Israel past, present and future

 

Alik Bakhshi

Israel past, present and future

 

 

 “The moral choice turns out to be the most pragmatic.”

                                                       Andrey Sakharov

 

     From the very first day of the formation of the State of Israel, its politicians were clearly guided by the words of Ben Gurion “it doesn’t matter what the goyim say, it’s important what the Jews do” and all their activities pursued one goal - to deprive the Palestinian people of their state. From the very first day of the official appearance of the state, the process of expulsion of Palestinians began, including from such large cities as Jaffa and Acre, which were supposed to be part of the Arab state. Millions of Palestinian refugees appeared.  Israel motivated the occupation of the territory intended for a Palestinian state by the fact that it has, firstly, a historical right to the entire territory of Palestine, and secondly, a myth about the mental inferiority of the Palestinians and their inability to create a normal state. (1) In this regard, the Palestinian the people need control and it is best to implement this on a reservation, fencing the Palestinians with a concrete wall and barbed wire, which for some reason causes them to frenzied resistance, accompanied by terrorist attacks and the launch of homemade primitive missiles at peaceful Israeli cities.

    The Palestinians, who initially did not have the opportunity to create an army, resist with all the methods available to them, characteristic of guerrillas or terrorists, which in principle is the same thing, because the difference between guerrillas and terrorists is the same as between intelligence officers and spies. By the way, it is appropriate to note that Jews were also involved in terrorism during the British Mandate, among whom the future Prime Minister of Israel Yitzhak Shamir was listed as terrorists by the British authorities. The most significant terrorist attacks were the bombing of the King David Hotel, which killed 91 people, and the public execution of two British officers. The terrorist Jewish organization Lehi (Israel Freedom Fighters) is responsible for the murder of UN representative Count F. Bernadotte, as well as for a very unsightly and immoral fact, namely the appeal in 1940 to the fascists of Germany and Italy with a proposal to jointly fight against Great Britain . The Lehi military movement later became the Israel Defense Forces. Who knows, maybe Hamas militants will form the basis of the Palestine Defense Army, and Hamas leaders Ismail Haniyeh or Yahya Sinwar will become the leaders of the Palestinian state. The difference between freedom fighters and terrorists is only in the definition, but not in their methods of fighting.

 

    Having such a powerful ally as the United States behind it, Israel was getting closer to its goal, and the so-called Peace Process, launched in 1991 at the Madrid Peace Conference (2), on which the Palestinians had high hopes, dragged on for a long time to no avail and was buried with murder in 1995 by Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin at the hands of a Jewish terrorist (3), and to be honest, with the tacit support of the Israeli public, who considered Rabin a traitor for wanting peace for his people, peace without which Israel has no future.(4)

                                                                                

     Israel's subsequent rejection of the Saudi peace initiative, which was based on the principle of “two states for two peoples,” was the reason for radicalization in the Palestinian environment and the rise to power of Hamas, whose leaders see liberation from apartheid, and quite reasonably, in armed struggle, because No other options, as reality shows, work. From a moral point of view, Hamas is fighting the occupier for the freedom of the Palestinian people; moreover, Hamas’s goal is to implement General Assembly resolution No. 181 of November 29, 1947 on the creation of two states in Palestine - Jewish and Arab, a resolution that has only been half fulfilled. Palestinians have no choice but to achieve freedom through war. Without an army, they are forced to wage a guerrilla war, which, like any war, is accompanied by terror, the victims of which are mainly the civilian population and confirmation of this is the Israeli war in Gaza, which is an integral part of the state of Palestine according to the map of the same UN resolution No. 181:

 

 As a result of annexation and the ongoing seizure of land for the construction of Jewish settlements, crumbs remained of the territory of Palestine, and the territory of the Gaza Strip shrank five times from its original size, which is why it became one of the most densely populated areas in the World.

 

                                                                                     

 

    What is happening clearly illustrates an indisputable fact that confirms Israel’s political goal to deprive the Palestinian people of their land or, in other words, to send both the Palestinian people and the country called Palestine into oblivion. In this sense, the frank calls of the participants in the debate on the Israeli Russian-language TV channel 9 to expel the Palestinians from Gaza are very indicative. It must be said that Russian repatriates, unlike native Israelis, are unique in their excessive aggressiveness towards Arabs and not only Palestinians. Thus, the popular leader of Russian aliyah, Knesset member A. Lieberman, at the dawn of his political activity, longed for a large-scale war with the Arab world, and first proposed blowing up the Aswan Dam. In the article “Baggage from the Empire, or why we are right-wing here,” I wrote: “Russian” aliya is represented mainly by the intelligentsia, which is phenomenally different from the Israeli, and indeed from the intelligentsia of the whole world, in its right-wing political views, which are more characteristic of representatives of the Israeli shuk, which is regularly Likud leaders are sent before each election. The fact that on the Palestinian issue we look holier than the Pope compared to the native Israelis is explained not by the desire to show them our patriotic feelings, but by the imperial worldview that we had and with which we came from the “Evil Empire”.

 Among us, great experts in history, there is an opinion that there is no Palestinian people as such. There are Arabs who came to Palestine and let them go back to where they came from. Thus, following a similar statement, one can extend it to the peoples of Egypt, Libya, Algeria and other Arab countries, and finally implement the idea of ​​​​transferring the Arabs, driving them all into the Arabian desert, and on even greater grounds, because, for example, in Morocco, they certainly came much later than in Palestine.” (5)

 

      Regarding the historical right of the Jews to Palestine, I would like to remind you that the Jews, as an established people, came out of Egypt when there were no Arabs there at all. In other words, the true homeland of the Jewish people is Egypt. In connection with which, historically, the Jewish people have more rights to Egypt than the Arabs who appeared there millennia later. (6) An irresistible love for free activity and reluctance to be in the status of slaves of the Pharaoh, in which the entire population of Egypt was, was the reason for the mass exodus from the country, where, after more than 200 years of residence, they became a people from the incoming tribe. According to legend, after 40 years of wandering through the Sinai desert, the Jews came to Canaan, where the Philistines lived, and subsequently took possession of the land of the Philistines, Palestine, and formed the Kingdom of Israel, the foundation of which dates back to the 11th century BC. e. around 1030 BC e. After the death of King Solomon (930–920 BC), the kingdom of Israel splits into the northern kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah.

 

     Judging by the map, the Gaza region was not historically part of the Israeli state. By the way, the first mention of the word “Israel” was discovered in Egypt on the stele of Pharaoh Merneptah (late 13th century BC) and referred to the people, and not to the country of Israel, which did not exist at all in those days. That is, the word “Jew” carries a more semantic load and comes from a very common Hindi word in the East - “avara” (tramp). Also in Hebrew it means “passed over.” This word also gave the name to the nomadic Turkic people - Avars.

 

     The Jewish kingdoms did not last long. The north was conquered 200 years later by Assyria (721 BC). The kingdom of Judah was later destroyed by the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar II in 586 BC. and significant by the destruction of the First Temple in Jerusalem and the Babylonian captivity, which began the resettlement of Jews in the countries of the East and West. Since then, Israel as a state has disappeared, and its territory turns out to be part of the Persian Empire, the Empire of Alexander the Great, the Seleucid Empire, with the fall of which for a short period of time 110 - 63 years. BC. The Hasmonean Empire emerges in Judea. Further, this region is controlled by the Great Roman Empire, the Byzantine Empire, the Sasanian Empire, the Arab Caliphate, the Seljuk Empire, and finally the Ottoman Empire.

 It is important to note the fact that the Persians and Turks treated the Jews very favorably; it was during the Persian Empire that the Jews were allowed to return to Israel and conduct religious ceremonies, and the Second Temple was built at that time. Jewish wandering Radanite merchants controlled the Great Silk Road and trade not only in the Middle East, but also in Khazaria and Crimea. During the expulsion of Jews from Spain, when the Inquisition burned at the stake throughout Europe, the Ottoman Empire accepted Jewish refugees. And right up to the Islamic Revolution, Israel and Iran had excellent interstate relations.

 

     So, Israel as a state, after the Jews captured the land of the Philistines, existed in the history of human civilization for only 300 years. Since then, due primarily to the national mentality, preserving the Faith and traditions, Jews settled in different countries, engaging in trade and usury, preserving in the people's memory information about Palestine as the Motherland, although in fact the homeland of the Jewish people, as I said, is Egypt, in which the Jews , have more historical rights than the Arabs, the existence of which in those distant times in those parts no one had ever heard of.  

 

     As you know, the Arabs appeared in Palestine after the victory over Byzantium in 634 and since then did not leave it until the Jews began to expel them in 1948, in connection with the UN decision to create two states. Thus, if the Jews who came to Palestine from Sinai created a state that lasted only 300 years, then the Arabs of Palestine as part of the Arab Caliphate before its fall in 1258 were on this land for more than 600 years, plus another 690 years as part of the Seljuk and then Ottoman empire, so the claim that Jews have more rights to this territory is highly questionable. As a result of Israel's occupation of all of Palestine, the Arab state did not exist, and for 77 years now the Palestinians have been waging an unsuccessful struggle with Israel for their state. It must be said that the blame for what happened lies entirely with the UN, which made a fatal mistake for which both Arabs and Jews are paying. First, it was necessary to introduce international forces to the envisaged border of the division of Palestine into Arab and Jewish states in order to avoid inevitable bloodshed.(7)

 

     Here it is appropriate to recall some very unsightly moments from a moral point of view related to the history of the creation of a state for Jews, which are not usually remembered. The fact is that, having set out to create a state, the Jews considered various countries, and in this regard, the Jews came closest to organizing such a state on the territory of the Soviet Crimea.

 

     It just so happened that the duty of the so-called Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee, organized during the war at the instigation of Stalin, was to establish contact with the rich and influential Jewish community of America, which could provide financial assistance to the Soviet Union in its fight against Nazi Germany. The Kremlin's initiative was gladly received by American Jews, but the intended assistance turned out to be not selfless. The leaders of the JAC, who received direct financial support, seemed to feel like great political figures, writing a letter to Stalin in which they requested the creation of a Jewish Socialist Republic in Crimea, mind you, not an autonomous region, but a union republic. In order to appease American Jews, the Father of All Nations ordered the deportation of the indigenous people of Crimea in May 1944, making it clear by this act that Crimea was being prepared for a future Jewish state. However, when the war ended, Stalin shot the entire Anti-Fascist Committee in its entirety. (8) However, subsequently Stalin assisted in the organization of the Jewish state in Palestine, which, according to his calculations, would be socialist. It must be said that it initially became such, but over time it turned into a mafia-socialist one, in which there is no market competition. Israel is essentially a semi-theocratic state, because religion is not separated from the state, which is nonsense for a democratic state. Numerous religious parties take an active part in parliament and government, moreover, the laws of Halakha are included in the country's legislation, and, who knows, under certain circumstances, the Jewish state can transform into the Jewish Republic of Israel, like the Islamic Republic of Iran. (9)

 

     Recently, the opinion of the world community has changed, today it has become more influential, and the words of Ben Gurion “it does not matter what the goyim say, it is important what the Jews do” do not work today. The latest war in Gaza, marked by an unprecedented number of civilian casualties, caused outrage among the world community. Anti-Israel demonstrations have taken place in democratic countries, and even in Israel itself, rallies and numerous demonstrations do not stop for the withdrawal of the Israeli army from Gaza and the resignation of the Netanyahu government, which does not find an answer to the important question of how he imagines the future status of Gaza. Moreover, it is not known when Netanyahu’s promised release of the hostages and victory over Hamas will be fulfilled. In the meantime, literally every day of the war brings sad news about the death of Israeli soldiers in Gaza, and the worst thing that can happen is if the state of Palestine becomes a reality and the untimely death of young people turns out to be in vain.

 

      The number of countries recognizing the state of Palestine is increasing, but Israeli society is not ready to come to terms with the idea that the Palestinians will live in their own state, and this fact is well understood by Netanyahu, who is forced to continue a senseless war for control over the entire territory of Israel, including the so-called fiction, that is, the Palestinian autonomy, which is actively being built up with Jewish settlements and even cities. Another 10 to 20 years of apartheid, which is exactly what we can call the conditions created by Israel on the territory designated for a Palestinian state in accordance with the same UN resolution No. 181, and such a concept as Palestine and the Palestinian people will become history. This situation explains the desperate and completely unequal struggle of the Palestinians with Israel and its patron, the United States, however... .

 

     America, which usually vetoes resolutions condemning Israel, is essentially pursuing a policy of double standard. On the one hand, America unconditionally supports Ukraine in its fight against fascist Russia, which intends to destroy Ukraine and the Ukrainian people (10,11,12), on the other hand, it covers Israel, whose goal is to wipe Palestine and its people off the face of the earth.

     Increasing global condemnation of Israel is forcing America to adopt a more cautious policy, as evidenced by President Biden's op-ed in the Washington Post, which suggested that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict could be resolved by creating two states for two peoples.(13)

 

    One thing follows from this: America’s policy regarding the Palestinian-Israeli conflict will no longer consist of unilateral support for Israel. And, most paradoxically, the terrorist organization Hamas led to this outcome! After all, it was Hamas that forced the world community to talk about the creation of a Palestinian state.

The Hamas ideology defeated the ideology whose goal was to create the state of Israel throughout the former Palestine. It should be noted here that the ideology of Zionism was deliberately modified, because initially it was intended to create a state for the Jews, which was accomplished, but the ideology did not include a strategy for the destruction of Palestine and the Palestinian people.

 

    Today, politicians in Tel Aviv are forced to reckon with the international community, otherwise Israel may find itself isolated, which is detrimental for a country that is not self-sufficient. Israeli society must abandon the idea of ​​owning the land of the Palestinian people. Only peace with its neighbors is the key to a future for Israel. The Jewish state, freed from the confrontation with the Palestinians, will finally acquire the Constitution long promised to the people with a clear separation of all three branches of government, and the separation of religion from the state, which is an indispensable condition for any democracy. Israeli society must understand that a market economy is the only way to the country's prosperity, and not the established mafia economy of Israel with half government companies, legally protected from competition with the world market. Such an economy cannot be competitive on the world market; moreover, it impedes the influx of investment.

 

     Israeli society has significant scientific and technological potential, especially after the Great Aliyah, but this alone is not an indispensable condition for prosperity. It is necessary to create production on this basis, but in this regard not everything is going well. Thus, there are many startups in Israel, but their successful developments always become the property of other countries. The startup sees its goal as obtaining a patent for the development and quickly selling it well, without bothering with the production of a new product. But without production there can be no prosperity of the country. Only production creates jobs and ensures the country's wealth. I would like to address a well-known fact in which the national mentality was of decisive importance. So in Germany, banks ended up in the hands of Rothschild, and production in the hands of Krupp. It was production that ensured the prosperity of the country, and not the money of Rothschild, who moved to America. The Jews have money only to make money; Jews have been engaged in usury since ancient times; the Germans have money in order to organize the production of goods and, by selling them, expand production, which provides work for the population and its well-being, as a whole and for the entire country. Having financial capital is not yet an indispensable condition for well-being; in conditions of general hunger, no one will sell you bread for a mountain of gold.

 

      Israel has all the conditions to become a leading country in the field of high technology, following the example of South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore, which, thanks to the smart policies pursued by the leaders of these countries, organized the production of competitive goods, which brought the people of these countries out of a miserable existence. In Israel, politicians are only concerned with the struggle for power and protecting mafia production from the world market; there is a kind of symbiosis that ensures the well-being of the authorities and the owners of banks and manufacturing enterprises.

 

     Today, the people of Israel are faced with a choice on which their fate depends: either continue a senseless war that leads to nowhere, or deal with internal problems in order to become the second Singapore in the Middle East.

 

 

1. The main myth of the state of Israel. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/109378.html

2. Peace process, moratorium and other “Jewish things.” https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/9080.html

3. On the question of who killed Rabin. Israel. Our country. 04.12.1996.

4. Peace and democracy are the future of Israel. Israel. Our country. 09.18.96.

5. Baggage from the empire or why we are right here. Israel. News of the week. 10/24/2002.

6. Facts, national mentality and historical justice. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/13335.html

 7. The UN's fatal mistake. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/106403.html

8. Whose Crimea. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/4030.html

9. Sephardic revolution or the Jewish Republic of Israel. Israel. Our country.09.14.20001.

10. Great Russian chauvinism, and Putin is its Fuhrer. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21133.html

11. Russia's war with Ukraine. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/81691.html

12. State-forming people and their Fuhrer or Ukraine and further down the list. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21749.html

13. Two states for two peoples. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/104990.html

 

 06/26/2024

Terrorists or partisans?

 

Alik Bakhshi

Terrorists or partisans?

 

         There is no clear answer to this question, because no war is complete without terror against civilians.

      In the article “International Terrorism and Its Interests,” I examined the topical issue of terrorism and its cause. (https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/1904.html) Today, Israel is waging a war in Gaza against the terrorist organization Hamas, which carried out an insidious attack on Israel, as a result of which 1,200 Israelis were killed and about 250 hostages were taken to Gaza. The Israeli government has decided to destroy Hamas. Due to the fact that the Gaza Strip is one of the most densely populated areas and the fact that Hamas terrorists hide behind civilians, casualties among the civilian population of the strip are inevitable. America cautiously reproached Israel for the disproportionate military actions in Gaza, once again demonstrating a double standard. Can America's actions during the war with Japan, when atomic bombs were dropped on the civilian population of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, be called proportionate?

 

     The UN adopted an anti-Israeli resolution, condemning Israel's military actions in Gaza, despite the fact that the initiator of the war is the terrorist organization Hamas.

     The representative of Israel in the Security Council, when discussing a resolution on Israel’s war with the Palestinians of the Gaza Strip, was strongly indignant, it must be said, at the very bold words of UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres that the Hamas attacks did not happen in a vacuum, the Palestinian people were subjected to a suffocating occupation for For 56 years, Palestinians have seen their lands consumed by the creation of Jewish settlements. Yes, the Israeli diplomat did not like the truth and aroused outright anger at Guterres, whom he strongly advised to resign, but he forgot that he was in the UN, and not in the US Congress, where the Jewish lobby traditionally has influence on political decisions.( 1) By the way, we must pay tribute to Biden, who spoke about the need to create a state for the Arabs of Palestine. Echoing the US President and Secretary of State, Blinken spoke about the need to revive the peace process.

      However, the peace process had already taken place, if we recall the Madrid Peace Conference on the Middle East in 1991, lasted for 4 long years and ended with the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin (2). And, if now, as Blinken advises, we begin the peace process again, which will again drag on for an unknown amount of time and it is unknown how it will end, then this is only a waste of time, during which Israel will continue to take away Palestinian land through settlement activities. We must not waste time during which blood will flow again. The UN must correct its mistake made in 1947 (3) and send troops to the borders between Israel and Palestine, as provided for in the UN resolution, in accordance with the famous map:

:

                                                                                                                                  

   True, in this case one unpleasant nuance will inevitably appear. The fact is that if the Palestinians really find their own state, then, sadly, the only conclusion that will follow is that this happened thanks to Hamas.

 

    1. Israel, and the simple, honest truth. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/6466.html

    2. On the question of who killed Rabin. Israel. Our country. 04.12.96

      https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/94912.html

   3. Two states for two peoples. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/104990.html

 

        11/22/2023

Georgia, - a difficult way to Europe

 

Alik Bakhshi

Georgia, - a difficult way to Europe

     

    To be honest, I had a better opinion about the maturity of the Georgian people in the sense of being more advanced in terms of democracy among the peoples of the Caucasus. However, the coming to power of the oligarch Bidzin Ivanishvili and his pro-Russian party with the loud name “Georgian Dream”, which intends to push through the law on foreign agents, designed, as in Putin’s Russia, to combat dissent, gave reason to doubt this.

   The first, is how it was possible to elect oligarch Bidzin Ivanishvili to power. Wasn't the example of what happened to Ukraine enough? There, too, with the help of the murderer and liar Putin, the oligarch Yanukovych came to power, promising the Ukrainian people entry into the EU and subsequently deceiving them, plunging the country into a bloody hell. The very fact that Ivanishvili is an oligarch who had a secret business in Russia should have alerted the people of Georgia, because the very word oligarchs is a caste of people parasitic on society who found themselves in power with the help of wealth acquired through criminal machinations. By the way, Ivanishvili, like the oligarch Yanukovych, who was in prison, was convicted by a Tbilisi court and sentenced to pay a fine of $90 million for bribing voters. But this fact did not alert the Georgian public.

   Second, according to a report by the US Agency for International Development, “Georgia’s richest oligarch Ivanishvili has seized the state, which has led to impunity for corrupt officials and Georgia’s growing economic dependence on Russia.” Ivanishvili’s capital is the result of a secret business, like other Russian oligarchs, amassed not without connections with corrupt government officials. Undoubtedly, Putin’s agents helped in organizing Ivanishvili’s Georgian Dream party and its victory in the parliamentary elections. I believe that the Georgian Dream party is called upon to fulfill not the dream of the Georgian people to join the democratic countries of Europe, but Putin’s dream of throwing Georgia into the orbit of his policy, the ultimate goal of which is to return Georgia again to the fold of the Russian Empire. It must be said that Ivanishvili uses the same false and absurd words, echoing Putin’s nonsense that the West is encroaching on the sovereignty, national identity and identity of the Georgian people. Here it would be nice to remember that it was the West that stopped Russian tanks on the approach to Tbilisi in 2008, and it may well be that otherwise today Georgian soldiers were dying in Ukraine along with the Buryats, Bashkirs and other colonial peoples of the Russian Empire.

   Ivanishvili, at the insistence of Putin, wants to pass through parliament, where his party has a majority of votes, a law on foreign agents, with the help of which it will be possible to control the media before the upcoming elections in order to achieve a landslide victory. However, the people of Georgia, and what is especially encouraging for their youth, are aware of the dangerous situation the country may find itself in if Putin, through his protege Ivanishvili, manages to carry out his insidious plan. It should be noted here that Ivanishvili, copying Putin, who organized a kind of guardsmen called the National Guard to fight dissent, also created the State Security Service, separating it from the structure of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, which today confronts the people who have rebelled against Ivanishvili and his treacherous Georgian Dream party. 

 

    It looks like Putin's Russia will break its teeth in Georgia. The Georgian people are not the Russian, uninitiated, silent people of serfs.

 

05/05/2024

International terrorism and interested parties

 

Alik Bahshi

                    International terrorism and interested parties

"In times of universal lies

 to tell the truth - it extremism"

                                       George Orwell 

"There is a national war

  The Holy War"

 

       These are the words of the famous song of the Great Patriotic War, the Soviet Union, called on the people to defend the homeland from which invaded its territory, the Nazis. Epithet sacred - is the religion, and the Muslims' people's holy war "is not nothing but a jihad, jihad is the one that interested parties today, pursuing, especially their own, selfish political objectives, trying to intimidate the people of Europe and America, the virtual Islamic conspiracy, deliberately looking for the roots of terrorism in religion. Why, in one case, the holy war is a positive sense, and in another (Afghanistan, Chechnya) - Negative?

     In an attempt to hide from the international community the real causes of today's terrorism and deflect blame for its occurrence, interested parties, using shortcuts, replace true with false notions. Moreover, they want to present themselves that way defenders of Western civilization against Islam - an extremist, in their interpretation, the religious ideology that threatens the values ​​of democracy. By the way, I want to mention that every religious dogma is inherently anti-democratic, and, as history has shown, when the clergy came to political power (medieval Europe, Iran, Afghanistan), it was judged obscurantism. Therefore, in civilized countries, separation of religion and state. Islam, along with Christianity, Buddhism and Judaism, is one of the major religions, and to blame Islam, and with it a quarter of the world population, of aiding international terrorism or, even more, because of its appearance, at least, unwise. That appearance, because the modern international terrorism, a phenomenon of our time and is not from the past. Not a correlation between the emergence of Islam as a religious ideology and terrorism as a phenomenon. Yes, terrorism is associated with some countries, whose people practice Islam, but the causes of terror are entirely different plane. In addition, deliberate on the part of interested parties or failed search for roots of terror in religion poses a great threat to the world community and opens a Pandora's box from which you will start to spread around the world hate religious fanaticism, which can actually lead to a clash of civilizations. And it is this latter-day prophets sought type of Osama bin Laden and Tehran obscurantism, for an open confrontation between East and West would be a justification for terrorist activities for the first and the desire to have a nuclear weapon for the latter.

“Tell a lie, repeated many times, it becomes true”. There are other version of a “lie can take off like a chicken, but it can not fly." Can not claim to which of these sayings is more correct, but what lies can bring a lot of trouble - no doubt. The only thing that puts everything in its place this time, it is severely punished for the evil committed by the lie, because to pay for everything, so the world works, but time can not return to this lie ruined lives and destinies.

      To get to the truth, to find sources of international terrorism, to understand its causes, which, without a doubt, there must be operated only by facts, discard bias and with great care to generalize, terms and labels, and sometimes, and insults to a people or religious denomination.
First of all, we need to understand the terminology, which had grown terrorism. Terrorism - is all that is connected with terrorism. The history of war shows that terror is an integral part of military strategy. Especially, it demonstrated the Second World War, in which, in order to intimidate and suppress the enemy morale, the two warring sides used out terror directed mainly against unprotected civilians. At the same time, to achieve maximum effect, that is, as many victims, special emphasis on stealth and surprise. Remember how the Germans bombed Minsk and Coventry, the Allies Dresden and Leipzig. Alas, the U.S. atomic bomb brought a sudden death in the early morning hours of civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were intended for them. Surprise and treachery are the first element in the success of any military enterprise, which in this case is different from the terror produced by a suicide bomber in the subway, plane or bus, except that the size and number of victims. The same principle of total terror strategy was laid out in the Cold War, when all the major cities is a target for nuclear warheads of intercontinental missiles.

    We understand and respect the guerrillas, but the methods of guerrilla warfare are all familiar with this ambush, sudden attack and escape, the attack finally. In view of the enormous difference in the armament and technical equipment, men can not resist the regular army in open battle. The strength of the guerrillas usually higher moral motivation, in comparison with the occupiers. Support of the people (in fact, it is the guerrillas people) and exceptional willingness to sacrifice that completely absent from the invaders, leading to a long, exhausting struggle, in which the aggressor is ultimately defeated.

    This brings us to an important point about terminology. Remember the King George Hotel, exploded in the era of the British Mandate. British death toll there to it was a terrorist attack, produced by Jewish terrorists (or, if you prefer, the guerrillas). That is one and the same fact undermining the hotel has two very different moral interpretations. If a Russian, put bomb in the path of German train, a hero-partisan, the Afghans and Chechens defeated the Russian convoy called dushmanov, Mujahideen bandits, in a word terrorists. It should be noted that after September 11 Chechens, whom the media usually called militants hung additional label. From now on, the Kremlin version, they are declared international terrorists in order to find sympathy and understanding from the stricken America. Most interestingly, this is actually what happened. Bush is a simpleton, who had to spawn a lot of political mistakes, get hooked KGB officer Putin, giving them an opportunity without regard to the West and to fearlessly continue the practice of "soaking in the toilet" at the state level. Gangster slang Russian president is consistent with the action of the Russian army in Chechnya. Moreover, with the acquiescence of the Bush, Putin emasculated and almost wiped out all the democratic achievements of Yeltsin era. Had tragedy in New York during the Russian intervention in Afghanistan, and the Afghan guerrillas would certainly international terrorists. The Kremlin is at the origin legends of Islamic invasion and strongly supports it, because a considerable part of it to the end of the collapsed empire inhabited by peoples professing Islam.

      Two hundred years before the Afghan company outside Russia invaded the Caucasus. Note, not mountaineers descended from the mountains, and the Russian came to him and not with bread and salt. Sword and fire Russian mountaineers conquered, as the archive documents the eloquent message of the king's general AP Yermolov Alexander - in 1819 during the war in the Caucasus: I did march in the mountains, using the general terror and flight, and destroyed several villages, all the bread in the fields and not one person in your path, so cleared the enemy. "There same: was ordered to exterminate the village, and by the way, ruining beautiful village of 800 houses, called Ulu Aya. Hence, with such haste fled residents that left several nursing children. BUSTED needed as a proud monument of punishment and none of the people had never pokorstvovavshegosya , to the edification of all the nations, on which some useful examples of terror imposed restraint " (Notes AP Ermolov while driving Georgia).

     There is no need to comment on this "hero" of the Russian troops, I will mention only two centuries ago that the situation is not much different from punitive action that holds the Russian military in Chechnya today. In essence, this den of terrorists international scale is outside the Kremlin. Terror is when the Russian tanks crushed the people in Budapest, Prague and Riga, terror is when sapper shovels soldiers killed women in Tbilisi, terror, when the Russian is deprived of life, millions of Afghans, terror, is when heavy artelleriya aviation and leveled to the ground and Bamut Samashki, with orders to violence came from the same people in the Kremlin, which include a former Communist and KGB officer Putin. But with such a fighter c terror, humanist and specialist soak in the toilet, but as it turned out unexpectedly, and circumcision, and cooperates President Bush to combat international terrorism. Particularly striking for flagrant lawlessness proposal of the Public Prosecutor of Russia to punish relatives of Chechen fighters - a kind of Russian version of the Sicilian vendetta or state terrorism with a "human face".

      Moscow is well aware that as long as there are people and ineradicable longing for freedom, so defiant people of the Caucasus deported three times and twice under the communists, despite the fact that the father of Communism, Karl Marx as an example for the fight for the freedom of the peoples of the Caucasus.
     Independence, which proclaimed Chechen people through democratic reforms in Russia, turned to him out terror from the Russian side, which shows the ruins of Grozny, reminiscent of Stalingrad, and the ashes, completely wiped out in the bombing Bamut and Samashki, no different from the destroyed Coventry . Hundreds of thousands of dead, contiguous strip, after which all disappear, they are capable of bearing arms, military bullying type of Colonel Budanov, here is the price for the little people for wanting to be free. To silence the voice of truth, Kremlin authorities do not stop even in the accomplishment attack outside Russia (assassination Zandarbieva).

     Evil can only cause harm. The war unleashed by Russia, turned to her string of terrorist attacks by Chechens, Nord-Ost "and Beslan. Way, the events associated with the Nord-Ost", a landmark that opened the real face of President Putin, for whom freedom of speech is as was an obstacle in the fight against terrorism, that is to say in the strangulation of its own citizens. "Nord-Ost" can be taken as the date of reference or landmark announcement Putin's all-out war with publicity and turn back to totalitarianism. Anyhow - Empire democracy contraindicated! The massacre of the Russian authorities over his disagreeable people (Politkovskaya, Litvinenko) method is quite appropriate terrorist exemplifies the very evil that lurks behind the high walls of the Kremlin. The revival of totalitarianism in Russia again lead to the recent past, the East-West confrontation. This cowboy Bush not understand.

     Next on terminology, say, may have been a Afghans, like Russian, declare a holy war (jihad), at a time when Russian limited 'contingent, fulfilling their internationalist duty "and using the most modern weapons, attempted to make their home in the regular cotton appendage of the Russian Empire. Russian soldier-internationalist (or soldier on international affairs, which is the same), sowed death and destruction left behind eight million dead Afghans, and in their eyes was none other than the most, which is not on there, an international terrorist, and if take account of religion, it is also a Christian, similar to Islam. Let me ask you then, who on whom attacked? Election forgetfulness Putin's intention to save the Empire from collapse, and even restore the old boundaries, that's the main reason why the West intimidation international terrorism, which is due to short-term considerations awarded another epithet - Islamic.

    A very important argument, denounced the Kremlin lies about global threat of Islamic extremism is Russia's assistance in the implementation of Iran's nuclear program, which has one single goal - the creation of the atomic bomb. In the presence of vast natural energy resources in the form of oil and gas to spend money, in general, a poor country to build a nuclear reactor, supposedly for an alternative form of energy, is devoid of expediency and against this background that all the assurances of Tehran and Moscow, of a purely peaceful uses Reactor look ridiculous. It is noteworthy that Moscow has always respectful to totalitarian regimes, whether fascist, communist, or to a new kind of religious guise. In the face of the Islamic Republic of Iran last colonial empire found itself a worthy political ally, who is by nature rabid enemy of democracy. Kremlin politicians 'concerns' invasion of Islam, does not bother the opposite effect, contributing to the attainment of Iranian obscurantist terrible weapons. There is no apparent at first glance, a paradox. The fact that Russia and Iran share common geopolitical interests and, then, in the rapprochement with Iran, the Kremlin sees an adequate response to the expansion of NATO to the countries that have been in the recent past, the western colonies of the Soviet empire. That is why Tehran has remained silent on the genocide conducted against fellow Russian Chechnya. This again reveals the lie of World Islamic conspiracy. Transfer into the hands of religious fanatics of Tehran's nuclear technology, that's what actually constitutes a threat to peace, not the liberation struggle of the peoples of the Caucasus.

     Terrorism in Russia is the result of the colonial war in the Caucasus and for international it can be taken only if we consider that the war is between the Russian people and the Chechen people and no more. Moscow hangs on Chechen freedom fighters label international terrorists to confuse public opinion with the Jesuit order, first, to turn them into criminals, led, some mythical foreign terrorist organization by the World Islamic conspiracy, second, to present part of their common enemy, dangerous both for Russia and for the United States, and third, to find sympathy, understanding and support for the protection of Western civilization from the barbarians.

 
     But let me ask you, but what about 11? There is certainly the work of international terrorists. Yes, but not faceless international terrorists, and specifically, the same Arabs who, in response to Israel's self-guided missiles fired from F-16, use at least accurate weapon - a weapon of desperation, blowing themselves among the Jews in crowded streets of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, in buses and restaurants. Weapons of despair was also used by the Japanese in World War II against the American fleet in the Pacific. Kamikaze pilots were sent planes packed with explosives into the aircraft carriers that are not inferior to their size skyscrapers of New York, America, and be better, nothing would deter the temptation to send kamikaze aircraft bomb a skyscraper, anticipating, so on September 11. Happen like that moralists would be hard to argue against such an action on the part of Japan, especially after the terrible tragedies of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the tragedy that there is still no definitive status. Then interested parties today, seeing the roots of terrorism in Islam, nothing would be left as Shintoism ranked as bad religion. Weakness, but the greatest motivation are the cause of the soldiers bombers (kamikaze suicide bombers), and in this case, religion is not the cause of bringing a sacrifice.

      President Bush, having the opportunity at any time to lower the curtain a bloody spectacle, stood by overseas dramas, where the blood is flowing not sham, as in, his usual, Hollywood blockbusters, and most did not eat the real thing.

     Due to these historical circumstances, for the past half-century of the Palestinian people under occupation, and the other side in the form of refugees swept the neighboring countries, and if the Chechens in Russia are formally by its citizens, the Palestinians, the so-called controlled areas (read occupied) are not. They did nothing. The only right that is granted to them, and that only a special, carefully selected categories, it is with the permission of the authorities to leave the reservation for the heavy work for starvation wages. I do not presume to predict what happened if the victorious countries occupied by Germany and Japan, have driven the German and Japanese to a state in which there are the Palestinians and the Chechens.

    Chronic Middle East Arab-Israeli conflict is the generator of terrorism, both inside Israel and for its aisles. Starting with the Palestinians killing Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics, the struggle between Arabs and Jews waged around the world, and the suffering and neutral states. That explodes the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires, the hotel in Istanbul, the aircraft with the hostages captured with no end in sight. Israeli intelligence across borders, and through acts of terrorism are dealing Palestinian terrorists. Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, who signed the peace agreement with the Palestinians, was killed in a suicide Jew. This demonstrates how deeply painful Israeli society in a pathological desire to see the Palestinians free. For twenty years, Israel violated Lebanese sovereignty, while fighting with the Palestinians, which, by analogy with the Chechens can be called bandits and terrorists, but the essence is the bandits are fighting for the freedom of their homeland. They want the occupiers withdraw their troops and this is the main condition for ending the war.

     Everyone has long been clear that the key solution to the Palestinian issue is at the White House in Washington, but as president, Bush moved away from the desire to deal with this problem. Bush blithely thought that America, being belligerent ally of Israel, is in complete safety, and made a mistake. The war took ally Israel crossed the ocean. The American President in time did not care of the lightning rod and the storm, long gathered over America, erupted on September 11. But instead to carefully begin to address the Arab-Israeli conflict, Bush comes up with a pill in the form of long-playing "road map" and was up to the war in Iraq with the following political mistake. As a result, the theater of war in the Middle East is expanding. If the Americans quite easily given the victory over the dictator of Baghdad, now that the situation in Iraq is beginning to grow into the people's resistance to the Islamic world conspiracy legionnaires can be easily counted among the Iraqi terrorists. Bush naively believes that democracy can be pinned on a bayonet Marines and present as a gift to the people who do not understand its value. It's like what to bring to the house of a Jewish believer as a delicacy roast pig.

     The only viable option for saving mankind from war, generating terror, it is a political resolution of international conflicts in accordance with the norms of morality and conscience, equally understood by all religions. That interested parties, through whose fault and blossomed terrorism, intimidate the world community to the war of civilizations, have called for a new crusade, trying to stir up hatred on ethnic and religious grounds, a danger to the World. To get rid of this ailment today, such as terrorism, it would be necessary to treat the disease, not the symptoms. Washington's inexplicable passivity and unwillingness to really address the Palestinian issue, which is over half a century bleeds and metastasizes like a cancer, spreading through the world, condemns not only the American people, but other people can not help related to this problem, in perpetual fear and concerns.

    Seeds of Evil, which the Russian planted in Afghanistan, have sprouted in the form of a religious movement Talliban from which especially hurt the Afghan people, but what happened in Afghanistan is a sign of warning to the world and want to believe that a reasonable person, would not go on about the lies on international terrorism, will not allow dark forces to open a Pandora's box, and prevent the world from disaster.

03.07.2004

 

The Fatal Mistake of the UN

 

Alik Bakhshi

The Fatal Mistake of the UN

 

      The United Nations, created after World War II, adopted Resolution No. 181 at the Second Session of the General Assembly on November 29, 1947, on the initiative of the political Zionism movement, which aimed to create a Jewish state, on the division of Palestine into two states, Jewish and Arab, the territory of which is shown on the map:

 

 

     According to this plan, Jerusalem received the status of an international city under the control of the UN.

 

    Then events began to develop like an avalanche. The Jewish paramilitary organization Haganah, created in advance, began to expel the Arab population from the territory intended for the Jewish state. Moreover, the Arab population of the cities of Jaffa and Acre, which, according to the partition plan, were part of the Arab state, was subjected to eviction. To illustrate, imagine the following situation: an armed man breaks into your apartment and presents a decision of some overseas organization unknown to you, obliging you to vacate two rooms of your apartment to a new tenant. You began to resist, but force turned out to be the decisive factor, and the attempt to resist only worsened your situation, they deprive you of the two remaining rooms, and you are locked in a closet, read reservation, surrounded by a concrete wall. The picture presented is identical to the fate of the Palestinian people.

   Here are maps that show the real state of affairs in Palestine:

 

 

    In reality, only pitiful crumbs remain from the territory of the Arab state as a result of the expulsion of the Arab population and the settlement policy of Israel. From the very first day of the emergence of Israel, for 75 years now, there has been a permanent war between the Palestinian Arabs and the Jews, taking thousands of lives. Serious people in the UN could not fail to foresee this war, moreover, they were obliged to foresee and preliminarily introduce international military forces to the border of these two artificially created states, thereby preventing the inevitable catastrophe from which both the Palestinian Arabs and the Jews suffer. However, they did not want to, deciding that the Palestinians were not worth bothering with their fate. True, it should be noted that the UN Security Council subsequently passed dozens of resolutions condemning Israel, but the United States, due to well-known domestic political circumstances, vetoed these resolutions each time.

    The UN has essentially turned into a high-flown talking shop, from whose rostrum political officials (read: rhetoricians) exercise their eloquence behind whose words there is emptiness. A striking example of this is the pale speech at the UN by American President Obama, who had previously received the Nobel Prize for his bold intentions to end the Middle East conflict, outlined in his speech known as the Cairo speech, but who showed cowardice in implementing them. (1,2)

   The endless war in Palestine has given rise to international terrorism, which was called Islamic for the simple reason that the Arabs preach Islam, which as a religious dogma has no direct relation to international terrorism. (3) Islam, along with Christianity, Buddhism and Judaism, is one of the main religions, and to accuse Islam, and with it a quarter of the world's population, of aiding international terrorism or, even more so, of causing it to arise, is, at the very least, unwise. Precisely arising, because modern international terrorism is a phenomenon of our time and does not come from the depths of centuries. There is no connection between the formation of Islam as a religious ideology and terrorism as a phenomenon. Yes, terrorism is associated with some countries whose people profess Islam, but the causes of terrorism lie in a completely different plane. The long-standing Middle East Arab-Israeli conflict is a generator of terrorism, both inside Israel and beyond its borders. Beginning with the murder of Israeli athletes by Palestinians at the Munich Olympics, the struggle between Arabs and Jews is being waged all over the world, and neutral states are also suffering. The Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires is blown up, hotels in Istanbul are blown up, planes with hostages are hijacked, and there is no end in sight. The terrorist attack that brought down the Twin Towers in New York is particularly brutal in its audacity and the number of victims. (4) Israeli intelligence services, regardless of borders, are also engaged in terrorist attacks against Palestinian terrorists. Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, who signed peace agreements with the Palestinians, is killed in a terrorist attack carried out by a Jew. This shows how deeply Israeli society is hurt by its pathological unwillingness to see the Palestinians free. In response, the Palestinians, who do not have a regular army, are waging a desperate struggle for the freedom of their people by all possible means, from time to time unleashing their anger on the peaceful cities of Israel.

 

     In order to end the Arab-Israeli conflict, the UN must correct its mistake, which cost thousands of lives, and send troops to the dividing line between Israel and Palestine. There is apparently no other way.

    The future of Israel in peace with its neighbors, it is reckless to rely entirely on a single ally, because the reliability of an ally depends on many circumstances. To rely on eternal superiority in military force over the Arabs is a dangerous delusion. Israel is a dependent country and it is clear that without American military and economic assistance it will not last long in a hostile environment. Even the presence of nuclear weapons does not guarantee security, because if they are used in such a limited theater of military operations, destructive radiation will penetrate the entire territory of Israel. And if the American taxpayer gets it into his head not to pour more dollars into the Middle East sand, receiving nothing in return except problems, then the most likely picture for Israel is far from rosy. Once the Jewish people lost their state, so is it the fate of the Jews to find themselves without it again and dissolve among other nations? (5)

     The fate of the people, as well as the fate of each individual, depends only on him.

 

"Destiny and history are written by one hand"

                                                      Paulo Coelho

 

1. Obama, return conscience to America and save Israel. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/7628.html

2. Obama - pragmatism or cowardice. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/12958.html

3. International terrorism and its interested parties. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/1904.html

4. And thunder struck ... . newspaper "Vesti", 05/09/2002. Israel.

5. Israel - the path to oblivion. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/6258.html 12/05/2023

   05.12.2023

Israel and the simple pure truth

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

Israel and the simple pure truth

 

 

    "The simple pure truth rarely

     is pure and never simple"

                               Oscar Wilde

 

       The experience of civilization shows that all human interventions in nature turned out to be a mistake. Human society is also a part of nature, and although man carries within himself the possibility of all-round creativity, civilization has developed according to its own laws, independent of man. One historical formation was replaced by another without meaningful, purposeful human participation, that is, the ideology of a social formation was not first created, which humanity then followed. Philosophers and historians could only state the fact of the transition from a slave system to a feudal system and further to capitalism without prior theoretical justification for the inevitable emergence of a future formation.

   

      At the end of the 19th century, among other major discoveries in natural science, the world was offered two ideologies (communism and Zionism), which, although they did not turn out to be valuable from the point of view of philosophy in relation to the first or universal social significance in relation to the second, but which left a significant mark on history those that have been put into practice.

    

       One is K. Marx, suggesting the inevitable replacement of Capitalism by the era of Communism as a new social formation, a kind of earthly paradise for humanity. An attempt to put this ideology into practice was carried out in Russia using a violent method, which required the destruction of the Russian intelligentsia and active business executives. The experiment on society turned out to be no less bloody than the era of medieval obscurantism, lasted 70 years, with the club of the proletarian revolution raised over the World, and ended in complete collapse. It should be noted that initially the initiators of the experiment were mainly representatives of Jewish nationality; they later became dissidents and fled from the country of “communist paradise” they created.

      I don’t want to examine in detail the mistakes of communist ideology, but, in my opinion, the main reason for its failure was that it provided for the creation of a new person, a certain individual of the communist type, based on the absurd assumption that the environment and conditions of upbringing can change the very nature of man. Therefore, the ideologists of Communism praised the scientific schemer Academician Lysenko to the skies, rejecting genetics, calling it a capitalist pseudoscience.

    

       The other, the ideology of T. Herzl’s Zionism, was less global in nature and contained the goal of creating a state for the Jewish people. It was assumed that Jews from all over the World would gather in one place on Earth. Incredibly and in some ways even funny, when searching for territory for the future Jewish state, South America, Africa, and Crimea were considered before settling on Palestine. True, it should be noted that instead of Crimea, Stalin allocated land for Jews in the Far East, organizing the Jewish Autonomous Region there. This fact suggests that the idea of Zionism also took place among the leaders of the Great October Socialist Revolution in Russia, the majority of whom were Jews. It can be assumed with a high degree of probability that if in the confrontation between Stalin and Trotsky (Bronstein) the latter had the upper hand, then Crimea would become a Jewish republic.

   

        In the end, after significant financial expenses and diplomatic efforts, after a fairly long period of time, including two World Wars and the Holocaust, the idea of Zionism was brought to life by the decision of the UN to allocate part of the territory of Palestine to the Jewish state. However, the Zionist program was not fully implemented because it was not possible to gather all the Jews in Israel. Jews did not want to leave prosperous countries for the sake of the Promised Land, and Israel was mainly settled by Jews from Eastern European countries, North Africa and the Middle East, relying on the full assistance of Jewish organizations encouraging repatriation, if this term can be used at all in this case. The fact is that all those who profess Judaism are Jews, but this does not mean at all that Jews represent an ethnically united people. European Jews differ from Moroccan Jews not only in appearance and traditions, but also in mentality; moreover, even in Israel the Faith has not united them, if we take into account that they pray every day in their own synagogues. Well, there’s no need to talk about Ethiopian Jews. For example, the Khazars, before accepting Islam, were Jews for a short time, so did they cease to be Khazars? Therefore, the word “repatriation” here is not identical to returning to the homeland. It’s the same as saying “repatriation of Christians.” So where should they repatriate? True, to a first approximation, the times of the Crusades can also be interpreted as the repatriation of European Christians to the homeland of the Faith in the Promised Land.

 

    But let’s leave such reasoning aside and turn to the facts, because only they reflect reality: the state of Israel exists and it is strong economically and even more powerful militarily when compared with the surrounding Arab countries. Here we must take into account a very important circumstance that as strong as Israel is, it is also dependent on its only powerful ally - the United States, an ally without whose help it is difficult to imagine the possibility of the existence of a Jewish state. The fact is that, for well-known reasons, from the day of its formation Israel has been in a state of war with the Arabs and, introduced half a century ago, martial law has not been lifted to this day. It is clear that such a small state as Israel cannot withstand a hostile environment alone for so long, and America’s role as an ally is invaluable.

   

      However, politics is pragmatic and in this regard, the quite reasonable question of what America benefits from friendship with Israel can cause confusion and bewilderment. Is there a clear answer as to what specific positive dividends America has by being in a military-political alliance with Israel? Sometimes the arguments in favor of the union are seen in the fact that Israel is an outpost of Democracy in the Middle East. But can a country that does not have a constitution, a country in which there is no separation of executive and legislative powers, a country in which religion is not separated from the state, a country with socialist economic principles, when the main financial and production means are in the hands of the state, and, finally, a country , which implements the policy of apartheid towards part of its population, be called democratic? And if we take a fundamental approach to this issue, then the outpost of Democracy in the Middle East is not Israel, but Turkey. The reason for the alliance between America and Israel lies on a completely different plane and is explained by the significant share of participation of American Jews in the financial and, as a consequence, political life of the country. It is thanks to the Jewish lobby of Congress that the United States allocates considerable financial resources from the state budget to help Israel, while providing military and political patronage. For the American taxpayer, this money disappears without a trace in the sands of the Middle East, bringing no benefit to America. Moreover, being an ally of a warring state, America puts itself under attack from the enemy. Israel's permanent war with the Palestinians has crossed the ocean and the tragedy of September 11 is the result of a bloody Middle East spectacle staged by the Jewish lobby with American money. For the Jewish lobby, Israel's interests are more important than America's interests. By blocking completely fair decisions of the UN Security Council condemning Israel for the occupation of Arab territories, the United States is forced to use double standards in politics. With the decision to deal with al-Qaeda, a continuous series of political mistakes by President Bush begins, because of all that was undertaken by the American president, there is nothing worthy of a positive assessment.

    

       If it were not for close ties with Israel, America would not have problems with the Arabs. America had and still has a big problem with the Russians. Moscow, using the Arab-Israeli conflict, tried to attract Arab countries to its side and change the strategic situation in the Middle East, the main supplier of oil to the West, in its favor. And even today the idea of strangling a strategic enemy with fuel hunger still lingers in the minds of Kremlin strategists. By the way, here I would like to note that if Israel makes peace with the Arabs, the Russians will finally lose hope in implementing this plan. And here’s a paradox: neither the Russians nor the Jewish right-wingers want real peace between Arabs and Jews, despite their mutual fierce hatred. Truly, from love to hate there is only one step.

    

       In my opinion, the main factor hindering the establishment of peace between Israel and the Arabs is the overseas patriotism of American Jews, who, having created a Jewish lobby in Congress, influence both US policy regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict and political life in Israel. Far from the real situation in Israel, they support the aggressive intentions of the Israeli right in terms of obstructing the creation of a Palestinian state and the annexation of territories in neighboring Syria and Lebanon.

 

    It is important to note here that in their aggressiveness towards the Arabs, the Jews of America surpassed the Israelis themselves. Over the past 10–15 years, Israeli society has noticeably moved to the left, and this despite the fact that it has received almost a million immigrants from the USSR, who are 99 percent completely ardent opponents of granting a state to the Palestinian Arabs. To complete the understanding, it is necessary to take into account a very important detail, which is that, unfortunately, Soviet Jews have an imperial worldview, which they acquired in the USSR and, burdened with this baggage, went to other countries. This fact at first glance seems like a phenomenon, but it is quite understandable. If the presence of an imperial worldview among Russians, as the state of the forming people (a creative discovery of Russian nationalists in the field of linguistics), does not raise objections, then Soviet Jews acquired it as a result of the revolution and the formation of the USSR. The fact is that the Jews perceived the USSR as a single whole, because they were not an indigenous people with a corresponding habitat. In addition, Jews stood at the origins of the socialist revolution and constituted the majority among communist leaders. Using the slogan “proletarians of all countries unite,” they managed to unite the peoples of the empire who believed in the “bright future of communism.” True, among the people who found themselves in power, mostly, let’s say, not of Russian nationality, there were not even close proletarians! If we consider that in the consciousness of the Russian people, in addition to the imperial worldview, there is also Great Russian chauvinism, which was pointed out by Stalin, so beloved by the people, then, undoubtedly, the other peoples of the empire were destined for the unenviable role of younger brothers. In such circumstances, Soviet Jews were the real cementing nation of the Soviet Union, which could not but affect their worldview, which they retained after leaving the collapsed country.

      The following fact is interesting; Despite strong patriotic feelings and love for Israel, Soviet Jews flocked to America and, oddly enough, to Germany, a country that, due to well-known historical events, would seem difficult to prefer to the Promised Land. By the way, it is quite possible that if it had not been for the Holocaust, there might not have been a Jewish state in Palestine. It is difficult to accuse people who want a better life, which is the same for everyone, of lack of patriotism, if we take into account that for most of them Israel is not the Motherland for which it is worth risking their well-being, or even their lives. The place where Faith was born does not always coincide with the concept of Motherland. For example, let us once again remember the Khazars, who converted to Judaism for a short time. For them, Israel could in no way be the Motherland, however, they did not become Arabs either, having converted to Islam.

      In order to redirect the flow of Jewish immigrants to Israel, where it is vital to change the demographic situation, which is developing in the future not in favor of the state as a Jewish one, the World Jewish Congress managed to get America to allocate 10 billion dollars to Israel to receive repatriates from the Soviet Union and thereby close America. This is how the Great Aliyah of the 90s happened; About a million Jews came to Israel. Quite a few of them subsequently moved to the United States and Canada, not only maintaining patriotism, but also even more showing aggressive intentions towards the Palestinians, calling from overseas those remaining in Israel to tighten military action against the Palestinians. For example, a former Russian-speaking Israeli journalist, once in New York, literally goes out of his way to urgently convince the Israelis not to conduct peace negotiations with the Palestinians and not to leave the occupied territories. Yes, from a distance everything seems simpler and courage is immeasurable, especially when your warlike calls, leading to nowhere, must be carried out by others.

    

     The Arab-Israeli conflict has been going on for more than half a century, in which neutral countries sometimes become unwitting participants, since scores between Jews and Arabs are settled wherever possible, regardless of borders and methods of struggle. Hostages are taken, planes are hijacked, hotels in Buenos Aires and Istanbul are blown up, cars and telephone receivers are blown up. Like a funnel, countries whose people are far removed from the Middle East conflict are being drawn into the depths of disaster. For example, the Afghan people became victims of this conflict because Bush, in pursuit of Bin Laden, started a war with the Taliban, who are very far from clarifying the relationship between Arabs and Jews. If we take into account that for Pashtuns there is no border between Afghanistan and Pakistan, then theoretically the theater of military operations could spread to Pakistan. But I don’t think it will come to that, because Bush doesn’t have time for this fatal mistake. Destabilizing the situation in a nuclear power is a very dangerous idea.

 

    All attempts to suppress Palestinian resistance are in vain. At the same time, Israel used all possible military actions, except perhaps napalm and the atomic bomb. If any military action on the part of Israel could solve the problem, it would have been implemented long ago. It is simply not possible in nature to force the Palestinians to give up their freedom. The problem cannot be solved by violence. Moreover, there is a threatening tendency for Israel to surrender its positions both politically and militarily. After all, this is the only way to interpret the withdrawal from Gaza and the complete failure in the Second Lebanon. The right camp, having killed Yitzhak Rabin and recklessly rejected the Saudi peace initiative, is bringing the country closer to destruction. Without peace with the Arabs, Israel has no future, but this peace is becoming increasingly elusive.

 

       In my opinion, the UN made a big mistake by deciding to divide the territory of Palestine into two states, without providing them with reasonable security and leaving the Jews and Arabs to maintain the border between the Jewish and Arab states themselves. The UN should have foreseen that confrontation was inevitable and the need for the presence of a third force on the border dividing line was obvious.

       The time has come to correct the mistake and bring UN troops into Israel, dividing Jews and Arabs along the border provided for by the once famous decision. There is no other real option to end the Middle East conflict today. True, there is one hypothetical solution - to give Palestinians equal rights with Jews, but in order to preserve the Jewish character of the state, it is necessary that the bulk of Jews from America move to Israel. By the way, finally, the goal of Zionism to gather all Jews into one state will be fully realized. However, from this moment some unpleasant questions arise.

       If American Jews move to Israel, they will lose their representation in the power structures of the United States and Israel will certainly lose the traditional support that it owed to the Jewish lobby. The departure of Jews from the political life of America cannot but affect the political and economic situation of the Jewish state. How will American politicians behave, freed from the pressure they experienced from the Jewish lobby? On the other hand, it is very doubtful that Jews, once in Israel, will retain the financial well-being that they had in America. The fact is that it was achieved among other nations and it is not a fact that in the Promised Land the Jews will maintain the same level of prosperity that they had in Galut.

       Peoples differ in mentality: - a kind of hereditary constant that determines a people, its character, behavior, visual difference and even way of existence. For example, if you give the gypsies land, you say, cultivate it, let it feed you, build houses, in a word, live on it as you see fit. The next morning you won't find them there. They have a different way of being. They won’t “steal horses” from themselves.

    

       However, history and fate do not tolerate a subjunctive interpretation, and everything is heading towards the fact that the world community will be forced to introduce international forces into Israel, which will establish a state border, dividing the two states. The UN must correct the mistake made half a century ago.

  

      I would like to hope that Zionism will not suffer the fate of Communism.

    

    “Fate and history are written with one hand”

                                                      Paulo Coelho

 

       4.10.2008