2017, Ukraine do not miss the chance!

 Unfortunately, Ukraine did not take advantage of the opportunity to return the territories occupied by Russia.

Alik Bakhshi

 

2017, Ukraine do not miss the chance!

     In 2017, Ukraine is given a chance to clear its territory of Russian invaders. The fact is that in 2018 Russia will host the World Cup. So, if Ukraine starts active military operations in 2017 to restore its territorial integrity, it is unlikely that Putin will decide on an open military confrontation on the eve of the World Cup 2018, especially since the Russian president adheres to the lie about Russia’s non-intervention in the ongoing war of the Ukrainian state with separatist fighters in the South-East of the country. If Putin does not surrender the separatists and gets involved in the war, then the Mundial, the holding of which in Russia has already been called into question due to corruption scandals in FIFA, will definitely be covered with a copper basin. The reaction of the world community will undoubtedly turn out to be unfavorable for Russia, and regardless of military successes. The role of an outcast of the world community of Russia cannot be avoided. There is no doubt that in the event of a full-scale war between Russia and Ukraine, the latter will begin to receive military assistance from the West. The war will become protracted. By the way, a similar scenario already took place in the Crimean War of 1853-1856, which Russia successfully lost due to economic and technical backwardness. There is no doubt that for the same reason the current war will turn out to be a defeat for Russia.

 

     Here we must take into account a very important circumstance, namely, that Putin has no way back, he cannot keep the regions torn from Ukraine in limbo for an indefinitely long time. It is clear that the so-called self-proclaimed Lugansk and Donetsk republics are not capable of functioning as independent states on their own. On the other hand, if Russia “according to the will of the population” of these republics, or according to Putin’s definition of Novorossiya, annexes this part of the territory of Ukraine, then, as it were, an end is put, and thereby the legal possibility of further expansion is excluded, and after all, Putin initially planned to seize all of Ukraine on the basis of from the message to which he directly pointed out, namely, that Russians and Ukrainians are one people. Here the question involuntarily arises, where exactly does the Russian revanchist see the end of the borders of Novorossia, or, like in Russia, according to Putin's dreamy but significant joke, do they end nowhere. And isn't it time to remember Putin another name for Ukraine - Little Russia.

   I believe that Putin has been preparing for the return of Ukraine to the bosom of the empire for a long time, for which he introduced his corrupt henchman Yanukovych, interfering in the presidential elections in Ukraine, but the Maidan violated his far-reaching plan. With this in mind, and also taking into account Putin's undisguised regret about the collapse of the Soviet Union, after the World Cup 2018, he will activate his innermost intention to return the former colonial peoples to Russia.

   Therefore, Ukraine must get ahead of Putin, finally declare martial law in the country and begin to liberate its territory from the invaders right now, in 2017, otherwise after the World Cup 2018 it will face big problems. By the way, a similar situation was before the Sochi Olympics and in the article “Ukraine as a Victim of the Immorality of the West towards Russia” I wrote: “One thing is clear, before the Sochi Winter Olympics, Russia will not invade Ukraine, so as not to repeat the failed Moscow Olympics in 1980. Therefore, Ukrainians need to hurry up with joining the EU before the end of the Sochi Olympiad” (1). And in the articles “A terrible price for a roof from rose revolutions” for 12/26/2005 (2) and “Whose Crimea” for 02/06/2006 (3), that is, long before the annexation of Crimea in 2014, I foresaw a Russian military invasion of Ukraine . Then the Ukrainians missed, one might say, all the possibilities and even missed the traitor Yanukovych, allowing him to flee.

    Without a doubt, the desire of the revanchist Putin to restore the empire within the borders of the Soviet Union under the far-fetched and insidious pretext of "defending the Russian world", and exclusively through the annexation of foreign territories, while in Russia itself this notorious Russian world is heading towards an economic catastrophe, will lead to another collapse empire. And, if the situation for Putin, in which he has driven himself, provides for two outcomes, the first is to be crucified by an angry people at the gates of the Kremlin and the second is to plunge the World into a nightmare of nuclear war (4), then in general for the Russian people with its According to the imperial worldview, there is only one outcome - the inevitable loss of the empire.

 

1. Ukraine as a victim of the immorality of the West in relation to Russia. 

    https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/06/ukraine-victim-of-immorality-west.html

2. The terrible price of protection from Rose Revolutions.

     https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/the-terrible-price-of-protection-from.html

3. Whose Crimea.  https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/04/who-is-putin.html

4. Nuclear nightmare as the only way for the Russian Fuhrer. 

     https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/nuclear-nightmare-as-only-way-russian.html

 

 05/24/17

The terrible price of protection from Rose Revolutions

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

The terrible price of protection from Rose Revolutions

 

   The Rose Revolution proved highly contagious, and its virus, lethal to the ruling nomenklatura entrenched in the power structures of the former Soviet republics, including Russia, is inexorably spreading across the post-communist space from West to East. In a relatively short time, the virus has struck Ukraine, Georgia, and Kyrgyzstan, wiping out the Kremlin-dependent and corrupt party bureaucracy from the annals of power. Judging by the political situation, the virus has penetrated Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan. However, it appears these countries do not yet have sufficient fertile ground for its successful pro-democratic activity. The same can be said of Russia, where, despite the presence of democratic parties, the virus is powerless, not because the state authorities hide from the people behind the high walls of the Kremlin, but because a significant portion of the Russian people has a strong immunity to the democratic "infection." This is precisely why there are no representatives of Russian nationality among the leaders of democratic parties. (More on this in my article "The People's Destiny, or Every Cricket in Its Own Place.") This immunity is explained by the traditional Russian servility to officials of any rank and a great-power imperial worldview. And as long as this immunity is present in the people literally at the genetic level, no variety of the democratic virus poses a threat to the Kremlin. Consequently, power in the Russian Empire can only be totalitarian. Empire and democracy are incompatible!

 

  The situation is different in the former Baltic Soviet colonies. There, the peoples of Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia have acquired national freedom and democracy simultaneously as self-evident and integral components of modern society. The color revolutions that took place in Ukraine and Georgia seem to have permanently brought their peoples within the legal framework of democracy. The only threat to these countries is the loss of territorial integrity, as the Kremlin will not exploit the difficult demographic situation in eastern Ukraine and Crimea, with their large concentration of Russians, and, of course, the extremely complex interethnic issues in Georgia. The democratic breakthrough in Kyrgyzstan, in the very heart of Asia, can be considered an unexpected phenomenon, but how serious it is, contrary to local perceptions, remains to be seen. As for the democratic situation in the remaining newly independent Soviet republics, it has undergone virtually no significant changes, and their democratization is hampered by the clan-based power structure traditional in the East.

 

  What is characteristic of all color revolutions is Moscow's extremely negative reaction. The fact is that color revolutions deprive Moscow of its reliance on corrupt authorities, finally removing former Russian colonies from political influence. Moreover, Moscow's reaction to democratic successes in its neighbors is a kind of test of the state of democracy in Russia itself.

 

  Given the above, the hasty and somewhat unexpected signing of the Treaty on Alliance Relations between Russia and Uzbekistan becomes understandable. In addition to the now-traditional generalities about combating international terrorism, it also provides for the deployment of Russian troops in the event of aggression by a third state. It's difficult to imagine that any neighbor, much less one on another continent, is planning aggression against Uzbekistan. Most likely, any move by the domestic opposition would be interpreted as aggression. The presence of international terrorists in Uzbekistan would immediately be announced, as happened in Chechnya, and a Russian soldier, fulfilling his international duty, would once again occupy the country. History remembers similar mutual assistance treaties between the Soviet Union and the Baltic states, which resulted in the latter losing their independence. But while those treaties were imposed by force, in this case, it represents a mutually beneficial deal between the Uzbek dictator, fearful of losing power, and a country increasingly reclaiming its imperial status. This treaty cannot be called international in any way, as it is an agreement between Russia and one man – Islam Karimov. Fear of an impending color revolution is the main reason that pushed Karimov to commit such a vile act against his people and his country. By signing the treaty, Karimov not only betrayed the Uzbek people but also transformed himself from the president of an independent country into a puppet, from which Putin can henceforth do whatever he pleases. It is no coincidence that, according to the text of the treaty, it remains in force until 12 months from the date on which one party notifies the other in writing of its intention to terminate it. Thus, Russia has ample time to turn the political situation in its favor, even to the point of replacing one puppet with another.

 

  A similar situation could arise in Azerbaijan. But if the Azerbaijani president, like Karimov, seeks to base his power in Moscow, then complications are inevitable due to the Karabakh conflict, in which Russia traditionally supports the Armenian side, and a mutual assistance treaty with Russia, as signed by Karimov, is impossible. And although Karimov's example demonstrates that there is no limit to human baseness, it seems that the son of Comrade Heydar Aliyev will not take such a step. If he loses a fair fight in the re-election or subsequent elections and another clan comes to power, which is most likely for Azerbaijan, then in the worst-case scenario, Aliyev Jr. will end up abroad, perhaps even in Russia.

 

  Regardless of any domestic political events, the most important thing for all former Russian colonies is to maintain their independence. This is precisely what Washington's policy should be focused on, in order to prevent the possibility of a revival of the Russian Empire within its former borders. Alas, the current occupant of the White House is a lousy politician; he doesn't understand that "the East is a delicate matter." The brilliant Winston Churchill once noted a certain political naiveté among Americans in their relations with Russia, for which they later paid with the long Cold War. But while Roosevelt, who relied entirely on the Soviet Union as a sincere ally, can be accused of naivety, Bush Jr., who found an ally in Russia in the fight against the virtual global Islamic conspiracy, an ally that is handing the atomic baton to the Iranian obscurantists, can be called simply a madman.

 

  Instead of addressing the real cause of the September 11 tragedy—namely, actively addressing the Arab-Israeli conflict—cowboy Bush, riding a camel, began racing across the sands of Babylon, shouting "Give us Democracy!" so loudly that he scared the czars in the entire area to death, one of whom, terrified of this very democracy, chose to hide in the lion's mouth.

 

March 29, 2008

 

 

Страшная плата за крышу от розовых революций

 

Aлик Бахши

 

  

  Страшная плата за крышу от розовых революций

 

 

  

   Революция роз оказалась весьма заразной и вирус её, смертельный для правящей номенклатуры, осевшей во властных структурах бывших Союзных республик, включая и Россию, неумолимо распространяется по всему посткоммунистическому пространству с Запада на Восток. За сравнительно короткое время вирус поразил Украину, Грузию, Киргизию, выметя из анналов власти, зависимую от Кремля и погрязшую в коррупции партократию. Судя по политической ситуации, вирус проник в Азербайджан и Узбекистан. Однако, видимо, в этих странах нет ещё достаточной питательной среды для его успешной продемократической деятельности. То же самое можно сказать и о России, в которой, несмотря на наличие демократических партий, вирус бессилен и не потому, что государственная власть прячется от народа за высокими стенами Кремля, а потому, что значительная часть русского народа имеет стойкий иммунитет против демократической "заразы". Именно поэтому среди лидеров демократических партий нет представителей русской национальности. (Более детально об этом в моей статье "Народная судьба или каждому сверчку свой шесток".) Иммунитет этот объясняется традиционным для русского раболепием перед чиновником любого ранга и великодержавным имперским мировозрением. И пока этот иммунитет присутствует в народе буквально на генетическом уровне, никакая разновидность демократического вируса для Кремлёвской власти не страшна. Как следствие, власть в Российской империи может быть не иначе, как только тоталитарной. Империя и Демократия вещи несовместимые!

    

    Иная ситуация в бывших Прибалтийских советских колониях. Там народы Литвы, Латвии и Эстонии обрели национальную свободу и демократию одновременно как само собой разумеющиеся и неотъемлемые составляющие современного общества. Цветные революции происшедшие на Украине и Грузии похоже навсегда ввели их народы в правовое поле демократии. Единственно, что угрожает этим странам, это потеря территориальной целостности, ибо Кремль не применёт использовать непростую демографическую ситуацию в восточной части Украины и в Крыму, с большой концентрацией русского населения, ну и конечно, чрезвычайно сложные межнациональные приблемы в Грузии. Прорыв демократии в Киргизии в самом центре Азии можно отнести к неожиданому феномену, a насколько это серьёзно, вопреки местному менталитету, покажет время. Что касается положения с демократией в остальных, ставших независимыми, советских республиках, то оно почти не претерпело никаких существенных изменений и их демократизации мешает традиционная для Востока клановая основа власти.

 

   Что показательно для всех цветных революций, так это крайне негативная реакция Москвы. Дело в том, что цветные революции лишают Москву опоры на коррумпированную власть, окончательно уводя из под политического влияния бывшие колонии России. Более того, реакция Москвы на успехи демократии у соседей, это своего рода тест на состояние демократии в самой России.

  

   С учётом вышеизложенного, становится понятным столь поспешное и где-то неожиданное подписание Договора о союзнических отношениях между Россией и Узбекистаном, в котором, кроме традиционных на сегодняшний день общих фраз о противостоянии международному терроризму, предусматривается введение русских войск в случае агрессии со стороны третьего государства. Трудно предположить, что кто-то из соседей и тем более из пределов другого материка планирует агрессию против Узбекистана, скорее всего за агрессию будет принят любой шаг внутренней оппозиции. Тут же будет объявлено о появлении в Узбекистане международных террористов, как это имело место в Чечне, и русский солдат, выполняя свой интернациональный долг, вновь оккупирует страну. История помнит подобные договора о взаимопомощи между Советским союзом и Прибалтийскими государствами, в результате которых последние потеряли свою независимость. Но если тогда договора были навязаны силой, то в данном случае это обоюдно выгодная сделка между узбекским диктатором, боящимся потерять власть и страной всё более возращающей себе статус империи. Договор этот международным назвать никак нельзя, потому что это договор между Россией и одним человеком - Исламом Каримовым. Страх перед грядущей цветной революцией является главной причиной подтолкнувшей Каримова на столь низкий поступок по отношению к своему народу и своей стране. Поставив подпись на договоре, Каримов не только предал узбекский народ, но и из статуса президента независимой страны перевёл себя в разряд марионетки, с которой отныне Путин может делать всё, что ему заблагорассудиться. Недаром, согласно тексту договора, он остаётся в силе до истечения 12 месяцев со дня, когда одна из сторон в письменной форме уведомит другую о своём намерении прекратить его действие. Таким образом, у России вполне достаточно времени, чтобы развернуть политическую ситуацию в выгодное направление, причём вплоть до замены одной марионетки другой.

  

    Аналогичная картина может возникнуть в Азербайджане. Но, если президент Азербайджана, подобно Каримову, будет искать опору своей власти в Москве, то в этом случае непременно предвидятся осложнения из-за Карабахского конфликта, в котором Россия традиционно поддерживает армянскую сторону, и договор о взаимопомощи с Россией в том виде, в каком он был подписан Каримовым, невозможен. И, хотя на примере товарища Каримова, видно, что нет пределу человеческой низости, думается, что сын товарища Гейдара Алиева на такой шаг не пойдёт. Если он в честной борьбе проиграет на повторных или следующих выборах и к власти придёт другой клан, что вероятнее всего для Азербайджана, то в худшем случае Алиев-младший окажется за границей, возможно даже в России.

  

 

   Kакие бы внутренние политические события не происходили, самое главное для всех бывших российских колоний, - это не потерять независимость. Именно на это должна быть ориентирована политика Вашингтона, дабы пресечь возможможность возрождения Российской империи в её былых границах. Увы, нынешний хозяин Белого дома политик никудышный, ему невдомёк, что "Восток - дело тонкое". Гениальный У.Черчиль в своё время отмечал у американцев присутствие некоей политической наивности во взаимотношениях с Россией, за что потом и пришлось расплачиваться долгим периодом Холодной войны. Но если Рузвельта, всецело пологавшегося на Советский Союз как на искреннего союзника, и можно упрекнуть в наивности, то Буша-младшего, нашедшего себе союзника, в лице России, в деле борьбы с виртуальным всемирным исламским заговором, союзника передающего в руки иранских мракобесов атомную дубинку, можно назвать просто чистым безумцем.

  

   Вместо того, чтобы искоренить действительную причину трагедии 11 сентября, a именно, активно заняться разрешением арабо-израильского конфликта, ковбой Буш, оседлав верблюда, принялся носиться по пескам Вавилона с кличем "Даёшь Демократию!" Да так громко, что насмерть перепугал вo всей округе товарищей царьков, один из которых со страху перед этой самой демократией предпочёл спрятаться в пасти льва.

 

 

  29.03.2008

  

  

  

  

 

Biden called Putin who he is

 

 

Alik Bakhshi

Biden called Putin who he is

     President Biden answered in the affirmative to a direct question from a correspondent whether he considers Putin to be a murderer. Putin found nothing better than to answer with childish babble, "whoever calls his name is what is called." In this simple verbal skirmish between the two presidents, Biden is morally and ethically superior to Putin. The fact is that Biden had to answer a simple question asked to him. As an honest and direct person, he, unlike his predecessors and soft-spoken European politicians, did not seek words to evade an answer in a diplomatic way. He defined Putin for who he really is. 

   Finally, a male politician appeared in the West, who gave a completely fair assessment of the St. Petersburg bandit, calling him a murderer. A bloody trail has been following Putin literally from the very first days of his stay in the Kremlin. The bombing of houses along with their residents was followed by enough murders, testifying to how cynical Putin is about human life in order to achieve the goal of reviving the Russian Empire. 

  The motto "no man - no problem" can be easily correlated with Putin's activities as president. In addition, the goal is to match the methods of achieving it. A revenge "back to the empire" requires, first of all, a leader or a Fuhrer (the German translation is more suitable in this case), who will return the empire they have lost to the Russian people, who have an imperial outlook. (1) The shadow of Hitler in the person of Putin hangs over Europe again (1) and I hope Biden will awaken it in the face of the threat of a new fascism in the person of Putin's Russia. (2,3)

 

1. Great Russian chauvinism, Putin and his Fuhrer.

     https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/great-russian-chauvinism-and-putin-its.html 

      https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21133.html

2. The ghost of Hitler is haunting Europe. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/38049.html

 3. Russian fascism. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/49653.html

 

03/19/2021

A Demonstrative Ride by Putin's Oprichniks

 Alik Bakhshi

A Demonstrative Ride by Putin's Oprichniks

    The end of the school year in Russia was marked by a rather significant event: the defiant behavior of school graduates, who celebrated their graduation with a demonstrative drive in dozens of Geländewagens through the streets of the capital. This action left the public somewhat confused and even shocked. It would seem that such a thing shouldn't surprise the public these days—after all, the gilded youth—the children of oligarchs, bribe-taking officials, and bribe-giving businessmen, if not for one thing. The young men riding in the black Geländewagens turned out to be graduates of the FSB school! The reaction of people connected to the FSB, including the well-known TV host Vladimir Solovyov, is interesting; they were all upset not so much by the moral and ethical aspects of the incident, but rather by the unprofessional behavior of future agents and spies. After all, in their opinion, they all exposed themselves by posting a video online that they themselves filmed, thereby capturing their faces. However, in my opinion, the situation is different.

    One can't help but wonder: could something like this have happened during the Soviet Union? The answer is clear: no. It happened under the Kremlin's master—the St. Petersburg hooligan, the notorious liar and deceiver, the permanent President Putin. The fact is, they weren't trained as intelligence officers. They represent an entirely new caste of people—Putin's oprichniki, called upon, like Ivan the Terrible's oprichniki, to carry out punitive actions within the state. These new oprichniks are as ignorant of morality as their master, Putin, who blew up buildings with sleeping residents in order to blame the Chechens for the crime and, amid a victorious war, be elected president. I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out that for some of the participants in the Geländewagen rally, their thesis was about being football fans in France during Euro 2016.

    Putin forgot to take one thing into account: Ivan the Terrible's oprichniks fled shamefully when the Crimean Khan Dovlet Giray appeared at the walls of Moscow, betraying the Tsar of All Rus'. Then Ivan the Terrible lost his menacing demeanor, looking at the Khan's whip, which the Khan hung in the Kremlin as a warning.

July 12, 2016.

   The oprichniks were Ivan the Terrible's personal guard and punitive detachment, created to strengthen the Tsar's power and suppress political opponents.

Why Putin will not leave

Alik Bakhshi

 

Why Putin will not leave

 

Power is a drug.

Who tried it once - poisoned it forever.

                                     Winston Churchill

   

   Today, ahead of the upcoming presidential elections, many are wondering whether Putin will leave, or will participate in the elections? The naive question of whether he will win elections is naturally not worth it. The active participation in the election process of state structures under Putin's control, down to power, as was demonstrated in the case of Navalny, excludes a different outcome. It's another matter if Putin decides not to run for president, but this will not happen due to the following circumstances.

   The main problem for Putin in the event of his resignation as president is his personal safety. Castling, which he carried out in tandem with Medvedev in the past, this time is impossible because of the extremely low popularity of the latter. There is no other reliable candidate for Putin. By the way, if Putin voluntarily leaves, then Medvedev automatically finds himself in an identical situation with him. The change of power against the backdrop of inexorably slipping into the abyss of the economy will inevitably lead to the search for the perpetrators, which is similar for Putin. Even if an associate who is loyal to Putin today comes to power, he will have to break down the vertical of power built by Putin, because it is completely corrupt, but because it was the conductor of the vicious economic policy of the center.

 

    Undoubtedly, Putin is responsible for the state of the economy, because it negated the economic and political reforms that began under Yeltsin. But could Putin have acted differently? The fact is that democracy in Russia was transformed into an ugly form, where the power was in the hands of the oligarchs - scammers who, taking advantage of the lack of initiative of the Russian people, both in business and in politics, seized all the command posts of the administration. Then the partial disintegration of the Soviet empire prevented the inevitable general riot and chaos. The scattered peoples, no matter how they could, took up survival. A fairly reduced empire, it would seem, escaped the catastrophe and the democratic reforms that were initiated promised a promising future, but ...

  However, the new nouveaux riches, devoid of patriotism, did not see the Motherland in Russia and plundered the country, leaving no chance for the future as an empire. Putin, gaining power from the oligarchs who rashly brought him to power, hoping to make a puppet out of him, got rid of them first, and then restored the authoritarian regime traditional for Russia, as the only one capable of stopping the further collapse of the empire. Having defined the social system as a sovereign democracy, that is, democracy for a sovereign, Putin essentially abandoned democracy to the great joy of the people who do not understand and accept its values. The absence of a free economic market, the state's participation in production activities, as a consequence of the growth of the bureaucratic administration and the inevitable corruption in such conditions, returned the country in the 1990s, when the USSR ceased to exist.

    The main reason for the failed democracy in Russia lies in the inability of the Russian people to organize themselves, both in labor and political activities, as well as servility to an official of any rank. Democracy and the Russian people, this is nonsense (1). In this case, it does not matter whether Putin understood this or not, the reality shows that his authoritarian regime of management brought the empire back to the historical point of inevitable disintegration. The secret desire of Putin's revanchist to restore the empire within the borders of the USSR resulted in the emergence of sanctions, which further exacerbated the economic situation. Putin, who has built a vertical of power for himself, when any action, it's ridiculous to see, up to the repair of someone's apartment, can not do without his participation, naturally automatically puts him the main culprit of the coming economic catastrophe. The vicious circle, in which the patchwork empire turned out (the definition of K. Marx), presupposes a single outcome - disintegration. The Russian empire is at a stage when it can not function normally either under authoritarianism or under conditions of democracy.

   Putin is trying to stop the course of history, but history is not a children's tale, and it is unlikely that a pike caught by him can help him in this regard. Anyone who tries to stop the course of history becomes its victim and Putin is no exception. Putin's Russia is like the miracle of a surviving prehistoric monster from the era of the Lizards, which has no place in the modern world.

 

    Another landmark fact pointing to the fact that Putin was not going to leave the Kremlin is the national guard created by him, in analogy with the oprichniks of Ivan the Terrible (2), who is in direct subordination to him, with the sole task of safeguarding power. Putin has not enough police and army. The police are a well-known case - corrupt, and the army is too large an organization to be close and always at hand. Of course, at the head of the oprichniki Khinshtein, who, of course, without hesitation, will give the order to shoot at the people. On the example of the well-known executioners Lazar Kaganovich and Mendel Khataevich, the Kremlin authorities always knew who to choose as punishers of the people (3). The other, similar to him, namely, a well-known liar and a whore, completely devoid of conscience, Putin-caressed Kremlin nightingale Vladimir Rudolfovich (4) had already shown his attitude to the people, calling those who dared to be dissatisfied with the Putin regime, 2% of shit. How can I not remember that the oprichniks were the first to leave the Tsar as Khan Girey approached Moscow. I am sure that this support of Putin, as soon as he smells fried, breaks into Israel, fleeing from the popular anger.

    

1. People's destiny, or each cricket has its own pole. 

    https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/04/the-peoples-fate-or-to-each-cricket-his.html 

2. Demonstrative departure of Putin's oprichniki. 

    https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/a-demonstrative-ride-by-putins.html 

3. Katyn, before and after. https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/katyn-before-and-after.html 

4. Amazing! https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/09/amazing.html 

    

  11.08.17.

 

Amazing!

 Alik Bakhshi

Amazing!

   It's well known that President Putin, as a true Russian patriot, is prepared to make any sacrifice to enhance Russia's prestige not only in sports, as demonstrated at the Sochi Olympics, but also in culture. For example, Putin spared no expense in purchasing rare Antonio Stradivari cellos for the country (one alone cost $12 million), for which the people adore him and are willing to endure any hardship for the sake of the promised bright future. Considerable resources are also invested in the media, where anyone willing to bribe the president into appearing on the idiot box is given the opportunity. Preference is apparently given to Russian-speaking representatives of the truthful word abroad, among those Jews who once left Russia, who are ready to join those who never left the country in beating their chests, vowing their sincere love for Putin, the great Russian people, and their great country.

      

 

               

This opportunity is readily provided by the Kremlin's nightingale, V. Solovyov, on a television program in which they, along with the Armenian supporters, vie with each other in singing the praises of Putin and his peace-loving, constructive policy toward fraternal Ukraine, where, according to them, Ukrainian fascists, with American assistance, staged a coup d'état. Putin demonstrated his nobility by urgently organizing the escape of his protégé, the legitimately elected Ukrainian President Yanukovych, who was forced to abandon his beloved collection of gold toilets to an enraged crowd, egged on by Western agents.

   It's worth noting the remarkable talent of host Solovyov, who at times has to restrain the ardor of some particularly zealous participants in the televised debates, in particular the ethnic lawyer Zhirinovsky and the Armenians Bagdasarov and Kurginyan, who persistently call for Russians to march on Kyiv. However, when the intensity of hatred subsides somewhat, Vladimir Rudolfovich Solovyov reminds listeners of Putin's words about Russia's legitimate national interests, which the West and especially the peoples of the entire post-Soviet space must take into account.

   Somewhat unexpectedly aggressive against the general backdrop are the speeches of Yakov Kedmi, an Israeli and former Mossad officer who has already become a regular on Solovyov's show. He is simply delighted with every step Putin takes toward the West.

  This same Kedmi predicts that 2017 will mark the end of the European Community, and Ukraine as well. After Putin's meeting with Trump scheduled for April, America will abandon Ukraine, and the fascist government in Kyiv will inevitably collapse, with all the ensuing consequences. Thus, according to the non-Russian participants of Solovyov's television show, the great Russian people can expect a joyful event in 2017: the disappearance of the state of Ukraine. It's amazing how easily, with the help of the media, two fraternal peoples were able to develop a fierce mutual hatred in such a short period of time.

   It's mind-boggling, but exactly 100 years ago, a small group of revolutionaries, without a single representative of the Russian people, managed to plunge Russia into civil war, with brother turning against brother. Yes, propaganda is a formidable weapon, especially in an age where television exerts an all-powerful influence on people's consciousness.

   But an even more astonishing event on Russian television seemed to me to be a program hosted by a certain Natanson,

                                         

in which Jews discussed issues related to the Russian Orthodox Church. Are we really expecting interesting events there too?

 19.02.2017

Revival of the Great Silk Road

 

Alik Bakhshi

Revival of the Great Silk Road

 

   The "Great Silk Road", connecting the countries of the Mediterranean, with China is known from 121 BC. With the opening of the sea route from Europe to China and the development of shipping, which had a greater advantage over camel caravans, the value of the land route fell.

 

     

    With the transformation of China into a world factory of various goods, and as a result of the colossal growth of freight turnover, the idea of ​​the revival of the Great Silk Road has again acquired relevance. China launched the initiative "One belt - one way", which means creating the shortest way of the railway that connects the Middle Kingdom with Europe. And this way was created. The route includes a ferry crossing in the Caspian Sea and the Marmaray Tunnel under the Bosphorus.

 

  

   

     October 30, 2017 in Baku, a significant historic event took place - the opening of the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway, as the final stage of the revival of the Great Silk Road. The opening ceremony was attended by the President of Azerbaijan Aliyev, the President of Turkey Erdogan, the Prime Ministers of Georgia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, the delegation of Turkmenistan, Tajikistan. Aliyev noted that the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway is the shortest and most reliable route connecting Europe with Asia.

  

                               

  

    Erdogan, in turn, said: "We are declaring a direct rail service from London to Beijing. I want this project to benefit the region and our peoples. " In continuation, stressing the importance of the event on a global scale, he said: "The new Silk Way project, in which over 60 countries of the world participate with a population of 4.5 billion people, passes through an area of ​​40 million square kilometers. This initiative is based on bilateral and regional cooperation between countries based on mutually beneficial relations, which is an important distinctive feature of the project. "

 

   In fact, the more countries will be on the route route, the more profitable the economic value of the project, not to mention the significant reduction in the delivery time of cargo, the volume of which can reach up to 17 million tons per year. This overland route alternative to sea transport will reduce the time of delivery of containers from China to the UK more than twice and will be 12-15 days.

 

   Very significant for the countries of the Caspian region is the fact that it became possible to supply liquefied gas to Turkey and Europe by rail, which naturally causes Moscow's discontent. Realizing the threat of the emergence of a hydrocarbon competitor in the European market to Russia's economy, it is vehemently opposed to laying a gas pipe along the Caspian seabed from Turkmenistan to Baku, citing the ecological danger of this project, while forgetting about the "Northern Stream" and the South Stream. " However, Moscow has no arguments, to oppose the supply of liquefied gas to Europe by rail. By the way, if Russia continues to persist in obstructing the construction of a gas pipeline in the Caspian Sea, Turkey will not cost anything in retaliation to block the "South Stream". So in any case, Russia can not avoid the appearance of a gas competitor.

   

   It is interesting to note that after the opening of the final section of the Silk Road of Baku-Tbilisi-Kars in the Russian media, articles appeared that the route, unlike the Russian project, passes through a potentially troubled region. The thing is that Russia actively pedaled in the issue of implementing the Silk Road route through its territory, doing nothing real, and eventually ended up outside the game. Hence, the Kremlin's silent resentment towards the official opening of the new "Silk Road" is understandable.

 

     The Kremlin has been discussing the far-fetched question of a threat from Islamic terrorists since the time of the Chechen war, which, according to the Kremlin, are sleeping and see how to seize the Turkic countries and further expand into Russia. In order to protect the post-Soviet space from the allegedly unavoidable invasion of Islamic terrorism, the Kremlin plans to introduce troops, after which, as already well-known traditional pattern, hold referendums on reunification with Russia. In short, if anyone threatens the well-being of the post-Soviet space, this is the Russian Empire, which the Fuhrer Putin wants to restore in its former borders (1). In this case, Russia will again gain a monopoly on the European hydrocarbon market (2), and the new "Silk Road" will be in its hands. To protect free trade from the Evil Empire, the world community must take care of the safety of the revived Silk Road in advance.

 

   In conclusion, I want to note an important point - the revival of the Great Silk Road will create conditions for the consolidation of the Turkic countries and Baku will inevitably become the strategically important geopolitical center of the Turkic world. Only the union of the Turkic countries is the guarantee of their future and protects from encroachments of the northern neighbor (3).

    

1.The state-forming people and its Fuhrer, - or Ukraine and further on the list. 

     https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21133.html

2. The Trans-Caspian gas pipeline or the Third World War. 

     https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/18362.html

3. One language, - one homeland. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/16879.html

 

   26.11.17

 

On the issue of genocide, or why Armenia is wary of judgment

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

On the issue of genocide, or

why Armenia is wary of judgment

 

     The fact of the genocide of the Jews was established by the International Military Tribunal, the organizers of the genocide and the perpetrators of this crime were found and condemned, this raises a completely natural question why Armenia, in order to once and for all end the issue of the alleged Armenian genocide in Turkey, is seeking an international tribunal. The question of the extermination of Armenians organized by the Turkish authorities was raised immediately after the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in the First World War, but more than a century passed, and the court never condemned it. And how can a court pass a sentence if Armenians have not bothered to apply, as it should be, to an international court. The court, only the court and no one else can determine the organizers of the genocide and its perpetrators, if any, and issue a corresponding sentence, following the example of the Nuremberg trial. Moreover, from the point of view of international law, the international Convention on the Prevention of Genocide was developed, which clearly states who has the right to recognize a crime as genocide - this is the court in The Hague and only he.

     

    So what is the reason for the Armenians to ignore the trial on such an important issue for the Armenian people? A huge number of publications report on the genocide, but, oddly enough, Armenians do not even attempt to appeal to this court. It should be noted that history already knows several courts in this case.

    

   The very first is the Maltese court. In 1920, the British occupation authorities in Istanbul, according to an Armenian tip, arrested 144 people as the main perpetrators of the Armenian genocide. A year before that, namely in 1919, a certain Aram Andonian published a book in which incriminating documents were collected - telegrams of Talaat Pasha, proving the irrefutable guilt of the Turkish authorities in organizing the genocide. This book is widely circulated widely sold in many countries. A year later, a trial took place in Malta, which did not reveal more than one document proving the guilt of the arrested, and this despite the fact that the judges already had Andonian’s book on hand, which was recognized as a rude fake. By the way, Andonian never submitted a single original of the telegram of Talaat Pasha, saying that they were lost. The prosecutor's office announced the termination of the proceedings on the basis that no document had been submitted, evidence proving the guilt of the prisoners and this at a time when all the archives of the empire were in the hands of the British and all the witnesses of the so-called genocide were alive. It should be noted that the British Foreign Ministry conducted its own investigation, as a result of which it came to the conclusion that Andonian’s “telegram” was a fake.

    

     An interesting and significant fact, the Turkish government proposed to establish an international commission of historians to find out the truth and open the Turkish and Armenian archives, to which Armenia categorically refused. Armenians decided to continue to exploit the lie about the bloodthirstiness of the Turks, relying on propaganda, and I must say we have achieved considerable success in this field. The human psyche is such that the first information about something is most deeply remembered. Thus, for example, Armenians refer to Hitler’s phrase “Who remembers the massacre of Armenians?”, Which he allegedly pronounced on August 22, 1939 during an appeal to the commanding staff of the armed forces, and these words are recorded in the Nuremberg trial protocol as an accusation. However, it turned out that there is nothing like this in the protocols. There were a great many similar false fabrications at the suggestion of Armenians. Hiding the reality and providing the public with false information is the only method for the advocates of the Armenian Genocide in Turkey.  Due to the spread of false propaganda, even the law on punishment for denying the Armenian genocide was adopted in France and Switzerland, but later the French Constitutional Court repealed this law as violating the principle of democracy - freedom of speech, and also because the fact of genocide was not recognized by any by the court. The Swiss court, which condemned the Turkish politician Dogu Perinchik, who denied the genocide, suffered the same fate, the European Court of Human Rights overturned this decision as violating freedom of opinion.

    Under the onslaught of the powerful Armenian diaspora, Switzerland was forced to file an appeal, which was nevertheless rejected. The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg left the previous decision unchanged and, despite an impressive delegation from Armenia led by the country's Prosecutor General, issued a final verdict on October 10, 17, which has historical significance, “from now on legally the“ Armenian genocide ”is declared not a historical fact , and by opinion, and any criminal prosecution for denying this opinion (as well as any other opinion in general) is already a violation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. ”

 

    There is still no document on the basis of which Turkey could be accused of organizing the genocide of the Armenian people. Having failed to accuse Turkey of genocide in a legal way, Armenians do not abandon attempts to propagate Lies to the wall of not individual organizers, the so-called genocide, which were never found due to the fact that there were no such people in nature, but the entire Turkish people. It would seem why the Armenians did not achieve a new trial in the Hague court, but it may happen that they turn out to be accused of the prosecutors and this is the most likely outcome that they seem to foresee.

 

There are hundreds of valid documents, not falsifications, including the statutes of the extremely Nazi Dashnaktsutyun Party, denouncing Armenians in organizing massacres and ethnic cleansing in Turkey and Azerbaijan, or even far from Armenia and Turkestan. It was the Nazis from “Dashnaktsutyun”, who made the entire Armenian people hostage for the crazy idea of ​​building a chimerical state “Great Armenia”, and are the main culprits in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people in Turkey and Azerbaijan. Armenian nationalists, taking advantage of the plight of the Turkish army on the fronts and receiving weapons from the Russians, began the extermination of the civilian population in the territory assumed under "Great Armenia". The ethnic cleansing undertaken by the Armenians in the rear was particularly cruel, the wells were bombarded with corpses, so that people would not even think about returning to their villages. To prevent a military defeat, the Turkish authorities had no choice but to begin the eviction of the Armenians in order to secure the rear in anticipation of the advancing Russian army. The columns of evicted now unarmed Armenians walked through the territory where the population had fled before, fleeing from the Armenian militants, and something happened that could not help but happen. Evil spawned evil. This was a spontaneous revenge of people, many of whom have lost their loved ones, and it was taken groundless to take it for the beating of Armenians specially organized by the authorities. It should be noted that a large number of Armenians living in Istanbul did not touch any genocide, which irrefutably testifies to the failure of the genocide planned by the Turkish government. It is precisely because of these circumstances that the Armenian guardians of the genocide fear as the light of a trial and continue to sow lies in the hope of tilting the world community to their side.

   

   08/03/19