Great Russian chauvinism, and Putin its führer

Alik Bakhshi

Great Russian chauvinism, and Putin its führer

The repulsive, arrogant appearance of the Russian president is entirely consistent with the blatant, outrageous, and, I would even say, uniquely brazen lies he told journalists during a meeting about the Russian army's invasion of Ukraine. It seems that lies and deceit are as inseparable from President Putin as a snail from its shell. Meanness, provocation, and immorality are, as reality shows, commonplace, characteristic features of Putin's activities, and perhaps not only as president:

- The oligarchs Berezovsky and Gusinsky, to whom Putin supposedly owes his power, were forced to flee Russia to avoid ending up behind bars, like Khodorkovsky. I remember in an interview with renowned television journalist Larry King, when asked what happened to the Kursk nuclear submarine, Putin replied, or rather, snapped, "It sank." King paused delicately, pointedly remaining silent, hoping Putin would shed light on the circumstances of the tragic loss of the submarine and its entire crew, but President Putin couldn't find even words of condolence for the drowned sailors.

To unleash a second war in Chechnya, Putin is orchestrating a provocation by blowing up apartment buildings, killing all the residents, and blaming the Chechens.

Taking advantage of the political naivety of the Americans and the traditional sleepiness of Europe, Putin manages to convince the West of his personal commitment to democratic principles and the irreversibility of the democratic reforms that have taken place in Russia. The military adventure in Georgia hasn't changed the West's attitude toward Russia either. It must be said that Putin was very lucky to have Bush Jr. This cowboy (it seems this definition most accurately describes a political amateur) called Putin nothing less than "friend Putin" (1). And today, "friend Putin" is a major problem for American President Obama. Incidentally, in my article "America Demands Change" (2), having predicted that Barack Obama would become president, I pointed out the need for the future occupant of the White House to take seriously the looming threat posed by Putin's Russia. However, I also noted there that Obama's rival, "John McCain, better understands what today's Russia is, whose imperial policies should not be ignored or condescending toward the curtailment of democratic institutions." Over 20 years of helping Russia strengthen its economy, the West has nurtured a snake that has now pulled out its sting, intending to swallow Ukraine. Once again, with the Evil Empire (3) in mind, I cite an Eastern proverb:

"Feeding a snake milk is like storing poison in it."

Knowing the Russian people's unacceptability of democracy, a resistance to which Russians are genetically immune (4.5), and understanding that outside the empire, the Russian people would be lost, Putin set the course "Back to the Empire" from the very first steps. With the West silently inactive, Putin dealt with the Chechen people, who had been hoping to gain freedom. Georgia was the second victim. True, the West, albeit belatedly, woke up, tearfully begging Putin to stop the Russian tanks already on the outskirts of Tbilisi, otherwise Georgia would have been doomed, having once again voluntarily expressed its desire to reunite with Russia. However, the proper lesson was not learned, and Russia's aggression went unpunished. And now Ukraine is next.

Putin has undoubtedly been preparing for an invasion for a long time. Two important points should be addressed here. First, Putin correctly bet on the corrupt Yanukovych of the "Party of Regions," financed entirely by businessmen of non-Ukrainian nationality. What kind of patriotism can we talk about if the main goal of these businessmen in politics is to line their pockets? A similar situation existed in Russia, but Putin, unlike Yanukovych, proved a patriot and dispersed the oligarchs who had prepared him for the role of puppet. Clearly, for the corrupt Yanukovych, Ukraine's accession to the EU meant only one outcome: prison, since the rampant corruption observed in Ukraine is in no way acceptable to the EU. This is precisely the reason Yanukovych reneged on his promise to bring Ukraine into the EU, which he made to its people before the elections, and this is precisely what Putin was counting on by helping the future traitor become president. And yet, the main reason for what happened to Ukraine is the gullibility and unscrupulousness of the Ukrainian people—I would even say, their carelessness in electing those in power. It's time to understand that nothing good can be expected from oligarchs, especially those of non-native origin, and their protégés, no matter what promises they make. After all, Ukrainians make up the majority of the country's population. Couldn't they have consolidated and chosen a worthy leader to avoid ending up in the current state? For example, the ethnic picture in Latvia was no better; it also had a high percentage of Russians, but Latvians were united in their choice of political leadership, understanding the danger that awaited them in the event of disunity and incoherence. Twenty years of independence, a wealthy country, a favorable climate, and a supposedly literate people—yet they were reduced to poverty, handed over to foreigners who suddenly disappeared, along with their money, to Switzerland and London, and to chatterboxes—just look at the Lady with the Braid! Take Yushchenko! Why couldn't Ukraine join the EU under him? Sometimes a parliamentary republic, sometimes a presidential one! They destabilized the country in every way possible. Freedom and independence are undoubtedly good, but one must also know how to use these benefits.

The second point is the significant number of Russians living compactly in the southeastern part of Ukraine. But this is not so much a matter of numbers, but of mentality. Russians and democracy—that's nonsense. If Ukraine joins the EU, democracy will become a daily reality, and Russians will find themselves like fish on ice, as happened in Russia under Yeltsin. This is the reason for the protest of the Russian population in Ukraine against joining the EU. Considering the above, plus the imperial worldview of the Russian people, combined with the Great Russian chauvinism that Stalin, the father of all nations, pointed out and which was easily aroused by the propaganda campaign launched against the Ukrainian people, Putin has a very powerful fifth column in Ukraine. Thus, dismembering Ukraine by force and annexing its entire southeastern part would not be difficult for Russia. It's all about the consequences. Has the Kremlin calculated them? That's a big question. One would think that Putin has found a sovereign, purely Russian economic model for the "sovereign democracy" he built! I can even guess what it will be: instead of goods-money-goods, it will be vodka-labor camp-vodka. Or perhaps Putin wants to go down in history as the champion of Crimea? Whatever the case, Putin has apparently already secured a Second Cold War for Russia. Russia successfully lost one, after which the USSR collapsed. Presumably, after the second, the Russian Empire will collapse, and for good. And then it may turn out that Putin will indeed be left holding the dead donkey's ears, which he once offered to someone in his characteristic manner (6).

It goes without saying that Obama overlooked the situation Putin created around Ukraine, which, if one were to look closely, was easily discernible given the Kremlin's entire previous domestic and foreign policy and the rabble of political monsters gathered around Russia, including Lukashenko, Ahmadinejad, Assad, and the late Hugo Chávez. As soon as Russia gained a modicum of strength, Great Russian chauvinism, thanks to Putin, reawakened. It's amazing how much malice has suddenly surfaced among Russians toward the fraternal Slavic people of Ukraine! What then should other neighboring nations expect? Today, it's "Give us Crimea." Tomorrow, expect Kazakhstan, where about 20% of the population is Russian, to follow, then Azerbaijan, with the help of Armenian Nazis, which will disrupt projects to deliver hydrocarbons from the Caspian Basin countries to Europe, and in passing, seize what remains of Georgia. In short, if the West continues to act, as it did with Nazi Germany, the world will get a new Führer in Putin, and as a consequence, World War III (7). In fact, the spirit of fascism has long hovered over the remnants of the Russian Empire, and after the collapse of the USSR, Putin had no trouble finding popular support for his intention to return the empire to the people within its former borders. Recall the unanimous jubilation with which the Russian people handed Putin the presidency after he drenched Chechnya in blood (8). Putin had neither a party nor a party ideology, unlike Hitler, who had to create a party and organize powerful propaganda for fascist ideology so that the German people would believe him and follow him. Putin merely opened the floodgates to Great-Russian chauvinism, the crest of which carried him to power. Putin tapped into something that had always been there, something that surfaced from the depths of the people's consciousness just as the empire began to crumble like a house of cards. So Stalin, who had a keen understanding of the national mentality, was a hundred times right when he spoke of Great-Russian chauvinism. To this day, the Russian people honor the memory of their leader, and if Putin suddenly needs popular support again, he would receive it, for example, by returning Stalingrad to its former name. The Russian Empire and chauvinism—the ideological and spiritual core of the Russian people—are inseparable concepts. Fascist ideology was imposed on the German people by Hitler and his party. Modern Germany, free of fascist ideology, is a democratic, economically powerful country. Take away the Russian people's empire, and they, unlike the German people, would, as I said, be lost in a democracy.

History repeats itself: the first aggressive steps of Nazi Germany began with the distribution of German passports to Sudeten Germans and a demagogic campaign against Czechs, who were allegedly "committing atrocities" against the German minority. By analogy, this is what is happening today in Crimea and throughout Ukraine. But history also repeats itself in that every empire disintegrates, and Putin's Russia is like a drowning man in a swamp, with every movement only bringing inevitable death closer. This time, it's unlikely there will be a wise man offering a saving hand.

1. "Putin Gives Bush a Lesson in Democracy" http://www.proza.ru/2008/03/22/599

2. "America Demands Change" http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/#post-alikbahshi-7191

3. "Ukraine as a Victim of the West's Immorality Towards Russia" http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/#post-alikbahshi-20891

4. "The People's Destiny, or Every Cricket in Its Place" http://www.proza.ru/2008/03/22/639

5. "A Word, Fornication, or Complete Albats" http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/#post-alikbahshi-8082

6. "When the Donkey Dies" http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/?skip=50#post-alikbahshi-3702

7. "The Trans-Caspian Gas Pipeline or World War III" http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/#post-alikbahshi-18362

8. "Chechnya and the Road to Power, or the Revival of the Empire According to Putin" http://www.proza.ru/2008/03/22/527

   17.03.2014 

October 7, - cause and effect

 Alik Bahshi

October 7, - cause and effect

     On October 7, 2023, Israel was subjected to a terrorist attack by Palestinians from Gaza, who, it must be said frankly, took advantage of the arrogance of Israeli border guards during the holidays, killed 1,200 people and took 242 hostages to Gaza. So, once again a war began again, which in duration exceeded 5 months and, despite the incomparable military superiority of Israel, continues to this day, claiming the lives of both Palestinians and Israelis.

    The United States and the EU, on the one hand, condemned the actions of Palestinian terrorists and believe that Israel has the right to punish the Palestinians, but at the same time they call on Israel to be more careful when dropping multi-ton bombs on Gaza, which has the largest population density in the world. Frankly, it’s amazing how a pilot dropping a bomb from a height can distinguish a terrorist from an ordinary citizen. After all, the Palestinians do not have a regular army with tanks, guns and planes. In general, judging by the scale of the destroyed buildings, they were all inhabited by terrorists, and it should be noted that this is closer to the truth. It is difficult to imagine that their residents would not wish the Israelis dead, given the conditions of their powerless existence under apartheid and the number of deaths from rockets, bombs and shells. I will not be wrong if I say that every Palestinian is a potential terrorist, including women.

      You don’t have to be particularly perspicacious not to understand why from the very first day of the formation of Israel in Palestine there has been a war between Jews and Arabs, and why martial law was introduced in Israel, which has not yet been lifted. The point is the demographic situation that arose immediately with the organization of the state for Jews. Israel cannot be a Jewish state if the majority of its citizens are Arabs. Therefore, expelled Palestinians emerged and became refugees scattered throughout the surrounding Arab countries. The remaining part of the Arab population of the former Palestine received Israeli citizenship, while most of the Palestinians were isolated in the autonomy, the territory of which, like shagreen leather, is shrinking from year to year.

                                              

  

    As a result of Israel's expansionist policy, the territory of the Palestinian Authority differs sharply from the territory of the Palestinian state, provided for by the well-known UN decision to create two states in place of Palestine for two peoples - Jewish and Arab. The Israeli government ignored the UN decision and found a solution to the problem by building a concrete wall around the occupied territory, which is more like a huge prison without a roof. The population of the autonomy is deprived of the civil rights inherent in citizens of the state and is a supplier of cheap labor. Isolating Palestinians in a concrete sack is very similar to the action of a state pursuing an apartheid policy. It would be another matter if the construction of this wall reflected a mutual agreement on the state border between Jews and Palestinians, but, unfortunately, there is no such agreement, and the location of the wall only secures the annexed territories for Israel, emphasizing aggressive intentions towards the Arabs, and most importantly, the wall acquires the meaning of another, additionally created, obstacle on the path to peace.

  In modern times, due to the war, Israel is experiencing serious problems in the field of construction, which has completely stopped, and in the declining production of agricultural products, the prices of which have increased by 50%. Israeli businessmen, accustomed to dealing with Palestinians from the autonomy, are not ready to pay much higher salaries to workers invited from abroad. Continuation of the war could lead to a catastrophic state of the economy.

As I wrote earlier (1), the blame for the fact that there is a permanent war going on in the former Palestine lies entirely with the UN, which was obliged to foresee the confrontation that had occurred and first send troops to the stipulated border of the division of Palestine in accordance with the map.

                                                                                                                                                                    

       The attack by Palestinian terrorists on October 7, which initiated military action, also initiated an appeal by the world community to the cause of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Many Western politicians, including Biden, suddenly remembered a state for the Palestinians and began to speak out about its creation as the only way to end this half-century-old conflict. This circumstance leads to a very unpleasant conclusion, namely, if not for the Hamas terrorists, then no one would have mentioned the forgotten state for the Palestinians, although everyone had long known how to stop the bloodshed between Jews and Arabs, but remained silent so as not to irritate... .

     By the way, a few words about terrorists. The fact is that partisans also engage in terror; moreover, any war cannot do without mass terror, as a result of which civilians die. There is the same difference between terrorists and partisans as there is between spies and intelligence officers. (2.3)

 1. The UN's fatal mistake. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com…

2. International terrorism and its stakeholders. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com…

3. Terrorists or partisans? https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com…

   02/21/2024

On the Breakdown of Relations between Azerbaijan and Russia

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

On the Breakdown of Relations between Azerbaijan and Russia

 

      

 

      The recent breakdown in relations between Baku and Moscow was entirely expected. Russia's aggressive imperial policies have never been supported by Azerbaijan, and the ethnic persecution of Azerbaijanis in Russia has exposed the aggressive nature of the Russian state and the Russian people toward other nations. Some believe that Putin is to blame, but this is far from the truth, as everything Putin does finds support among the Russian people. Perhaps I'm just unlucky, but I haven't met a single Russian who condemns Putin. I was shocked to see a long line of Russian Israelis at the Tel Aviv embassy voting for Putin during the presidential election. I'm sure that Russians living in Azerbaijan also support Putin. Russians, like those in Ukraine or Lithuania, are a fifth column, supporting the lies emanating from the Kremlin. Aliyev did the right thing by shutting down Sputnik, known for its espionage and propaganda activities. It's no wonder this Russian organization was shut down in many countries. I personally experienced Russian media activity. Ten years ago, not on the Russian, but on the Azerbaijani Russian-language forum Bakililar.az  the administration there blocked me for my anti-Putin articles without any explanation. Incidentally, I'm still banned from publishing there. I have no doubt that, given the opportunity, Russians in Azerbaijan will reveal their feelings about the country they live in, as happened in Ukraine.

 

    Today, the Kremlin has unleashed all its full-time propagandists on Azerbaijan and President Aliyev, who, you see, dared to call on the Russian authorities to maintain order and justice in accordance with the law.

 

    Some readers have seen my words as inciting hatred toward the Russian people. As an example, I'll cite a comment on my Facebook page from a certain Oleg Namazov, who expressed outrage at my characterization of the Russian people as Great Russian chauvinism.

Oleg Namazov:

   In the USSR, things weren't like they are now. I said and did whatever I wanted, and the chauvinism was of the utmost proportions. And yet, I could confidently prove any truth to Russians, just like an Azerbaijani, whether in Moscow or Irkutsk. And so, this point of view of yours is also part of the toolkit of those who pull strings and manipulate public opinion...

 

    Oleg Namazov, you're saying the chauvinism was of the utmost proportions? Doesn't the fact that all higher education textbooks were in Russian mean anything to you? Dissertations were required to be written exclusively in Russian. In other words, the entire elite, the entire cultural stratum of any people in the USSR, had to be represented in Russian. The national languages ​​of the peoples were in danger of disappearing. Russians generally didn't know the language of the indigenous peoples in the republics and even mocked those who spoke Russian poorly. And if anyone protested this situation, they would be labelling a nationalist and, at best, sent to a mental hospital. The national republics were subjected to state-sponsored plunder. Have you ever wondered why, when the country was starving, people went to Moscow for sausage and butter? You say you did whatever you wanted in the USSR, but your desires were very limited, like a bug that needs nothing more than an acre of blood. I, too, wanted fried potatoes back then, but the butter disappeared from the grocery stores in Baku. I had no choice but to fly to Moscow to fulfill my desire. I bought 15 kg of butter, which I melted in the student dorm. The smell of melted butter permeated the entire floor. Oleg Namazov probably hasn't wondered why Moscow has everything, while Baku doesn't even have such a basic commodity as butter.

 

     Azerbaijan, having freed itself from Moscow, has been transformed, and this is a clear example of what independence from Russia has brought. And what kind of Russian people are they, who overwhelmingly vote for Putin and consider Crimea and Ukraine Russian soil, is evident from the atrocities they witnessed in Bucha and Baku. This is chauvinism, which you've sized up to the size of a bedbug. Rather, your dear fellow, you have the brain of a bedbug.

 

     And the USSR, by its very nature, was a gigantic bedbug, sucking the blood of other peoples, reducing them to poverty. And when everything had been sucked dry, Moscow, realizing it had nothing left to feed itself with, issued a cry: "We have nothing left to feed the other republics with." And now that the free republics have grown stronger, it has smelled fresh blood. This is the essence of Russia and its people. It is the people who determine the place where they live. As the saying goes, it's not the place that makes the man, but the man that makes the place. So, the people of Russia are like their country. And Russia is an aggressor, and it's not Putin's fault, but the Russian people. However, this applies to any nation. No one but the people is responsible for everything they've done. In short, the country is like the people. For example, Finland is the most prosperous country, and it owes its prosperity to the people who live there. Finland has no oil or gas, a quarter of the country is covered in snow for eight months, while Russia has oil, gas, and fertile soil, yet its people live in poverty. Relocate Finns to Russia, and Russians to Finland, and it's not hard to imagine what prosperous Finland would become, and how Russia would be transformed. Finns work and create wealth, build enormous airliners, produce telephones—in other words, they produce everything for the benefit of the people—while Russians create Kalashnikovs to rob and kill people. There you have it, a distinctive feature, in this case, of the Russian people, from other nations.

 

05.07.2025

 

Трамп на крючке у Путина

 

 

 

Алик Бахши

 

Трамп на крючке у Путина

 

Статья на встречу Трампа и Путина в Хельсинки была написана 29.07.2018 в первую каденцию Трампа (1), и сегодня решение Трампа в отношении Украины, которое по сути является поощрением агрессора, убедительно показывает кто из пары Трамп – Путин есть удав, а кто кролик.

 

 Алик Бахши

Хельсинки: Удав и Кролик

 

Кролик:

«Ваш гипноз — это наш страх.

Наш страх — это ваш гипноз»

                                                Фазиль Искандер «Кролики и удавы»

  

                                                                                      

   Состоявшаяся пресс-конференция Путина и Трампа после их встречи тет-а-тет в Хельсинки вызвала в памяти повесть-притчу Фазиля Искандера «Кролики и удавы». Американский президент предстал в моём сознании кротким кроликом, находящимся в ступоре под гипнозом удава. Куда делась бравурная спесь, хорохористость Трампа? В какой-то момент показалось, что Трамп безмолвно открывал рот, а отвечал на задаваемые вопросы за него Путин. Трамп раболепно вторил всему, что вещал его политический соперник и это несмотря на серьёзные и принципиальные политические разногласия, ради которых и состоялась столь долгожданная встреча на высшем уровне. Мне не известны детали их разговора наедине и как выглядел при этом Трамп, но судя по его поведению на пресс-конференции думается, что и там он, подобно кролику, с расширенными зрачками смирно сидел под взглядом маленьких колючих глаз Путина, боясь перечить словам: «Мы провели референдум в строгом соответствии с международным правом устава Организации Объединённых Наций. Для нас Российской Федерации этот вопрос закрыт. Всё!».

 

   Я бы на месте Трампа нашелся бы, что ответить и напомнил Путину о том, что Москва имеет богатый опыт по проведению референдумов, например в Эстонии, Литве, Латвии в 1940 году. Тогда, также как и в Крыму, русские сначала вводили войска, после чего состоялись референдумы, на которых народы этих стран «добровольно» изъявляли желание войти в состав СССР. Впрочем, не исключено, что Трампу неизвестен этот факт. Интересно, как бы парировал Путин, если бы Азербайджан по аналогии с Крымом ввёл армию в Дагестан и провёл референдум о добровольном вхождении в Азербайджан на том основании, что Дербентское ханство входило в состав Азербайджана?

 

   На пресс-конференции американский президент побоялся даже произнести слова «Украина» и «Крым». А ведь главная причина антироссийских санкций и состоит в агрессии России против Украины, гарантом независимости, которой, кстати, является страна президента Трампа. Невольно возникает вопрос, а для чего вообще Трамп прилетел в Хельсинки? Неужели только для того, чтобы кивать головой, выражая согласие со словами Путина, «для нас вопрос закрыт». 

   Похоже, Путин действительно имеет компромат против Трампа (1).  Как иначе можно объяснить его полное единодушие с Путиным в том, что Россия не вмешивалась в американские выборы, вопреки уверениям американских спецслужб. Правда, вдали от Путина, уже в Америке, Трамп всенародно дезавуировал свои высказывания, попросту говоря, отказался от всего того, что наговорил на пресс-конференции в Хельсинки в присутствии Путина.

 

   Прав был кролик Фазиля Искандера, если в нашем случае с Трампом и Путиным в словах кролика заменить «страх» на «компромат».

 

------------------------

 

 Как Вы думаете, из фотографии, кто на кого имеет компромат?

 

 

  Затаённая улыбка Путина обнажает мысль – помни, ты у меня на крючке.

 

 

1.Хельсинки: Удав и кролик.

 https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/39575.html

2.   Рука Путина в Белом доме

 https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/124179.html

 

    22.11.2025

 

 

 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Правда от пресс-секретаря армии обороны Израиля

 

  Алик Бахши

 

Правда от пресс-секретаря армии обороны Израиля

  

    Пресс-секретарь армии обороны Израиля генерал Эфи Дафрин в телепередаче непростительно оплошал, а именно, объясняя трудности войны в Газе, он сослался на то обстоятельство, что израильским солдатам приходится воевать не с регулярной армией, а вести партизанскую войну. Да, но партизан, это лицо, добровольно ведущее вооружённую борьбу за свободу и независимость своей страны в составе вооружённых организованных партизанских сил на территории, оккупированной противником, с использованием методов партизанской войны, которая не предусматривает открытого противостояния с регулярной армией государства оккупировавшего чужую территорию,  другими словами – террористическими методами. Так еврейские партизаны совершили в 1946 году теракт, - взорвали в Иерусалиме гостиницу  «King David». В результате теракта погибли 91 человек, среди погибших 41 араб, 17 евреев, 28 англичан и пятеро других национальностей. Разница между партизанами и террористами весьма условная и находится в конъектурной зависимости.(1)  Генерал Дафрин, назвав войну в Газе партизанской, обнажил правду, в которой Израиль боится признаться.

 

     Обычно в партизанской войне агрессор терпит поражение, ибо партизанская война это по сути, есть народная война. Так например, Советский Союз, имеющий самолёты, ракеты, танки, потерпел позорное сокрушительное поражение в Афганистане от партизан, имеющих самодельные автоматами и ослов вместо бронетранспортёров. Партизанскую войну можно выиграть только в одном случае, истребив народ, или изгнать в другую страну, а ведь в действительности Израиль в Газе и пытается осуществить это. Израиль, ведя войну в Газе игнорирует международные права и в этом не отличется от путинской России.

 

1.     Террористы или партизаны?   https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/105826.html

2.    Международный терроризм и его интересанты.   https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/1904.html

 

 

                  19.09.2025

 

     

Facts, People's mentality and historical justice

 

Alik Bahshi
                  

                     Facts, People's mentality and historical justice 

    Or about what conclusions can be arrived at if we take into account only the bare facts of history.

    Known - the Jews formed a nation left Egypt. The reason was the end of an order to deprive the Jews of Pharaoh privileged position in which they were in the country for over 430 years and ordered to carry out construction work along with other subjects. Not wishing to engage in grueling physical labor, the Jews left the land of plenty together and their host once the Egyptian people, taking their belongings good and gold, which they then, despite the warning, and the prophecy of Moses, cast the golden calf, which became the fate of the Jewish people. Since then, the Jews wander through the world, and even created for the Jews in 1948 in parts of the state of Palestine, Israel and the Jews not live in push it and the reason for it, in my opinion, people's mentality and the same golden calf.

 

                            

   The peoples of different mentality: - a sort of hereditary constant defining the people, and this is not just a visual difference, but his character, behavior, and even a way of life. For example the Russian people, a distinctive feature - complete lack of self-organization. This people, as history shows, in constant need of the organizers and leaders of business executives at all levels and from the side. Another example, the Roma people are not self-sufficient. If you give Roma the ground, say, treat it, let it feeds you, build a house, the city created its own state in the end, the word live as you see fit. The next morning, you will not find them there. They have a different way of being. They will not do in his "stealing horses." English "my house - my fortress" not a gypsy, in a house he would die of hunger.

     Nature is very complex system, including human society. There are works of nature plants and animals enjoying life activity of others, and we do not know much, and are unlikely to learn all the secrets of Nature. And is it possible to take drastic action in favor of expediency, which has the power of a man, is not the right solution in the future may well be a fatal mistake. In short, "if the stars are lit, it means someone has to." After all, if there were no germs, then there would not be in the nature and immunity. I think that wisdom lies in the fact that perceive the world as a multi-faceted, it is. Learn to resist, to fight, but not destroyed. After all, if the world triumphed over German Nazism - perfect order, no matter how boring and spiritually poor humanity would not think that this will bring you to the end, but you never know ... because the entropy measure of chaos, which is equal to zero, there is nothing. Nature or with simple set up different people, it is the difference and is the engine of civilization. By the way, Judaism actually is an ideology of the End. The arrival of the Messiah (Messenger) provides for the destruction of all non-Jews and the reign of the chosen people, in a single copy, representing the human race, but in this nelly, "who will milk cows on Saturdays?" Not really the Messiah! Judaism is essentially little different from the Nazi ideology, with the only difference being that if the Nazi ideology of Nazi Germany included the subjection of peoples to higher German race, that Judaism does being denied future Gentiles.

     But back to our Jewish and the Golden Calf. Judaism, unlike Christianity can engage moneylender Jew, but with one condition, lend only goyim. Thus, whether driving in religious ideology by your mentality, or following it, the Jews among non-Jews in Christian countries gained financial health, which could take place in the homeland of the Jews because of religious ban on this type of activity in their environment.
No other type of activity does not so easy enrichment without any physical costs. Perhaps this is the reason decision Jewish people and at the same time the persecution of him in almost all countries. Is not that just the Ottoman Empire, which gave shelter to 500 years ago, Spanish Jews, is an exception. It should be noted that even the incident occurred with the "Mavi Marmara", in which Israeli commandos killed nine Turkish citizens human rights, are not adversely affected the Jews living in Turkey. And really, what does a Jew who sells gold at the Istanbul bazaar, to what they do hawks from Tel Aviv.
The desire to have money in preference to any other property, whether land, factory, farm, make the Jews mobile. They like the Roma, who appreciate the absolute freedom and gold, are not tied to one place and can migrate to any vending their country. After all, the name "Jew" is translated as nothing more than "gone over." A good example is the mass migration of Jews associated with the collapse of Communism and the collapse of the USSR, and preference was given to America and the rich countries of Western Europe, mainly Germany, despite the Holocaust, and not problematic for Israel. It took the pressure of the Jewish lobby in the U.S. Congress to redirect Soviet Jews to Israel, providing for the purpose of the U.S. $ 10 billion budget.

     For a Jew money are valuable in themselves, and are a means to enlarge the scheme: money - (mediation, foreign exchange) is money - in other words, the money put into circulation, to make money. Germans see the money means for production, that is, they do not appreciate the money as such, but a product that can be made on the money (according to the scheme: product - money - product). Therefore, banks have been the Rothschild, and the means of production from the Croup.

    But not always for the money can buy everything. For example, there was a famine, no one will sell you bread. And then, the money can be taken away, the one who made the money gun. No wonder the prophet Moses warned his tribe from the worship of the Golden Calf. Unfortunately, either then or later, that charge is left without proper obedience. The people who cannot feed himself, will always depend, - gold not grow corn. And in order to grow grain, we need not only his own land, but also their sweat. But with this there is a known problem. Well, there's a big and important politically active Jewish community in America, which is influenced by the Congress, together with the local president. True to the young Obama got some occasion, too much, he allowed himself at the beginning of his presidency, in contrast to its predecessors, but, according to his report to the leadership of the Jewish lobby (AIPAC), the American president has realized that if he wanted to continue his political career, he will have to consider the interests of world Jewry, even if they do not coincide with the interests of his country and its taxpayers, pay for, including the lives of American soldiers, political adventures and unnecessary wars to the detriment of the United States itself (1).

     Thus, the current situation, namely the existence of the Jewish state of Israel, while the Jewish community in America, as the most powerful country in the world, is the best option for the Jewish people as a political and economic points of view.
It is doubtful that the Jews, it was all in Israel, will maintain their financial well-being. The fact that it was achieved in an environment of other people and not the fact that the Jews in the Holy Land to keep the same level of wealth, which they have in the Diaspora. Yes, and to lobby for the interests of Israel need Jewish community in America, and without the military power that Israel cannot alone against the Arabs. Apparently, the balance between the number of Jews in Israel, and their number in the Diaspora is the ideal for the prosperity of the Jewish people in a given historical period, and the main challenge in this balanced system, it is to confront the Arab pressure and territorial claims with reference to the story. However, if we follow the historical truth, that Egypt should be part of Israel after the first migration of Jews out of Egypt and was born in Egypt, the Jewish people. In those days the Arabs there and was not close, and the Sinai desert Jews mastered the legend for 40 years when no quarter, and even more so with the Arab, it did not receive any complaints. It is quite possible cause of the destruction of the First and Second Temples in the fact that they were not built in the right place and the Third Temple will be built in Egypt, as the true home of the Jewish people. After all, he could not afford to destroy a God created in his honor Temple. Imagine what would have looked good the Third Temple near the Sphinx, overlooking the pyramids of Egyptian pharaohs.

     That's based on hard facts, and tendentious private no commenting on them, can be branded an anti-Semite or anti-Russian (2), or ..., and so on. While, on the other hand, the fact that it is something that, as it does not comment, it will remain a fact for all time!

1. "Obama - Pragmatism or cowardice», https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/12958.html
2. "People's fate or his last cricket each»,  https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/28564.html

  30.04.2012.

 

 

Израиль в кругу политического абсурда (2)

 Израиль совершил налёт на столицу Катара в результате которого были убиты палестинцы, ответственные за переговоры по прекращению военных действий в Газе и освобождению заложников. Теперь Израилю не с кем будет вести переговоры, и вопрос освобождения заложников вновь откладывается вместе с вопросом прекращения войны. Таким образом, Нетаньяху следует своему плану не прекращать войны, а до судьбе заложников ему нет дела.

Вместе с тем в международной Говорильне, то бишь ООН, в который раз будет обсуждаться вопрос о признании государства Палестина, с тем же отрицательным итоговым результатом, благодаря вето от страны, являющейся оплотом мировой демократии и справедливости.

В подтверждение данному обстоятельству привожу статью:

Алик Бахши

Израиль в кругу политического абсурда

Итак, по прошествии 77 лет, когда согласно резолюции Генеральной Ассамблеи ООН № 181 от 29 ноября 1947 было принято решение о создании на подмандатной Великобритании территории Палестины двух государств Израиль и Палестина, Палестина 10.05.2024 наконец получила статус полноправного члена ООН. Честно говоря, данная резолюция вызвала у меня удивление. Дело в том, что благодаря резолюции № 181 Израиль автоматически получил членство в ООН, разумеется это должно было произойти и с Палестиной. Какой смысл было вновь привлекать ООН для повторного решения вопроса о принятии Палестины в ООН? Абсурд, не иначе!

Однако один абсурд порождает другой, не менее невероятный абсурд. Израиль, являясь яростным противником членства Палестины в ООН, обращает внимание международной общественности на то, что резолюции ООН имеют лишь рекомендательный характер и не обязательны к их выполнению. Данное пояснение со стороны Израиля вызвало вновь недоумение, ведь Израиль получил мандат на государство и на членство в ООН благодаря именно резолюции. Такое отношение к резолюциям ООН вовсе обнуляет значимость этой международной организации.

Надо сказать следующее обстоятельство ещё более несуразно. Имеются ввиду те 9 стран противников членства Палестины в ООН, мотивирующие своё отрицательное отношение к Палестине и становлению государства Палестина тем, что прежде этот вопрос должен решаться между Израилем, имеющем статус государства, и Палестиной с неравнозначным статусом автономии. Но, как известно, они этот вопрос безрезультатно решают уже 75 лет путём войны, которая, как и всякая война, сопровождается массовой гибелью гражданского населения. С первого дня становления государства в Израиле введено военное положение, которое не отменено по сей день. Правда, в бытность премьер-министра Ицхака Рабина была возможность договорится о мирном решении палестино-израильского конфликта, но всё закончилось с его убийством, и, чего греха таить, это возмутительное убийство израильским террористом, было воспринято большинством граждан Израиля положительно.(1) И вот сегодня администрация Байдена отсылает решение вопроса о создании государства Палестина в Израиль, который в отличие от палестинцев, повторяю, имеет статус государства. Бред скажите вы, но это то, что имеет место быть. Разве учитывали мнение палестинцев, когда решили в 1947 году выделить часть территории Палестины под государство Израиль, который оккупировал всю территорию бывшей Палестины!

Крючкотворство Америки вместе с Израилем и создало абсурдность ситуации в вопросе создания государства Палестина, который был уже решен в далёком 1947 году. (2) По мнению американского президента Байдена положить конец противостоянию евреев с палестинцами можно созданием государства Палестина, однако, с другой стороны Америка блокирует эту возможность, накладывая вето в Совете безопасности. Вновь абсурд и демонстрация политики двойных стандартов.(3) Такая аморальная позиция Байдена не красит Америку, ратующую за справедливость и демократию.

Будущее Израиля в мире с арабами, и другого варианта не существует.(4)

1. К вопросу кто убил Рабина. Израиль. Наша страна. 04.12.96.

2. Роковая ошибка ООН. 05.12.2023. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/106403.html

3. Открытое письмо г-ну президенту Джозефу Байдену. 23.04.2024. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/109710.html

4. Мир и демократия - будущее Израиля. Израиль. Наша страна. 18.09.96.

11.05.2024

11.09.2025