It turns out the Kremlin liar stashed hundreds of millions
of dollars stolen from the Russian people in the accounts of his childhood
friend, cellist Roldugin, who is also his daughter's godfather and who, for
some reason, slinks off to an offshore zone in distant Panama, where, according
to Putin, he buys musical instruments for the Russian state's musical
institutions with his own money, purely out of altruistic motives.
http://www.forbes.ru/rassledovaniya/finansy/325383-koshelek-violonchelista-kak-sergei-roldugin-spryatal-svoi-dokhody
So that's it, no more, no less. How about this Liar's
answer? Simply wonderful! I dare suggest introducing a measure of deception: 1
Putin equals 100% falsehood. A half-lie, accordingly, would be 0.5 Putin’s. And
so on.
Alik Bakhshi
The Empire of Lies and Its Chief Liar
"You're guilty, if only because I'm hungry."
I. Krylov
These words of Krylov's
remarkably accurately reflect the predatory nature of the Russian Empire, as
evidenced by the current dangerous situation around Ukraine created by the
Kremlin. Needless to say, the attainment of freedom by the Ukrainian people, the
most ethnically related of all the empire's many peoples, is a painful blow to
the pride of the nation-forming nation (1), with its imperial worldview. The
loss of Ukraine and Crimea as a result of the collapse of the Soviet Union also
affected the geostrategic situation in the southwestern part of the Russian
Empire. However, all this does not give the Kremlin any right to a military
invasion of Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea, which, incidentally, was
never truly Russian territory, nor was the entire Black Sea coast. Crimea's
predominantly Russian population is a consequence of Russia's genocide of the
indigenous Tatar people and the subsequent settlement of the area by Russians.
Looking back to the recent past, a similar situation led to World War II, when
England and France, fulfilling their obligations, declared war on Germany for
the German invasion of Poland. Strictly speaking, Russia's aggression should
have been followed by a declaration of war from the United States and Great
Britain, which, according to the Budapest Memorandum, are guarantors of
Ukraine's security and integrity. However, this did not happen, either because
they were perplexed by President Putin's unusually brazen lie about the
non-involvement of Russian troops in the military events in Ukraine, or because
of this brazen, documented lie on an international scale—after all, Russia also
signed up to be the guarantor of Ukraine's security in the same Budapest
Memorandum. Of course, no declaration of war should be expected between nuclear
powers, when every second counts. However, it must be said that the West's
reaction to Moscow's unexpectedly monstrous insolence, bordering on sheer
savagery, was rather restrained.
It would seem that the days of
Hitler's fascism have sunk into oblivion, but no, the aggressive actions of
Putin's Russia have brought Western politicians, who were scratching their
heads, back to reality. They certainly haven't read Krylov's fables "The
Wolf and the Lamb," but I hope they know that appealing to the wolf for
justice is a hopeless endeavor. Perhaps they will finally realize that
"friend Putin," who loudly declared his regret at the collapse of the
USSR and compared it to a catastrophe of universal proportions, intends to
recreate the Soviet Union and is little different from Hitler, who set out to
build a "Greater Reich." I'd like to point out that Putin's
intentions even have an advantage over Hitler's, for unlike Hitler, Putin relies
on the people's ingrained imperial worldview and Great Russian chauvinism (2).
Putin doesn't need to build a party or create an ideology; he only needs to
issue the cry "kill Chechnya" or "give us Crimea," and he
is assured of the support and full understanding of the Russian people. It's
simply astonishing how unanimously Putin's lie about the non-involvement of
Russian troops, the so-called "little green men," without insignia,
in the annexation of Crimea was accepted and supported by the people. This is
precisely the case when, in the words of Fazil Iskander, "the general
stench is mistaken for the unanimity of the people."
It's worth noting a unique trait
of the Russian people: their tolerance for lies. In the Russian consciousness,
truth and lies coexist harmoniously without causing any harm. Once, during the
Soviet era, a Swedish woman interning at Moscow State University told a group
of students about what she considered an important discovery: "In your
country, everyone says one thing and thinks another." This ambiguity, so
familiar to our consciousness, perplexed her. Having grown up in a free
society, she couldn't understand how it could be that everyone had the same
opinion on every issue. What seemed self-evident to us, accustomed to universal
deception, struck her as unnatural, and perhaps even herd-like savagery,
something she, of course, kept silent about. This explains how easily the
Russian president's lies, which align with the people's imperial worldview, are
instantly and without hesitation accepted by every Russian, regardless of the
country in which they live. This suggests that even changed circumstances are powerless
to alter the Russian people's imperial worldview.
Perhaps I'm wrong, but in my
opinion, Russian society, accustomed to lies during the Soviet era, coupled
with the Russian people's pathological inability to live in a democracy (3),
combined with their imperial worldview, constitutes a kind of embodiment of
Universal Evil, posing a threat to the world. And this isn't about Putin; Putin
merely serves as a successful conduit, orchestrating the outpouring of this
Evil. Thus, to the generally accepted, well-known definition of Russia as an
"Evil Empire," one could equally add "Empire of Lies," for
"lies" and "evil" are complementary concepts and cannot
exist without one another. Thus, Russia's aggression against Ukraine was
accompanied by the mass dissemination of an incredible amount of disinformation
and outright lies by the Kremlin and President Putin himself – the main, I
would say, unrivalled liar in Russia today. There's no point in citing the
Russian president's long track record of lies, as every word he utters is laced
with lies. Perhaps, after Putin's treatment of Ukraine, it's hard to find a
diplomat who would take on the responsibility of negotiating with Putin. It's
no wonder Putin counts among his friends the entire world's rabble, including
Belarusian dictator Lukashenko, the bloody Syrian dictator Assad, former
Iranian Prime Minister Ahmadinejad, and the late Hugo Chavez.
The Empire of Lies currently has
one strategic ally: Armenia, which, with Moscow's support, has annexed 20% of
Azerbaijan's territory and is awaiting Moscow's go-ahead to resume aggression,
with the undisguised goal of creating a "Greater Armenia" from sea to
sea, in accordance with a historical lie in which there is no place for
Azerbaijan or its people (4). There is no Turkey, no part of Georgia. It is all
Armenia, with numerous Armenian enclaves in the North Caucasus, Kuban, Crimea,
Ukraine, Syria, Libya, and perhaps now even California, which may in the future
form part of "Greater Armenia."
In his territorial claims to
southeastern Ukraine and Crimea, where a Russian diaspora exists—a consequence
of the forced expulsion of the indigenous people and the settlement of Great
Russians—Putin unwittingly replicates the ideology of the Armenian Nazi party,
Dashnaktsutyun, founded in 1890, long before Hitler's ideology of German
national superiority. All Nazi ideologies that invoke national superiority and
"greatness" primarily generate historical lies, sometimes about a
"Greater Germany," sometimes about a "Greater Armenia,"
which serve as the basis for territorial claims and, as a consequence, military
aggression. Vasily Grossman presents a very accurate picture of the national
"superiority" of Armenians (Znamya, no. 11, 1988):
"With insidious ease, the
nationalism of the people loses its noble foundation; it does not become
formidable, it becomes pitiful; it does not provoke, but humiliates."
Thus, in seeking to prove some kind of inferiority, man reveals his own. Some
of my interlocutors, in all areas of human creativity, emphasized the Armenian
national primacy in architecture, science, and poetry. They emphasized the
superiority of the architectural merits of the temple in Garni over what they
considered primitive architecture on the Acropolis; speaking of the poet
Tumanyan, they persistently convinced me that Tumanyan's genius surpassed that
of Pushkin. The point, of course, isn't whether Garni's architecture isn't more
perfect than that of the Acropolis, or whether Tumanyan is a greater genius
than Pushkin. The point—and the point, of course, is sad—is that poetry,
architecture, science, and history themselves, in their essence, cease to be
significant in the conversations of some of my interlocutors. They matter only
to demonstrate the superiority of the Armenian national character over the
national character of other peoples. Poetry isn't important, but rather proving
that an Armenian national poet is superior to, say, a Russian or French poet.
My interlocutors, without even realizing it, impoverished their souls and
hearts by ceasing to rejoice in poetry, the perfection of architecture, and the
grandeur of science, instead seeing poetry and science merely as a means to
assert their national superiority. This aspiration can be so fanatical and
narrow that at times it seems like madness.”
The notion of national
superiority breeds Nazism and lies, ultimately resulting in evil. Thus, the
Dashnak Party's ideology included a clause that presented terror as a method
for achieving the creation of a "Greater Armenia." Following this programmatic
principle, Armenian Nazis subjected the civilian populations of Turkey and
Azerbaijan to brutal terror, literally clearing the territory for a
"Greater Armenia," which brought untold suffering to the peoples of
Turkey and Azerbaijan, as well as to the Armenian people themselves. The Nazi
ideology of German fascists also led to a global catastrophe, from which the
German people themselves suffered most.
Today, Putin has opened the
floodgates to Great-Russian chauvinism; the essentially fascist rhetoric of
"Great Russian people" and "Great Russian language" is
increasingly heard, with the word "great" implying quality rather
than quantity. Interestingly, in Russian sources, of all the peoples of the
world, only the Russian people are described as "great." Even the
Chinese are not destined to be so. How can a Great Russian, with such an
approach, dare speak Ukrainian in Ukraine? And how dare Ukrainians neglect the
great Russian language by not making it their official language! Remember the
sneers and disdain shown by Russians living, for example, in Baku, at an
Azerbaijani who spoke Russian poorly or with an accent, despite the fact that
the Great Russians themselves never even bothered to learn the language of the
indigenous people. They had no idea how tactless their ridicule was. Only a
latent sense of one's own inferiority and lack of culture leads to
self-aggrandizement. Incidentally, if we're being honest about the richness of
the language, Russian contains many borrowed Turkic words, while, for example,
Azerbaijani doesn't have a single word of Russian origin, despite Moscow's
Russification policy. It's worth noting that the Russians forcibly deprived the
Azerbaijani people of their alphabet, rendering them illiterate overnight by
introducing the Cyrillic alphabet. Imagine Russia suddenly switching to the
Chinese alphabet. I'd like to see Russians reading Pushkin in Chinese
characters.
By supporting the chauvinistic
frenzy of Russian separatists in Ukraine, Putin is peddling yet another
historical lie about Ukraine never having existed as a state. In that case, how
should we view the agreement on Ukraine's reunification with Russia, signed by
Bohdan Khmelnytsky? If Ukraine never existed, as Putin claims, then with which
country was the agreement signed? It seems that Bohdan Khmelnytsky, without the
Ukrainian people, has become a one-and-only Russian subject, so to speak. Thus,
in his historical digressions, President Putin completely denies the Ukrainian
people the right to their own country, thereby justifying the actions of
Russian separatists in Ukraine.
In general, Putin, to put it
politely, is "completely rotten" with the separatists (5). Thus, the
Chechens who fought the Russians for the freedom of their homeland are all
bandits, robbers—in short, separatists, worthy of being urinated on in Putin's
toilet. In that case, what should we call the Russians who settled in Ukraine
and now want to tear away the part of Ukraine where they live and annex it to
Russia? Or are there bad separatists, and there are good separatists, who
should be aided by secretly transporting Russian fascists to Ukraine, equipped
with the latest weaponry, including anti-aircraft guns and tanks. In short,
returning to Krylov's fable:
"The strong always blame
the weak:
We hear countless examples of
this in history."
Having transferred nuclear
weapons to Russia, Ukraine found itself defenceless against the Evil Empire.
One cannot help but wonder: would Putin have dared to attack Ukraine if it had
nuclear missiles? Of course not. The Evil Empire, having promised to be the
guarantor of Ukraine's integrity and independence, essentially deceived both
Ukraine and America and Great Britain, which gives Russia the right to call
itself the "Empire of Lies." Therefore, all countries, especially
former colonies of the Russian Empire, must be extremely cautious about
treaties, alliance commitments, and other agreements with Moscow, dooming
themselves to become victims of deception. This explains the concerns of
Finland, which has been peacefully neutral until now, and its sudden desire to
join NATO.
Without a doubt, it can be
assumed that if not for NATO, Fuhrer Putin would have unhesitatingly revived
the Russian Empire within its former borders, including Poland and Finland.
1. "The State-Forming People
and Its Führer, or - Ukraine and Further Down the List,"
http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21749.html
2. "Great Russian
Chauvinism, and Putin Its Führer,"
http://samlib.ru/b/bahshi_a/alikbahshi-38.shtml
3. "The People's Destiny, or
To Each His Own Candle," http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/4732.html
4. "Armenia and the
Moscow-Tehran Axis," http://www.proza.ru/2008/03/22/521
5. "A Word, Fornication, or
Complete Albats," https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/8082.html
June 20, 2014
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий