under the Bosphorus.

 

  

   

     October 30, 2017 in Baku, a significant historic event took place - the opening of the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway, as the final stage of the revival of the Great Silk Road. The opening ceremony was attended by the President of Azerbaijan Aliyev, the President of Turkey Erdogan, the Prime Ministers of Georgia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, the delegation of Turkmenistan, Tajikistan. Aliyev noted that the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway is the shortest and most reliable route connecting Europe with Asia.

  

                               

  

    Erdogan, in turn, said: "We are declaring a direct rail service from London to Beijing. I want this project to benefit the region and our peoples. " In continuation, stressing the importance of the event on a global scale, he said: "The new Silk Way project, in which over 60 countries of the world participate with a population of 4.5 billion people, passes through an area of ​​40 million square kilometers. This initiative is based on bilateral and regional cooperation between countries based on mutually beneficial relations, which is an important distinctive feature of the project. "

 

   In fact, the more countries will be on the route route, the more profitable the economic value of the project, not to mention the significant reduction in the delivery time of cargo, the volume of which can reach up to 17 million tons per year. This overland route alternative to sea transport will reduce the time of delivery of containers from China to the UK more than twice and will be 12-15 days.

 

   Very significant for the countries of the Caspian region is the fact that it became possible to supply liquefied gas to Turkey and Europe by rail, which naturally causes Moscow's discontent. Realizing the threat of the emergence of a hydrocarbon competitor in the European market to Russia's economy, it is vehemently opposed to laying a gas pipe along the Caspian seabed from Turkmenistan to Baku, citing the ecological danger of this project, while forgetting about the "Northern Stream" and the South Stream. " However, Moscow has no arguments, to oppose the supply of liquefied gas to Europe by rail. By the way, if Russia continues to persist in obstructing the construction of a gas pipeline in the Caspian Sea, Turkey will not cost anything in retaliation to block the "South Stream". So in any case, Russia can not avoid the appearance of a gas competitor.

   

   It is interesting to note that after the opening of the final section of the Silk Road of Baku-Tbilisi-Kars in the Russian media, articles appeared that the route, unlike the Russian project, passes through a potentially troubled region. The thing is that Russia actively pedaled in the issue of implementing the Silk Road route through its territory, doing nothing real, and eventually ended up outside the game. Hence, the Kremlin's silent resentment towards the official opening of the new "Silk Road" is understandable.

 

     The Kremlin has been discussing the far-fetched question of a threat from Islamic terrorists since the time of the Chechen war, which, according to the Kremlin, are sleeping and see how to seize the Turkic countries and further expand into Russia. In order to protect the post-Soviet space from the allegedly unavoidable invasion of Islamic terrorism, the Kremlin plans to introduce troops, after which, as already well-known traditional pattern, hold referendums on reunification with Russia. In short, if anyone threatens the well-being of the post-Soviet space, this is the Russian Empire, which the Fuhrer Putin wants to restore in its former borders (1). In this case, Russia will again gain a monopoly on the European hydrocarbon market (2), and the new "Silk Road" will be in its hands. To protect free trade from the Evil Empire, the world community must take care of the safety of the revived Silk Road in advance.

 

   In conclusion, I want to note an important point - the revival of the Great Silk Road will create conditions for the consolidation of the Turkic countries and Baku will inevitably become the strategically important geopolitical center of the Turkic world. Only the union of the Turkic countries is the guarantee of their future and protects from encroachments of the northern neighbor (3).

    

1.The state-forming people and its Fuhrer, - or Ukraine and further on the list. 

     https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21133.html

2. The Trans-Caspian gas pipeline or the Third World War. 

     https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/18362.html

3. One language, - one homeland. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/16879.html

 

   26.11.17

 

On the issue of genocide, or why Armenia is wary of judgment

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

On the issue of genocide, or

why Armenia is wary of judgment

 

     The fact of the genocide of the Jews was established by the International Military Tribunal, the organizers of the genocide and the perpetrators of this crime were found and condemned, this raises a completely natural question why Armenia, in order to once and for all end the issue of the alleged Armenian genocide in Turkey, is seeking an international tribunal. The question of the extermination of Armenians organized by the Turkish authorities was raised immediately after the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in the First World War, but more than a century passed, and the court never condemned it. And how can a court pass a sentence if Armenians have not bothered to apply, as it should be, to an international court. The court, only the court and no one else can determine the organizers of the genocide and its perpetrators, if any, and issue a corresponding sentence, following the example of the Nuremberg trial. Moreover, from the point of view of international law, the international Convention on the Prevention of Genocide was developed, which clearly states who has the right to recognize a crime as genocide - this is the court in The Hague and only he.

     

    So what is the reason for the Armenians to ignore the trial on such an important issue for the Armenian people? A huge number of publications report on the genocide, but, oddly enough, Armenians do not even attempt to appeal to this court. It should be noted that history already knows several courts in this case.

    

   The very first is the Maltese court. In 1920, the British occupation authorities in Istanbul, according to an Armenian tip, arrested 144 people as the main perpetrators of the Armenian genocide. A year before that, namely in 1919, a certain Aram Andonian published a book in which incriminating documents were collected - telegrams of Talaat Pasha, proving the irrefutable guilt of the Turkish authorities in organizing the genocide. This book is widely circulated widely sold in many countries. A year later, a trial took place in Malta, which did not reveal more than one document proving the guilt of the arrested, and this despite the fact that the judges already had Andonian’s book on hand, which was recognized as a rude fake. By the way, Andonian never submitted a single original of the telegram of Talaat Pasha, saying that they were lost. The prosecutor's office announced the termination of the proceedings on the basis that no document had been submitted, evidence proving the guilt of the prisoners and this at a time when all the archives of the empire were in the hands of the British and all the witnesses of the so-called genocide were alive. It should be noted that the British Foreign Ministry conducted its own investigation, as a result of which it came to the conclusion that Andonian’s “telegram” was a fake.

    

     An interesting and significant fact, the Turkish government proposed to establish an international commission of historians to find out the truth and open the Turkish and Armenian archives, to which Armenia categorically refused. Armenians decided to continue to exploit the lie about the bloodthirstiness of the Turks, relying on propaganda, and I must say we have achieved considerable success in this field. The human psyche is such that the first information about something is most deeply remembered. Thus, for example, Armenians refer to Hitler’s phrase “Who remembers the massacre of Armenians?”, Which he allegedly pronounced on August 22, 1939 during an appeal to the commanding staff of the armed forces, and these words are recorded in the Nuremberg trial protocol as an accusation. However, it turned out that there is nothing like this in the protocols. There were a great many similar false fabrications at the suggestion of Armenians. Hiding the reality and providing the public with false information is the only method for the advocates of the Armenian Genocide in Turkey.  Due to the spread of false propaganda, even the law on punishment for denying the Armenian genocide was adopted in France and Switzerland, but later the French Constitutional Court repealed this law as violating the principle of democracy - freedom of speech, and also because the fact of genocide was not recognized by any by the court. The Swiss court, which condemned the Turkish politician Dogu Perinchik, who denied the genocide, suffered the same fate, the European Court of Human Rights overturned this decision as violating freedom of opinion.

    Under the onslaught of the powerful Armenian diaspora, Switzerland was forced to file an appeal, which was nevertheless rejected. The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg left the previous decision unchanged and, despite an impressive delegation from Armenia led by the country's Prosecutor General, issued a final verdict on October 10, 17, which has historical significance, “from now on legally the“ Armenian genocide ”is declared not a historical fact , and by opinion, and any criminal prosecution for denying this opinion (as well as any other opinion in general) is already a violation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. ”

 

    There is still no document on the basis of which Turkey could be accused of organizing the genocide of the Armenian people. Having failed to accuse Turkey of genocide in a legal way, Armenians do not abandon attempts to propagate Lies to the wall of not individual organizers, the so-called genocide, which were never found due to the fact that there were no such people in nature, but the entire Turkish people. It would seem why the Armenians did not achieve a new trial in the Hague court, but it may happen that they turn out to be accused of the prosecutors and this is the most likely outcome that they seem to foresee.

 

There are hundreds of valid documents, not falsifications, including the statutes of the extremely Nazi Dashnaktsutyun Party, denouncing Armenians in organizing massacres and ethnic cleansing in Turkey and Azerbaijan, or even far from Armenia and Turkestan. It was the Nazis from “Dashnaktsutyun”, who made the entire Armenian people hostage for the crazy idea of ​​building a chimerical state “Great Armenia”, and are the main culprits in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people in Turkey and Azerbaijan. Armenian nationalists, taking advantage of the plight of the Turkish army on the fronts and receiving weapons from the Russians, began the extermination of the civilian population in the territory assumed under "Great Armenia". The ethnic cleansing undertaken by the Armenians in the rear was particularly cruel, the wells were bombarded with corpses, so that people would not even think about returning to their villages. To prevent a military defeat, the Turkish authorities had no choice but to begin the eviction of the Armenians in order to secure the rear in anticipation of the advancing Russian army. The columns of evicted now unarmed Armenians walked through the territory where the population had fled before, fleeing from the Armenian militants, and something happened that could not help but happen. Evil spawned evil. This was a spontaneous revenge of people, many of whom have lost their loved ones, and it was taken groundless to take it for the beating of Armenians specially organized by the authorities. It should be noted that a large number of Armenians living in Istanbul did not touch any genocide, which irrefutably testifies to the failure of the genocide planned by the Turkish government. It is precisely because of these circumstances that the Armenian guardians of the genocide fear as the light of a trial and continue to sow lies in the hope of tilting the world community to their side.

   

   08/03/19

100 years of the Republic of Azerbaijan

 

In an interview with Al Arabiya, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev revealed a historical truth concealed by Russia about the first republic in the history of the East, Azerbaijan, established by the Azerbaijani people in 1918.

I am quoting my article on this event, written for the anniversary in 2018. In the article, I foresaw Azerbaijan's break with Russia and rapprochement with the West:

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

100 Years of the Republic of Azerbaijan

 

On May 28, the people of Azerbaijan celebrate an important historical date – the 100th anniversary of the proclamation of the Democratic Republic of Azerbaijan. However, two years later, on April 28, 1920, independence was lost following the invasion of the Russian army under the command of Kirov, whose monument with a symbolic outstretched hand towered over Baku until 1991, when Azerbaijan regained its sovereignty. Independence has enabled significant economic success, despite constant military provocations from Armenia, backed by Putin's Russia and its revanchist policies. The leadership of this country, located at the crossroads of East and West, is literally forced to perform a political balancing act to avoid angering Moscow prematurely, during which time it must find friends and understanding in the West.

 

 

The fact is that Azerbaijan is not the Baltics, in the sense that Western democracy, due to a popular mentality prone to clannish power and other reasons I will discuss below, has not materialized in Azerbaijan, despite Azerbaijan positioning itself as a democratic country. Incidentally, back in 1918, the government in Azerbaijan was more democratic than it is today. True Western-style democracy also existed in 1992, when Abulfaz Elchibey became president for the first time in a popular election. However, the complex military situation in Karabakh and the lack of a political base, or more precisely, a clan, prevented Elchibey from effectively exercising power as president. A year later, he was forced to cede the post to former Politburo member Heydar Aliyev, who had a trusted supporter among his close allies. With extensive experience in government, Aliyev managed to stabilize the political situation and save the country from imminent economic collapse and its capture by Armenian Nazis with their chimerical vision of an Armenia stretching from sea to sea, with neither Azerbaijan nor the Azerbaijani people on the map. It seems the Armenians cannot forget March 1918, when, in an armed rebellion, they seized power in Baku and massacred the unarmed local population, who were forced to flee the city in their attempt to escape (1, 2). Then, despite the dire situation on the front lines of World War I, Turkey sent an army to help the fraternal people of Azerbaijan, suppressing the Armenian rebellion. Otherwise, there would be no country called Azerbaijan today.

 

It should be noted that Heydar Aliyev, even as First Secretary of the Communist Party of Azerbaijan, was committed to the creation of a diversified industry in the republic. For example, he secured the establishment of an air conditioning plant, the first and only one in the USSR. I remember a conversation between Aliyev and the director of our institute on this occasion. The institute was supposed to receive a new building, which was constructed on land adjacent to the new air conditioning plant, and even some laboratory equipment had been installed. Suddenly, Aliyev ordered the transfer of the building to the plant. The director of the institute, justifying his objection, began to talk about scientific achievements and the construction of a workshop in the Urals based on the institute's research. Then Aliyev calmly asked, "What will this mean for Azerbaijan? I need to provide jobs for people here." It was under Aliyev that non-oil enterprises emerged in Azerbaijan, although these, admittedly, declined after the collapse of the Soviet Union. But how could Aliyev have foreseen the demise of the Soviet Union in the 1970s? However, this episode highlights Aliyev's patriotism and his genuine concern for the people of the republic.

It must be said that Heydar Aliyev enjoyed prestige both at home and abroad. Not every leader has been honored with a reception by the Queen of Great Britain.

 

Certainly, under President Aliyev, democracy in Azerbaijan is a mere name, as it is throughout the post-Soviet space, including Russia (3). Only the Baltic republics remained committed to democratic principles, and to some extent, Ukraine, where democracy manifested itself in the people's blatant inability to reach a unified consensus and, consequently, in the belatedness of necessary decisions, a circumstance exploited by the revanchist Putin. The same situation, made even more dangerous by the war with Armenia, could have arisen in Azerbaijan if not for Heydar Aliyev. In this regard, Western accusations of a lack of democracy are illogical. Incidentally, due to Armenia's aggressive plans in the simmering Karabakh conflict, which Moscow is always ready to stoke, the danger remains under Aliyev Jr. Russia is very sensitive to the oil and gas projects of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan. Foreign Minister Lavrov's words convey an undisguised threat: "The trans-Caspian gas pipeline project affects Russia's legitimate interests" (4). On May 29, Azerbaijan officially opened the Southern Gas Corridor, which will supply Caspian gas to Europe, bypassing Russia (5). Moscow is undoubtedly irritated by the fact that Azerbaijan, together with Turkey and Kazakhstan, has recreated the "Great Silk Road," linking Beijing with London, also bypassing Russia (6).

 

The shared economic goals of Azerbaijan and the Turkic countries of Central Asia also contribute to political consolidation, which is particularly important given Russia's overt claims to the entire post-Soviet space.

 

Despite the well-known difficulties over the past 100 years, the Azerbaijani people approached the anniversary with a strong foundation for moving into the future.

 

 

     With firm steps into the future. (on the site of the demolished monument to Kirov, commander of the army that occupied Azerbaijan).

 

1. Azerbaijan, Azerbaijan. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/13967.html

2. A Hole in the Portrait, or From the Great Lie to "Great Armeniа"

   https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/14877.html

3. Post-Soviet Democracy (Azerbaijani-Style Democracy)

    https://samlib.ru/b/bahshi_a/alikbahshi-142.shtml

4. Russia's National Interests https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/35700.html

5. "Southern Gas Corridor" https://samlib.ru/b/bahshi_a/alikbahshi-100.shtml

6. Revival of the "Great Silk Road" https://samlib.ru/b/bahshi_a/alikbahshi-94.shtml

 

May 29, 2018.

Appeasing Putin

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

Appeasing Putin

 

 

    Trump appears to have kept his promise to stop the war between the victim of aggression, Ukraine, and the aggressor, Russia, which annexed part of Ukrainian territory. The key is not simply to stop it, but to formalize its outcome with a peace treaty between the victim and the aggressor, a more accurate term for which is appeasement. Something similar has already happened once, known as Chamberlain's appeasement, when he ceded Czechoslovakia in the hopes of preventing war. It's a shame that Franklin Roosevelt didn't think to do the same in 1941-1942. He had the potential to negotiate peace with the fascist Hitler, ceding Europe, thereby saving millions of lives, not counting Jews and Poles. Trump, in his peacemaking efforts, is similarly willing to cede Ukraine for the sake of peace and the Nobel Prize, ignoring Putin's assertion that the Ukrainian people as such do not exist.

 

    Incidentally, Armenia and Azerbaijan also signed an agreement in 1994, not for peace, but for a ceasefire. This was temporary, and thus fundamentally different from the agreement proposed by Trump after his meeting with the fascist Putin in Alaska. (1, 2)

 

1. Trump's Deal with Conscience.

  https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/trumps-deal-with-conscience.html      https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/138677.html ,

2. Hitler's Ghost  wanders through Europe.  

    https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/38049.html

 

    19.08.2025

Trump's Deal with Conscience

 

Alik Bahshi

Trump's Deal with Conscience

 

 

                                                                           Meeting in Alaska

 

   US President Donald Trump is known as a man of deals. As a businessman, Trump, by the nature of his work, was engaged in arranging deals, not always successful, however, because in every deal there is always a share of risk that each businessman takes on himself. Trump, having become president, transferred his experience as a businessman to the sphere of politics, but there is a very significant difference here, because it is one thing to risk your well-being - another thing to risk the country, its people. True, the president can appeal to the fact that the American people chose him and in this perspective let the people themselves bear responsibility. In other words, this is not Trump's problem, but America's problem. (1) In principle, this is so!

 

   It is hard to imagine that Churchill and Roosevelt could shake hands with Hitler, who was responsible for the millions of victims of the war he unleashed. Today, the American people should be ashamed that their president shook hands with the universally recognized kidnapper, murderer and world-class liar Putin. (2,3) I believe Trump is not familiar with Goethe's Faust, otherwise he would know that making a deal with Conscience is a hopeless business. Businessman Trump does not know that Conscience is the substance that will present the final bill before going into oblivion, decide to leave a good memory or consign to oblivion. Trump dreams of the Nobel Peace Prize, but I do not think that the Nobel Committee will make a Peace Prize laureate a man who shook hands with a murderer. How can such an act look in front of people tortured in Bucha, poisoned with Novichok, buried under the arches of the theater in Mariupol? Trump would hardly have shaken hands with Putin if a person close to him had been among these victims.

 1.The Problem of America.

 https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/05/alik-bahshi-problem-of-america-after.html

 2. Hitler's ghost wanders  through Europe. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/38049.html

 3. The Empire of Lies and its main liar. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/22317.html, 

     https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/hitlers-ghost-haunts-europe.html 

 

16.08.2025

 

One language - one homeland

 

Alik  Bahshi

One language - one homeland

     Peoples, whose language the word sounds the same homeland, have every reason to be one nation, one language - one homeland. For residents of Istanbul, Tabriz, Baku, Ashgabat, Tashkent, Almaty word Yurdum (Yurdum) sounds the same and has only one thing - the Motherland, so why not overcome parochialism and clannish nature of power - the main enemies of any combination, all the rest to Democracy . Why not take a sample of Turkey, which, despite the many objective obstacles, entered the 21 economically developed country, ahead of a neighboring democracy in the region, Israel, where religious laws are part of the halachic state law like Sharia law in Iran.

    Unity five Turkic countries of Turkey, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan will give them the strength and security, especially from attacks by the Russian Empire, which, judging by the efforts it had aggression in Georgia, not to give up hope for the return of lost colonies. The need for mutual support is well illustrated by the events of 1918 in Azerbaijan, when the Dashnak-raising treacherous armed rebellion in Baku and other cities of Azerbaijan started ethnic cleansing, literally cutting out the local population, clearing the way to the territory under the chimerical "Great Armenia from sea to Sea, "just as it was in Turkey in 1915." In the unarmed civilian population there was no way to resist the Nazis and Armenian, if not hasty assistance fraternal Turkey, the catastrophe would have been inevitable. I must say that for Azerbaijan security issue relevant in the present time, and the war in Nagorno-Karabakh is a consequence of the fact that in Armenia again in power, the Nazis of "Dashnaktsutyun" party, which originated long before Nazism in Germany, and is a prototype of Hitler's National Socialist Party. In this regard, some of the stories emerge associative moments when we remember that the ideology of "ARF" to a certain extent endorses Moscow, namely, during the First World War, and again found understanding the collapse of the Soviet Union shared with Yerevan strategic considerations. It is noteworthy that Moscow also maintained friendly relations with Nazi Germany until it was attacked by the Soviet Union.

   It looks like a destiny and tradition in Russia to be friends with the rogue world community, such as Hugo Chavez or dad Lukashenko, and support for the bloody Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad and tacit patronage Tehran obscurantist proof.

   Certainly, there are external enemies Turkism, Russia with its Turkic-speaking peoples, China Eastern Turkestan, Iran and South Azerbaijan, but as always, the Turks have, overcoming cravings for isolation, start with yourself, because the union is the way of the future and no other way. A good example is the Germany that we know today as powerful in every sense of the state - the result of realization of the idea of ​​pan-Germanism, associations based on ethnic, linguistic and cultural basis of ten small German states into one. If the peoples of Europe, despite the ethnic and linguistic differences, could unite, why and Turks, who do not have these differences, not to create something like the European Union.

16.01.13

 

 

 

 

Towards the Revival of Turan

 

Alik Bakhshi

Towards the Revival of Turan

 

 

All known revanchist projects, such as Great Germany, Great Italy, were unsuccessful. The same fate awaits Putin's revanchist project Great Russia, which consists of recreating the empire within the borders of the USSR. The very first and longest in time, the chimerical project "Great Armenia", which originated at the beginning of the 20th century, cost a lot of blood both to the Turks of Turkey and Azerbaijan, and to the Armenians themselves, also ended in failure.

Another matter when such grandiose national projects concern the unification of the people. For example, the idea of ​​Pan-Germanism, which united many German states (except Austria) was successfully implemented. In our time, in connection with the collapse of the USSR and the upcoming inevitable end of the Russian Empire, as a result of which the Turks of the Volga region, the Urals and Siberia will also be freed from colonial dependence, an opportunity has arisen to implement the idea of ​​​​pan-Turkism. (1) It should be noted that the very word "pan-Turkism" inspired fear in the Russians, because the Turks were the most numerous colonial people of the empire. (2)

The revival of Turan in the vast space from the Angara in Turkey to the Angara in Siberia in a form similar to the EU is quite feasible. This union will become more viable, because unlike the EU, which includes various peoples, Turan will become the unity of one Turkic people. The core and successful prototype of such a union today is the union of Turkey and Azerbaijan under the motto "one people - two states". It was thanks to this union that it was possible to put an end to the 30-year occupation of 20% of the territory of Azerbaijan by Armenia.

 

The unification of the Turks will be the key to their security and economic prosperity.

 

1. One language - one homeland. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/16879.html ,

    https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/one-language-one-homeland.html 

2. Turkey - the Turkic direction, or this terrible word - pan-Turkism.

   https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/9868.html ,

   https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/turkey-turk-direction-or-is-it-terrible.html 

 09/25/2023