среда, 14 октября 2026 г.

The hole in the portrait or to the Great Lie of GreatArmenia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                          Alik Bakhshi


A hole in a portrait or from the Great Lie to "Great Armenia"

 

 



        

 

  "Let the lies spread for 24 hours

  and it will take 100 years to refute it"

                                              Eastern proverb

                  

        An old photograph of my grandfather hanging on the wall is pierced in the chest area, this is a trace left by an Armenian saber. How much hatred the murderer who burst into the house had, who had never seen my grandfather or his family in his life, in order to take out the evil in the portrait - a silent witness to that monstrous massacre in 1918, perpetrated by the Armenian diaspora in Baku.

      Terrible news came to Balakhani, the Armenians killed all the Muslims in the city and are now heading to the villages. Everyone encountered, whether a woman or a child, is subject to destruction. Resistance is useless, because the Armenians are armed. At night, my grandfather's family, along with the rest of the villagers, hurriedly left the house. There was nowhere to run especially, their way of salvation was blocked by the northern desert coast of the Caspian Sea. Well, the Armenians did not think of continuing the pursuit in that direction, otherwise the mighty Khazri, a strong north wind from the sea, raking the golden sand of the coastal strip, would still expose human bones. (I want to note that in this case, the cry of the Armenian Nazis “Armenia from sea to sea” was not translated into reality. The Armenians did not bother to cross even the small Absheron Peninsula. Well, the Armenians have some kind of rock with these seas! Maybe someone heard so that Armenian ships plow the seas? Phoenician - yes, Greeks, Persians, Arabs, Turks ... but Armenians? True, you can remember Noah's Ark, which, according to one of the legends, is supposedly located on Mount Ararat, but Noah, it seems, is Armenian was not. In any case, history is silent about the Armenian sailors. But the Armenian unfortunate cartographers "Great Armenia" was washed by as many as three seas. With the seas, the Armenians have a clear bust, but not only with the seas.) Returning a few days later, the family found a devastated house and this portrait of his grandfather, with a gaping hole in his chest, as an ominous reminder of the terrible fate of family members, finding the Armenians in the house.

        So what exactly was my grandfather's fault before that Armenian who came with one sole purpose - to kill. Armenians did not live in Balakhany at all, usually Armenians settle compactly in cities, and it is difficult to assume that the grandfather or any of the villagers had any common business with the Armenians. What kind of guilt could the Armenians lay against the Balakhani, Baku residents? In the end, what was the fault of the people of Azerbaijan before the Armenians, because the bloody rebellion simultaneously occurred in all the cities where the Armenian diaspora was present. Their only fault was that they were Turks (in Russian, Turks). True, the Balakhans are not ethnic Turks, their native language is Farsi, but the killers were not up to such subtleties. Their task was to ethnically cleanse the territory of Azerbaijan under the supposed "Great Armenia" and Baku with its oil fields, apparently, was to become an important source of income. It was not enough for the Armenian bandits led by the Bolshevik Shaumyan to kill tens of thousands of Azerbaijanis, at the same time they began to destroy cultural heritage, showing unheard of vandalism - they destroyed and burned the Teze Pir mosque and the beautiful Ismailiye building, opening direct fire on buildings from artillery guns . (In contrast to the vandalism of the Armenians, neither in 1918 nor in 1989 did the Azerbaijanis allow themselves to destroy the Armenian church, which still stands safely in the very center of Baku. It would be nice to open a museum of the genocide of the Azerbaijani people in that church.) the Dashnak Nazis managed to carry out in Turkey in 1914-1918, they tried to do it in Azerbaijan in 1918, and if it were not for the fraternal help of Turkey, which, despite the desperate situation on the fronts, hastily sent an army to save Baku, otherwise rare in cruelty the extermination of the local population by the Dashnaks would take on the scale of a catastrophe no less than the genocide of European Jews. To the credit of the Turks, it should be noted that by defeating the Dashnak armed detachments, they did not allow a mass retaliatory massacre to occur, thereby preserving the Armenian diaspora in Azerbaijan.

    

      The Nazi ideology of "Dashnaktsutyun" arose long before the fascist one in Germany, and the ethnic cleansing undertaken by the Dashnaks in Turkey and Azerbaijan under the territory that was supposed to become "Great Armenia" is a real genocide. In fact, this was the first genocide planned by the Dashnaktsutyun ideologists in history, because it was impossible to build an Armenian state either on the territory of Turkey, where Armenians did not constitute a majority in any vilayet, or on the territory of Northern Azerbaijan, where Armenians are in significant numbers. appeared only as a result of the expansionist policy of Moscow, which also consisted in squeezing out the local Turkic population from the regions bordering Turkey. In this regard, the claims of the Dashnaks on Baku, otherwise the bloody rebellion of 1918 cannot be interpreted, generally testify to the rare impudence of the Armenian Nazis from the Dashnaktsutyun, because even in accordance with the map drawn, precisely drawn, by them, the borders of “Great Armenia” Baku are not outlined, must be assumed by forgetfulness. Here, apparently, the Dashnaks are guided by the presence of the Armenian diaspora, so that all places where there is an Armenian diaspora, which is characterized by compact focal residence, are potential territories of "Great Armenia". So it happened with the Zangezur region, which in 1920 was transferred to Armenia by order of Moscow, as a result of which Nakhichevan became an autonomous region, losing its territorial connection with Northern Azerbaijan. So it happened with the Karabakh region in 1989 of Azerbaijan. It is enough for one Armenian to appear, as he begins to acquire compatriots exponentially. Therefore, there is nothing surprising in the fact that the resort towns of the North Caucasus and the Black Sea coast are currently pockets with a compact Armenian population. In recent years, there has been an intensive settlement of Kuban by Armenians. Usually, the emergence of Armenians is inevitably accompanied by the emergence of mafia structures, which, as a rule, seek social and political privileges. I won't be surprised if it comes to a comical situation; formations will appear in the Kuban - "Armenian" Cossacks! So you won’t envy the Kuban Cossacks, especially if you remember the instructions of the famous French singer Aznavour, an Armenian by birth, who changed his role as a singer to a politician:

"Do you want to be a mafia? - Form your mafia in another country. Don't do it in your country, don't do it against your people." (http://armtoday.info/default.asp?Lang=_Ru&NewsID=52566)

      Aznavour is deeply indignant that the local mafia has flourished in Armenia, which already aggravates the catastrophic economic situation in the country, and therefore, apparently knowing the mentality of his people (the tendency to migrate), he strongly recommends that the Armenians, if it is impossible to do without the mafia, otherwise his words cannot be interpreted, other countries for mafia activities. That's it, no more, no less!

    

       Armenians are leaving Armenia today, and also, oddly enough, Karabakh annexed by them and forming diasporas among other peoples, of course, not following the recommendations of Aznavour, because this circumstance accompanies the entire history of the Armenian people in accordance with its mentality. An interesting, one might say incredible, historical fact: at the time of Russia's conquest of Georgia, Armenians made up 60% of the population of its capital, Tbilisi! And who knows, perhaps the Armenian Nazis from the Dashnaktsutyun have already secretly introduced Tbilisi into Greater Armenia.

      Involuntarily, but in the words of Aznavour, the quintessence of the people's mentality is revealed, which contains the fate of the people, its past and future. The dispersion of the Armenian people with the formation of numerous diasporas scattered throughout the world is something that can be traced in history. Paulo Coelho famously said:

  "Fate and history are written with one hand"

  

      Each nation, like an individual, creates its own destiny and history in full accordance with its mentality. There are peoples, such as the Anglo-Saxons, Scandinavians, who are prone to creative and rational work, they are self-sufficient and do not need anyone, and their complete opposite is the gypsies, who are not capable of any creative work at all, they have a different way of existence , they do not need their own state, figuratively speaking, they will not steal horses from themselves. If you hypothetically imagine that the UN will allocate territory for the Roma to form a state, then literally the next day you will not find them there. You will consider such conclusions to be pure racism, but alas, this is what it is, no matter how sad it is. Come up with a different definition, but the essence of this will not change. As in the animal world there is a small class of parasites, so in human society there are gypsies who cannot exist on their own, and there is no escape from this. There is no unequivocal answer to the philosophical question why Nature needs this, but there is a fact. The character of a people, like the character of an individual, has hereditary roots, is transmitted genetically, which distinguishes peoples from each other, determining their past, present and future.

 

   I will give an example typical of the Armenian diaspora. After the conquest of Turkistan, the Russians, knowing well the mentality of the Armenian people, their tendency to migrate and surprisingly adapt to new conditions, encouraged the resettlement of Armenians to new colonial territories in order to dilute the hostile Turkic population with Christians. As well as in the Caucasus, the Russians saw in the Armenians the backbone of their power in Turkistan. In a short period of time, a powerful Armenian diaspora was formed in the Fergana and Zarafshan valleys, as the richest ones. The Armenians drove out the merchants of the Turks; the owners of shops, many shops, restaurants, tailoring workshops, buyers and dealers, the keepers of the beer houses and tenement houses that appeared were Armenians. Naturally, a considerable number of Armenians were represented by government officials and military personnel. An Armenian quarter was formed in Kokand, in which an Armenian Gregorian church and Armenian parish schools were opened, in a word, an exact copy of Armenikand, a large Armenian district in Baku. It is important to note here that there was not even a hint of any hostile confrontation between the Armenians and the local Turkic population. However, everything changes radically at the first destabilization of the existing socio-political relations.

    

       After the revolution, the national government of Turkestan is created in Kokandna, in parallel, the Bolsheviks in Tashkent create their own government without a single representative of the indigenous nationality, which turns to Kokand with an ultimatum to recognize Soviet power. It was then that the insidiousness of the Armenian diaspora manifested itself, Dashnak military formations suddenly appeared, which staged a particularly brutal massacre in Kokand, massacring the entire population within three days. The city was completely destroyed and burned. It must be said that such an action was the cause of the emergence of Basmachism, with which the Russians had to fight right up to the 30s. An interesting fact is that the massacres in Baku and Kokand completely coincide in time - March 1918. One conclusion follows from this: where there is an Armenian diaspora, the extremely nationalist ideology of the Dashnaktsutyun party is also secretly present, because otherwise such sudden deceit on the part of the Armenian diaspora cannot be explained. Moreover, the Kokand massacre is an eloquent illustration of the bestial bloodthirstiness of the Dashnaks and the danger fraught with the Armenian diaspora. Armenian historians, it seems, did not include Central Asia in the composition of “Great Armenia” and there is only one explanation here - bloodlust and terror as indicators of its activities accompanying and integral to the “Dashnaktsutyun”.

 

      The desire and readiness for migration with the creation of numerous diasporas in other countries is characteristic of the Armenian people. Why are Armenians leaving Armenia? Why did the Armenians after the Baku events rush to Russia, America, only rare units ended up in the “historical” Motherland, and even those subsequently left it, never to return. The fact is indisputable. It would seem that there is a free independent country Armenia, live, build, develop. However, the picture is completely opposite. There is no one to live in the captured Karabakh! New Armenian schools are opening in the Krasnodar Territory in the Kuban, while they are emptying in Armenia itself. There is only one answer - it's all about mentality and there is no other explanation. Even if we hypothetically assume that the Dashnaks after ethnic cleansing (by the way, the Kurds claim exactly the same territory) will create a “Great Armenia”, then I have serious doubts that the Armenians will leave prosperous countries for the sake of the “Motherland”. And what will they do there? To sew each other's boots?

      

       With the settlement of Greater Armenia, taking into account the mentality of the Armenian people, the Nazis from the Dashnaktsutyun have an insurmountable problem and a situation similar to the one that happened in Israel may well arise. As you know, the State of Israel was created by European Jews - Ashkenazi, mostly from Eastern European countries, but most Ashkenazim did not bother to leave their settled life in Europe and America for the sake of the Promised Land. The young country clearly did not have enough people, and in order to solve a vital problem, it was decided to open Israel to all peoples who profess Judaism. Jews from North Africa and Asia came to Israel, Moroccans, Ethiopians, Kurds, Indians and others who ethnically have nothing to do with Ashkenazim. I worked with an ethnic Irish Israeli who converted to Judaism. In short, just as many nations profess Christianity, for example, there are Christian Arabs, the same picture is similar with the Jews. It is known from history that for a short time part of the Khazars converted to Judaism, but from this they did not become ethnically Jews. Thus, by allowing all professing Judaism to settle in Israel, the problem was partially solved. However, unlike other religions, the Armenian Gregorian Church is isolated and unites only Armenians on a national basis. This is somewhat reminiscent of the fact that of all the republics of the USSR, Armenia became more and more mono-ethnic, while in others the picture was exactly the opposite. This circumstance will certainly create a big problem with the settlement of the territory of the hypothetical “Great Armenia”. No nation, except for the Armenians, has such an excessive, literally painful, degree of self-praise in order to prove national superiority, which inevitably causes disgust, and Vasily Grosman was right in his observations:

 

“With insidious ease, the nationalism of the people loses its noble foundation, it does not become formidable, it becomes pitiful, does not provoke, but humiliates. So trying to prove some kind of inferiority, a person discovers his own. Some of my interlocutors in all areas of human creativity, first of all, emphasized the Armenian national priority in architecture, science, and poetry. They emphasized the superiority of the architectural merits of the temple in Garni over the primitive architecture of the Acropolis that seemed to them: speaking of the poet Tumanyan, they persistently convinced me that the genius of Tumanyan was higher than the genius of Pushkin. The point, of course, is not that the architecture of Garni is not more perfect than the architecture of the Acropolis, is Tumanyan more brilliant than Pushkin, the essence, and the essence of course is sad, is that poetry, and architecture, and science, and history in itself, according to their essence in the conversations of some of my interlocutors cease to mean. They only mean to reveal the superiority of the Armenian national character over the national character of other peoples. It is not poetry that is important, but it is only important to prove that the Armenian national poet is higher than, say, a Russian or French poet. My interlocutors, without noticing it themselves, impoverished their souls and hearts by ceasing to rejoice in poetry, the perfection of architecture, the greatness of science, and saw in poetry and science only a means to assert their national superiority. This desire can be so fanatical, narrow, that for a moment it seems like a manifestation of madness. ("Banner", n.11, 1988)

      

        It is difficult to suspect Grosman of anti-Armenian sentiments, but it seems to me that many will agree with his opinion. Perhaps such an attitude towards foreigners and their culture is also the reason for the exclusive mono-ethnicity of Armenia. Once at school, the physical education teacher, lining us up in a line, commanded “two steps forward” and drew our attention to the fact that the lowest in the ranks jumped out the farthest; so to speak, short stature syndrome. Hence the origin of “Great Armenia” is clear. There were great empires in those parts, Assyria, the Persian Empire, the empire of Alexander the Great, the Roman, Byzantine, Arab Caliphate, Ottoman, so why not be “Great Armenia”, and why be trifles, right from sea to sea. Next in line, presumably, will be the “Great Kurdistan”, which definitely aims for the same territory, because it was not without reason that the Ararat Kurdish Republic was proclaimed in 1927 in the Ararat mountains of the Armenian Highlands. This is probably why, during the First World War, the Dashnaks slaughtered the Kurds along with the Turks in order to prevent the Kurds from claiming this territory.

       

         However, back to reality, the Dashnaks did not create a chimerical “Great Armenia”, but shed enough lies and blood. By provoking the Armenian people to a pre-planned massacre of the indigenous Turkic population in Turkey and Azerbaijan, the Dashnaks provoked a response of spontaneous popular anger, which turned out to be no less a tragedy for the Armenian people. The atrocities perpetrated by the Dashnaks against the civilian population during the cleansing of the territory under the Armenian state, which they planned to create on the line of fire between the two empires, were the cause of a response spontaneous wave of popular revenge, namely spontaneous, and not organized by the state, as the Dashnaks are trying to present. The only thing that the Ottoman government did was to evict the rebellious Armenian population from the frontline places in order to secure the rear of the fighting army. The path of the evicted Armenians lay in the area where the population had previously fled from the brutal pogroms carried out by the Dashnaks, and something happened that could not but happen.

        The blame for the extermination of hundreds of thousands of Turks, Kurds and Armenians lies entirely with the Nazi party "Dashnaktsutyun" and no one else. It was the Dashnaktsutyun ideologists who organized the genocide of the Muslim population of Turkey and Azerbaijan and, in order to deflect accusations from themselves, taking advantage of the period of the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the departure of the former government and the deposition of the Sultan, the period when the Turkish people, led by Mustafa Kamal (Ataturk), had to to defend their homeland, they, hastily preparing and actively distributing accusatory documents in the form of Andonyan’s book “TALAAT PASHA’S TELEGRAMS”,  which were recognized as a gross fake, tried to accuse the country’s leaders of allegedly pre-planned extermination of Armenians.

 

     An interesting fact: in 1920, the British occupation authorities in Istanbul, on an Armenian tip, arrested 144 people as the main culprits in the Armenian genocide. A year later, a trial took place in Malta, which did not find a single document proving the guilt of the arrested, and this despite the fact that the judges already had Andonyan's book on hand, which was recognized as a complete fake. The prosecutor's office announced the termination of the proceedings on the basis that not a single document was presented, evidence of the guilt of the prisoners, and this at a time when all the archives of the empire were in the hands of the British and all the witnesses of the so-called genocide were alive.

 

       Having suffered a complete failure at the beginning of the 20th century, the guardians of “Great Armenia” did not leave their extravagant idea and, continuing to exploit the lie about the genocide, without any evidence, they are trying, calling for help from the world community, to put not individuals, but all Turkish people. For all the time of false propaganda, not a single accusatory document was found testifying to the genocide of the Armenian people organized by the government of the Ottoman Empire. It is difficult to assume that every one of the government and army orders, circulars, dispatches were intentionally and timely destroyed. With the general mess that accompanied the crumbling empire, at least a piece of some incriminating note remained, but ...

    

        The lie accompanies the entire propaganda campaign launched by the Armenian Nazis from Andonyan's book to the latest forgery of Ara Sarafyan, in which there is also not a single original pointing to the Armenian genocide, and where does it come from 100 years later, except perhaps a new fake was made, of which there were plenty . As blasphemous as it sounds, but after listening to them, one might think that the Armenians have found a way to reproduce in the next world, not otherwise, because the number of victims of the so-called genocide is growing exponentially, reaching a number of 1.5 million out of the initially assumed three hundred thousand , in general, as usual with the living. They want Turkic blood to wash away their bloody crimes in the hope that the world community will be deceived and fall for the lies about the genocide. It seems that the time has come to understand the reality of what is happening, the reality of which, if indulged and misjudged, can again shed a lot of blood. I have no doubt that if a trial takes place, at which, along with the charter of the Dashnaktsutyun party, which openly calls for terror, the available archival materials on the bloody deeds of the Dashnaks on the eve and during the First World War, as well as on the fact of terrorist acts committed by the Dashnaks, will be considered around the world, against representatives of the Turkish Republic, who have nothing to do with the Ottoman Empire, eyewitnesses of the blatant massacre of the citizens of Khojaly in Azerbaijan and the portrait of the grandfather pierced by the Dashnak saber as a dumb witness of the Baku massacre back in 1918 were interrogated, then the Armenian dreamers of the “Great Armenia”, any desire to mention the genocide will disappear.

_____________

     

     Today, Armenia is represented in the company of the world rabble that has gathered around Putin's Russia - Hugo Chavez, Lukashenko's father, Tehran obscurantists, the bloody Syrian dictator Assad. How can one not remember the phrase: "Tell me who your friends are, and I will tell you who you are."

 

     01.10.12.

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий