Obama, - pragmatism or cowardice

 

This article was written before the second election

of Obama.                                                                                                   

 

Alik Bahshi

                                             

 Obama, - pragmatism or cowardice

 

"Yeshua Ha-Nozri: cowardice, of course,

                                one of the worst vices"

          Mikhail Bulgakov "The Master and Margarita"

      If we compare the speech of President Barack Obama at Cairo University with his performance (I would say the report) to the leadership of the American Jewish lobby (AIPAC), that despite the antagonism is readily apparent in task orientation, they have one thing in common, namely, in both speeches Obama said what he wanted to hear the audience. What is this, the political pragmatism or immorality? Involuntarily ask yourself, in which case Obama was sincere? Undoubtedly, there will be a time when Obama will have to answer to his conscience, but we can not know and hardly we find out what it will be. After all, we do not have the moral right to interfere in such an intimate relationship between the individual area with a Conscience. Let it be, as they say, Conscience Obama, but there are circumstances which details please clarify, because the words of a man with the power, for which there is the strongest military power in the state today, the man from whose will determine the fate of many people and even nations , should be treated with all seriousness. In this case we are talking about the Arab-Israeli conflict - the headache of American Presidents (1), which are forced by the Jewish lobby, a policy of double standards, damaging not only the image of America, but also imposed, it is unnecessary to any economically or political point of view, the policy of confrontation with the Arab world with the resultant conglomerate here interrelated issues such as security (the tragedy of September 11) and the subsequent unnecessary wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, in which the actions of America are like the raging elephant in a china shop. Yes, in the outbreak of the war is not the fault of Barack Obama, however …

      However, Obama, understanding the role of the Arab-Israeli conflict in all the Middle East problems, as seen in his fiery speech at Cairo University, which he said almost immediately after the president took so nothing substantial and are not made to put an end to more than half-century conflict. Of course, President Obama is the first of his predecessors made it clear that he is clearly a problem and knows how to solve it, and most importantly, is going to solve it. It seemed that Obama is willing to fight the Jewish lobby (2.3), for this, he had plenty of time and power, but ... Do business in the worst vice, pointed to by Yeshua Ha-Nozri.

So what are the details please find out the circumstances to find out which of the speeches Obama sincere? For this we need to ask just two questions:

- Does the right audience at Cairo University, Obama's political position?

Answer – NO

- Does AIPAC audience directly on the political situation Obama?

    The answer is unequivocal - yes, even more so that it delivered to the Jewish lobby on the eve of the presidential election.

Thus, one can safely doubt the sincerity of Obama's audience AIPAC. America's president is limited in time and, in contrast to the sovereign of Putin, who can afford it down the toilet the whole people, is obliged to adjust their actions and spoken language with public opinion, and the opinion of the all-powerful Jewish lobby cannot be ignored, especially in anticipation of the election, if he wants to stay in the White House for a second term.

Obama more time for his first term in office, he held a major health care reform for the country, his head fell off an environmental disaster in the Gulf of Mexico as a result of the accident at the rig, he had to take bold decisions to confront the economic crisis in America, take the form of a global As promised, Obama withdrew its troops from Iraq, and maybe it's not cowardly to fight the Jewish lobby and down the curtain bloody Middle Eastern performances based on the money of the American taxpayer, and that, subject to these urgent cases for the country, Obama physically not enough time. Now, in order to perform software Cairo speech and avoid being accused of terrible flaw mentioned by Yeshua Ha-Nozri, Obama at least needed a victory in the elections. In light of this political insincerity Obama to AIPAC quite obyasnimo. This behavior is similar to a doctor, putting the patient before surgery necessary for his own good, but the fact that Israel needs this operation, no doubt.

Deciding the question of Palestine Obama deprive Tehran obscurantist motivation to use the Arab-Israeli conflict to justify political goals to lead the Islamic world in the fight against such hateful Western democracy from which they protect their people, and in which they are, quite rightly, they see a potential threat to his power.

If this forecast Obama's policy in the Middle East conflict is wrong, and Obama did not dare to political battle with the Jewish lobby, leaving open the question of Palestine, then, I think he does not avoid a difficult conversation with a Conscience.

 

This brings to mind:

"Ultimately, the moral choice is the most pragmatic."

                                                                 Andrei Sakharov

1. " Belated flowers”.. https://samlib.ru/b/bahshi_a/salt8-1.shtml 

.2. America  needs changes. https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/04/belated-flowers.html 

3. Obama, bring America's conscience and save Israel.

   https://alikbahshi.blogspot.com/2026/04/obama-bring-back-americas-conscience.html

 

03/16/2012