An Unanswered Question

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

An Unanswered Question

 

 

Due to my diligent efforts to find an instance where President Putin had told the truth, I posed the question on my Proza.ru blog, LiveJournal, and on Russian-language forums, "I would be grateful if anyone could provide even one example of Putin telling the truth." (1) To my surprise, there was no affirmative answer. The reaction of the Proza.ru moderator to this innocent question was particularly telling. The thread immediately disappeared, replaced by the message "Work not displayed." (2) After some time, apparently realizing that he was thereby revealing the lack of truth in Putin's words, the moderator reinstated my question. However, no one who read the question found an example where Putin had told the truth. After that, the moderator was finally forced to close the thread to avoid being labeled an extremist under the new legislation and facing prison.

Thus, the lack of an answer leads to an unambiguous conclusion: Putin is a liar, which once again confirmed my long-standing definition of Putin as a liar. (3)

 

1. Who can answer a simple question? https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/66404.html

2. Who can answer a simple question? https://proza.ru/2021/05/22/140

3. The Empire of Lies and its Chief Liar. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/22317.html

 

May 28, 2021

War Instead of Elections

 

Alik Bakhshi

  With this article, I predicted a year and a half ago that Russia would inevitably attack Ukraine in 2022.

 

War Instead of Elections

                                               

 

In anticipation of the upcoming elections, Putin organized massive military exercises along the entire perimeter of the Ukrainian border, including the Belarusian-Ukrainian one. Fully aware of the potential defeat of his party in the elections and taking into account his declining popularity among the people, the security officer could easily interrupt the elections by starting a war with Ukraine. It seems the two dictators have decided that war is the surest way to maintain their power. Putin certainly doesn't want a repeat of the Belarusian election failure in Russia, and in such a case, there's nothing better than war.

 

Furthermore, war would finally complete the plan, begun in 2014, to return Ukraine to the Russian Empire and resolve the Transnistria issue. Even if he fails to seize all of Ukraine, Putin will try to open a corridor to Moldova by capturing Odessa, cutting Ukraine off from the Black Sea entirely.

 

Due to legislative and democratic procedures, the West will not be able to immediately agree on a joint response to this brazen invasion. The advantages of totalitarian rule over democracy will be evident. However, in the long term, Russia's defeat is inevitable; the only pity is that many people will fall victim to Putin's gamble.

 

September 15, 2021

The nation-forming people and their Führer, or Ukraine and so on down the list

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

The nation-forming people and their Führer,

or Ukraine and so on down the list

 

 

Explanation: "nation-forming people" is a fortunate linguistic find for a federal state, so that there is no doubt who is the most important among the numerous peoples of the Russian Empire.

 

Finally, the Russian people have found a Führer who fully corresponds to their mentality and who is capable of restoring confidence in the future to the Russian Empire and its nation-forming people.

 

 

I considered writing "leader" instead of "Führer"; the words are foreign anyway, but "Führer" is somehow stronger in spirit, which is important for this historical moment. The fact is that after the defeat in the Afghan War and the subsequent collapse of the USSR, the Russian people became somewhat lost as a result of the democratic reforms undertaken by the government (1). A pathological inability to organize and govern, a lack of initiative in political and economic activity, under the open plunder of the country by oligarchs, naturally non-Russian, led the Russian people to impoverishment and, as a consequence, the final collapse of the Russian Empire (2). Considering that the Russian people can only exist within an empire, the collapse of the empire would have threatened the very existence of the Russian people. This would likely have happened if not for the great stroke of luck when the oligarchs Berezovsky and Gusinsky made a grave mistake in finding in Putin a replacement for the utterly degenerate Yeltsin. I would like to point out that because of their mistake, the oligarchs had to flee, and Berezovsky never forgave himself for such a blunder and, in grief, hanged himself in a toilet. As the saying goes, even an old woman can make a mistake.

 

Putin's slogan, "Back to the Empire," reflects great power status as the spiritual essence of the nation-forming people and its eternal, literally painful, desire to be a "protector" of other peoples, who, one after another, have voluntarily expressed a desire to be the younger brothers of the nation-forming people. Perhaps this explains the fact that Russians are constantly searching for goodness and justice, precisely what they chronically lack. In this regard, President Putin aptly captures the well-known saying, "Every nation has the government it deserves." And the Russian people deserve sovereign democracy under the sovereign Putin—that's how President Putin defined his status in the Russian Empire. I think he was being a bit modest here; in an empire, the proper status is that of an emperor. Incidentally, it's no coincidence that coins bearing the profile of Emperor Putin have appeared. During the reign of the Tsar-father, and then under Soviet rule, the constituent peoples of the state settled in Ukraine, Crimea, the Urals, Siberia, the Caucasus, Central Asia, Transnistria, the Baltics, Karelia, and so on down the list, if I've missed anything. Moreover, it sometimes happened that before this, to avoid any misunderstandings, certain peoples—such as the Poles, Lithuanians, Latvians, Estonians, Crimean Tatars, Circassians (who almost disappeared), Chechens, and so on—were resettled in more "favorable" climates. The only exception, either through forgetfulness or thanks to the long-serving Kremlin ruler Mikoyan, were the Armenians. But I dare say the reason for this is mentality. Armenians prefer to leave Armenia, which is catastrophically depopulating, and settle in resort areas along the Black Sea coast and the North Caucasus, in the hospitable lands of Kuban and Ukraine. After the collapse of the USSR, Armenians appeared in large numbers in California. Thus, there was no need for the nation-forming people to settle in Armenia in order to expel Armenians. A kind of Armenian cunning. It must be said that the Armenians are associated with an act that is astonishing for a totalitarian state like the former Soviet Union, a kind of nonsense: ethnic cleansing—the expulsion of the Azerbaijani population from Armenia and the creation of homeless refugees, followed by the provocation in Sumgait and the seizure, with the military support of the nation-forming people, of 20% of the territory of neighboring Azerbaijan. Armenia, unlike other fraternal republics in the USSR, became the only mono-ethnic republic, and one that even annexed part of the territory of a neighboring republic. Armenia today is Russia's only strategic ally of all the breakaway republics (3).

 

As I said, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the nation-forming people became somewhat lost, but, thanks to the fatal mistake of the oligarchs, they were found again and, under the leadership of the Fuhrer, they once again began to determine, as is proper for the nation-forming people according to their status.

 

So it was decided: Tajiks would be the janitors, probably because Russian house servants are usually drunk after dinner. Incidentally, even in Tsarist times, janitors were usually Tatars for the same reason, while taxi drivers were usually Caucasians—they don't drink before leaving for work. Uzbeks were entrusted with construction and vegetable gardening. Restaurant workers were to be specially imported Serbs—they weren't pushy. Bankers were to be Jews and Armenians by default.

All would have been fine, if not for the fact that the Russian people, apparently due to their mentality, began to dominate not only their own country but also neighboring Ukraine, where they have lived since the time of Hetman Khmelnytsky, who voluntarily reunited Ukraine with Russia. Since then, the percentage of the Russian population living in Ukraine has steadily increased, fueled by the settlement of Russians in the southeastern part of Ukraine, which had been particularly depopulated as a result of the Holodomor orchestrated by Moscow. In Crimea, for example, the entire indigenous population was evicted and replaced by a state-forming people. And so today, under the leadership of Führer Putin, the gatherer of Russian lands (wherever the state-forming people reside), Ukraine is faced with a dilemma: either voluntarily renounce Crimea and the southeastern territories, or face war, as a result of which the Ukrainian people as a whole risk becoming a "fraternal" people once again. The same fate, apparently, awaits other countries where Russians live, and Russians live in many countries.

 

Alone among others, Russians are, for the most part, quite pleasant people, especially the intelligentsia. True, in numbers equal to three, some imbalance can be observed, but in a certain number, a kind of critical mass, one can expect, as the events in Ukraine demonstrate, something akin to a chain reaction, whereby the Russian people instantly transition to the status of a state-forming people, threatening the world with a nuclear chain reaction.

 

It would be useful to identify a pattern in which such a threat is possible in a given country, depending on the percentage of the state-forming people living there. A kind of mathematical constant, upon reaching which the local population could lose its state:

 

k = R/P

where R is the minimum number of Russians settling there for self-determination, and P is the size of the local population. Knowing this constant, one can always calculate in which country one would expect Russians to form their own state, depending on the resident Russian population.

 

So: R = kP

It must be assumed that each people has its own value for this constant.

 

I propose naming k, following the example of "Planck's constant," "Putin's constant," in honor of the man who first successfully demonstrated the validity of this formula. Admittedly, Hitler came very close to discovering it before him, if we recall the annexation of the Sudetenland, but his experiment was unsuccessful. I can only assume that although Putin and Hitler are both Führers of their respective nations, there is a very significant difference between them: Putin and the Russian people are inseparable. Unlike Hitler, Putin did not have to create a party; his party is the entire Russian people, boundlessly grateful to him for the return of the empire, without which the nation-forming nation has no future.

 

The German people rejected Hitler and the propaganda and punitive methods of fascist ideology imposed on them, while the Russian people, with their inherent Great Russian chauvinism, are hardly ready to reject Führer Putin, who so remarkably successfully reflects the hopes and aspirations of his people.

 

Once again I am convinced that at the most difficult historical moment, a strong personality emerges within the nation, capable of averting disaster. Thus, after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the subsequent threat of the Turkish people losing their own country, Mustafa Kamal (Atatürk) emerged—a leader whom the people completely trusted and followed into the future. Today, we know Turkey as a democratic and economically developing country, whose policies show no sign of returning to the past. To say that this is solely the work of Atatürk would be inaccurate; it also belongs to the Turkish people, who were forced to make self-sacrifice to defend their homeland in a brutal struggle against numerous enemies, and who also found the strength to renounce much that connected them to the past.

 

Putin is certainly a sought-after figure for the Russian people, but, unfortunately, he is leading them back to empire, which poses a potential threat to the countries where the nation-forming people live.

 

1. "The People's Destiny, or Every Cricket in Its Own Place" http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/4732.html

2. "When the Donkey Dies" http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/3702.html

3. "Armenia and the Moscow-Tehran Axis" http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/1347.html

 

April 25, 2014

Putin, a coward and a villain

 

Alik Bakhshi

Putin, a coward and a villain

 

 

Putin is like a maniac in his revenge against all enemies of his empire. This time, an assassin sent by him shot and killed Zelimkhan Khangoshvili, a Georgian citizen, in central Berlin. He was fighting on the side of the Republic of Ichkeria against the Russian army. The German government suspects that, as with the Skripal case in the UK (1), this was a contract killing. The killer fired two shots to the back and one to the head, then attempted to escape but was caught. He turned out to be a 49-year-old Russian citizen. The victim's brother, Zurab, said that FSB officers had attacked Zelimkhan twice before in Georgia, but that time he escaped with only a wound. The Georgian authorities did not take the investigation seriously, forcing Zelimkhan to flee to Germany. However, the maniac Putin nevertheless carried out his vengeful plan, following through on his promise to "kill" the Chechens who dared to liberate their homeland from colonial dependence. (2)

 

Behind the walls of the Kremlin lurks a true criminal, using terrorist methods to eliminate those he dislikes. For him, neither international borders, nor established international order, nor signed treaties or obligations exist—he is Satan in human form. It's no wonder the Yakut shaman Gabyshev launched a campaign against Moscow to exorcise the demon from the Kremlin. Putin was so terrified by the prospect of the shaman appearing on Red Square that he hastily dispatched a detachment of 40 armed oprichniki to Buryatia to apprehend the daredevil. What sane leader would fear a peaceful, unarmed, lone beggar who dreams of depriving him of power through prayer? It seems Putin truly is Satan, if he fears a man of God.

However, another possibility is possible: Putin, in deciding the fate of the shaman Gabyshev, wants to immortalize himself by repeating the famous act of Pontius Pilate, who executed the man who said that among human vices, one of the most important is cowardice. Only a coward could act as Putin did.

 

1. Empire of Lies, or How the Skripals Broke Putin's Principles. https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/08/the-empire-of-lies-or-how-skripals.html

2. Chechnya and the Road to Power, or the Revival of an Empire According to Putin.  https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/04/chechnya-and-road-to-power-or-revival.html

 

September 25, 2019

Taras Shevchenko and Putin - representatives of the same people

 Alik Bakhshi

Taras Shevchenko and Putin - representatives of the same people

Taras Shevchenko, poet and artist. Vladimir Putin, liar and thief.

He spoke and wrote in Ukrainian. He neither speaks nor writes in Ukrainian.

"When I die, bury me

In dear Ukraine,

Amid the vast steppe

Dig a grave,

So that I may lie on a burial mound,

Over the mighty river,

So that I may hear the raging

Old Dnieper beneath the cliff.

And when from the fields of Ukraine

The blood of hateful enemies

Carries... then I will

Rise from the grave—

I will rise and reach

God's threshold,

I will pray... But for now

I do not know God.

Bury me and rise,

Break the chains,

Sprinkle my will with the evil blood of the enemy"

                                                          Taras Shevchenko 

I'd like to ask President Putin which hateful enemies of Ukraine are we talking about, and whose enemy blood Taras Shevchenko proposes to sprinkle in the struggle for freedom. Perhaps a strongman and expert on history, as Putin positions himself—and not only positions himself but also lectures—will explain why the Ukrainian poet and artist Shevchenko was exiled to the Kazakh steppes and forbidden to write or draw. It's a shame, but in those distant years, the imperial authorities didn't know the correct history according to Putin, namely, that Russians are the indigenous people of Ukraine. If that were true, they wouldn't have taken the reference to enemies in Shevchenko's poem personally, and they shouldn't have exiled the Russian Shevchenko. Incidentally, I'm interested in how Putin will explain why Shevchenko wrote not in Russian, but in some Ukrainian language, if he was Russian. How is it that if Russians and Ukrainians are, as Putin claims, the same people, then why do they speak different languages? For example, people in Turkey and people in Azerbaijan speak the same language they understand—Turkic. They are truly one people living in different countries. I believe the newly created "Commission under the President of the Russian Federation to Counter Attempts to Falsify History to the Detriment of Russia's Interests" (1) will find an explanation for this phenomenon. I dare to suggest that Shevchenko, when speaking of enemies, prophetically had in mind the State Department, Navalny, and other foreign agents like him.

"If they are right,

you understand my lie!

If they are human,

are we to be called human?"

Nizami

1. Appeal to the "Commission under the President of the Russian Federation to Counter Attempts to Falsify History. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/6934.html

01.07.2021

Give us Donetsk! Or a May 9th parade in Donetsk

 Alik Bakhshi

Give us Donetsk! Or a May 9th parade in Donetsk

                                                                                   

  

As reality shows, Russian President Putin is a deeply cynical pragmatist, meticulously and long-term in his plans, secretly from the public, as is typical of a professional KGB officer—an organization in whose ranks Putin faithfully served during the Soviet era. I'm sure Putin has long had the seizure of Crimea and southeastern Ukraine in mind, as well as his claims to the remaining territories the Russian Empire lost with the collapse of the USSR. Putin doesn't hide his regret, equating the disappearance of the Soviet Union with the greatest geopolitical catastrophe. Putin sees his task as president, and in this he is united with the Russian people, as the return to the bosom of the empire of former fraternal peoples who fled the "prison of nations," which, according to the founder of Marxism, is Russia (1). Remember that Putin's first political undertaking was the bloody massacre of the small Chechen people who had sought freedom.(2) In this regard, the Ukrainian Maidan was merely a pretext for the annexation of Crimea and the seizure of southeastern Ukraine, with its densely populated Russian population, which Putin effortlessly turned into a fifth column, having already dispatched Chekist provocateurs and outright fascists to Ukraine, who, with Putin's help, were legitimized in Russia. I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out that there are Russian army soldiers disguised in civilian uniforms in Donetsk or Luhansk, or even paid bandits and hooligans released from prison.

Bold lies and disinformation, hypocrisy and cynical treachery—these are what guide the Russian president from literally his first steps in the Kremlin. I dare say these same character traits are inseparable from Putin's personality in his everyday life. Putin, without hesitation, is marching toward his intended target over the corpses of residents of buildings deliberately blown up as a pretext for starting the Second Chechen War. Putin is not in the least embarrassed by his blatant, involuntarily humorous lie about the non-participation of the Russian regular army in the annexation of Crimea. The Russian president continues to lie, claiming the alleged absence of Russian special services on Ukrainian territory, sent by him to destabilize the political situation ahead of the presidential elections and seize Ukraine's southeastern region.

It must be said that Putin, in accordance with a carefully crafted plan, launched an active undercover operation against Ukraine, attempting to install a corrupt figure as president. For Moscow, this was a bold and the only correct decision, because

- firstly, a corrupt government will never agree to an association with the EU, as it would be tantamount to signing its own death warrant;

- secondly, a corrupt government is easy for Moscow to keep on a short leash.

Forgive my immodesty, but back in early 2006, I foresaw the danger Yanukovych posed to the Ukrainian people (3,4), and, unfortunately, my fears were not unfounded. Although it took a second attempt, Putin succeeded in bringing Yanukovych to presidential power. The blame here lies primarily with the Ukrainian people. After all, why wouldn't the Maidan have happened a year before the Sochi Olympics? It's unlikely Putin would have dared to resort to aggression at that time. Naivety and indiscriminateness, and perhaps even indifference in electing people to power, ultimately resulted in a catastrophic situation for Ukraine, like a rabbit in the tightening coils of a python. The Kremlin's reliance on Yanukovych fully justified its efforts. During his presidency, Yanukovych handed out command posts in the army and police to traitors to the Ukrainian people, just like himself. This circumstance explains the inaction of law enforcement agencies and the army in response to Russia's blatant aggression.

I believe the Russian army will not stop at Crimea and will invade southeastern Ukraine, because Putin is not the type to easily abandon his goals. Putin absolutely cannot see Ukraine joining the EU, as it runs counter to his "Back to Empire" policy. Moreover, he has gone so far in implementing his plan to seize Ukrainian territory that he cannot afford to stop halfway, otherwise the Russian people, with their great-power worldview, will consider Putin a traitor and a windbag. The likelihood that the Russian army will march in Donetsk on May 9 is quite high. Yes, popular celebration and jubilation are expected in Russia, but what will happen afterward?

It is safe to assume that the Russian people will acquire a bitter enemy right on their border. Moreover, the global community is finally recognizing Russia for what it is: an Evil Empire that was and remains one. Economic isolation is inevitable for Russia, after which the empire will disintegrate, and this time for good.

1. Great Russian Chauvinism and Putin Its Führer. http://samlib.ru/b/bahshi_a/alikbahshi-38.shtml

2. Chechnya and the Road to Power, and or the Revival of the Empire According to Putin.

     http://www.proza.ru/2008/03/22/527

3. Whose Crimea? http://www.proza.ru/2008/03/23/498

4. The Terrible Price for Protection from Rose Revolutions. http://www.proza.ru/2008/03/22/593

22.04.14.

On the rupture of relations between Azerbaijan and Russia

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

On the rupture of relations between Azerbaijan and Russia

 

 

The rupture of relations between Baku and Moscow was quite expected. Russia's aggressive imperial policy has never been supported by Azerbaijan, and the persecution of Azerbaijanis in Russia on ethnic grounds has exposed the aggressive nature of the Russian state and the Russian people towards other nations. Some believe that Putin is to blame for everything, but this is far from reality, because everything Putin does finds support among the Russian people. Maybe I'm unlucky, but I have not met a single Russian who condemns Putin. I was shocked when I saw a long line of Russian Israelis at the embassy in Tel Aviv voting for Putin during the presidential elections. I am sure that the Russians living in Azerbaijan are also for Putin. Russians, like in Ukraine or Lithuania, are a fifth column supporting the lies coming from the Kremlin. Aliyev did the right thing by closing down Sputnik, which is known for its espionage and propaganda activities. It is no wonder that this Russian organization was closed down in many countries. I myself had to experience the activities of Russians in the media, so 10 years ago, not on the Russian, but on the Azerbaijani Russian-language forum Bakililar.AzForum, the local administration blocked me for my anti-Putin articles without any explanation. By the way, I am still prohibited from publishing there. I have no doubt that, if the opportunity arises, Russians in Azerbaijan will show their attitude to the country where they live, as happened in Ukraine.

 

Today, the Kremlin has unleashed all its full-time propagandists on Azerbaijan and President Aliyev, who, you see, dared to call the Russian authorities to order and justice in accordance with the law.

 

Some readers saw in my words incitement to hatred towards the Russian people. As an example, I will cite the response of a certain Oleg Namazov, outraged by my definition of the Russian people as Great Russian chauvinism. By the way, I am not the first to have this opinion.

Oleg Namazov:

In the USSR it was not like now. I said and did what I wanted, and the chauvinism was of bug proportions. And I calmly dared to prove any truth among Russians, as an Azerbaijani, even in Moscow or Irkutsk. And so, this point of view of yours is also included in the toolkit of string pullers, manipulators of public opinion...

 

    Oleg Namazov, you say the chauvinism was of bug proportions? And the fact that all textbooks on higher education were in Russian, does this mean anything to you? Dissertations had to be written exclusively in Russian. That is, the entire color of the people, the entire cultural layer of any people in the USSR had to be presented in Russian. The national languages ​​of the peoples were under threat of extinction. Russians usually did not know the language of the indigenous people in the republics and even treated them with mockery if they spoke Russian poorly. And if someone began to complain about this situation, they would be labeled a nationalist and, at best, sent to a madhouse. The national republics were subjected to robbery at the state level. Have you ever thought about why, when the country was starving, people went to Moscow for sausage and butter. You say that in the USSR you did what you wanted, but your desires were very limited, like a bug that needs nothing more than an acre of blood. I also wanted fried potatoes at that time, but the butter disappeared from the grocery stores in Baku. I had no choice but to fulfill my desire to fly to Moscow. I bought 15 kg of butter, which I melted in a student dormitory. The smell of melted butter permeated the entire floor. Oleg Namazov must not have asked himself why Moscow has everything, while Baku does not even have such a necessary product as butter.

Azerbaijan, having freed itself from Moscow, has transformed itself and this is a clear example of what independence from Russia has given. And what is the Russian people, who overwhelmingly vote for Putin and consider Crimea and Ukraine to be Russian land, can be seen from the results of those atrocities that were demonstrated to them in Bucha and Baku. This is chauvinism, which you have measured with the size of a bug. Rather, you, my dear, have a brain like a bug.

 

  And the USSR by its nature was a bug of enormous size, sucking the blood of other nations, bringing them to a state of poverty, and when everything was already sucked out, Moscow, realizing that there was nothing more to feed on, threw out a cry, like, we have nothing to feed the other republics. And now, when the free republics have grown stronger, it has smelled fresh blood. This is the essence of Russia and its people. It is the people who determine the place where they live. As they say, it is not the place that makes the man, but the man that makes the place. So what kind of people Russia is, such is its country. And Russia is an aggressor country and it is not about Putin, but about the Russian people. However, this circumstance concerns any people. No one else but the people is responsible for everything they have shown themselves to be. In short, what kind of people are, such is the country. For example, Finland is the most prosperous country and it owes its well-being to the people living in it. Finland has no oil or gas, a quarter of the country is covered with snow for 8 months, while Russia has oil and gas and fertile land, but the people are in poverty. Move the Finns to Russia, and the Russians to Finland, it is not hard to guess what prosperous Finland will turn into and how Russia will be transformed. The Finns work and create wealth, build huge airliners, produce phones, that is, they produce everything for the benefit of the people, and the Russians create Kalashnikovs to rob and kill people. Here you have a distinctive feature, in this case, the Russian people, from other peoples.

 

07/05/2025

On the results of the Russian-Ukrainian war

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

On the results of the Russian-Ukrainian war

 

Concern for the well-being of the Russian, that is, the Ukrainian people, which, according to the historical discovery of the famous Kremlin historian Putin, is the same thing, forced Russia to invade Ukraine. However, Russian Ukrainians (that is, the people inhabiting the territory called Ukraine), apparently due to insufficient education, not understanding Putin's discovery, worthy of the Nobel Prize, met the tanks of their half-brothers as German fascists in 1941, not recognizing the difference between them not only visually, but also in the consequences of the invasion.

 

                                                                                       

 

And what is especially offensive for the benefactors from Russia, Russian Ukrainians, stupefied by the Jew Zelensky, who they themselves elected as president, who took advantage of their delusion, began to desperately resist. Moreover, they found entertainment in setting fire to Russian tanks with Javelins, which Zelensky had begged overseas Jews for this purpose. There, overseas, they decided to finish the job they had started, if we recall the 1917 revolution, when the Jews befuddled the Russians with Marx's communist idea, specially invented to destroy the Russian Empire. This Marx turned out to be a treacherous guy, his ideology, like a time bomb, ticked for 80 years and suddenly, when the Russian people were peacefully vegetating in anticipation of the promised communist Paradise, it went off so hard that the Empire collapsed like a "house of cards". The Javelins were followed by more destructive toys for Ukrainian Russians: Heimers, Harpoons, Caesars, Cheetahs, Leopards and others, which, according to Putin, have no analogues in the Russian army. Russian soldiers, who, due to the usual Russian sloppiness, were not warned about the existence of such beasts, ran away, scared only by the scary names. After all, no one wants to be harpooned or bitten to death.

 

Putin, in order to avenge the shameful flight and show the population that Russian weapons can do the same, ordered the destruction of Ukrainian power plants using expensive "calibers" and "daggers", launching them from Russian territory. This is, so to speak, a gift to the Russian people living in Ukraine for the winter. For the same purpose, the Zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant was taken out of operation. In short, the Kremlin fools began to bombard Ukraine with the remaining missiles, which will cause a response and I will not be surprised if missiles are launched from Ukraine into Russian cities.

 

Of course, the Jewish-Armenian propagandists who infiltrated Russian television and set the fraternal nations against each other are also to blame for what happened. They specifically foamed at the mouth assuring that as soon as Russian tanks crossed the border, the Ukrainian army would flee, and the population would meet the soldiers with bread and salt. It seems that Putin, like all Russians, believed this when he started the war, and now the Russian Empire will finally fall apart, and the Russian people will pay for the war for many years with free gas and oil.

 

The great power worldview of the Russian people made Putin the master of the Kremlin (1), and it will also be the cause of a popular uprising, the angry people will crucify Putin at the gates of the Kremlin for losing the empire, without which they cannot exist, because outside of it they will be lost. (2)

 

1. Great Russian chauvinism, and Putin is its Fuhrer

    https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21133.html

2. Back to the empire, or restoration of historical justice according to Putin.

    https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/22792.html

 

09/13/2022

An Updated History of the Russian State (according to V.V. Putin)

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

An Updated History of the Russian State

(according to V.V. Putin)

 

 

History as a discipline in Russia has a unique characteristic: it changes with each new ruler of the Kremlin, serving the goals and plans of that ruler depending on the circumstances. After the collapse of the USSR, Putin, who did not hide his regret over the significant loss of once-conquered territories, harbored thoughts of revenge, a sentiment confirmed by military adventures in Georgia and Ukraine. There is no doubt that the fate of Ukraine would have befallen the former Soviet Baltic states, which had a higher percentage of ethnic Russians than Ukraine, had they not joined NATO in time.

It is important to note that, under Yeltsin, with the fall of the communist regime, historical materials relating to World War II, which had been carefully concealed from the public, became available. However, even earlier, perhaps those who didn't take Soviet propaganda at face value and took an analytical approach to historical facts inevitably raised questions that were dangerous for the authorities, or rather for themselves (1). The truth about the war (2) didn't suit the revanchist Putin, so he declared himself the custodian of the state archive, which affected its accessibility. Moreover, in order to reinstate the lies with which the Russian people had lived throughout the Soviet era, Putin created a special body charged with protecting these lies, with the rather frank name "The Commission under the President of the Russian Federation to Counter Attempts to Falsify History to the Detriment of Russia's Interests" (3). This is precisely the case when the truth hurts the eyes and is unwelcome to the people with their imperial worldview.

It must be said that Putin, in order to justify his territorial claims, began searching for historical bonds, and exclusively outside of Russia. Incidentally, the bearer of the bonds pledged to protect the "Russian world" in countries that had broken away from the Russian Empire, while within Russia itself, he successfully fleeced the dwindling population, willing to endure any hardship for the sake of "Crimea is ours." However, Russian history is known for popular rebellion, "senseless and merciless." Time will tell how long the people's patience will last, and it may well be that the desperate people crucify their idol and his nouveau riche cronies at the gates of the Kremlin.

                                                                       

Returning to the Russian people the history written by their Kremlin predecessors, Putin decided to make his own contribution by writing an article, "On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians," the essence of which boils down to a discovery in historical science: namely, that Russians and Ukrainians are one people. It's a shame Taras Shevchenko didn't live to see this Nobel Prize-worthy discovery. Then he wouldn't have had to serve exile in Central Asia and waste his time writing the poem "Testament," which lost its relevance after Putin's discovery. I'd like to brag, but I'll say right away, without any Nobel Prize ambitions, that I wrote an article on my blog (4) entitled "Taras Shevchenko and Putin – Representatives of the Same People" somewhat earlier than Putin. I don't think Putin will be offended, as it's purely coincidental, especially since I'm, so to speak, a history buff compared to Putin. Incidentally, following the logic of Putin's historical research, Hitler could also have declared the English and Germans to be a single Anglo-Saxon people, despite the fact that they don't understand each other, just as the Russians don't understand the Ukrainians. My only personal criticism of Putin the historian's article, undoubtedly due to my lack of knowledge, concerns the phrase by former St. Petersburg Mayor Anatoly Sobchak: "Leave with what you came with," which is key to the article justifying Putin's intentions to reclaim territories stolen by the former Soviet republics that left the Russian Empire. The fact is, as we know, they didn't come to the empire, but were brought there, meaning conquered, for example, Turkestan (5), the Caucasus, or even Crimea. However, I repeat, this is probably due to my misunderstanding of the factual historical material.

 

1.The Father of Papers and the History of the Russian State. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/66241.html

2. Stalin's Fatal Mistake That Saved the World. 

   https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/20036.html

3. Appeal to the "Commission under the President of the Russian Federation to Counter Attempts to Falsify History to the Detriment of Russia's Interests" https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/6934.html

4. Taras Shevchenko and Putin – Representatives of the Same People. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/69850.html

5. E. A. Glushchenko. Russia in Central Asia: Conquests and Transformations. Moscow: Centerpoligraf, 2010

 

July 15, 2021

Putin's New Vehicle

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

Putin's New Vehicle

 

 

 

 

    It appears Putin has finally fulfilled one of his many promises: the newest vehicle for transporting people to Heaven and Hell has successfully completed tests in Severodvinsk. This vehicle is a nuclear-powered rocket, ensuring its full mission is accomplished. From now on, the road to Heaven for the Russian people and to Hell for everyone else, as Putin promised, is closed. Presumably, mass production of this vehicle for transporting people to holy places will now begin.

 

August 20, 2019