Monotheism is Evil that divides the human race

 

Alik Bakhshi

 

Monotheism is Evil that divides the human race

 

First, I want to clarify that I am not an atheist, but I am not a follower of any religious denomination. Rather, I am a dualist, based on the fact that Matter and Reason in the Universe are in complete harmony and cannot exist without each other.

An interesting observation: if you are an atheist, then a believer is usually indifferent to you, however, if you are a believer, but of another denomination, then you are an enemy. A believer of monotheism is even more embittered by a representative of another direction of the same denomination, for example, the enmity between Catholics and Protestants, Sunnis and Shiites. A zealous attitude towards God between believers to the point of madness has been characteristic of monotheism since its inception and, unfortunately, to a greater or lesser extent, continues to this day. Even in the holy of holies of Christianity - the Jerusalem Church of the Holy Sepulchre - fanatical believers often start fights, not sharing the one God among themselves (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q88iQE6_t-c ). Or here is another wonderful example of "universal love" for the one God, demonstrated by Judeo-Orthodox Christians, who painted in Hebrew the Cross of Worship, erected in Uman (Ukraine) in honor of the 1025th anniversary of Orthodoxy.

(http://lenta.ru/news/2013/08/20/krest/ ).

 

                                                               

 

 

It should be noted that the era of polytheism did not know such religious intolerance. It seems that the diversity among the many idols and their free choice allowed society to be more tolerant, and religious ideology did not have the merciless power to suppress other worldviews up to the physical destruction of the individual, which it became under monotheism, especially in the era of medieval obscurantism. By the way, democracy, as we know, first arose in the ancient world. We can safely assume that Humanity had to endure a fair share of misfortunes with the belief in one God. In any case, the history of paganism does not know endless religious wars.

 

I do not think that man became more humane after becoming acquainted with the 10 commandments allegedly given to him by God? If we are more consistent and punctual in the biblical legend, then all these commandments were originally given to the Jewish people. And, following the prescriptions of such religious sources of Judaism as the Torah and the Talmud, it turns out that the prohibitions "do not kill", "do not steal", "do not commit adultery" and others concern only Jews and do not apply to goyim (all other nations), that is, they have legislative force exclusively among the people chosen by God. In this case, the question involuntarily arises, is it not for this reason that the all-knowing God gave all these instructions to the Jews, as the most prone to such violations. It does not matter, by misunderstanding or intentionally, but the Jews interpreted this instruction from above as exclusivity, elevating themselves to the rank of the people chosen by God.

In short, it can be unequivocally stated that the Faith in one God, when religious fanatics cannot divide Him among themselves, has become an insurmountable obstacle that has divided Humanity and all attempts to destroy this ideological barrier are doomed to failure.

 

Recently, there has been a tendency to use religious intolerance for political purposes. This is what Israel does, transferring the struggle of the Palestinian people for freedom and independence into the mainstream of religious hatred, calling the Palestinians Islamists or, even more harshly, Islamic terrorists, although Islam has no direct relation to this struggle. Thus, by analogy, for example, the British could call the Indian fighters for independence Buddhists or Buddhist terrorists. Russia, in order to disavow the national liberation movement in Chechnya and Dagestan, also found its cause in Islam. In an effort to hide from the world community the true causes of today's terrorism and to absolve themselves of blame for its emergence, interested parties, using labels, replace true concepts with false ones (see "International terrorism and its interested parties" http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/?skip=50#post-alikbahshi-1904). You will say that the Chechens burned Russian tanks on the streets of Grozny shouting "Allah is Great", which indicates a connection with Islam, but the Russians in World War I also rushed into a bayonet attack shouting "God is with us", and the same Christian God as the enemy. If at first the Kremlin called the Chechen partisans fighters, then later they became Islamic terrorists and Wahhabis. There were even Al-Qaeda envoys in the Caucasus, which is absurd, because Al-Qaeda is an Arab organization fighting America and Israel. Doesn't this coincide with the policy of the Kremlin, which has always been on the side of the Arabs? Remember how the Kremlin demonstratively received a delegation of Hamas from Gaza in opposition to Israel and America, but according to the Israeli definition, Hamas members are also Islamists. It turns out that there are good Islamists and there are bad Islamists, and how does this agree with the source itself – Islam.

 

In short, the interested parties of Islamic terrorism from Moscow and Tel Aviv, who are strategic opponents among themselves, can hardly explain such nonsense intelligibly. But an important conclusion follows from all this, namely the desire of the interested parties to use religious ideology for political purposes. Evil multiplied by Evil conceals a huge danger and opens a Pandora's box, from which the hatred of religious fanaticism will begin to spread throughout the world, which in fact can lead to a confrontation of civilizations, and this is what the interested parties from Moscow and Tel Aviv are intimidating the world community with. Moreover, this circumstance is skillfully used by the obscurantists from Tehran, who position themselves as true defenders of the Faith from the machinations of Satan (by default - Democracy). A nuclear baton in their hands will be a good help for such a godly cause, and the desire to acquire it, undoubtedly, finds justification in the eyes of religious fanatics.

 

In the religious aspect, an Islamist is, one must understand, a religious fanatic who professes Islam. By analogy, a Jew is a fanatic who professes Judaism. Why a fanatic, because he is ready to even give his life for the Faith or take someone's life for it. Maybe the point is that Islam is less tolerant of religions, more militant towards non-believers? Again, no, Islam is no better, and certainly no worse than Christianity, if you remember how ancient temples were destroyed at the dawn of Christianity. After all, it was Christianity that destroyed ancient culture. The works of ancient thinkers, philosophers, and scientists were consigned to oblivion. Christianity was spread by fire and sword in America, Africa, and Polynesia. Just look at the era of the Crusades! And the era of medieval obscurantism with the sophisticated tortures of the Inquisition! After all, two world wars that took millions of lives were also attributed to Christians. Or Judaism with its misanthropic ideology of the chosen people, compared to which the rest of Humanity is goyim, whose only reason for existence is to serve the Jews, on the grounds that “The difference between a Jew and a goy is so great that it cannot be compared with the difference between a man and an animal” (http://www.hofesh.org.il/haredim_papers/01/1201.html). Tell me, how do such Talmudic conclusions differ from the ideology of racism? And, although Christianity and Islam have nothing similar, all monotheistic faiths are united by one thing - irreconcilable hatred for each other, which is a source for unscrupulous politicians. Religion, although it proclaims virtue, in fact contains an element of discord.

Here is a paradox for you: it would seem that Faith in one God should unite people, but in fact it turned out to be exactly the opposite.

In democratic countries, religion is separated from the state, and this circumstance is one of the important signs of democracy. Countries where religious parties exist, where priests, ayatollahs, rabbis and other officials from religion take part in power, a priori cannot be considered democratic. Faith and Democracy are incompatible things, and such countries as Iran and Israel (1,2) are an example of this.

 

1. The Sephardic Revolution or the Jewish Republic of Israel. Our Country.        09/14/00. http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/12635.html

2. Israeli democracy or "Jewish view of the world".

    http://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/10015.html

 

11/27/2012