Who is Putin?

 

Alik Bakhshi

Who is Putin?

 

    I did not consider himself to be a strong physiognomies, but since he saw this unsympathetic, devoid of soulfulness with small, prickly mouse eyes, a troubled sense of expectation of great misfortune arose in his mind. Putin introduced himself to me as the complete opposite of Democrat Yeltsin, a man who will try to revive the empire within the borders of the USSR and begin with the rebellious Chechnya. Unfortunately, my fears were justified. As soon as the news of the demolition of houses with tenants in Moscow, Volgodonsk and Buinaksk in 1999, I immediately realized who and for what these attacks were committed. Putin was in a hurry, there was not much time left before the presidential elections. Yes, cruelly and ruthlessly, but 307 victims served as a pretext for Putin to start an even bloodier Second Chechen War (1). Knowing perfectly the mentality of the Russian people with their imperial worldview, which was in abundance and in itself, Putin, having restored Chechnya to the bosom of the Russian Empire, became a people's favorite and a well-deserved candidate for the presidency. Russian oligarchs Berezovsky and Gusinsky, who led Putin to power and calculated to make a puppet from him, did not see the patriot Nazi in Putin, for which they paid for themselves, fleeing the country. Thus, Putin's way to power is covered with thousands of corpses.

 

   Well, then it went and went. The Kremlin as a nest of international terrorism (2) under Putin began to act even more cynically and impudently, without fear of incriminating him in terrorism. Putin covers the perpetrators of the death of 298 people of the Malaysian Boeing Flight MH-17, shot down by the Russian complex Buk over the occupied territory of Ukraine (3). The well-known phrase "the Kremlin has long arms" has again gained relevance. Not embarrassed at all, Putin physically removes his accusers, wherever they are. Guided by the words of Machiavelli "the end justifies the means," Putin, using lies and cunning (4), began to rebuild the empire. Above the former colonial peoples of the Russian Empire, there was a real threat of re-entering the "prison of nations" (5). There was a war with Georgia, Ukraine. Under the pretext of "defending the Russian world" in any post-Soviet republic (6), Putin is preparing, after Ukraine, to enter the troops into Moldova, the Central Asian republics, and if necessary, to start a war with Azerbaijan with the hands of Armenia.

     In this regard, Putin prepares the international community for the introduction of the Russian army in the post-Soviet republics under one more pretext, namely, to protect Russia from Islamic terrorists on long-range (meaning Syria) and near approaches (it should be understood that these are Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan , As well as Azerbaijan). From Russian politicians, intentions are increasingly heard to fight the terrorists ahead of schedule. This means that Moscow can at any time begin the annexation of the above-mentioned countries without a connection there appeared terrorists wishing to go to war with Russia or not. Clearly, there are no Islamic terrorists who have penetrated into these countries from the Middle East to go to Russia, and why they need Russia, but is this really the case? In short, as there, in the fable of Krylov wolf words:

 

     "You are to blame for it,

              That I want to eat "

  

    Russia was an aggressive country, so it remained (7). Even defeat in the Cold War did not change its essence. And the reason is not in Putin, but in the mentality of the Russian people, in its dense imperial worldview, expressed in its extreme form of Great Russian chauvinism. In the pathological inability to exist in conditions of democracy, which was well demonstrated by the short period of Yeltsin's rule, when the Russian people, incapable of independent production and political activity in conditions of freedom, cowered with blood from the oligarchs who plundered the country, various criminal groups and outright bandits. The Russian people and Democracy are nonsense (8). A people who enters a stupor when they see the well-being of a neighbor and, in order to find peace of mind, tries not to achieve this prosperity, but to destroy it, democracy does not need anything. Under the conditions of democracy, the Russian people will be lost and lose their so beloved empire, in which everything is decided by the tsar, the secretary-general, or today a lifelong president with the authority of the emperor of all Russia.

   Putin has emasculated the rudiments of Yeltsin's democracy, leaving only names from it, such as the Constitution, elections, freedom of speech, freedom of rallies and demonstrations. The vertical of power built by Putin and the inevitable corruption permeated the whole country from Putin to the smallest official. In this light, the appearance on the political background of a fighter against corruption Navalny, who is about to run for president, looks ridiculous, because corruption is a consequence of the political structure of the country and the people's mentality, and not a phenomenon that has arisen on its own. And in this aspect, Navalny has no plans. Even if we assume that the people will choose him instead of Putin, he, being the emperor of the Russian Empire, will not be able to change anything. After all, Navalny did not say a word about changing the political system, as the only sure way to defeat corruption in Russia. Navalny certainly can make trouble in the country, take people to demonstrations and rallies, but for this case, Putin prudently created an army of personal guards - the national guard, whose sole purpose is precisely to combat such a phenomenon as popular revolt.

 

    We must pay tribute to Putin, who does everything for the spiritual satisfaction of his people, not only by giving him the Crimea and Ukraine, but also benefiting from sporting achievements in the international arena, soldering athletes with doping. Victory at any cost turned into a shame for Russia and an unprecedented catastrophe (9). Putin trampled on the Olympic slogan "sport outside politics." Russia is the only country in the World where there is a government minister who has the right to decide the fate of any athlete representing Russia in international competitions. Is it possible to imagine that without the knowledge of President Putin, the structure of the FSB for fraud with samples of athletes for doping was involved. Conscience, morality for Putin, not existing concepts. Putin is the initiator and harborer of the use of doping. Victory at any cost, the main message of Putin to his servants, who are ready to rally, flouted the norms all morality.

     Putin's efforts ultimately resulted in the isolation of Russia and its transformation into an outcast of the world community.

   

     In peaceful conditions, the empire can not function for a long time by nature, from time to time the empire needs another victim to mobilize the imperial spirit, otherwise it will wither away. Any country for the empire is a potential enemy, especially rich. The Russian people do not tolerate the welfare of the West, and Putin's propaganda easily finds among the people fertile soil for cultivating hatred of the values ​​of Western democracy. This is the reason why Russia is afraid and shy away from its president, whom in a decent society will soon be driven in vain. It's unlikely that there will be a politician who decides to negotiate something with a liar and a deceiver. For example, the intellectual Obama stopped all contacts with Putin, realizing the futility of any negotiations with the Russian president. "Friend Putin" disappeared along with the cowboy from the policy of Bush-junior, by the will of circumstances, happened to be in the White House (10). Today neither Russia nor its president has friends of the Armenian dashnaks, Tehran obscurantists, and the bloody Syrian dictator, whom they call shameful.

  

   Putin's Russia carries a real danger to the world community, which should clearly define who Putin is and what his country is.

 

  P.S. I give links where the material is considered in more detail.

 

1. Chechnya and the road to power, or the rebirth of the empire by Putin. https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/04/blog-post_25.html 

2. International terrorism and its stakeholders.

  https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/04/international-terrorism-and-its.html 

3. MH-17, or Russia is in a lie. https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/04/mh-17-or-russia-in-lie.html 

4. The Empire of Lies and its main liar. https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/04/the-empire-of-lies-and-its-chief-liar.html 

  5. Great Russian chauvinism and Putin its Fuhrer. Http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/#post-alikbahshi-21133

6. The state-forming people and its Fuhrer, or Ukraine and further on the list.

 Http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/#post-alikbahshi-21749

  7. Russia is the most aggressive country. Http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/#post-alikbahshi-32531

  8. People's fate, or each cricket has its own pole. Http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/?skip=100#post-alikbahshi- 4732

  9. The Russian Empire in the results of the Olympics, or sports and politics. Http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/#post-alikbahshi-29551

  10. A camel for the president. Http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/?skip=50#post-alikbahshi-5271

 

   03/31/17

The Empire of Lies and Its Chief Liar

 

It turns out the Kremlin liar stashed hundreds of millions of dollars stolen from the Russian people in the accounts of his childhood friend, cellist Roldugin, who is also his daughter's godfather and who, for some reason, slinks off to an offshore zone in distant Panama, where, according to Putin, he buys musical instruments for the Russian state's musical institutions with his own money, purely out of altruistic motives. http://www.forbes.ru/rassledovaniya/finansy/325383-koshelek-violonchelista-kak-sergei-roldugin-spryatal-svoi-dokhody

So that's it, no more, no less. How about this Liar's answer? Simply wonderful! I dare suggest introducing a measure of deception: 1 Putin equals 100% falsehood. A half-lie, accordingly, would be 0.5 Putin’s. And so on.

 

Alik Bakhshi

The Empire of Lies and Its Chief Liar

 

"You're guilty, if only because I'm hungry."

I. Krylov

 

These words of Krylov's remarkably accurately reflect the predatory nature of the Russian Empire, as evidenced by the current dangerous situation around Ukraine created by the Kremlin. Needless to say, the attainment of freedom by the Ukrainian people, the most ethnically related of all the empire's many peoples, is a painful blow to the pride of the nation-forming nation (1), with its imperial worldview. The loss of Ukraine and Crimea as a result of the collapse of the Soviet Union also affected the geostrategic situation in the southwestern part of the Russian Empire. However, all this does not give the Kremlin any right to a military invasion of Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea, which, incidentally, was never truly Russian territory, nor was the entire Black Sea coast. Crimea's predominantly Russian population is a consequence of Russia's genocide of the indigenous Tatar people and the subsequent settlement of the area by Russians. Looking back to the recent past, a similar situation led to World War II, when England and France, fulfilling their obligations, declared war on Germany for the German invasion of Poland. Strictly speaking, Russia's aggression should have been followed by a declaration of war from the United States and Great Britain, which, according to the Budapest Memorandum, are guarantors of Ukraine's security and integrity. However, this did not happen, either because they were perplexed by President Putin's unusually brazen lie about the non-involvement of Russian troops in the military events in Ukraine, or because of this brazen, documented lie on an international scale—after all, Russia also signed up to be the guarantor of Ukraine's security in the same Budapest Memorandum. Of course, no declaration of war should be expected between nuclear powers, when every second counts. However, it must be said that the West's reaction to Moscow's unexpectedly monstrous insolence, bordering on sheer savagery, was rather restrained.

It would seem that the days of Hitler's fascism have sunk into oblivion, but no, the aggressive actions of Putin's Russia have brought Western politicians, who were scratching their heads, back to reality. They certainly haven't read Krylov's fables "The Wolf and the Lamb," but I hope they know that appealing to the wolf for justice is a hopeless endeavor. Perhaps they will finally realize that "friend Putin," who loudly declared his regret at the collapse of the USSR and compared it to a catastrophe of universal proportions, intends to recreate the Soviet Union and is little different from Hitler, who set out to build a "Greater Reich." I'd like to point out that Putin's intentions even have an advantage over Hitler's, for unlike Hitler, Putin relies on the people's ingrained imperial worldview and Great Russian chauvinism (2). Putin doesn't need to build a party or create an ideology; he only needs to issue the cry "kill Chechnya" or "give us Crimea," and he is assured of the support and full understanding of the Russian people. It's simply astonishing how unanimously Putin's lie about the non-involvement of Russian troops, the so-called "little green men," without insignia, in the annexation of Crimea was accepted and supported by the people. This is precisely the case when, in the words of Fazil Iskander, "the general stench is mistaken for the unanimity of the people."

It's worth noting a unique trait of the Russian people: their tolerance for lies. In the Russian consciousness, truth and lies coexist harmoniously without causing any harm. Once, during the Soviet era, a Swedish woman interning at Moscow State University told a group of students about what she considered an important discovery: "In your country, everyone says one thing and thinks another." This ambiguity, so familiar to our consciousness, perplexed her. Having grown up in a free society, she couldn't understand how it could be that everyone had the same opinion on every issue. What seemed self-evident to us, accustomed to universal deception, struck her as unnatural, and perhaps even herd-like savagery, something she, of course, kept silent about. This explains how easily the Russian president's lies, which align with the people's imperial worldview, are instantly and without hesitation accepted by every Russian, regardless of the country in which they live. This suggests that even changed circumstances are powerless to alter the Russian people's imperial worldview.

Perhaps I'm wrong, but in my opinion, Russian society, accustomed to lies during the Soviet era, coupled with the Russian people's pathological inability to live in a democracy (3), combined with their imperial worldview, constitutes a kind of embodiment of Universal Evil, posing a threat to the world. And this isn't about Putin; Putin merely serves as a successful conduit, orchestrating the outpouring of this Evil. Thus, to the generally accepted, well-known definition of Russia as an "Evil Empire," one could equally add "Empire of Lies," for "lies" and "evil" are complementary concepts and cannot exist without one another. Thus, Russia's aggression against Ukraine was accompanied by the mass dissemination of an incredible amount of disinformation and outright lies by the Kremlin and President Putin himself – the main, I would say, unrivalled liar in Russia today. There's no point in citing the Russian president's long track record of lies, as every word he utters is laced with lies. Perhaps, after Putin's treatment of Ukraine, it's hard to find a diplomat who would take on the responsibility of negotiating with Putin. It's no wonder Putin counts among his friends the entire world's rabble, including Belarusian dictator Lukashenko, the bloody Syrian dictator Assad, former Iranian Prime Minister Ahmadinejad, and the late Hugo Chavez.

 

The Empire of Lies currently has one strategic ally: Armenia, which, with Moscow's support, has annexed 20% of Azerbaijan's territory and is awaiting Moscow's go-ahead to resume aggression, with the undisguised goal of creating a "Greater Armenia" from sea to sea, in accordance with a historical lie in which there is no place for Azerbaijan or its people (4). There is no Turkey, no part of Georgia. It is all Armenia, with numerous Armenian enclaves in the North Caucasus, Kuban, Crimea, Ukraine, Syria, Libya, and perhaps now even California, which may in the future form part of "Greater Armenia."

In his territorial claims to southeastern Ukraine and Crimea, where a Russian diaspora exists—a consequence of the forced expulsion of the indigenous people and the settlement of Great Russians—Putin unwittingly replicates the ideology of the Armenian Nazi party, Dashnaktsutyun, founded in 1890, long before Hitler's ideology of German national superiority. All Nazi ideologies that invoke national superiority and "greatness" primarily generate historical lies, sometimes about a "Greater Germany," sometimes about a "Greater Armenia," which serve as the basis for territorial claims and, as a consequence, military aggression. Vasily Grossman presents a very accurate picture of the national "superiority" of Armenians (Znamya, no. 11, 1988):

"With insidious ease, the nationalism of the people loses its noble foundation; it does not become formidable, it becomes pitiful; it does not provoke, but humiliates." Thus, in seeking to prove some kind of inferiority, man reveals his own. Some of my interlocutors, in all areas of human creativity, emphasized the Armenian national primacy in architecture, science, and poetry. They emphasized the superiority of the architectural merits of the temple in Garni over what they considered primitive architecture on the Acropolis; speaking of the poet Tumanyan, they persistently convinced me that Tumanyan's genius surpassed that of Pushkin. The point, of course, isn't whether Garni's architecture isn't more perfect than that of the Acropolis, or whether Tumanyan is a greater genius than Pushkin. The point—and the point, of course, is sad—is that poetry, architecture, science, and history themselves, in their essence, cease to be significant in the conversations of some of my interlocutors. They matter only to demonstrate the superiority of the Armenian national character over the national character of other peoples. Poetry isn't important, but rather proving that an Armenian national poet is superior to, say, a Russian or French poet. My interlocutors, without even realizing it, impoverished their souls and hearts by ceasing to rejoice in poetry, the perfection of architecture, and the grandeur of science, instead seeing poetry and science merely as a means to assert their national superiority. This aspiration can be so fanatical and narrow that at times it seems like madness.”

 

The notion of national superiority breeds Nazism and lies, ultimately resulting in evil. Thus, the Dashnak Party's ideology included a clause that presented terror as a method for achieving the creation of a "Greater Armenia." Following this programmatic principle, Armenian Nazis subjected the civilian populations of Turkey and Azerbaijan to brutal terror, literally clearing the territory for a "Greater Armenia," which brought untold suffering to the peoples of Turkey and Azerbaijan, as well as to the Armenian people themselves. The Nazi ideology of German fascists also led to a global catastrophe, from which the German people themselves suffered most.

Today, Putin has opened the floodgates to Great-Russian chauvinism; the essentially fascist rhetoric of "Great Russian people" and "Great Russian language" is increasingly heard, with the word "great" implying quality rather than quantity. Interestingly, in Russian sources, of all the peoples of the world, only the Russian people are described as "great." Even the Chinese are not destined to be so. How can a Great Russian, with such an approach, dare speak Ukrainian in Ukraine? And how dare Ukrainians neglect the great Russian language by not making it their official language! Remember the sneers and disdain shown by Russians living, for example, in Baku, at an Azerbaijani who spoke Russian poorly or with an accent, despite the fact that the Great Russians themselves never even bothered to learn the language of the indigenous people. They had no idea how tactless their ridicule was. Only a latent sense of one's own inferiority and lack of culture leads to self-aggrandizement. Incidentally, if we're being honest about the richness of the language, Russian contains many borrowed Turkic words, while, for example, Azerbaijani doesn't have a single word of Russian origin, despite Moscow's Russification policy. It's worth noting that the Russians forcibly deprived the Azerbaijani people of their alphabet, rendering them illiterate overnight by introducing the Cyrillic alphabet. Imagine Russia suddenly switching to the Chinese alphabet. I'd like to see Russians reading Pushkin in Chinese characters.

 

By supporting the chauvinistic frenzy of Russian separatists in Ukraine, Putin is peddling yet another historical lie about Ukraine never having existed as a state. In that case, how should we view the agreement on Ukraine's reunification with Russia, signed by Bohdan Khmelnytsky? If Ukraine never existed, as Putin claims, then with which country was the agreement signed? It seems that Bohdan Khmelnytsky, without the Ukrainian people, has become a one-and-only Russian subject, so to speak. Thus, in his historical digressions, President Putin completely denies the Ukrainian people the right to their own country, thereby justifying the actions of Russian separatists in Ukraine.

In general, Putin, to put it politely, is "completely rotten" with the separatists (5). Thus, the Chechens who fought the Russians for the freedom of their homeland are all bandits, robbers—in short, separatists, worthy of being urinated on in Putin's toilet. In that case, what should we call the Russians who settled in Ukraine and now want to tear away the part of Ukraine where they live and annex it to Russia? Or are there bad separatists, and there are good separatists, who should be aided by secretly transporting Russian fascists to Ukraine, equipped with the latest weaponry, including anti-aircraft guns and tanks. In short, returning to Krylov's fable:

"The strong always blame the weak:

We hear countless examples of this in history."

 

Having transferred nuclear weapons to Russia, Ukraine found itself defenceless against the Evil Empire. One cannot help but wonder: would Putin have dared to attack Ukraine if it had nuclear missiles? Of course not. The Evil Empire, having promised to be the guarantor of Ukraine's integrity and independence, essentially deceived both Ukraine and America and Great Britain, which gives Russia the right to call itself the "Empire of Lies." Therefore, all countries, especially former colonies of the Russian Empire, must be extremely cautious about treaties, alliance commitments, and other agreements with Moscow, dooming themselves to become victims of deception. This explains the concerns of Finland, which has been peacefully neutral until now, and its sudden desire to join NATO.

 

Without a doubt, it can be assumed that if not for NATO, Fuhrer Putin would have unhesitatingly revived the Russian Empire within its former borders, including Poland and Finland.

 

1. "The State-Forming People and Its Führer, or - Ukraine and Further Down the List," http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21749.html

2. "Great Russian Chauvinism, and Putin Its Führer," http://samlib.ru/b/bahshi_a/alikbahshi-38.shtml

3. "The People's Destiny, or To Each His Own Candle," http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/4732.html

4. "Armenia and the Moscow-Tehran Axis," http://www.proza.ru/2008/03/22/521

5. "A Word, Fornication, or Complete Albats," https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/8082.html

 

June 20, 2014

 

MH-17, or Russia in a lie

 

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

MH-17, or Russia in a lie

 

      So, after a two-year investigation of the Netherlands published an interim report of an international group of experts about the cause of the crash Malaysian Boeing-777, the MH-17 flight over the territory of South-Eastern Ukraine, rejection of Russian separatists with military support from Ukraine. On the basis of valid facts experts concluded that the aircraft was shot down by air defense missile system "Buk", which contradicts promulgated in 2014 the Russian Defense Ministry radar data indicative of finding Ukrainian attack aircraft C-25 in the sky at the time of the disaster, which is missile "air-to air "supposedly brought down the plane.

     It seems that Russian power structures there is a competition for Russian disavowal of blame for the deaths of 298 people MH-17 flight. Kremlin is rushing from one absurdity to another. Put forward a variety of mutually false assumption to avoid responsibility for the downed «Boeing-777". So, based apparently on the assumption that the US space surveillance could register absence in the incident area more any aircraft object, in addition to the Malaysian liner, followed by the assertion that the Boeing-777 was struck by a missile "surface-to-air", launched from the territory controlled by Ukrainian military indicating the exact rocket launch site - at the settlement Zaroshchenske.

    However, taken soil samples did not confirm the Russian version of the missile launch at Zaroshchenske. From a survey of eyewitnesses it was revealed that the rocket was launched in the area of ​​the settlement of snow. For collecting samples of soil found the exact location of the launch rocket, namely settlement Pervomayskiy, which is two kilometers from the municipality of snow, which is on the territory of the self-proclaimed republic of Donetsk. The report also pointed out that the complex "Buk" was delivered to the Russian border, and after the launch of a missile by the Malaysian «Boeing-777" hastily evacuated back to Russia.

 

    The lack of information about the investigation made it difficult in choosing the Kremlin false choices, refuting the participation of Russian air defense systems in the Donetsk region. In this connection it is interesting the last Russian reaction to the report of the Netherlands. Russia introduced a new radar data of the situation at the time of death Boeing, from which it follows that no missiles or attack aircraft Ukrainian radar station is not registered. Involuntarily the question arises as to why these data Russia hid for two years and gave the commission leading the investigation, only after reading the report. Moreover, Russia can claim that the missile was launched from the village Ukrainians Roschenskoe if the submitted data it is not fixed radars of any missiles. It turns out that the flight MH-17 was shot down, and fell on his own. Absurd! The Kremlin finally entangled in lies

 

   Now I understand why Russia vetoed a UN Security Council resolution on the establishment of an international tribunal into the death of Flight MH-17. Chief liar Empire of Lies (1) tries to take the blame for the death of Russian military 298 people.

 

   It is time for the Russian aggression in Georgia and Ukraine, with the blood-drenched Chechnya excluded from the United Nations, as was once expelled from the League of Nations, the Soviet Union has unleashed a war with Finland in 1939. The international community finally has to realize that to negotiate, let alone sign any documents with false Russian is useless.

 

1. The Empire of Lies and its chief liar http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/22317.html

 

10/8/2016

   

 

 

Чечня и дорога к власти или возрождение империи по Путину

 

Алик  Бахши

 

Чечня и дорога к власти или возрождение империи по Путину

 

 

“Горят аулы, нет у них защиты,

  Врагом сыны отечества разбиты,

  И зарево, как вечный метеор

  Играя в облаках, пугает взор.

  Как хищный зверь, в смиренную обитель

  Врывается штыками победитель;

  Он убивает старцев и детей,

  Невинных дев и юных матерей”

...............

   “Прошло два года, всё кипит война;

   Бесплодного Кавказа племена

   Питаются разбоем и обманом;

   И в знойный день и под ночным туманом

   Отважность их для русского страшна.”

 

         “Измаил – бей”  М.Ю. Лермонтов

 

    С тех пор, как великий поэт написал эти строки, минуло 170 лет, но время нисколько не умалило их актуальность на фоне происходящих в наши дни кровавых событий на Кавказе. Военные действия в Чечне и Дагестане можно рассматривать как очередной эпизод Кавказкой войны. Войны, которую Россия вела в 19 веке и которая вновь разгорелась в конце 20 века. Война на Кавказе началась не сегодня и не вчера, она началась 200 лет назад, когда русские решили захватить этот райский уголок земли. Заметьте, не горцы (читай бандиты, террористы) спустились с гор на русскую равнину, а русские пришли к ним и отнюдь не с хлебом и солью, а с превосходящим по качеству и количеству оружием, неся смерть и разрушение непокорным нехристям. И то, что русский классик не преувеличивал рифмы ради свидетельствует не менее красноречивое послание царского генерала А.П. Ермолова Александру – в 1819 году во время военных действий на Кавказе: “Я сделал марш в горы, пользуясь общим ужасом и бегством, истребил несколько селений, весь на полях хлеб и ни одного не встретил на пути человека; до такой степени рассеялся неприятель”. Там же: “Приказано было истреблять селения, и, между прочим, разорен прекраснейший городок до 800 домов, Улу-Айя называемый. Отсюда с такой поспешностью бежали жители, что оставили несколько грудных ребят. Разорения нужно было как памятник наказания гордого и некому доселе не покорыстовавшегося народа; нужно в назидание прочим народам, на коих одни примеры ужаса удобны наложить обуздание.” (Записки А.П. Ермолова, во время управления Грузией).

   

    Из всех колониальных народов Российской империи на долю кавказцев пришлись наибольшие лишения за их любовь к свободе. Русские власти уже тогда отлично поняли, что стремление к независимости можно уничтожить только вместе с народом, поэтому было предпринято беспрецедентное в истории планомерное физическое истребление горцев, которое  можно сравнить с Катастрофой европейского еврейства. Обрекая горцев на голод, все плодородные земли Кубани и Терека были изъяты и розданы под казачьи станицы. Отсюда и появились кубанские и терские казаки, которые сегодня требуют возрождения казачьего войска. Огромные массы горцев насильственно вывозили с родных мест на поселение в глубь России, вернее не на поселение, а на гибель. Что может быть красноречивее следующего факта: В 1859 году 159 человек были направлены на поселение в Новоузенский уезд Самарской губернии. Через год в живых осталось только 81 человек. ( Центральный государственный военно-исторический архив. Москва). Кроме насильственной депортации от горцев избавлялись и обманным путем, а именно, под предлогом паломничества в Мекку. По плану царского министра Милютина, желающих совершить паломничество переправляли в Турцию бесплатно, на нанятых государством пароходах. Таким путем было вывезено с Кавказа 500 тысяч человек. Всем им не суждено было увидеть Родины, потому что  с возвращением у них возникали заготовленные бюрократические трудности. У многих за время паломничества паспорта оказывались просроченными, и им ничего не оставалось, как принять турецкое подданство. Тех же, которых миновали бюрократические препоны, направляли этапом, минуя Кавказ, в Уральские степи на поселение, мотивируя тем, что в случае возвращения в родные места, их ждут неизбежные стычки с казаками. Дело в том, что за время отсутствия горцев земля и имущество их конфисковывались в пользу переселенных на Кавказ донских казаков. Уже в советское время  дело физического уничтожения горцев продолжил “отец всех народов”, по приказу которого горцев, словно скотину, битком набитыми эшелонами вывозили в Сибирь и Казахстан. Нетрудно догадаться какая участь их там ожидала. Причем, эта депортация народов Кавказа Сталиным бала осуществлена дважды; до и во время Второй мировой войны.

  

    Какой бы красивой идеологией не прикрывала свою захватническую сущность  Империя Зла, наступил и её конец. Завязнув на восемь лет в другой горной стране, которой кремлёвские идеологи хотели принести процветание, вспахивая её землю разрывами бомб и снарядов, Россия потерпела жестокое поражение. Афганец-бандит, -душман, -дух, одним словом - террорист, с самодельным автоматом и ослом вместо бронетранспортера отстоял свою свободу, не дал превратить свою родину в очередной хлопковый придаток российской империи и похоронил давнюю мечту Кремля выйти к Индийскому океану. Ведь оставалось два танковых перехода через Пакистан и русский солдат полоскал бы портянки в водах Индийского океана с чувством выполненного интернационального долга.                     

 

  Громадная страна, имеющая самую большую в мире армию, вооруженную сверхзвуковыми самолётами, мощными танками, артиллерией всех калибров, лучшими в мире автоматами Калашникова, самонаводящимися ракетами и прочими электронными штучками не смогла справиться с афганским народом. Афганистан оказался тем последним лишним куском, который вызвал у страдающего внутренними болезнями дракона несварение. Оказывается, слова Александра Невского “Кто к нам с мечём придет от меча и погибнет” справедливы не только на русской земле.

   Неудачная военная авантюра в Афганистане имела далеко идущие политические последствия. Необъявленная позорная война обнажила всю ложь и лицемерие, которыми почивали кремлёвские коммунисты своих граждан. Невозможно было запаять правду вместе с погибшими, неизвестно за что, в цинковые гробы, поступавшие всё в больших количествах в ответ на тотальную войну, развязанную Советским Союзом против афганского народа. Первые же демократические преобразования, которые М. Горбачёв вынужден был ввести, чтобы придать цивилизованное лицо советскому строю, так перетрясли лоскутную империю, что она начала распадаться на куски. Москва еще правда пыталась залить кровью эту поступь к свободе, - события в Тбилиси, Риге, Вильнюсе и Баку, но как метко сказал архитектор перестройки Михаил Горбачев, сам того не понимая, во что она выльется, “процесс пошел “.     

  

   

   Развал Российской колониальной империи не закончился с обретением независимости бывшими союзными республиками, что видно на примере Чечни. Но, если свобода для союзных республик обошлась малой кровью, то Чечне она стоила 100 тысяч жизней. По уже известной традиции, обозвав чеченцев бандитами, а народное ополчение банд-формированиями, Россия в который раз развязывает войну на Кавказе, мотивируя, что это исконно российская территория и чтобы не создавать прецедента для других покорённых ею народов. Правда говоря, не поддаётся разумному объяснению чем, например, отличаются Чечня или Дагестан от Азербайджана или Молдавии, получивших статус независимых государств. Может ли кто-то ответить на вопрос: почему Грузия имела статус союзной республики, а Ингушетия, Тува или Чечня являются автономными республиками. Как определялось это различие? Грузия сама вроде бы попросилась в состав России, во всяком случае, так утверждает легенда с подачи Москвы. Украина даже подписала знаменитый договор Богдана Хмельницкого “Навеки вместе”. Белоруссия, вообще никогда не знавшая государственности, неожиданно получает независимость буквально в подарок и до сих пор не знает, что с ней делать. Народы же Кавказа сотни лет боровшиеся против присутствия русских на своей земле не удостоились такой привилегии на свободу. За два года войны была полностью разрушена нефтедобывающая и нефтеперерабатывающая промышленность. Руины Грозного напоминают Сталинград времен Второй мировой войны, а стёртые с лица земли Бамут и Самашки отличаются от  трагедии Хиросимы и Нагасаки  разве что масштабом опустошения и отсутствием радиации. Но также как в Афганистане, несмотря на то, что русские войска полностью владели оперативным пространством, они потерпели поражение. Маленький полуторамиллионный народ, бросивший вызов империи, вынудил Москву начать переговоры о мире, которые завершились Хасавьюртовсим соглашением. Хотя Россия официально и не признала самостоятельность Чечни, фактически чеченский народ ценой неимоверных лишений обрёл независимость.

   

    Однако, после чехарды премьер-министров во главе российского правительства становится бывший чекист В.Путин, который от либерально-интеллигентных предшественников отличается  типичной для работников КГБ протокольно-серой внешностью и, как вскорости выяснилось, грубой, характерной для убийц-рецидивистов, речью. Каковы же причины прихода к власти подобной личности,- своего рода российского варианта Августо Пиночета? Но в отличие от чилийского генерала, захватившего власть самолично, В. Путин всё же ставленник российских олигархов, которые перед страхом победы коммунистов на предстоящих выборах привели его к власти взамен прогрессивно деградирующему больному президенту Б. Ельцину.

    Ельцин, считавший себя гарантом Конституции, которая для России - пустой звук, на самом деле являлся гарантом финансового благополучия олигархов. Именно при Ельцине симбиоз власти и денег достигает наивысшего апогея. Новая власть, пришедшая на смену коммунистам, предоставила возможность легкого обогащения, поэтому коррупция моментально пронизывает все эшелоны власти. Деньги и власть приобретают в сложившихся условиях России неограниченные возможности. За деньги олигархами покупаются депутатские кресла в государственной думе и посты в правительстве. Б. Березовский самый богатый человек в России, имеющий израильское гражданство, становится секретарем Совета Безопасности. Правда, впоследствии, уже будучи секретарем, Березовский отказывается от израильского гражданства, но этот факт лишь  подчеркивает уникальность ситуации. Можете представить себе, чтобы в Израиле аналогичный пост занимал человек, русский по национальности, да еще и с российским гражданством. В Путине как в традиционно исполнительном чиновнике КГБ олигархи видели безвольную марионетку, которая позволит им дальнейшее обогащение за счет продажи сырьевых ресурсов страны без создания производственных предприятий. Такая тенденция в экономике могла поставить Россию в положение стран, являющихся сырьевыми придатками Запада и Японии. Россия из страны бывшей диктатуры пролетариата могла превратиться в страну диктатуры олигархов. Новые нувороши не связывали свое будущее с Россией. Прежде всего, они не видели в ней Родины. Все они заранее подготовили тылы  в Израиле и в других странах, вывозя туда по мере возможности свои капиталы. Россия для них являлась только средством обогащения. Однако в Путине они вовремя не разглядели второй стороны его натуры. Как истинный чекист, он сумел скрыть свои будущие честолюбивые намерения, замешанные на сильном патриотизме. Тогда олигархи не предвидели, какую опасность для их финансовой империи представляет собой Путин.

  

     Не сомневаясь, что в России довольно много противников отпускать Чечню, даже среди интеллигенции, Путин, дабы заручиться поддержкой народа на предстоящих президентских выборах, делает ставку на новую войну с Чечней. С этой целью сразу же после прихода националиста Путина в правительство затевается война в Дагестане. Вспомнили вдруг о непокорных ваххабитах, которые вот уже два года не подчинялись ставленникам Москвы в Махачкале. Ваххабиты снабжались оружием из Чечни и поддерживались тамошними добровольцами, заметьте не официальным Грозным. Но для русских этого было достаточно, чтобы начать войну в Чечне. Проскальзывают обвинения в сторону Грузии и Азербайджана, через территорию которых возможно поступает военная помощь Чечне. Так что, при необходимости, ни Грузия, ни Азербайджан не застрахованы от посягательства кремлёвских политиков. Вспоминается аналогичная ситуация: афганские партизаны имели лагеря в Пакистане, но русские не осмеливались бомбить территорию нейтрального государства. Или другой пример. Добровольцы из России воевали в Боснии на стороне своих единоверцев, однако боснийцы не объявляли за это войны России.

    Кроме того, очень кстати взрываются жилые дома в самой Москве. Против Чечни по всей стране раздувается настоящая истерия. Сразу, буквально в первые же часы после террористических актов, ловят десятки причастных к ним чеченцев, находят сотни килограммов гексагена. Правда, в Рязани у ФСБ случился прокол; жильцы дома, который якобы хотели взорвать террористы, обнаружили, что вместо гексагена в мешках находился обычный сахар. Чтобы сгладить свой промах, ФСБ объясняет, что это была проверка на бдительность. Российские следственные органы, не раскрывшие ни одного из целой серии громких заказных убийств,  как то, убийство Холодова, Меня, Листьева, Старовойтовой, проявляют вдруг такую расторопность. Всё это выглядит, по меньшей мере, довольно странно. Чеченский президент А. Масхадов, отрицая причастность Грозного к взрывам, неспроста упоминал имя Березовского, подчёркивая опасность этого человека, как  для Чечни, так и для России. Почему-то Масхадову больше верится, тем более, что известны давние связи Березовского  с чеченским криминалом.

  

    Оккупировав Чечню, Путин конечно же чеченскую проблему не решил, как раз наоборот Россия вновь обрела кровоточащую рану, приносящую страдания обоим народам, но зато, Путин выглядел триумфатором, этаким собирателем “земли русской”, что и позволило ему въехать в качестве такового в Кремлевские ворота. С этого момента и можно начать отсчет времени для олигархов, свободы слова и вообще демократии западного образца, ибо все это вредно для Российской империи, которую Путин хочет сохранить, а то и возродить в прежних границах. За четыре года своего президентства Путину удалось многое: устроив гонения на олигархов, Путин лишил их возможности влиять на политику Кремля, более того, у олигархов отобрали то, чем они владели в России и что наиболее важно СМИ оказались в руках президента. Путин постепенно фактически ликвидировал свободу слова в СМИ. Телевидение стало таким же лживым, зарегулированным и неинтересным, каким оно было при коммунистах и это наглядно показало освещение событий, связанных с “Норд-Остом”. Свобода слова, развалившая тоталитарный коммунистический режим, оказывается, мешает специалисту по “замачиванию в сортире”, а также, как неожиданно выяснилось, “обрезанию”, успешно бороться с международным терроризмом и экстремизмом. Используя телевидение, Путин превращает выборы в Думу в фарс и теперь, обеспечив себе абсолютное большинство в парламенте, он может изменить Конституцию. Примечательно, что  это самое абсолютное думское большинство составляет пропрезидентская партия “Единство”, не имеющая какой-либо программы и что не менее примечательно, сам президент не является ее членом. Здесь важно отметить, что вместо потерпевших полное фиаско демократов, за душой которых кроме амбиций ничего нет, в нынешней Думе заседают депутаты от откровенно националистических партий. В сложившейся политической ситуации вполне верится в заверения президента Путина, что предстоящие выборы будут для него последними, потому, что они могут оказаться последними вообще. Все это очень напоминает обстановку, при которой Гитлер пришел к власти в Германии.

 

    Мировая демократия должна понять, что Россия была тюрьмой народов и остаётся ею по сей день, а приход к власти таких людей, как Путин, свидетельствует о тенденции к возрождению былого величия Советского Союза.   Реставрация тоталитарного строя в России, вновь поставит мир на грань ядерной угрозы. Cнисходительность Запада на то что происходит в Чечне развязывает руки русским нацистам и заключает величайшую опасность для Мира. Лермонтовские строки могут стать актуальными не только для народов Кавказа:

                   

         “Не ждут ли русского отряда,

           До крови лакомых гостей?”

                      

                                       “Хаджи-Абрек” М.Ю. Лермонтов

 

  Русский поэт 19 века был гораздо большим демократом, чем нынешний президент России. 

 

14.10.1999

 

3/1=3

 Алик Бахши

3/1=3

Под давлением Запада, угрожающего, в случае отказа Путина от 30-ти дневного прекращения огня, новыми санкциями и поставками Украине вооружения в необходимом количестве, в том числе ракет с большей дальностью поражения, Путин срочно в 2 часа ночи собрал штатных пропагандистов, чтобы поспешно, пока угроза не приведена в действие, сообщить Миру свою готовность начать 15 мая прямые переговоры с Киевом в Турции. Зеленский в свою очередь без промедления выразил готовность вылететь в Стамбул и встретиться тет-а-тет с Путином, дав знать Хозяину Кремля, чтобы тот не искал отговорок. Торопливость Путина поставила его перед ситуацией, которую он явно не предвидел. Во всяком случае личная встреча с Зеленским, в его планы точно не входила. Путин рассчитывал послать на переговоры группу дипломатов, в задачу которых, надо думать, входила бесконечная проволочка на всё время пока идёт война, война, которая для Путина является гарантией его пребывания в качестве президента. Пока идёт война, которая питает имперское мировоззрение русского народа, Путину нечего опасаться за власть. Поэтому война для фашиста Путина подобна соломинке для утопающего (1).

Вероятность, появления Путина на переговорах в Стамбуле нулевая. Дело в том, что при встрече с Зеленским сразу выяснится не только нежелание Путина на 30-ти дневное перемирие, но и на прекращение войны. Не приедет же Путин лишь для того, чтобы сказать хочу воевать. Более того, встреча, можно сказать, произойдёт косвенно в присутствии Трампа, который изъявил желание засветиться в этот момент в Турции, чтобы вызвать у мировой общественности свою причастность к столь знаменательному событию, что вполне в его духе самовосхваления. Нельзя не учесть и Эрдогана, формального организатора встречи, позиция которого известна, как сторонника суверенитета Украины, имеющего большие виды на Крым с его коренным тюркоязычным населением. В связи с этим, Путин, если приедет на встречу с Зеленским, в одиночку предстанет в Турции перед тремя идеологическими противниками. Однако, такой расклад маловероятен. В лучшем случае, как я сказал, в Турцию прибудет группа ничего не решающих переговорщиков, с которыми вести переговоры бесполезно.

Как бы там не было, с большой вероятностью состоится встреча трёх президентов Зеленского, Трампа и Эрдогана, итоговый результат которой в отношении России будет сопоставим с результатом тегеранской встречи Рузвельта, Черчилля и Сталина в отношении фашистской Германии. Таким образом, прекращение войны между Украиной и напавшей на неё Россией может быть достигнуто только в одном случае, а именно, при победе над фашистской Россией, с последующем падением режима фюрера Путина. (2)

1. Путин в панике. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/128808.html
2. Великорусский шовинизм, и Путин его фюрер. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21133.html

13.05.2025

Armenia and the failed Crusade

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

Armenia and the failed Crusade

 

 

 

       Having lost the last two wars to Azerbaijan, the Armenians, finally convinced that the Russians no longer intended to fight for them, turned to the West in the hope of finding new patrons to realize the dream of creating a chimerical Greater Armenia from sea to sea. To this end, the Armenians began to once again exploit the Christian idea of ungrateful barbarian Muslims who had seized the promised land and, it must be said, found fertile soil in France (1), which in the past was the most active participant in the Crusades against the Saracens. Only this time, instead of the promised land, Azerbaijan was offered, which is about to begin the genocide of the Christian Armenian people.

      It seems that the French liked the idea of a new Crusade, but in order not to be alone in this godly undertaking, they decided to attract fellow travelers through the UN and urgently convened the Security Council to condemn Azerbaijan with the adoption of subsequent sanctions, and possibly forceful methods. However, unexpectedly, one might say, right during a meeting of the Security Council, the Armenians let France down by officially abandoning territorial claims to Azerbaijan, thereby making France a laughing stock. Members of the Security Council, who already had enough problems with the war in Ukraine, breathed a sigh of relief and peacefully dispersed, mentally scolding the French representative.

    

     As a result, Armenia, which uses political chicanery (2) and has traditionally betrayed its allies in history, flogged itself, burying the “Great Armenia” project (3, 4).

 

 

1. Corrupt girl of imperialism. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/97866.html

2. Armenia’s trickery in the Karabakh conflict. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/58068.html

3. Was there a “Great Armenia”? https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/71952.html

4. “Great Armenia” or the Great Lie. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/91885.html

  

       09.22.2023

The Great Religious Controversy Returns

 

Alik Bakhshi

The Great Religious Controversy Returns

 

 

      

        Today, it can undoubtedly be said that the liberation of Azerbaijan’s territory from the Armenian occupiers was openly disapproved by Western Europe, and this despite 4 UN Security Council resolutions calling for the withdrawal of all Armenian occupation forces from the occupied regions of Azerbaijan. For 30 years, European politicians, along with the aggressor, ignored UN resolutions; they were not bothered by the expulsion under threat of death of 186 thousand ethnic Azerbaijanis from Armenia and 500 thousand from Karabakh and seven surrounding regions. There was no political or economic pressure from the West to force Armenia to seize 20% of Azerbaijani territory. But the Europeans reacted completely differently when Azerbaijan complied with UN resolutions, liberating its lands from the Armenian occupiers. Suddenly, Azerbaijan was called an aggressor country by Western politicians, and without any intelligible arguments. They suddenly became concerned about the Armenian refugees of Karabakh, although no forced deportation was noticed on the part of Azerbaijan, the Armenians voluntarily left Karabakh, despite the guarantees given by Azerbaijan for their safety, endowing them with the same rights that citizens of Azerbaijan have. So what is the reason for such an ambiguous attitude towards Azerbaijan and Azerbaijanis on the part of Western democracies calling for economic sanctions and even sending Western peacekeepers to Karabakh to protect the non-existent Armenian population from supposedly bloodthirsty Azerbaijani Islamists?

       A similar situation happened in Ukraine, when the Russians, having occupied Crimea and Eastern Ukraine and then held a referendum, seized these territories from Ukraine, on the grounds that a significant number of Russians lived there. And in this case, the West identified Russia as the aggressor and sided with Ukraine, which is absolutely correct from all points of view. Sanctions were introduced against Russia, and both political and military support were provided to Ukraine. But Armenia did exactly the same as Russia! Why such an unfair assessment regarding Azerbaijan? The double standard of the West is clearly evident here without any reservations.

      In my opinion, there is an explanation for this, because there is a reason for everything and it lies, strange as it may seem in our enlightened age, in religion. Armenia is the only Christian country in the Middle East and is perceived by the West as the leading stronghold of Christianity. Here it is appropriate to turn to distant history, namely the era of numerous Crusades of Western European countries, whose troops, during 1096 - 1272, rolled into the Middle Eastern region in waves, bringing death and destruction to the Muslim population. They were opposed mainly by the Turks, who put up stubborn resistance and forced the Europeans to leave the region. It must be said that the military confrontation between Christianity and Islam, represented by the Ottoman Empire, continued until the 15th century. Few people know that the fortress wall around Jerusalem, which the crusaders tried to capture, was built on the orders of Suleiman the Magnificent. This wall still encircles the old historical part of Jerusalem. It is appropriate to remember here that the initiator of the Crusades was France, which even today shows the most active support for defeated Armenia, provoking it to a new war with Azerbaijan. France's demarche against Azerbaijan was stopped by the UN Security Council (1), but France stubbornly continues to try to turn the EU against Azerbaijan and exert political and economic pressure on Azerbaijan.

    Thus, in the Karabakh conflict, France openly sided with Yerevan, not taking into account all four UN resolutions, which clearly indicate the withdrawal of Armenian occupation forces from Azerbaijan. (2) Today, because of France, Armenia, not deciding on the issue of choosing a patron, is similar to Buridan's donkey, which is characteristic of the historical past of the Armenians. To betray Russia, which created an Armenian state on the lands of Azerbaijan, a state that has never existed in those parts in history, is entirely in the spirit of the Armenians. (3)

     It should be noted that the West is very narrow-minded, accusing countries that have recently gained independence from the Russian Empire of insufficient Western-style democracy. In this regard, it is necessary to take into account the fact that these countries, having fallen into colonial dependence on Russia for a long time, whose people do not like democracy (4), were cut off from world social progress. Democracy cannot suddenly be acquired by the people, much less introduced at the bayonets of the Marines, as was the case in Iraq. The people themselves must evaluate the advantages of democracy without outside interference, and this is a striking example of Turkey, whose people unconditionally accepted the democratic reforms introduced by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. The same France moved towards democracy through guillotines and bloody revolutions, passing through five republics. By the way, Azerbaijan, having gained independence, became the first in history in 1918 in the East, a democratic republic in which religion was separated from the state, and women received all rights equal to men, which was a very progressive step for a Muslim country in those days. True, soon, after the arrival of the Red Army, democracy in the young Azerbaijan Democratic Republic was ended for a long time, the Azerbaijani people again found themselves under the harsh heel of Moscow.

      Western guardians of democracy do not want to take into account the difficult conditions in which the Azerbaijani people found themselves, namely the fact that democratic reforms had to be carried out from the very first day of independence, namely, being in a state of war with Armenia, which did not hide its aggressive intentions to seize significant territories , or even completely capture the whole of Azerbaijan, if we take into account the plans of the Armenian nationalists to create a chimerical Greater Armenia, in which, judging by the map drawn by the Armenian would-be historians, there is no place for either the Azerbaijani people or the country called Azerbaijan.(4)

      Today, some European politicians are opening Pandora's  box, and again at the initiative of France, making plans for a new Crusade, but not under the pretext of saving Christ, but under the absurd pretext of saving Armenia from non-existent Azerbaijani Islamists and creating a vast Christian state in the Middle East.

       Undoubtedly, it is absurd, but on the other hand, how else can we explain the behavior of the West towards Azerbaijan, which finally expelled the Armenian occupiers from its land.

  

1. Armenia and the failed Crusade.  https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/04/armenia-and-failed-crusade.html  

2. Corrupt girl of imperialism. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/97866.html 

3. Armenia – history and legend. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/101164.html

4. Was there a “Great Armenia” https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/71952.html

                              

02/05/2024

Israel in the circle of political absurdity

 

Alik Bakhshi

Israel in the circle of political absurdity

 

         

 

       So, after 77 years, when, in accordance with UN General Assembly Resolution No. 181 of November 29, 1947, it was decided to create two states of Israel and Palestine in the British mandated territory of Palestine, Palestine finally received the status of a full member of the UN on May 10, 2024. To be honest, this resolution surprised me. The fact is that thanks to resolution No. 181, Israel automatically received membership in the UN, and of course this should have happened to Palestine as well. What was the point of re-involving the UN to re-admit Palestine to the UN? Absurd, nothing less!

 

       However, one absurdity gives rise to another, no less incredible absurdity. Israel, being a fierce opponent of Palestine's membership in the UN, draws the attention of the international community to the fact that UN resolutions are only advisory in nature and are not obligatory for their implementation. This explanation from Israel again caused bewilderment, because Israel received a mandate for a state and membership in the UN thanks to the resolution. This attitude towards UN resolutions completely nullifies the significance of this international organization.

 

        I must say the following circumstance is even more absurd. This refers to those 9 countries that are opponents of Palestine’s membership in the UN, motivating their negative attitude towards Palestine and the formation of the state of Palestine by the fact that first this issue should be resolved between Israel, which has the status of a state, and Palestine with an unequal status of autonomy. But, as you know, they have been solving this issue for 75 years to no avail through war, which, like any war, is accompanied by mass deaths of the civilian population. From the first day of the formation of the state, martial law was introduced in Israel, which has not been lifted to this day. True, during the time of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin there was an opportunity to agree on a peaceful solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, but everything ended with his murder, and, to be honest, this outrageous murder by an Israeli terrorist was perceived positively by the majority of Israeli citizens. (1) And Today, the Biden administration is sending the decision on the creation of the state of Palestine to Israel, which, unlike the Palestinians, I repeat, has the status of a state. You may say it's nonsense, but this is what is happening. Did they take into account the opinion of the Palestinians when they decided in 1947 to allocate part of the territory of Palestine to the state of Israel, which occupied the entire territory of former Palestine!

 

       America's mischief-making together with Israel created the absurdity of the situation regarding the creation of the state of Palestine, which had already been resolved back in 1947. (2) According to American President Biden, it is possible to end the confrontation between Jews and Palestinians by creating the state of Palestine, however, on the other hand, America is blocking this possibility by vetoing it in the Security Council. Once again, absurdity and a demonstration of the policy of double standards. (3) Such an immoral position of Biden does not paint America, which stands for justice and democracy.

       Israel's future is at peace with the Arabs, and there is no other option.(4)

 

1. On the question of who killed Rabin. Israel. Our country. 04.12.96.

2. The UN's fatal mistake. 05.12.2023.  https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2024/07/the-fatal-mistake-of-un.html  

3. An open letter to Mr. President Joseph Biden. 04/23/2024. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/109710.html

4. Peace and democracy are the future of Israel. Israel. Our country. 09.18.96.

     

         05/11/2024