Alik Bakhshi
Azerbaijan,
Azerbaijan

Can the soul be stolen from the heart? Never!
You are my breath, you are my bread and water!
Your cities have opened up before me.
I am all yours. I am given to you as a son forever!
Azerbaijan, Azerbaijan!
Samed Vurgun
If, by repeating the name of his homeland twice, the poet
strengthens the feeling of his enthusiastic love for it, then similarly with
the title of the article I want to reflect the misfortune of the people of
Azerbaijan, cut into two parts by the interstate border.
A difficult fate befell the colonial peoples of the Russian
Empire. Not many managed to break free with the collapse of the Soviet Union.
But even those who have gained freedom are still experiencing the consequences
of being in the "prison of nations", moreover, the threat of ending
up there again is very real: for example, if it were not for the West's demand
to stop the advance of the Russian tank column on Tbilisi in 2008, and if the
American frigate had not appeared off the coast of Georgia, the Georgians would
have been a people who voluntarily entered Moscow's protection twice. How can
one not mention here, I would say, the unique ability of the Russians to
liberate peoples with their inevitable subsequent annexation to the empire.
This peculiarity of the Russians to bestow freedom on peoples has a long
tradition, runs like a red (read bloody) thread, with which the patchwork
empire is sewn, and is recorded in the history textbooks of the USSR, and
although, in the case of Afghanistan, it has somewhat weakened, in the long
term none of the neighboring peoples of the Russian Empire is guaranteed
against the manic desire of the Russians to free them from the heavy burden of
freedom. For example, the rumor of this Russian peculiarity reached Turkistan
in its time, and in 1865 the Russians were invited by the residents of Tashkent
to free them from life. True, the Tashkent residents stubbornly resisted
liberation, probably due to their masochistic inclinations, and after the
capture of the city they were mercifully killed, including women and children,
which gave them the opportunity to posthumously voluntarily join the Russian
Empire. Or another example: Moscow went to meet and satisfied the persistent
request of Fatali Khan of the Derbent Khanate of Azerbaijan to become a vassal.
This glorious act of voluntary reunification with Russia was later especially
noted by the fact that the Kremlin cartographers included Dagestan (translated
from Turkic - the land of mountains) into the Russian Federation, which the
inhabitants of the former territory of Azerbaijan were extremely happy about
and still express their gratitude to the Russians, saluting with gunfire and
blowing up houses in Buinaksk, and in some cases, the joy overwhelms their
souls so much that, unable to withstand the emotional load, they blow
themselves up, involving those around them in an instant move to paradise, who
naturally voluntarily joined the holiday of the soul, similar to that voluntary
expression of the will of peoples to join Russia and free themselves from ...
Once, while in Soviet Lithuania, I heard a phrase from an aborigine, pronounced
with enthusiastic sarcasm, which I remembered forever: "the Russians came
and freed us from meat and butter." Thus, the Lithuanian expressed
personal gratitude to the "elder brother" for his concern for the
health of the Lithuanian people. Indeed, what could be better than a diet for
increasing life expectancy!
It must be said that the Azerbaijani people (more correctly
called the Azerbaijani Turks, as the people in South Azerbaijan define
themselves, as well as the Turkish Turks, Iranians and Armenians), like no
other, have been especially favored by the Russians. Thus, as a result of a
series of "voluntary" annexations of the peoples of the Caucasus,
Azerbaijan was divided into Northern Azerbaijan as part of the Russian Empire
and Southern Azerbaijan in Iran, where there are twice as many Azerbaijanis as
in its northern part. Since then, apparently in gratitude for Baku oil, and
perhaps for purely altruistic reasons, Moscow's concern for the Azerbaijani
people has continued without ceasing, and in addition to the territory of
Dagestan (Derbent Khanate), the Azerbaijani people were also liberated from the
territory of the Zangezur region, which was transferred to Armenia, on the
grounds that, as a result of Moscow's far-sighted national policy based on the
principle of "friendship of peoples" (read ethnic cleansing), the
number of the fraternal Armenian people had grown significantly there. Thus,
the territory of the former Karabakh Khanate of Azerbaijan, previously
populated by Armenians from Iran and Turkey, then received the status of an
autonomous region under Soviet rule, and in 1989-1991, after the complete
deportation and destruction of the Azerbaijani population on this original
Azerbaijani land, the birthplace of folk poets and musicians, Moscow actually
transferred to Armenia all of Karabakh with the adjacent areas, which were also
liberated from the Azerbaijani population. As a result of the Karabakh
conflict, Azerbaijan lost another 20 percent of its territory.
From the very beginning of the arrival of Russians in the
Caucasus, Russia pursued a policy of ethnic expulsion of the Turkic population
from the teTurkey and Iran, and the settlement of these lands by Armenians,
encouraging their migration from neighboring countries. These vile actions
against the Azerbaijani people reflect the real picture of the coincidence, up
to a certain point, of the strategic goals of Moscow and the Armenian Nazis,
dreaming of a Greater Armenia, from sea to sea. Yes, yes, exactly like that,
“from sea to sea” and nothing else, because how can one explain the massacre of
1918, carried out by Armenians in Baku and other cities of Azerbaijan. Having
secretly supplied weapons to the numerous Armenian diaspora, the Dashnaks
prepared an unheard-of insidious rebellion in its cruelty. The Armenians, who
had lived side by side with the Azerbaijanis for many years, suddenly began to
break into houses and literally slaughter the unarmed population of the city,
sparing neither children nor women. The residents fled, there was no way to
organize resistance to the outrageous armed murderers. Pursuing the refugees,
the bandits rushed to the suburban villages. Let me make a short lyrical
digression. There was a large old photograph of my grandfather hanging in the
house. As a small child, I noticed that there was a patched hole in the chest
area of the portrait.
When asked about its origin, my father answered briefly, "from a
sabre." He generally did not like to talk about military topics, although
he had been through the entire war from beginning to end, commanding an
anti-aircraft battery. I learned the details from my mother when I was already
an adult: Terrible news about the cruelty of the Armenians reached Balakhani.
The residents, taking their children and food, hastily left the village at
night. There was nowhere to run, Baku and the surrounding villages are located
on a peninsula. Their escape was interrupted by the deserted shore of the
Caspian Sea. Fortunately, the Armenians did not think to move to the sea. A few
days later, when the grandfather's family returned, they found broken dishes
and a portrait pierced by a saber in the house, a colorful hint of what awaited
them if the Armenians found the family in the house.
In Azerbaijan, the Armenians used the same tactics of ethnic
cleansing of the territory for the proposed Armenian state as in Turkey in
1915, with the only difference that in Turkey this action was carried out with
the help of the tsarist authorities, and in Azerbaijan with the assistance of
the communists. The then Armenian military commander Andronnik telegraphed the
Kremlin about the glorious victory over the enemy. However, the joy was
short-lived. Turkey, despite the desperate situation on the front, sent a
military detachment to Baku for rescue. (Turks and Azerbaijanis are one people,
by analogy with the Germans and Austrians). Having broken the defense organized
by the Dashnaks on the approaches to the city, the Turks entered the city,
which, apparently, according to the invaders' plans, was supposed to enrich
Great Armenia with oil.
The Dashnaks hoped that the Russians would help them create
Great Armenia, but they were deeply mistaken. Having organized the Armenian
Socialist Republic on the site of the Yerevan Khanate (one of the khanates of
Azerbaijan), the Kremlin communists simultaneously buried any hope of the
Armenian Nazis for independence, which responded many years later with a series
of terrorist attacks carried out by the newly strengthened Dashnak party in the
form of blown up ducklings in the Moscow metro and commuter trains.
However, the main thing that, in my opinion, the Dashnak
ideologists, planning to build a chimerical state, did not take into account is
the mentality of the Armenian people. Here it is appropriate to point out the
peculiarity of the mentality of the Armenian people, namely the desire to
migrate to economically developed areas, usually cities, creating centers of
compact settlement there. For example, a very eloquent fact is that at the time
of the Russian conquest of Georgia, there were more Armenians living in Tbilisi
than Georgians themselves. In Baku, an entire district of the city was called
Armenikend, with an exclusively Armenian population. By the way, in Soviet
times, the number of Armenians making up the population of Baku exceeded the
number of Armenians living in all of Karabakh. Only the difference in mentality
can explain the fact that Azerbaijani refugees from Armenia and the occupied
territories fled to Azerbaijan, while Armenian refugees ended up anywhere but
in Armenia. Those few who did end up in their homeland soon left it with the
sole thought of never returning there. But it was after the collapse of the
USSR, when it would seem there were no special reasons not to come to the free
and much-desired Armenia, that a significant number of them appeared in the
rich American state of California. Didn't they follow in the footsteps of the
Jews, in order to create an Armenian lobby in the most powerful world power, to
solve their problems with the hands of American taxpayers, or even with the lives
of American soldiers to implement the Dashnak ideology of creating a Greater
Armenia. The reason for the lack of desire for the Motherland can also be
sought in the fact that today's Armenia is an artificial formation of Armenians
resettled from Turkey, Iran and Lebanon, as a consequence of the
implementation, with the assistance of Moscow, of the ideology of the extremely
nationalistic Dashnaktsutyun party.
It is no secret that the Armenians had great influence in
the Kremlin under the communists (A. Mikoyan), creating a powerful diaspora in
Moscow, otherwise howrritories adjacent toIt can be explained that of all the
Soviet republics, only Armenia became increasingly mono-ethnic, and this
despite the fact that the number of Armenians in Armenia itself did not
increase due to the continuous migration of Armenians to the central cities of
Russia, as well as the resort cities of the Black Sea coast and the North
Caucasus. Not only the Azerbaijani population was gradually squeezed out of
Armenia, but even Russians, whose number was constantly growing in all the
other Soviet republics, were practically gone in Armenia at the time of the
collapse of the USSR. By the way, the impetus for the Karabakh conflict was the
forced deportation of Azerbaijanis from Armenia. This was a well-planned,
insidious action. (Let me note that insidiousness on the part of Armenians has
been noted more than once in history). At its first stage, refugees from Kafan
appeared in Azerbaijan. And this was in the USSR, in peacetime! Driven out of
their homes by Armenian militants, they headed to Baku, intending to seek
protection and justice from the official authorities, who were in complete
indecision, because all the requests of responsible party comrades from Baku
remained unanswered. Moscow maintained a stubborn silence. General Secretary
Gorbachev did not take any action to stop the lawlessness committed in Armenia.
What is the reason for such strange behavior of a person in whose hands all the
power is concentrated in the conditions of such a totalitarian state as the
Soviet Union? One involuntarily recalls the time of Gorbachev's visit to
France, his meeting with representatives of the Armenian diaspora. One can only
guess how they managed to tie Gorbachev's hands. The only thing that the
cowardly republican government did, instead of ringing all the bells about the
blatant arbitrariness of Armenian nationalists, was to prevent the appearance
of Kafan refugees in Baku. They were not allowed to go further than Sumgait,
otherwise what happened in Sumgait would have had larger-scale consequences in
Baku due to the large Armenian population, significantly exceeding the number
of Sumgait Armenians. It must be assumed that the Dashnaks were counting on an
Armenian pogrom in Baku, having started to play out sinister plans, having
prepared the fate of hostages for the Baku Armenians in favor of their crazy
ideology of creating a "Great Armenia from sea to sea". Time passed,
and the homeless refugees were left alone with their problems in an
artificially created information vacuum. The authorities did not even create a
tent camp for them. It was then that provocateurs appeared, as it turned out
later, two Armenians, who, taking advantage of the artificially created
dangerous situation, pushed desperate people to a pogrom of Armenians in
Sumgait. The action was so carefully planned and, most importantly, documented
at the same moment and, moreover, surprisingly quickly, literally a few hours
later the film of the vandalism of the Azerbaijanis, having crossed the state
border, which was already nonsense for the USSR, ended up abroad, which leaves
no doubt about the pre-planned sinister operation. Note that at that time the
common people did not have video cameras, much less professional movie cameras.
It is difficult to imagine that all this suddenly appeared in a timely and
appropriate manner. But it is even more difficult to imagine that something like
this could have happened in such a totalitarian state as the Soviet Union! In a
state in which not only a tank, but every bullet was accounted for, and all
this unexpectedly ended up in the hands of Armenian militants who began open
military actions against Azerbaijan.
The planned tragedy of Sumgait legitimized the expulsion of
the Azerbaijanis from Armenia, and then the seizure of Karabakh. As I said,
Moscow remained silent about the lawlessness of the Armenian authorities, it
seemed that, hiding behind the Kremlin wall, the all-powerful Secretary General
was afraid to restore order in the country. No, apparently, there is a reason
for such inaction, which can only be guessed at. For the first time since the
war, thousands of refugees appeared in the USSR, direct evidence that Soviet
power on the territory of the Armenian Socialist Republic ceased to exist.
However, when the retaliatory expulsion of Armenians from Baku began, Gorbachev
immediately sent troops to restore Soviet power in Azerbaijan, and this against
the background of the fact that in Armenia itself, Soviet power practically no
longer existed. In fact, the collapse of the Soviet empire can be counted from
the moment the Karabakh conflict began.
The communists, in fact, continued the policy of tsarism to
resettle Armenians among the Muslim Turkic population of Azerbaijan, hence the
deliberately created Karabakh problem, thanks to which today Russia has the
opportunity to influence the political situation in the Caucasus region, which
is strategically important for it. Russia, whose economy traditionally relies
solely on energy sales, will do everything in its power to prevent a
competitor, such as Azerbaijan, from entering the European market. Incidentally,
Russia's failed intervention in Georgia also envisaged blocking the Baku-Ceyhan
oil pipeline. Armed RoArmenia is only waiting for the Kremlin's go-ahead to
begin military action to further annex the lands of neighboring Azerbaijan and
Georgia into Greater Armenia - the programmatic goal of the revived extreme
nationalist Dashnaktsutyun party, the party responsible for the tragedy of the
Turkish Armenians in 1915, when the Dashnaks, with the help of the Russians,
undertook the ethnic extermination of the Turks in order to build an Armenian
state on the free territory. At the time when the Turkish army was engaged in
heavy fighting with the Russian troops, the Armenians raised a bloody rebellion
in the rear not against the regular Turkish army, but against the civilian
population, in order to cause general panic and facilitate the advance of
Russian troops deep into Turkish territory. However, the cruelty committed by
the Dashnaks spontaneously caused massive popular resistance, which led to
colossal casualties among the Armenians. Accusing Turkey of genocide is
completely groundless, because, unlike the Jewish one in Germany, no genocide
was planned by the Turkish authorities or carried out by the army, what
happened was a spontaneous popular retaliation for the extermination of the
civilian population organized by the Armenian Dashnaks. During the entire
existence of the Ottoman Empire, Armenians lived happily among the Muslim
population and no oppression was noted either on national or religious grounds.
Having failed in Turkey, the Dashnaks did not abandon their plan and undertook
a similar insidious action in 1918 in Azerbaijan, also failing. But the most
important thing is that in their insidious plans, the Dashnaks, in order to
achieve their political goals, each time, playing a kind of "Armenian
Gambit", if we follow the chess terminology, set up the Armenian people,
as happened in Turkey in 1915, in Baku in 1918 and as happened in Sumgait in
1988.
The care of the "big brother" affected not only
the reduction of the territory of Azerbaijan, but also the culture: the
Azerbaijani people, of course, by their voluntary expression of will, by a
special order of Moscow, were twice deprived of the alphabet, that is, they
became illiterate overnight; first, the Latin alphabet was introduced, and then
they came to their senses and switched to the Russian alphabet. By the way,
failure to comply with this decree was tantamount to anti-Soviet activity and
was strictly punished. It is the same as if Russians were obliged to use the
Japanese alphabet, and after, say, five years, the Chinese. I wonder what
Pushkin's poems would look like in Chinese characters! And who would read
Pushkin and Dostoevsky given the sudden illiteracy of the Russian population.
This is exactly what happened in Azerbaijan. At best, if someone heard that
there were such poets as Nizami, Khagani, and there was no real opportunity to
read them. In schools, instead of national literature, the study of purely
Russian writers and poets was imposed, and, of course, how can one not mention
the masterpiece of Soviet literature "How the Steel Was Tempered".
Honestly, the name of the author of this masterpiece has been forgotten for
some reason.
Having gained independence, Northern Azerbaijan adopted a
democratic constitution, but the people's mentality and corruption do not allow
it to fully benefit from its benefits, there is also the fact that the people
had no experience of Democracy, which, as if a self-evident gift, suddenly fell
on them. Of course, it will take time, but while the country is developing
economically, Baku is acquiring the appearance of a modern metropolis, which
harmoniously combines the beauty of ancient architecture with bold
architectural projects of skyscrapers, and the only dangerous moment is the
aggressive intentions of the Armenian Dashnaks with their chimerical dream of
building "Armenia from sea to sea".
Today, Azerbaijan is a place where the strategic and
economic interests of Putin's Russia and the Tehran obscurantists intersect,
which consist, firstly, in preventing energy resources from the Caspian basin
countries from entering the world market, and secondly, in the unification of
Northern and Southern Azerbaijan, and the smoldering Karabakh conflict is a
good fuse for the start of military actions, which have every chance of
escalating into a large-scale regional war, or, God forbid, into World War III.
28.07.12.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий